How can I remove capturing from arbitrarily nested sub-groups in a a Perl regex string? I'd like to nest any regex into an enveloping expression that captures the sub-regex as a whole entity as well as statically known subsequent groups. Do I need to transform the regex string manually into using all non-capturing (?:) groups (and hope I don't mess up), or is there a Perl regex or library mechanism that provides this?
# How do I 'flatten' $regex to protect $2 and $3?
# Searching 'ABCfooDE' for 'foo' OK, but '((B|(C))fo(o)?(?:D|d)?)', etc., breaks.
# I.E., how would I turn it effectively into '(?:(?:B|(?:C))fo(?:o)?(?:D|d)?)'?
sub check {
my($line, $regex) = #_;
if ($line =~ /(^.*)($regex)(.*$)/) {
print "<", $1, "><", $2, "><", $3, ">\n";
}
}
Addendum: I am vaguely aware of $&, $`, and $' and have been advised to avoid them if possible, and I don't have access to ${^PREMATCH}, ${^MATCH} and ${^POSTMATCH} in my Perl 5.8 environment. The example above can be partitioned into 2/3 chunks using methods like these, and more complex real cases could manually iterate this, but I think I'd like a general solution if possible.
Accepted Answer: What I wish existed and surprisingly (to me at least) does not, is an encapsulating group that makes its contents opaque, such that subsequent positional backreferences see the contents as a single entity and names references are de-scoped. gbacon has a potentially useful workaround for Perl 5.10+, and FM shows a manual iterative mechanism for any version that can accomplish the same effect in specific cases, but j_random_hacker calls it that there is no real language mechanism to encapsulate subexpressions.
In general, you can't.
Even if you could transform all (...)s into (?:...)s, this would not work in the general case because the pattern might require backreferences: e.g. /(.)X\1/, which matches any character, followed by an X, followed by the originally matched character.
So, absent a Perl mechanism for discarding captured results "after the fact", there is no way to solve your problem for all regexes. The best you can do (or could do if you had Perl 5.10) is to use gbacon's suggestion and hope to generate a unique name for the capture buffer.
One way to protect the subpatterns you care about is to use named capture buffers:
Additionally, as of Perl 5.10.0 you may use named capture buffers and named backreferences. The notation is (?<name>...) to declare and \k<name> to reference. You may also use apostrophes instead of angle brackets to delimit the name; and you may use the bracketed \g{name} backreference syntax. It's possible to refer to a named capture buffer by absolute and relative number as well. Outside the pattern, a named capture buffer is available via the %+ hash. When different buffers within the same pattern have the same name, $+{name} and \k<name> refer to the leftmost defined group.
In the context of your question, check becomes
sub check {
use 5.10.0;
my($line, $regex) = #_;
if ($line =~ /(^.*)($regex)(.*$)/) {
print "<", $+{one}, "><", $+{two}, "><", $+{three}, ">\n";
}
}
Then calling it with
my $pat = qr/(?<one>(?<two>B|(?<three>C))fo(o)?(?:D|d)?)/;
check "ABCfooDE", $pat;
outputs
<CfooD><C><C>
This does not address the general case, but your specific example can be handled with the /g option in scalar context, which would allow you to divide the problem into two matches, the second picking up where the first left off:
sub check {
my($line, $regex) = #_;
my ($left_side, $regex_match) = ($1, $2) if $line =~ /(^.*)($regex)/g;
my $right_side = $1 if $line =~ /(.*$)/g;
print "<$left_side> <$regex_match> <$right_side>\n"; # <AB> <CfooD> <E123>
}
check( 'ABCfooDE123', qr/((B|(C))fo(o)?(?:D|d)?)/ );
If all you need is the portion of the string before and after the match, you can use the #- and #+ arrays to get the offsets into the matched string:
sub check {
my ($line, $regex) = #_;
if ($line =~ /$regex/) {
my $pre = substr $line, 0, $-[0];
my $match = substr $line, $-[0], $+[0] - $-[0];
my $post = substr $line, $+[0];
print "<$pre><$match><$post>\n";
}
}
Perl v5.22 and later has a /n modifier which turn all capturing off.
This doesn't disable capturing, but might accomplish what you want:
$ perl -wle 'my $_ = "123abc"; /(\d+)/ && print "num: $1"; { /([a-z]+)/ && print "letter: $1"; } print "num: $1";'
num: 123
letter: abc
num: 123
You create a new scope and the $1 outside it will not be affected.
Related
I have a string that looks like this (key":["value","value","value"])
"emailDomains":["google.co.uk","google.com","google.com","google.com","google.co.uk"]
and I use the following regex to select from the string. (the regex is setup in a way where it wont select a string that looks like this "key":[{"key":"value","key":"value"}] )
(?<=:\[").*?(?="])
Resulting Selection:
google.co.uk","google.com","google.com","google.com","google.co.uk
I want to remove the " in that select string, and i was wondering if there was an easy way to do this using the replace command. Desired result...
"emailDomains":["google.co.uk, google.com, google.com, google.com, google.co.uk"]
How do I solve this problem?
If your string indeed has the form "key":["v1", "v2", ... "vN"], you can split off the part that needs to be changed, replace "," by a space in it, and re-assemble:
my #parts = split / (\["\s* | \s*\"]) /x, $string; #"
$parts[2] =~ s/",\s*"/ /g;
my $processed = join '', #parts;
The regex pattern for the separator in split is captured since in that case the separators are also in the returned list, what is helpful here for putting the string back together. Then, we need to change the third element of the array.
In this approach, we have to change a specific element in the array so if your format varies, even a little, this may not (or still may) be suitable.
This should of course be processed as JSON, using a module. If the format isn't sure, as indicated in a comment, it would be best to try to ensure that you have JSON. Picking bits and pieces like above (or below) is a road to madness once requirements slowly start evolving.
The same approach can be used in a regex, and this may in fact have an advantage to be able to scoop up and ignore everything preceding the : (with split that part may end up with multiple elements if the format isn't exactly as shown, what then affects everything)
$string =~ s{ :\["\s*\K (.*?) ( "\] ) }{
my $e = $2;
my $n = $1 =~ s/",\s*"/ /gr;
$n.$e
}ex;
Here /e modifier makes it so that the replacement side is evaluated as code, where we do the same as with the split above. Notes on regex
Have to save away $2 first, since it gets reset in the next regex
The /r modifier†, which doesn't change its target but rather returns the changed string, is what allows us to use substitution operator on the read-only $1
If nothing gets captured for $2, and perhaps for $1, that means that there was no match and the outcome is simply that $string doesn't change, quietly. So if this substitution should always work then you may want to add handling of such unexpected data
Don't need a $n above, but can return ($1 =~ s/",\s*"/ /gr) . $e
Or, using lookarounds as attempted
$string =~ s{ (?<=:\[") (.+?) (?="\]) }{ $1 =~ s/",\s*"/ /gr }egx;
what does reduce the amount of code, but may be trickier to work with later.
While this is a direct answer to the question I think it's least maintainable.
† This useful modifier, for "non-destructive substitution," appeared in v5.14. In earlier Perl versions we would copy the string and run regex on that, with an idiom
(my $n = $1) =~ s/",\s*"/ /g;
In the lookarounds-example we then need a little more
$string =~ s{...}{ (my $n = $1) =~ s/",\s*"/ /g; $n }gr
since s/ operator returns the number of substitutions made while we need $n to be returned from that whole piece of code in {} (the replacement side), to be used as the replacement.
You can use this \G based regex to start the match with :[" and further captures the values appropriately and replaces matched text so that only comma is retained and doublequotes are removed.
(:\[")|(?!^)\G([^"]+)"(,)"
Regex Demo
Your text is almost proper JSON, so it's really easy to go the final inch and make it so, and then process that:
#!/usr/bin/perl
use warnings;
use strict;
use feature qw/say postderef/;
no warnings qw/experimental::postderef/;
use JSON::XS; # Install through your OS package manager or a CPAN client
my $str = q/"emailDomains":["google.co.uk","google.com","google.com","google.com","google.co.uk"]/;
my $json = JSON::XS->new();
my $obj = $json->decode("{$str}");
my $fixed = $json->ascii->encode({emailDomains =>
join(', ', $obj->{'emailDomains'}->#*)});
$fixed =~ s/^\{|\}$//g;
say $fixed;
Try Regex: " *, *"
Replace with: ,
Demo
I recently started learning Perl to automate some mindless data tasks. I work on windows machines, but prefer to use Cygwin. Wrote a Perl script that did everything I wanted fine in Cygwin, but when I tried to run it with Strawberry Perl on Windows via CMD I got the "Unescaped left brace in regex is illegal here in regex," error.
After some reading, I am guessing my Cygwin has an earlier version of Perl and modern versions of Perl which Strawberry is using don't allow for this. I am familiar with escaping characters in regex, but I am getting this error when using a capture group from a previous regex match to do a substitution.
open(my $fh, '<:encoding(UTF-8)', $file)
or die "Could not open file '$file' $!";
my $fileContents = do { local $/; <$fh> };
my $i = 0;
while ($fileContents =~ /(.*Part[^\}]*\})/) {
$defParts[$i] = $1;
$i = $i + 1;
$fileContents =~ s/$1//;
}
Basically I am searching through a file for matches that look like:
Part
{
Somedata
}
Then storing those matches in an array. Then purging the match from the $fileContents so I avoid repeats.
I am certain there are better and more efficient ways of doing any number of these things, but I am surprised that when using a capture group it's complaining about unescaped characters.
I can imagine storing the capture group, manually escaping the braces, then using that for the substitution, but is there a quicker or more efficient way to avoid this error without rewriting the whole block? (I'd like to avoid special packages if possible so that this script is easily portable.)
All of the answers I found related to this error were with specific cases where it was more straightforward or practical to edit the source with the curly braces.
Thank you!
I would just bypass the whole problem and at the same time simplify the code:
my $i = 0;
while ($fileContents =~ s/(.*Part[^\}]*\})//) {
$defParts[$i] = $1;
$i = $i + 1;
}
Here we simply do the substitution first. If it succeeds, it will still set $1 and return true (just like plain /.../), so there's no need to mess around with s/$1// later.
Using $1 (or any variable) as the pattern would mean you have to escape all regex metacharacters (e.g. *, +, {, (, |, etc.) if you want it to match literally. You can do that pretty easily with quotemeta or inline (s/\Q$1//), but it's still an extra step and thus error prone.
Alternatively, you could keep your original code and not use s///. I mean, you already found the match. Why use s/// to search for it again?
while ($fileContents =~ /(.*Part[^\}]*\})/) {
...
substr($fileContents, $-[0], $+[0] - $-[0], "");
}
We already know where the match is in the string. $-[0] is the position of the start and $+[0] the position of the end of the last regex match (thus $+[0] - $-[0] is the length of the matched string). We can then use substr to replace that chunk by "".
But let's keep going with s///:
my $i = 0;
while ($fileContents =~ s/(.*Part[^\}]*\})//) {
$defParts[$i] = $1;
$i++;
}
$i = $i + 1; can be reduced to $i++; ("increment $i").
my #defParts;
while ($fileContents =~ s/(.*Part[^\}]*\})//) {
push #defParts, $1;
}
The only reason we need $i is to add elements to the #defParts array. We can do that by using push, so there's no need for maintaining an extra variable. This saves us another line.
Now we probably don't need to destroy $fileContents. If the substitution exists only for the benefit of this loop (so I doesn't re-match already extracted content), we can do better:
my #defParts;
while ($fileContents =~ /(.*Part[^\}]*\})/g) {
push #defParts, $1;
}
Using /g in scalar context attaches a "current position" to $fileContents, so the next match attempt starts where the previous match left off. This is probably more efficient because it doesn't have to keep rewriting $fileContents.
my #defParts = $fileContents =~ /(.*Part[^\}]*\})/g;
... Or we could just use //g in list context, where it returns a list of all captured groups of all matches, and assign that to #defParts.
my #defParts = $fileContents =~ /.*Part[^\}]*\}/g;
If there are no capture groups in the regex, //g in list context returns the list of all matched strings (as if there had been ( ) around the whole regex).
Feel free to choose any of these. :-)
As for the question of escaping, that's what quotemeta is for,
my $needs_escaping = q(some { data } here);
say quotemeta $needs_escaping;
what prints (on v5.16)
some\ \{\ data\ \}\ here
and works on $1 as well. See linked docs for details. Also see \Q in perlre (search for \Q), which is how this is used inside a regex, say s/\Q$1//;. The \E stops escaping (what you don't need).
Some comments.
Relying on deletion so that the regex keeps finding further such patterns may be a risky design. If it isn't and you do use it there is no need for indices, since we have push
my #defParts;
while ($fileContents =~ /($pattern)/) {
push #defParts, $1;
$fileContents =~ s/\Q$1//;
}
where \Q is added in the regex. Better yet, as explained in melpomene's answer the substitution can be done in the while condition itself
push #defParts, $1 while $fileContents =~ s/($pattern)//;
where I used the statement modifier form (postfix syntax) for conciseness.
With the /g modifier in scalar context, as in while (/($pattern)/g) { .. }, the search continues from the position of the previous match in each iteration, and this is a usual way to iterate over all instances of a pattern in a string. Please read up on use of /g in scalar context as there are details in its behavior that one should be aware of.
However, this is tricky here (even as it works) as the string changes underneath the regex. If efficiency is not a concern, you can capture all matches with /g in list context and then remove them
my #all_matches = $fileContents =~ /$patt/g;
$fileContents =~ s/$patt//g;
While inefficient, as it makes two passes, this is much simpler and clearer.
I expect that Somedata cannot possibly, ever, contain }, for instance as nested { ... }, correct? If it does you have a problem of balanced delimiters, which is far more rounded. One approach is to use the core Text::Balanced module. Search for SO posts with examples.
I have a string like "ven|ven|vett|vejj|ven|ven". Treat each "|" delimiter for each column.
By splitting the string with "|" saving all the columns in array and reading each column into $str
So, I'm trying to do this as
$string =~ s/$str/venky/g if $str =~ /ven/i; # it will do globally.
Which not met the requirement.
On-demand basis, I need to replace string at the particular number of occurrence of the string.
For example, I've a request to change 2nd occurrence of "ven" to venky.
Then how can I met this requirement simply? Is it some-thing like
$string =~ s/ven/venky/2;
As of my knowledge we have 'o' for replace once and 'g' for globally. I'm struggling for the solution to get the replacement at particular occurrence. And I should not use pos() to get the position, because string keeps on change. It becomes difficult to trace it every-time. That's my intention.
Please help me on this regard.
There is no flag that you can add to the regex that will do this.
The easiest way would be to split and loop. However, if you insist to use one regex, it is doable:
/^(?:[^v]|v[^e]|ve[^n])*ven(?:[^v]|v[^e]|ve[^n])*\Kven/
If you want to replace the Nth occurrence instead of the second, you can do:
/^(?:(?:[^v]|v[^e]|ve[^n])*ven){N-1}(?:[^v]|v[^e]|ve[^n])*\Kven/
The general idea:
(?:[^v]|v[^e]|ve[^n])* - matches any string that isn't part of ven
\K is a cool matcher that drops everything matched so far, so you can sort of use it as a lookbehind with variable length
Currently you're replacing every instance of'ven' with 'venky' if your string contains a match for ven, which of course it does.
What I assume you're trying to do is to substitute 'ven' for 'venky' within your string if it's the second element:
my $string = 'ven|ven|vett|vejj|ven|ven';
my #elements = split(/\|/, $string);
my $count;
foreach (#elements){
$count++;
s/$_/venky/g if /ven/i and $count == 2;
}
print join('|', #elements);
print "\n";
Your approach was already pretty good. What you described makes sense, but I think you are having trouble implementing it.
I created a function to do the work. It takes 4 arguments:
$string is the string we want to work on
$n is the nth occurance you want to replace
$needle is the thing you want to replace – thing needle in a haystack
Note that right now we allow to pass stuff that might contain regular expressions. So you would have to use quotemeta on it or match with /\Q$needle\E/
$replacement is the replacement for the $needle
The idea is to split up the string, then check each element if it matches the pattern ($needle) and keep track of how many have matched. If the nth one is reached, replace it and stop processing. Then put the string back together.
use strict;
use warnings;
use feature 'say';
say replace_nth_occurance("ven|ven|vett|vejj|ven|ven", 2, 'ven', 'venky');
sub replace_nth_occurance {
my ($string, $n, $needle, $replacement) = #_;
# take the string appart
my #elements = split /\|/, $string;
my $count = 0; # keep track of ...
foreach my $e (#elements) {
$count++ if $e =~ m/$needle/; # ... how many matches we've found
if ($count == $n) {
$e =~ s/$needle/$replacement/; # replace
last; # and stop processing
}
}
# put it back into the pipe-separated format
return join '|', #elements;
}
Output:
ven|venky|vett|vejj|ven|ven
To replace the n'th occurrence of "ven" to "venky":
my $n = 3;
my $test = "seven given ravens";
$test =~ s/ven/--$n == 0 ? "venky" : $&/eg;
This uses the ability with the /e flag to specify the substitution part as an expression.
How do you create a $scalar from the result of a regex match?
Is there any way that once the script has matched the regex that it can be assigned to a variable so it can be used later on, outside of the block.
IE. If $regex_result = blah blah then do something.
I understand that I should make the regex as non-greedy as possible.
#!/usr/bin/perl
use strict;
use warnings;
# use diagnostics;
use Win32::OLE;
use Win32::OLE::Const 'Microsoft Outlook';
my #Qmail;
my $regex = "^\\s\*owner \#";
my $sentence = $regex =~ "/^\\s\*owner \#/";
my $outlook = Win32::OLE->new('Outlook.Application')
or warn "Failed Opening Outlook.";
my $namespace = $outlook->GetNamespace("MAPI");
my $folder = $namespace->Folders("test")->Folders("Inbox");
my $items = $folder->Items;
foreach my $msg ( $items->in ) {
if ( $msg->{Subject} =~ m/^(.*test alert) / ) {
my $name = $1;
print " processing Email for $name \n";
push #Qmail, $msg->{Body};
}
}
for(#Qmail) {
next unless /$regex|^\s*description/i;
print; # prints what i want ie lines that start with owner and description
}
print $sentence; # prints ^\\s\*offense \ # not lines that start with owner.
One way is to verify a match occurred.
use strict;
use warnings;
my $str = "hello what world";
my $match = 'no match found';
my $what = 'no what found';
if ( $str =~ /hello (what) world/ )
{
$match = $&;
$what = $1;
}
print '$match = ', $match, "\n";
print '$what = ', $what, "\n";
Use Below Perl variables to meet your requirements -
$` = The string preceding whatever was matched by the last pattern match, not counting patterns matched in nested blocks that have been exited already.
$& = Contains the string matched by the last pattern match
$' = The string following whatever was matched by the last pattern match, not counting patterns matched in nested blockes that have been exited already. For example:
$_ = 'abcdefghi';
/def/;
print "$`:$&:$'\n"; # prints abc:def:ghi
The match of a regex is stored in special variables (as well as some more readable variables if you specify the regex to do so and use the /p flag).
For the whole last match you're looking at the $MATCH (or $& for short) variable. This is covered in the manual page perlvar.
So say you wanted to store your last for loop's matches in an array called #matches, you could write the loop (and for some reason I think you meant it to be a foreach loop) as:
my #matches = ();
foreach (#Qmail) {
next unless /$regex|^\s*description/i;
push #matches_in_qmail $MATCH
print;
}
I think you have a problem in your code. I'm not sure of the original intention but looking at these lines:
my $regex = "^\\s\*owner \#";
my $sentence = $regex =~ "/^\s*owner #/";
I'll step through that as:
Assign $regexto the string ^\s*owner #.
Assign $sentence to value of running a match within $regex with the regular expression /^s*owner $/ (which won't match, if it did $sentence will be 1 but since it didn't it's false).
I think. I'm actually not exactly certain what that line will do or was meant to do.
I'm not quite sure what part of the match you want: the captures, or something else. I've written Regexp::Result which you can use to grab all the captures etc. on a successful match, and Regexp::Flow to grab multiple results (including success statuses). If you just want numbered captures, you can also use Data::Munge
You can do the following:
my $str ="hello world";
my ($hello, $world) = $str =~ /(hello)|(what)/;
say "[$_]" for($hello,$world);
As you see $hello contains "hello".
If you have older perl on your system like me, perl 5.18 or earlier, and you use $ $& $' like codequestor's answer above, it will slow down your program.
Instead, you can use your regex pattern with the modifier /p, and then check these 3 variables: ${^PREMATCH}, ${^MATCH}, and ${^POSTMATCH} for your matching results.
There's an example snippet in Mail::POP3Client in which theres a piece of syntax that I don't understand why or how it's working:
foreach ( $pop->Head( $i ) ) {
/^(From|Subject):\s+/i and print $_, "\n";
}
The regex bit in particular. $_ remains the same after that line but only the match is printed.
An additional question; How could I assign the match of that regex to a scalar of my own so I can use that instead of just print it?
This is actually pretty tricky. What it's doing is making use of perl's short circuiting feature to make a conditional statement. it is the same as saying this.
if (/^(From|Subject):\s+/i) {
print $_;
}
It works because perl stops evaluating and statements after something evaluates to 0. and unless otherwise specified a regex in the form /regex/ instead of $somevar =~ /regex/ will apply the regex to the default variable, $_
you can store it like this
my $var;
if (/^(From|Subject):\s+/i) {
$var = $_;
}
or you could use a capture group
/^((?:From|Subject):\s+)/i
which will store the whole thing into $1