I have a file that is located at a different path at development time, however at the time of release it will be in a different location. The title of the documentation, after being generated, is set to the development path. Is it possible to manually set the path of the filename?
What I mean about title:
The structure of the documented source file is:
\File\Path\Filename.cpp [Title]
Function prototypes
… (other documented aspects)
For example the file is located at c:\Code\Dev\Filename.cpp during development and during release it is located at c:\SuperFantasticApplication\Code\Filename.cpp.
I’ve tried adding a parameter after the filename at the top of the file (\file [name I want it to be]). However, that does not work.
There's an option in doxygen to turn of using full path names in the documentation. Inside your doxygen configuration file set FULL_PATH_NAMES to NO.
Here's what the documentation says about it:
If the FULL_PATH_NAMES tag is set to
YES doxygen will prepend the full
path before files name in the file
list and in the header files. If set
to NO the shortest path that makes the
file name unique will be used
Related
I try to create a report (PDF/WORD) using docmosis.
In my report, I would like one of the fields to point to a file that resides relatively to the output-report. Is it possible? I saw the documentation that says I have to add to the template the prefix link:, e.g. <<link:linkToFile>> so docmosis understands this is a link. However, in the output report this links to a directory which does not even exist under %TMP% folder (C:\Users\ohadr\AppData\Local\Temp...).
Is there a way to add a link to file with docmosis? And how about relative file?
The <<link:abc>> directive is intended for external links which can be to files to download etc. Currently it will not reference any relative content/file.
I just start to use IAR Embedded workbench and meet an issue now. What I need to do is to make a project via IAR with some specific file(.h and .c).
In Eclipse I can add a directory, and then when it compiles, it will scan every sub-directories in the directory to find the included files. I did the same in IAR, but it didn't work. The IAR only scans the directory I added in the 'preprocess' TAG, and it never scans the sub folders in it. Is there any way that can help me to let the IAR scan the 'entire directory', not only the current path?
I'm not sure if my description is accurate or not. Please let me know and help me with this issue.
Thank you so much!!!!!
Your description of the IAR C and C++ include file search is correct: you must explicitly include the directory. The compiler does not search subdirectories.
If the number of subdirectories makes entry in the [IDE Options> Preprocessor > Additional include directories] entry table unwieldy, you can place them in a separate text file and add "-f " in the extra options. Note that using that parameter you may want to use the $PROJ_DIR$ as a root for a relative path.
$PROJ_DIR$ does not seem to get expanded if you put the include directories in a file and use -f
I'm trying to build opencv2 as a universal framework. I am systematically removing the files/folders that I do not need. But I am running into this issue where the include files are not found. See the image below:
The following image clearly shows that the file is indeed there.
One of the contractors working with us said he had put the include files into the same directory as the source files and rename them according to their file structure but using "." instead of "/" as shown below:
But that means that I must go through all of the files that include files and change the include statement to use "." instead of "/". REALLY?
Is this true? Or do we have a configuration set wrong?
You need to setup search paths for your target in Build Settings->Search Paths->Header search paths.
I want to write a log file for my application. The path where I want to store the file is:
destination::"C:\ColdFusion8\wwwroot\autosyn\logs"
I have used the sample below to generate the log file:
<cfset destination = expandPath('logs')>
<cfoutput>destination::"#destination#"</cfoutput><br/>
<cflog file='#destination#/test' application="yes" text="Running test log.">
When I supply the full path, it didn't create a log file. When I remove my destination, and only provide a file name, the log is generated in the ColdFusion server path C:\ColdFusion8\logs.
How can I generate a log file in my application directory?
Here is the description of attribute file according to cflog tag specs:
Message file. Specify only the main part of the filename. For example,
to log to the Testing.log file, specify "Testing".
The file must be located in the default log directory. You cannot
specify a directory path. If the file does not exist, it is created
automatically, with the extension .log.
You can use cffile tag to write information into the custom folder.
From the docs for <cflog>:
file
Optional
Message file. Specify only the main part of the filename. For example, to log to the Testing.log file, specify "Testing".
The file must be located in the default log directory. You cannot specify a directory path. If the file does not exist, it is created automatically, with the extension .log.
(My emphasis).
Reading the docs is always a good place to start when wondering how things might work.
So <cflog> will only log to the ColdFusion logs directory, and that is by design.
I don't have CF8 handy, but you would be able to set the logging directory to be a different one via either the CFAdmin UI (CF9 has this, I just confirmed), or neo-logging.xml in WEB-INF/cfusion/lib.
Or you could use a different logging mechanism. I doubt it will work on a rusty of CF8 install, but perhaps LogBox?
http://youtu.be/6NCtnKcwOas (select better quality!)
As you can see on the attached video, I have the two projects in my solution - a dll creator and a simple testing project. Just followed this tutorial .
Why does the MathFuncsDll.h still remain undetected?Everything works fine after specifying the full path after '#include'. However, I don't want to use such rough-and-ready method because it looks messy and unprofessionally.
If you can specify the file using an absolute path, but not by only using its filename, the compiler doesn't "know" about the folder containing that file.
You can tell the compiler about your additional include directories via the /I directive (documentation). And of course you can set that via the IDE.