I have a Visual Studio 2008 solution with a number of projects that all define _HAS_ITERATOR_DEBUGGING=0 in the Preprocessor Definitions setting in project files. But this only seems to work on some of the projects, while others still get compiled with iterator debugging enabled.
I have checked every file in the solution, and nowhere is _HAS_ITERATOR_DEBUGGING defined other than the project settings.
Adding #define _HAS_ITERATOR_DEBUGGING 0 to the top of each stdafx.h in the solution works around the issue, but I would like to know why setting this in the project Preprocessor Definitions section is not working some of the time. Any ideas?
One thing that bites me every now and then is that project settings can easily become different between different configurations (Release vs. Debug for example). Make sure the setting is there or the configuration you're building. And of course that the define is spelled correctly...
For the projects that are having the problems, take a look at the build log (BuildLog.htm - a link to it shows up in the Build Output window) and make sure the
-D "_HAS_ITERATOR_DEBUGGING=0"
option shows on the compiler command line (actually in the response file that has the command line options passed to the compiler).
Related
I am using Eclipse 3.8, I am working on a LED panels having different configuration like common cathode & common anode. For this purpose I set some preprocesser directives as configuration in one of the cfg.h file as -
#define _COMMON_CATHODE_
#undef _COMMON_ANODE_
Initially both the macros when set or reset respectively, it works fine. But later when I perform the changes on these macros I found the changes are not considered during compilation, as a result I am still getting the old data.
Some workaround -
If I do some changes in the source code Like altering text to display, then the fresh build will show text in oriented form.
I try finding solution for this but unable to get similar case.
Please let me know if anyone have any possible fix.
Had the same issue with Codebench(it's roughly based on Eclipse).
Build version of software was stored in a definition, but if clean build is not done changes won't apply which bothered me a lot, not sure if there is a workaround with building without cleaning.
The only thing that helped me was cleaning project before building, so:
Project -> Properties
C/C++ Build
Settings
Build Steps tab
Add "make clean" to pre-build steps.
Since for you it's not something like build version, another solution I could think of is creating 2 configurations with different sets of macros definitions, that means taking your defines from source code and moving them to project settings.
Project -> Properties
C/C++ General
Paths and Symbols
Symbols tab
GNU C++ or GNU C depending on the project
At the same screen create a few configurations at Manage Configurations page and set needed definitions for every configuration. Your object files will be stored in separated folders, so they won't get mixed up.
When I go to debug my C++ project in Visual Studio, up pops a little warning dialogue box that tells me:
A copy of datum.h was found in
c:/users/brad/desktop/source/binary/datum.h, but the current
source code is different from the version built into
c:/users/brad/desktop/source/binary/datum.h.
I'm having trouble understanding what this is even trying to tell me, let alone how to fix it. At first I thought it might be complaining that I'd accidentally duplicated a file in the directory, which I checked, and found nothing of the sort, which leaves me pretty stumped. I also tried excluding the file from the solution and adding it again, which didn't fix the problem either.
The warning doesn't appear to actually hinder the development of my project, but I suppose warnings exist for a reason, so if anyone knows what's gone wrong, any advice would be greatly appreciated. To my knowledge, I didn't change anything to cause the message to appear, it just popped up one time I went to debug the solution and has kept on appearing ever since.
Also, more copies of the same warning have started popping up, pertaining to other header files in my solution (I haven't recieved any about .cpp files yet, but it could be a coincidence, because it's only been going on for about 20 minutes).
Try removing breakpoints from the file in question.
This worked for me when it occurred with Visual Studio 2013 for a header file in debug build.
Source: Release mode file sync issue - current source code different from the version built
Additional notes: Clean / Rebuild also works, but that is painful for regularly changing code. Enabling the break point after starting debugger merely delays the message.
I solved it:
Close the window of the .h file in Visual Studio if it's open.
Close Visual Studio.
CUT the .h file from its normal location and paste it into a temporary folder that VS doesn't know about.
Restart VS and compile. It'll complain about the missing .h file. Good -- Make the bastard beg for it!
Paste the .h file back into its original location.
Compile. VS will gratefully accept the missing file. (Damn I hate Microsoft!)
This occurs if you rename an implementation file (*.c, *.cpp, etc.) to a header file.
This is because the Item Type still remains as C/C++ Source File, making it get compiled as a separate translation unit rather than as an actual header, preventing Visual Studio from recognizing its inclusion as a header elsewhere.
It took me quite a while to figure this out.
To fix this:
Right-click your header file in Solution Explorer and select Properties.
Select All Configurations, All Platforms.
Under General, change Item Type to C/C++ Header.
Press OK.
Force-recompile any file that #includes your header (or just Rebuild the solution).
The problem is that the debugger thinks that the checksum of the source file is different from what the compiler calculated and put in there. The debugger will then refuse to apply breakpoints in the files that mis-match, to prevent you from seeing data it can't guarantee is correct.
I have had this keep happening even after a clean rebuild. This is with VS 2015. My guess is perhaps the debugger and the compiler disagree on how to hash newlines or something like that? The fix is to turn off "require source files to exactly match the original version" in Debug -> Options -> Debugging -> General
Could you by any chance be debugging another executable (not the one actually built?). This is a common issue in scenarios where Visual Studio builds the binaries in one directory but then they are copied over to some other directory for debugging. I'd suggest you compare the target path under the debugging settings and the output directory under the general settings in Visual Studio.
This would explain the issue, since you are actually debugging some older version of the binary (not the one built currently) and thus the warning, since Visual Studio can't find the version of the source files for that version of the binary.
The reason may be circular header dependencies. datum.h may includes another_header.h (directly or indirectly), which includes datum.h.
I see the real reason of this question is not answered. So for someone still looking, here it goes...
The most common reason of this problem is that the source files used to build the existing obj files are different than the existing ones. In other words the
particular project did not build after new modifications to source. The solution to this problem is to rebuild the project after modifying.
This happened to me in situation where I had modified my static library projects files and then without building that project I started my application project which was using this static library project.
this worked for me:
close VS
delete *.vcxproj.filters file
restart VS
problem should be gone.
this worked for me:
clean project
debug/delete all breakpoints :)
This worked for me (as of March 2019):
Click the 'Build' drop-down menu in the top left of your Visual Studio window
Select 'Rebuild Solution'
I've changed the file name and it works now.
Just encountered this. In my case, one of my .h files contained implementation (a class with static methods), which was #included by one of my .cpp files, but the Project Settings were also telling Visual Studio to compile the .h file.
I manually edited both the .vcxproj and .vcxproj.filters project files, moving the .h file from the <ClCompile> ItemGroup to the <ClInclude> ItemGroup.
This did the trick for me; I never saw the "A copy of...is different from..." pop-up again.(Note that this was after I had thoroughly failed in attempts to get <DependentUpon> to work.)
My solutiion:
Build -> Configuration manager
Switch to another configuration (any, example Releas or Debug)
Switch to previous configuration
It is possible to have multiple projects, each with their own entry point within a solution. Make sure that the correct project is being run.
The source code is different message can appear in a project A's source when you are running project B. In this case, the message can mean This breakpoint won't be hit because you're running a project that doesn't include it
So I have main.cpp and main2.cpp with int main in each. I want to get 2 exes out of it. Is it possible and what would be instruction to create such project?
Nope, Visual Studio's project model is rigidly built around the assumption that "one project generates one output".
If you need two executables, you have to create two projects. You can keep them in the same solution to make things easier for yourself, but they have to be separate projects.
Edit
Ok, as other answers have pointed out, it can of course be done, if you're desperate. You can add a custom build step, which does anything you like, including building another executable. (However, the build system won't understand that this file should be considered project output, and so some scenarios may fail: for example the file won't be automatically copied to the output folder, and when checking dependencies before a rebuild, it might not be able to understand which files to check, and what (or how) to rebuild.)
Visual Studio (at least up to 2008, not sure about 2010) also allows the use of nmake files, but then I think you're stretching the definition of "a Visual Studio project".
But under "normal" circumstances, one project implies one output. And in order to get two executables, you'd normally create two projects.
You need a solution which includes two projects. Have a read of the Visual Studio documentation on solutions and projects.
Here's my solution, since nobody in a Google search seems to suggest this method. It's quite simple and I've used/seen it used in other IDEs (like Code::Blocks).
Within your project, create a configuration for each output that you want. Then, only include one main source file in each configuration.
In VS, this means for each source file with main: right-click -> Properties -> Excluded From Build = Yes. So, once you're done, only one main source is built for each configuration. You can then specify a different output for each configuration in the Project Properties. I did this on VS 2010, but it should probably work with other versions.
I'm using this approach so that I can have several tests for one project, without cluttering the solution with more test projects than actual code projects.
I don't know if it can be done ,but the only change you have ,to do this ,is with custom build step.
EDIT: Since someone downvoted this ,i did a test making a dummy configuration.
In the custom build step I two Link-cmds (copied form original link-cmdline and modified it a bit) taking as input main1.obj resp. main2.obj and outputting App1.exe resp. App2.exe.
It's executed after Compiling and before linking.
It worked !
The downside is I cannot prevent (yet) the linking ot the orinal exe (which errors on duplicate main function).
Solution to this could be to have a lib project excluding the sources with main()from build and build them in the custum-step too.
So the answer to the question should : Yes ,it can be done!
You can't have more than one main() function in a single visual studio project. So you can't compile 2 executables, the only way is to make two different project in the same solution
You can create a solution with two project one for each output you want. Then head to Build menu and select Batch Build.. and select both projects.
If you want both exe files to be in one place you can specify a custom Post-build action:
For both project:
view the project properties page and in Build events select Post-Build events, then in the Command line field enter the command that will copy the output to the location you want, something like:
copy $(TargetPath) c:\yourlocation /Y
Then after you build the solution the output files will be copied to that location.
Another option you have is to use conditional compilation with sth like
main()
{
#ifdef VERSION1
call_main_logic();
#else
call_main2_logic();
#endif
}
and then define different configurations within the project. For each configuration you will then need to define preprocessor symbols appropriately (in: project settings -> configuration properties -> C/C++ -> preprocessor).
Please note, that it will be only one executable created at a time, but with switching configurations you'll get the one that does what you want at the moment.
... which may suit your needs or not, depending on more specific situation that you are in.
Edit: In addition, since different configurations create their separate output folders, you will have your both execs as outputs.
In a single solution, if I have the same source file present in multiple projects (with different project settings, e.g. different #defines), Intellisense and all the features depending on it seems to arbitrary pick one of the project settings when I edit the source file.
How do I get Intellisense to switch which project settings it uses for that file ?
If that is not possible, it would be at least useful to know which project Intellisense picks ?
I have exactly the same problem using VS2005. I read a while back that Microsoft found this to be 'intended functionality' and would not sort this out.
It seems that intellisense uses the first loaded project of the solution to apply the #defines for.
We just got a new developer and I'm trying to set him up with Dev Studio 2005 (The version we all use at this office), and we're running into a weird problem that I've never seen before.
I have some code that works perfectly on my system, and he can't seem to get it compiled. We've tracked the issue down to his copy of dev studio ignoring the preprocessor directives.
For example, in the project properties under C/C++|Preprocessor|Preprocessor Directives, I add DEFINE_ME. Which should translate to a /D"DEFINE_ME" for the compiler. And it does in my development environment, but it doesn't on his.
I verified that when he checks out the code from the source repository, that he has the same version of the code I do. And if I look in his Project Properties, all of the directives are there. For some reason they're just not getting passed down to the compiler.
Any Ideas?
I recently ran into the same symptom with VS2005. Ultimately I was able to resolve it by explicitly adding my preprocessor defines via the Command Line - Additional options dialog:
Configuration Properties -> C/C++ -> Command Line
When I added '/DPROPERTY' there it was recognized at compile time, whereas adding it under 'Preprocessor -> Preprocessor Definitions' did nothing. Oddly the Command Line dialog did show that Visual Studio was adding the property to the command line, albeit in the form '/D "PROPERTY"'.
Unfortunately schedule pressure being what it is I have not been able to dig into the issue deep enough to figure out what the underlying issue was/is, nor why it seems to work out of the box for some of our projects but not others. Nonetheless the workaround above is worth a shot if you're having this symptom.
Also, credit where credit is due: the idea came from this thread.
Make sure that the project configuration which is being built in the selected solution configuration is the same as the one you're configuring the properties for, and/or that you're configuring the properties for all project configurations. A common problem with new VS installations is that the current active solution configuration is system-specific, and may default to something not matching yours (eg: Release vs Debug).
You can see the project config in the build output, and/or check it in the Configuration Manager.