I have a flash drive and I want to compile everywhere - c++

I came from gnu/linux world but recently I must to work on a windows system and I want to be able to compile my c/c++ console programs on it. The problem is I don't have administrative privilegies to install anything.
I looked for portable apps. I'd find gvim and mingw but I don't know how to make them work together on a flash drive. I'd found also a vim plugin called msysportable that's supposed to do the job but I don't know how.
So my question is: how can I make a portable windows c/c++ development environment using gvim?
(don't tell me to use code::blocks or visual studio, I've this installed but I want vim)

copy your development environment to your flash-drive. Create a batch file to setup environment variables for paths to include dirs ,lib dirs ,executables ,etc. Then use this environment in cmd session with console commands. If you have installed MSVC on your own system then there is a batch-file called vcdirs.bat thar does this on youre system, Take it as example how to make a portable environment. By the way ,INSTALLING youre tools at a vlient-site may be a license violation. The portable environment is not as long as you do not install it.

Related

Configure kit for Qt automatically

SO!
Let's say I have a number of settings (GCC compiler 9.3.0 built from source, as the distribution I have to use has a very old one, along with environment setup) for a new Kit in QtCreator.
I have managed to setup an environment for compilation and execution of compiled binaries, and made a script to make it work (like qmake -nocache -recursive/make/sudo make install, direct execution of g++, and other stuff).
One thing that script can't do at the moment, is that it cannot create a kit for QtCreator with new compilers and environment being set as required, so after running a script, its user has to go through setting it up himself through GUI, which is bad, because this can cause misconfiguration.
This thing I'm trying to create is going to be used by around ~200 people in my company, so leaving readme.txt with instructions just doesn't go well enough for me - I don't want running around fixing missing "{" and "}" in Environment description in created Kits, and other stuff.
Are there ways to create Kits for QtCreator automatically from command line? Maybe, there's some files to edit?
I've looked into this one a few years back (I wanted to do something similar for registering Buildroot toolchains automatically in QtCreator), and I was unable to find an off the shelf solution. So i think there are 2 ways to implement this:
a) Implementing a command line utility the manipulate the ~/.config/QtProject/qtcreator/{toolchains,profiles}.xml files. Maybe by (re)using the existing C++ implementation within QtCreator, or just re-implement it ie. in Python. Back than I didn't start to work on this as there was no real business need.
b) Switching to qbs, as qbs has support for setting up toolchains from the command line ( see: https://doc.qt.io/qbs/cli-setup-toolchains.html)
If you decide to go with solution a), please let me know and maybe we can partner up to implement it.
Check out the command line sdktool bundled with QtCreator:
The SDK tool can be used to set up Qt versions, tool chains, devices
and kits in Qt Creator.
There still is a lot of knowledge about Qt Creator internals required
to use this tool!
I haven't tried it yet, but I did find the executable under Tools/QtCreator/libexec/qtcreator subdirectory of the Qt Creator installation directory. ./sdktool --help works for me under Linux.

Qt C++ application: self autostart installation in Linux

I'm porting some Qt Windows/VC++ code to Linux/GCC. The application can add it's own shortcut to the Windows Autostart folder so the application starts after login.
I want to do the same in Linux. I'm using Kubuntu 15.10 but the solution should work for virtually all (or at least most) Linux variants out there. And it should work without super user rights (or it should request the rights automatically).
I searched the web and found two solutions:
Add a desktop entry file to $HOME/.config/autostart
Add a symbolic link to /etc/init.d/
Will they both work in all Linux distributions? What are the differences? Which is to be preferred?
Also I would like to know if I should do that by programmatically running a shell command or if there is some native API I could use in C/C++ (including easy error detection).
I have put project in GitHub for managing auto-start feature in different OS. It's written in Qt.
Please check it and let me know if you have any problem using it:
https://github.com/b00f/qautostart
You can add application in various ways.
Via linux init system. For newest linux OS systemd is a standard. In this case your need to create systemd unit for your application
Via desktop manager, such as gnome, kde and possible others. In this case you need also create specification for autostarting your app.
Via bash files
I think, prefered way via systemd unit, because now this is standard way for starting process at boot time and for special user, if need.

What is the recommended way for packaging a C++ daemon on Mac OSX?

I'm working on a multi-platform project that is composed of a service/daemon which runs on Windows, Linux, and Mac OSX.
The code I have is portable, and the application runs fine (from the command line) on all the systems. As this application is designed to run in the background, I made it a Windows service on Windows and a Linux daemon (with the appropriate scripts in init.d) for Linux.
Now my problem is Mac OSX: I have little experience with this operating system, and I am having hard times figuring out the best practices for it regarding my situation:
I'd like to have an installer for my project (I believe a .dmg file, that would likely install an .app; please correct me if there is a better alternative).
Here some information about this project of mine:
It is build entirely in C++ (it uses boost, curl, iconv)
The current build system is not XCode (however If there is a way of keeping my current code layout while integrating and building everything into XCode, I don't mind. I've done something similar for Windows anyway).
There is no graphical user interface
The daemon should start on startup automatically (or even better: make that a user's choice).
The daemon requires root access during its execution.
That's probably a lot of context to consider for a single question, so I will try to make it easier to read:
How would you package/create an installer for a pure-C++ daemon on Mac OSX ?
Since this doesn't have a UI, I wouldn't package it as a .app -- that's the preferred format for double-clickable GUI apps, not for daemons. If it's just a single binary (no support files except maybe things like config files, etc), I'd follow unix conventions and put the binary someplace like /usr/local/libexec (or wherever you put it on Linux). Note that /usr/local doesn't exist by default on OS X, so your installer will need to create it if it doesn't exist.
For getting it to execute: I'll agree with James Bedford's suggestion of using launchd. The launchd .plist file should be installed in /Library/LaunchDaemons (LaunchDaemons run as root at startup, while LaunchAgents run as normal users when that user logs in). Make sure the daemon does not drop itself into the background -- launchd keeps watch over the programs it launches, and if they background themselves it thinks they've crashed, and generally tries to relaunch them, which doesn't work very well. You can adjust the settings to work with background programs, but it's best to have it run in the foreground.
For packaging: Here, I agree with mah -- use an installer package. I actually still like the old GUI PackageMaker tool (deprecated, but it still works), but the new CLI tools are probably better to learn at this point. If you follow my recommendation about /usr/local/libexec, your package should actually contain the "local" directory (with libexec subdir and your binary in that), and install that into /usr -- if /usr/local already exists, it'll just merge with what's already there, but if not it'll create the entire thing. On the other hand, /Library/LaunchDaemons is guaranteed to exist, so your package only needs to contain the actual .plist file to put in it.
Packaging as a .app makes some sense if what you're distributing is more than just a command line (for example, if it has resources such as static configuration data, images, frameworks/dylibs) that need to come along with it).
Regardless of what exactly is getting distributed, you can create an installer using tools that you already have -- pkgbuild and productbuild, both in /usr/bin. Making OS X Installer Packages like a Pro - Xcode Developer ID ready pkg can get you started using these tools.
Have you checked out the Daemons and Services Programming Guide provided by Apple? I think that would be very helpful as an introduction to the platform and should point you in the right direction (if not show you how to do exactly what you want).
You should also check out launchd (which is discussed in that programming guide). launchd is the official deamon launcher/manager for OSX, and is heavily integrated with the operating system. It should be easy enough to wrap your existing cross-platform deamon into a launched deamon, and you can integrate with OS X so that the deamon will start up automatically.

How to make Qt4 work using Code::Blocks in Linux Mint

I'm trying to use Qt4 using the Code::Blocks IDE. I'm running Linux Mint and I'm getting some errors. I looked around and found some people that had the same problem as me, but I can't seem to get their solutions working on my computer.
I installed Qt4 using the command
sudo apt-get install qt4-dev-tools
And when I type whereis qt4, I get qt4: /usr/lib/qt4 /usr/include/qt4 /usr/share/qt4
If I select "Create new Projet" in Code::Blocks and Select Qt4 project, it asks for Qt's location, which is $(#qt4) by default. If I click next, it says Code::Blocks doesn't know the "qt4" variable and gives me a prompt to set the base location, the include directory, etc.
Since I don't have any idea as to what I should be putting in there since nothing works (either it says "QTCore cannot be found in the specified directory", or the "lib" directory couldn't be found, etc.).
I tried what was posted on this forum: http://crunchbang.org/forums/viewtopic.php?id=18210, but it didn't solve my problem and I get the same errors.
In the "/usr/share/qt4" directory, there's a link to the "include" directory, but not to the "lib" directory.
I'm pretty new to Linux and all of this, so I'd like it if the answer was very detailed explaining what I did wrong / what I have to do.
Install the QtSDK
As a first step I would advise you to download directly the QtSDK, from the project site here.
Note: You could also use the precompiled version for your Mint version,
but in my personal experience, when working with external SDK,
you have more independence in development, it also allows you to work
freely with multiple versions of Qt simultaneously without move any
dependence of your OS.
You can follow the graphics steps to install the SDK, I advise you to check the option "download source", later this is going to be used for debugging code, and if necessary will allow the recompilation of some classes.
Now your QtSDK is installed on the folder eg "/usr/local"
So, all references inside your IDE should refer to this location.
Install the C::B
You can use the version available in "Software Manager"
Configure the C::B
When we start a new project and asks the location of our SDK we indicate this directory /usr/local/QtSDK/Desktop/Qt/4.8.1/gcc
Now the project is ready!
Note: "/usr/local" and "4.8.1" are variables depending on where
and what version you have installed.
Is very likely that your build directory, is not correctly assigned in "Settings->Compiler and Debugger->Toolchain ...->Compiler's Directory"
will be the default "usr" which should be replaced by "/usr/bin"
Now, when compiling with the standard project ".pro" and if your project has the requirement to use a "moc" tool strategy, the simplest way to do that, is use a customized Makefile, with all stages of compilation.
To learn how to make a customized makefile, you can read this answer.
And although I would advise again:
Although that CB is an optimal environment for working with wxWidgets, and C/C++ in general, I personally think that in the case of working with Qt, QtCreator provides a development environment more native and optimized to work with your projects QT.

is it possible to have a C/C++ GUI application in linux bare-bone server?

I am very disappointed with my school linux server when doing the homework on it.
The reason is: my homework requires to make GUI application.
All the tool that I have is:
- ssh from my local machine to school machine
- gcc/g++ in my school machine
I have been thinking and tried out different solutions for a week.
I still can't be able to figure out how to bring GUI to my application.
Here is some solutions I tried:
- Install some graphical library (sdl,ncurses...) but school computer does not allow to install because i'm not the root user
- Try to compile with /X11/ to produce X-GUI application. Then running it throgh ssh (tunneling). This does not work either because school computer does not have headers file located in X11.
So, What CAN I DO? Anybody has suggestion?
I will thank you million times if you could help for a solution.
Thanks you much.
tsubasa
It should be possible to install most things, like ncurses or even X11, in user space (in your home directory), if you install them from source. With a Gnu package, you just use --prefix= as an argument to configure, like this:
./configure --prefix=/name/of/directory/to/install/into
I'm not sure about the other packages.
Without a GUI library to link against, you won't be able to develop a C/C++ app on that server. It seems to me that you have a few options:
1) Develop this GUI app someplace else. If it has to be in Linux, and you're a Windows/Mac user, you can install Ubuntu (or some other Linux Distro) on a Virtual Machine and get a full featured environment.
2) Contact the Linux administrator to explain the homework assignment and convince them to install a GUI package for you. (It may help to have your professor also contact the Linux Administrator) (If you don't know who the linux admin is, try emailing root#linuxbox
3) Bend the rules on what a "GUI" environment is. For example, can your C/C++ app output HTML files for a GUI-like experience through a web-browser?
4) Try to install some sort of GUI package inside your account on the server. This will likely fail unless you are very, very good at administering a linux box, and you've hand-built packages before.
Could do it with ncurses
Perhaps you could ditch the school server and use Virtualbox to run a linux VM locally on your machine and develop on that. It's free.
From "INSTALL" file in ncurses source archive:
The package gets installed beneath the --prefix directory as follows:
In $(prefix)/bin: tic, infocmp, captoinfo, tset,
reset, clear, tput, toe
In $(prefix)/lib: libncurses*.* libcurses.a
In $(prefix)/share/terminfo: compiled terminal descriptions
In $(prefix)/include: C header files
Under $(prefix)/man: the manual pages
Note that the configure script attempts to locate previous
installation of
ncurses, and will set the default prefix according to where it finds the
ncurses headers.
Do not use commands such as
make install prefix=XXX
to change the prefix after configuration, since the prefix value
is used
for some absolute pathnames such as TERMINFO. Instead do this
make install DESTDIR=XXX
So I'd recommend using "make install DESTDIR=XXX" where XXX is the location where you have write persmissions.
HTH