Today, no matter what I did, my application just would not recognise a change I did to a file I uploaded. I even put a cfabort at the top of the page and it just ignored it.
Now, this is a production server, so there were some things I normally have to do for the fusebox framework to load the new pages. However, all the usual processes failed and I even tried numerous others. Let me list them:
Normal Process:
&fusebox.parseAll=1&fusebox.password=whatever <- Did not work
&fusebox.load=1&fusebox.password=whatever <- Did not work
Other things I tried:
* changed mode from production to development-full-load <- Did not work
* called onApplicationStart to reset app <- Did not work
* changed the application name to reset app <- Did not work
* deleted parsed folder and regenerated <- Did not work
No matter what I did (they may have been more that I just don't recall at present) nothing would refresh the page. The only thing that worked after I was at my wits end, was to stop the Railo server, restart it and then run the thing I tried first again, being:
&fusebox.parseAll=1&fusebox.password=whatever
That worked. So my only assumption can be that somehow, somewhere in the one of the applications, the cached code was being used to regenerate the parsed files instead of the actual updated file.
Has anyone experienced this before and do you have any solutions to avoid this. I can not keep restarting my production application just to update a changed file.
Thanks
From what you've said it sounds like Trusted Caching may be turned on, which is an odd name but basically means "I trust that these files will not change, so don't bother checking" or something like that. The main thing is it doesn't look at your cfm/cfc files for changes, which is faster, but of course very annoying when you make changes.
On Railo, that can happen at the per-mapping level, so first thing is to check all your mappings to see if the "Trusted" option is enabled - unless your site is high enough traffic that it's beneficial, for a Fusebox app it's probably more hassle than it's worth - so for any relevant mappings, unless you specifically need it, go ahead and disable it.
There is also a similar global caching option - in Railo Web Admin, go to Settings>Performance/Caching and most likely you want to have "Inspect Templates" set to "Once". If it is set to "Never", this is same as Trusted cache, which again is faster but not best for a changing site.
However, you may have noticed there is a "Clear template cache" button below - if you prefer to keep it on "Never" you can press this button each time the code changes, and it will rebuild the cache with the latest files.
Related
Is there a way to stop ColdFusion 11 from caching Fusebox circuit.xml.cfm files?
I have to restart the coldfusion service every time I make a change to a fuseaction file and it's getting tiring.
There are 2 settings in play here. One is "trusted cache" - a setting in the CF admin that does not "check" for a modification once a class has been compiled. You can turn trusted cache off and CF will begin to check for modifications.
The second (and more likely) setting is "parsed" setting. This setting actually saves all your include files into a "parsed" directory and compiles the from there. You can try adding the following to your URL:
Fusebox.parseall=true or alternately Fusebox.loadclean=true - one of these might work.
Finally there is a "mode" setting you can modify to "development" from "production" - that will cause the whole thing to be reparsed.
This is from memory - but maybe it will be enough to get you going. good luck! :)
I am trying to use Coldfusion CFPRINT to print UPS labels to a network printer. The starting labels (png files) are great and I can print them locally to the zebra printer and they print and work wonderfully. The barcodes produced by CFPRINT however are of such poor quality that a barcode scanner cannot read them. My research shows that Coldfusion uses the jpedal java library which resizes the images to 72 dpi - which is just not crisp enough for a scanner.
I read about using a jpedal setting: org.jpedal.upscale=2 but I have no clue as to where you would utilize this.
Any suggestions on how to fix this CFPRINT resolution issue using Coldfusion?
(Just to add a bit more detail to the comments)
That is a JVM argument. There are several ways to apply it:
Add the setting to your jvm.config file manually. Backup the file first. Then add -Dorg.jpedal.upscale=2 to the end of the java.args section. Save the changes and restart the CF Server. Do not skip the backup step! Errors in the jvm.config file can prevent the server from starting. So it is important to have a good copy you can restore if needed.
Open the CF Administrator and select Server Settings > Java and JVM > JVM Arguments. Add -Dorg.jpedal.upscale=2 to the end of the arguments. Save the settings and restart the CF server.
Again, I would strongly recommend making a backup of the jvm.config file first. As #Mark noted in the comments, some versions of CF have been known to mangle the jvm.config file, which could prevent the server from starting. But as long as you have a good backup, simply restore it and you are good to go.
IIRC, you could also set the property at runtime, via code. However, timing will be more of a factor. Their API states system properties must be set before accessing JPedal. The docs are not clear on exactly what that means. However, the implication is the system property is only read once, so if you set it too late, it will have no affect.
// untested
sys = createObject("java", "java.lang.System");
prop = sys.getProperties();
prop.setProperty("org.jpedal.upscale", "2");
sys.setProperties(prop);
Side note, I was not familiar with that setting, but a quick search turned up the CF8 Update 1 Release Notes which mention this setting "improves sharpness, but it also doubles the image size" and also increases memory. Just something to keep in mind.
We have a collection of VB.NET / IIS web services on some of our servers, and they have web.config files in the websites' root directories that they're already reading configurations from. There is a new configuration that needed to be added that will immediately be quite a bit longer than the others, and it'll only stand to grow. It's essentially a comma-separated value, and I'm wanting to keep it specifically in a configuration file of some sort.
At first I started doing this with a text file, but there was a problem with that. The text file's contents could change while web service threads and processes are running, so they would need to essentially re-read the file every time they needed to access its values. I thought about using some sort of caching, but unless the web services are completely restarted each time the file is updated, caching would block updates to the file from being used immediately. But reading from a text file each time is slow...
Then came the idea of putting that value in web.config, along with the other configurations the services are already using. When web.config is altered, the changes are able to be cached in the code, on top of coming into play immediately. However web.config is, well, web.config, and it's not a totally trivialized text file that is simply read out of in the code. IIS treats web.config in a special manner.
I'm tempted to think any negative consequences of putting a comma-separated value in web.config would be outweighed, in comparison to storing them in a text file (or a database, which probably can't be used for this anyway), but I guess I better ask.
What are the implications of storing a possibly lengthy, comma-separated value in web.config, instead of in its own little text file? Is either file a particularly good or bad idea? To me, it seems like web.config would be easy to get along with without having to re-read the file over and over, but there's certainly more to it than the common user is aware. Thanks!
I recommend using the Application Cache for this:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/vstudio/6hbbsfk6(v=vs.100).aspx
Okay SO. I need some guidance. I apologize for the length of this post, but I need to provide some details:
I've got someone who is interested in me to do a small project for them. The application in general is a fairly straightforward employee record keeping / documentation app, but it makes pretty heavy use templated Word and Lotus documents. The idea is you select the employee “event” such as commendation, promotion, discipline, etc., and it loads the appropriate template doc and you fill it in from there, and later you can select an employee, view all the “events,” and view the individual documents associated with each one.
Thus, the app must know where the .docs are saved when the user is done.
The client actually has a v1 of this app (it doesn’t do any management of the files or anything, just launches Word/Lotus with the document you wanted to view in a new instance, presumably via a system() call.) We’ve not gotten into a detailed requirements phase, but the client and I agree that for this to really work, some kind of control over where the user saves the .doc’s to is going to be critical , because otherwise the app provides them with the new copy of the template doc, they "Save as" somewhere else, and the app is pointing to the blank copy it provided them with.
Obviously, I can’t think of a way to achieve “Save as” restriction/control in any way via just launching a new instance of Word. The client has the idea of an embedded Word/Lotus instance in the app with the template doc when you choose one, but I’ve few reservations with that:
I’ve dug around online and I’ve read that whichever version of Word I borrow MSWORD.OLB from will be the one the end user would require?
I’ve tried to do the MSDN example of embedding a Word doc from here, but as I’ve come to get used to, the MSDN example doesn’t even compile.
Even if I CAN figure out how to embed a .doc file into their application, I don’t know that I could control the use of “Save as…”
All of this STILL hasn’t touched on Lotus (!)
So… instinctively, I feel the embedded Word/Lotus thing has to be more work than it’s worth in the end.
So I’ve had a few other ideas brewing around.
One is looking into using Office XML (and if there’s a lotus equivalent), and get the user’s “inputs” separately and generate the document on the fly each time. I’m not particularly thrilled with that idea, but I think it COULD work, provided I just use old features to try and stay far backwards compatible.
Get user’s “inputs” separately and generate a document in HTML. Meh. Works, very cross platform and easily parsed and understood, but not good if you want to be able to email it to someone (who emails a .html? Works, yes, very unconventional which to the average user will throw them off) and even worse if you need to email it to someone for revisions…
Perhaps some kind of editable PDF? I know there are PDF libraries out there, and the more I stew on it, the more this sounds like the best option, though I’ve not done much work with PDFs and I don’t know how easily embeddable they are / what options one has when creating them. I know they can be save-disabled, I’ve had that with my bloody state taxes before.
I need some input here. Here’s the TLDR questions:
Is launching a new instance of Word for each .doc as bad as I feel, given user can “Save as” document wherever and then application is left pointing to a blank document?
Is trying to support embedded Word as big of a trouble as I feel like it is / more work than it’s worth / likely to cause problems with supporting multiple versions of Word? (Forward compatibility as well as currently released versions?)
What are thoughts on the PDF plan?
Any other good ideas?
Word does allow for programming some "Save" and "Save As" control via its object model. Any subroutines coded in VBA and placed into your Word template will be copied into all documents generated from that template. Additionally, most menu and Ribbon commands can be intercepted by creating a module containing subroutines named for the intercepted commands. So, for example, if a module contains a sub named FileSaveAs(), any code in that sub will be executed instead of the standard File|Save As command. Lastly, this code will replace Save As commands executed via keystroke, toolbar, menu, or Ribbon.
The code below will launch a dialog box to a predetermined path whenever a "Save" or "Save As" command is executed:
Sub FileSave()
ControlSaveLocation
End Sub
Sub FileSaveAs()
ControlSaveLocation
End Sub
Sub ControlSaveLocation()
Dim Directory As String
Directory = "C:\Documents\"
With Application.Dialogs(wdDialogFileSaveAs)
.Name = Directory
.Show
End With
End Sub
Hope this helps.
how do we rename .xaml and .cs files?
would like to be able to keep development in synch with the original sketchflow. i.e. sketchflow has features such as the ability to collect client feedback on a per screen basis, etc.
... I kind of answered my own question here, so I'll post it as a follow up. Asked the original question 9 hours ago on the MS site without response... still trying to work out where the best place is to talk to the community, so sorry for the duplicate.
THE ANSWER (IS THERE A BETTER ONE?)
Context: Sketchflow is a prototyping tool. In large teams possibly you want to keep the prototype seperate from the finished version, or there's a large prototyping phase.
My view is that I really like Sketchflow. It's one of the coolest things I've seen for a while (well done Microsoft).
... so for me, I want the prototype to become a the finished product. I want the designers to step in and make transitions whenever they want. I want the designers to kick the process off, and the developers to put in the detail. I'd like our customers to be able to post feedback at any time during the build process. btw: get your developers to check out MVVM. It's very cool.
My bet is that the feedback could get lost if you make a breaking change (a file rename) -- so just beware of that. That wont be a problem for us. We'll get our file names to make sense and then mostly leave it alone. Of course MS could fix this this by creating a globally unique id (Guid) for each screen that is created. Perhaps they've done this already. If someone from MS reads this, please put this on your requested features list.
THE ANSWER:
So here is the answer that works for me:
don't try to hand-edit the xaml / cs, as all the cross referencing that you might be doing with behaviors will break if you aren't really careful. Typical files that need to be modified: .csproj, Sketch.Flow, xxxx.xaml, and xxxx.cs.
To auto do it, download a tool like Ultraedit. Alternatively, you might be able to just use VS 2010 (untested).
Steps with ultraedit:
(BACKUP YOUR PROJECT FIRST)
Search/Replace In Files...
Find in files... "Screen_1_19"
Replace with... "Welcome"
In Files/Types... "."
Directory...
Match Whole Word Only
Hit "Start"
follow the prompts
rename the files (.xaml & .cs) to be Welcome.???? (where ???? is .xaml or .cs) . Since I use SVN, this step gets done for me in one step (no big deal).
If using VS2010 for steps 1 through 8, be careful do longer string replacements first e.g. Screen_1_19 before Screen_1. I think VS treats _ as a word break. On ultraedit you'll be fine.
If there's interest, in the spare time that I don't currently have, I could release a quick tool to do this on codeplex.
** note: because we are working with XML and XML is very particular about being correct, I close expression blend down, and then reopen it again after the replace/rename to see if I was successful + my screen map still has all the flow lines still drawn in.
answer is above in the body of the question.