shared_ptr gets destroyed before I can use it properly - c++

Question

I have the following code, which is supposed to add a shared_ptr instance to an intrusive linked list by thread A. Some other consumer thread will then use it later on by removing it from the list. However at a certain point my shared_ptr seems to get destroyed and the reference to it in the linked list is no longer valid resulting in an Assert.
Can someone enlighten me on what I am doing wrong? I suspect it is because I create my original shared_ptr in a local scope and it just gets destroyed. Although the List should still have a reference to it??? (This is NOT production code)
EDIT:
Defintiions of variables used:
BaseHookQueueList* lst;
typedef boost::intrusive::list<QueueList> BaseHookQueueList;
class QueueList : public boost::intrusive::list_base_hook<>
// Making my BaseHookQueueList take a shared_ptr of pointing to type QueueList conflicts // with the list_base_hook because it does not seem to like shared_ptr...
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
if (dwWait == WAIT_OBJECT_0) //Wait is successfull
{
while(count != 100)
{
//Some new request arrived
boost::shared_ptr<QueueList> Qlist (new QueueList()); //Create shared_ptr instance
int temp = 0;
if (count > 5)
{
Qlist->SetName(names[temp]); // Fill up name property of QueueList object with some nonsense...
temp++;
}
else
{
Qlist->SetName(names[count]);
}
workerfunc(lst, Qlist); // Pass to worker func
count++;
}
} // shared_ptr goes out scope and I get ASSERT error from list!!
}
}
void workerfunc(BaseHookQueueList* l, LIST item) // LIST is a typedef shared_ptr<QueueList> LIST
{
{
boost::mutex::scoped_lock workerfunclock(listlock);
l->push_front(*item); //Add to list
}
//Scope of lock
{
boost::mutex::scoped_lock workerfuncconsoleLock(consolelock);
printf("Adding item to list...\n");
}
ReleaseSemaphore(hConsumer, 1, NULL); // Set conumser Semaphore to Signalled with number of items currently on the queue
}

Answer 1

l->push_front(*item); //Add to list
The dereference could be the problem. You are not passing a shred_ptr instance to the l list but the pointee itself. If that's not it, please post more complete and less confused test-case.

Answer 2

If BaseHookQueueList is an intrusive list like you said, then you should remember that intrusive list doesn't take the ownership of the objects. In this case your shared pointers have the ownership, and when they are destroyed, the object is destroyed too.
edit: Instead of intrusive list you could use a container like std::list or std::queue that can contain smart pointers.

Answer 3

In your worker function, you're storing the pointed-to item, rather than the shared pointer, so the shared-pointer's reference count is not incremented.

Answer 4

I guess item is wrong in this case.
As the operator returns a reference to your type. So you put a const ref into your list but not a copy of the shared_ptr.