Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
Does anyone know of any free (critical point I'm afraid) code coverage tools for Visual Studio 2010 Professional edition. I know there are commercial offerings such as NCover and DotCover, but due to budget considerations these can't be considered. For similar reasons, upgrading to versions of VS that come with code coverage built in also can't be considered.
Looking around I see there appears to be loads of free options for Java developers, but there doesn't appear to be any (VS integrated) options for .NET developers. Please note that I am looking for VS integrated solutions. I know there is a free community version of NCover that runs from the command line, but only the commercial edition is integrated with the VS IDE.
Edit: If no one is really aware of any free tools currently available, could anyone provide pointers to tutorials on how to create VS plug-ins that decorate code in the source window?
partcover?
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/38360/can-you-recommend-an-alternative-for-ncover
Related
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed yesterday.
Improve this question
The official Arduino IDE has some nice features, such as the board and library management, which works relatively well. However, when it comes to building. It only supports .ino files, while my project has .hpp and .cpp files, just like any regular C++ project. I tried things like the VS Code plugin for Arduino, but that also uses .ino files.
The only alternative I found is Sloeber, which is an Eclipse plugin, and it has the usual problem of Eclipse plugins that I can either install it or not. I had a previous version installed, but when I tried to update it, it completely broke my Eclipse installation. I tried installing the latest version, but it doesn't work.
Is there any alternative to sloeber? I'd prefer something that can be used from the command line, but an IDE is just fine too.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 6 years ago.
Improve this question
Question is - how to develop on Windows platform with comfort, using CMake as primary configuration tool. What I mean is IDE or something, that parse CMake config and help you to include external hpp files for example. I know that Qt Creator can (it support MSVC compiler), but Qt Creator sometimes fail to save file with error "Can't write to disk. Is it full". Seems like bug. And that's all.
What I mean is not generate .sln for Visual Studio.
Also I tried VS 2017 RC, but its crashing constantly with my project.
P.S. I tried Visual Studio with separate .sln, but it's really uncomfortably to support two different configs.
Thanks
Try out KDevelop 5 for Windows, it has great CMake support, as well as Clang based language features.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 6 years ago.
Improve this question
I know, it sounds ridiculous but I was asked to make an application backwards-compatible with win98. Specifically, I am interested in the boost-thread library that I have used. So, where can I find information about which version of the boost libraries is compatible with which operating system?
It depends on which version of Boost you are interested in.
You can go through the Boost version history and search the Release Notes for one that lists a compiler that supports Win98.
A quick search hints that this is likely to be MSVS 2005. This means Visual C++ 8.0.
The latest version of boost that I've found to list this version of VC++ as a supported (and targetted) compiler is boost 1.52.0.
The Boost Thread library has been around since version 1.25.0, so this seems like an acceptable candidate.
Conveniently, the link to download the source code (of any particular version) are also provided on the version history page.
See http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_55_0/libs/log/doc/html/log/installation.html
It requires XP or newer, and at least VC8.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 6 years ago.
Improve this question
Recently I downloaded Qt 5.6
I didn't knew that installing visual studio is necessary to build with Qt.
I have a poor internet connection and somehow managed to download Qt. But now is it necessary to install visual studio of 7 GiBs which is nearly impossible for me to download with my shitty kind of internet? I had searched on google and found that MinGW can be used to build with Qt. Please help me to configure it.
You can download a pre-build version of Qt, building it yourself is not necessary or recommended for beginners:
http://download.qt.io/official_releases/qt/5.6/5.6.0/
The qt-opensource-windows-x86-mingw492-5.6.0.exe comes with MinGW 4.9.2 bundled.
Building Qt from sources can take many hours on a slow machine, and potentially fail for a number of reasons, also it has 3rd party requirements such as perl and python.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
I'm starting a C project with CMake and I want to use TDD. So I need an efficient unit testing framework which can be integrated with CMake.
I'm looking for a UTF wich can:
Be easily integrated with CMake
Gives me code coverage
Be (if it is possible) BSD-licenced
I have tried Kuya wich matches 3. but doesn't give a CC, then Check wich matches 2. but I haven't find any UTF that can be easily integrated with CMake.
By "easily integrated with CMake" I mean a tool wich can be launched by $ make tests.
http://code.google.com/p/googletest/ is C++.
It's well integrated with CMake, and I guess that shouldn't be a big problem to have your tests using a bit of C++, even if your tested files are in plain C.
What about CTest? CTest allows you to integrate tests into CMakeLists.txt. See http://cmake.org/Wiki/CMake/Testing_With_CTest for more thorough explanations. For your for requirements:
It can't be more simple.
That depends on how you design your tests - ctest only runs them
The same license as cmake