I know we can use
perror()
in C to print errors. I was just wondering if there is a C++ alternative to this, or whether I have to include this (and therefore stdio.h) in my program. I am trying to avoid as many C functions as possible.
You could do something like:
std::cerr << strerror(errno) << std::endl;
That still ends up calling strerror, so you're really just substituting one C function for another. OTOH, it does let you write via streams, instead of mixing C and C++ output, which is generally a good thing. At least AFAIK, C++ doesn't add anything to the library to act as a substitute for strerror (other than generating an std::string, I'm not sure what it would change from strerror anyway).
You could use the boost::system_error::error_code class.
#include <boost/system/system_error.hpp>
#include <cerrno>
#include <iostream>
void
PrintError(
const std::string& message,
int error
)
{
std::cerr << message << ": " <<
boost::system::error_code(
error,
boost::system::get_system_category()
).message()
<< std::endl;
}
int
main()
{
PrintError( "something went wrong!", EINVAL );
return 0;
}
it's a tad verbose, and somewhat overkill if you aren't already using the boost_system library.
With C++11, we have the <system_error> header, so you should be able to use:
std::error_code{errno, std::generic_category()}.message();
Example program:
#include <system_error>
#include <iostream>
int main() {
std::cout << std::error_code{errno, std::generic_category()}.message() << '\n';
}
This prints Success.
See also:
How to convert errno to exception using <system_error>
<system_error> categories and standard/system error codes (regarding whether to use generic_category or system_category)
Related
I'm basically looking for a C++ version of fdopen(). I did a bit of research on this and it is one of those things that seems like it should be easy, but turns out to be very complicated. Am I missing something in this belief (i.e. it really is easy)? If not, is there a good library out there somewhere to handle this?
EDIT: Moved my example solution to a separate answer.
From the answer given by Éric Malenfant:
AFAIK, there is no way to do this in
standard C++. Depending on your
platform, your implementation of the
standard library may offer (as a
nonstandard extension) a fstream
constructor taking a file descriptor
as input. (This is the case for
libstdc++, IIRC) or a FILE*.
Based on above observations and my research below there's working code in two variants; one for libstdc++ and another one for Microsoft Visual C++.
libstdc++
There's non-standard __gnu_cxx::stdio_filebuf class template which inherits std::basic_streambuf and has the following constructor
stdio_filebuf (int __fd, std::ios_base::openmode __mode, size_t __size=static_cast< size_t >(BUFSIZ))
with description This constructor associates a file stream buffer with an open POSIX file descriptor.
We create it passing POSIX handle (line 1) and then we pass it to istream's constructor as basic_streambuf (line 2):
#include <ext/stdio_filebuf.h>
#include <iostream>
#include <fstream>
#include <string>
using namespace std;
int main()
{
ofstream ofs("test.txt");
ofs << "Writing to a basic_ofstream object..." << endl;
ofs.close();
int posix_handle = fileno(::fopen("test.txt", "r"));
__gnu_cxx::stdio_filebuf<char> filebuf(posix_handle, std::ios::in); // 1
istream is(&filebuf); // 2
string line;
getline(is, line);
cout << "line: " << line << std::endl;
return 0;
}
Microsoft Visual C++
There used to be non-standard version of ifstream's constructor taking POSIX file descriptor but it's missing both from current docs and from code. There is another non-standard version of ifstream's constructor taking FILE*
explicit basic_ifstream(_Filet *_File)
: _Mybase(&_Filebuffer),
_Filebuffer(_File)
{ // construct with specified C stream
}
and it's not documented (I couldn't even find any old documentation where it would be present). We call it (line 1) with the parameter being the result of calling _fdopen to get C stream FILE* from POSIX file handle.
#include <cstdio>
#include <iostream>
#include <fstream>
#include <string>
using namespace std;
int main()
{
ofstream ofs("test.txt");
ofs << "Writing to a basic_ofstream object..." << endl;
ofs.close();
int posix_handle = ::_fileno(::fopen("test.txt", "r"));
ifstream ifs(::_fdopen(posix_handle, "r")); // 1
string line;
getline(ifs, line);
ifs.close();
cout << "line: " << line << endl;
return 0;
}
AFAIK, there is no way to do this in standard C++. Depending on your platform, your implementation of the standard library may offer (as a nonstandard extension) a fstream constructor taking a file descriptor (This is the case for libstdc++, IIRC) or a FILE* as an input.
Another alternative would be to use a boost::iostreams::file_descriptor device, which you could wrap in a boost::iostreams::stream if you want to have an std::stream interface to it.
There's a good chance your compiler offers a FILE-based fstream constructor, even though it's non-standard. For example:
FILE* f = fdopen(my_fd, "a");
std::fstream fstr(f);
fstr << "Greetings\n";
But as far as I know, there's no portable way to do this.
Part of the original (unstated) motivation of this question is to have the ability to pass data either between programs or between two parts of a test program using a safely created temporary file, but tmpnam() throws a warning in gcc, so I wanted to use mkstemp() instead. Here is a test program that I wrote based on the answer given by Éric Malenfant but using mkstemp() instead of fdopen(); this works on my Ubuntu system with Boost libraries installed:
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <assert.h>
#include <string>
#include <iostream>
#include <boost/filesystem.hpp>
#include <boost/iostreams/device/file_descriptor.hpp>
#include <boost/iostreams/stream.hpp>
using boost::iostreams::stream;
using boost::iostreams::file_descriptor_sink;
using boost::filesystem::path;
using boost::filesystem::exists;
using boost::filesystem::status;
using boost::filesystem::remove;
int main(int argc, const char *argv[]) {
char tmpTemplate[13];
strncpy(tmpTemplate, "/tmp/XXXXXX", 13);
stream<file_descriptor_sink> tmp(mkstemp(tmpTemplate));
assert(tmp.is_open());
tmp << "Hello mkstemp!" << std::endl;
tmp.close();
path tmpPath(tmpTemplate);
if (exists(status(tmpPath))) {
std::cout << "Output is in " << tmpPath.file_string() << std::endl;
std::string cmd("cat ");
cmd += tmpPath.file_string();
system(cmd.c_str());
std::cout << "Removing " << tmpPath.file_string() << std::endl;
remove(tmpPath);
}
}
It actually is quite easy. Nicolai M. Josuttis has released fdstream in conjunction with his book The C++ Standard Library - A Tutorial and Reference. You can find the 184 line implementation here.
I've tried the solution proposed above for libstdc++ by Piotr Dobrogost, and found that it had a painful flaw: Due to the lack of a proper move constructor for istream, it's very difficult to get the newly constructed istream object out of the creating function. Another issue with it is that it leaks a FILE object (even thought not the underlying posix file descriptor). Here's an alternative solution that avoids these issues:
#include <fstream>
#include <string>
#include <ext/stdio_filebuf.h>
#include <type_traits>
bool OpenFileForSequentialInput(ifstream& ifs, const string& fname)
{
ifs.open(fname.c_str(), ios::in);
if (! ifs.is_open()) {
return false;
}
using FilebufType = __gnu_cxx::stdio_filebuf<std::ifstream::char_type>;
static_assert( std::is_base_of<ifstream::__filebuf_type, FilebufType>::value &&
(sizeof(FilebufType) == sizeof(ifstream::__filebuf_type)),
"The filebuf type appears to have extra data members, the cast might be unsafe");
const int fd = static_cast<FilebufType*>(ifs.rdbuf())->fd();
assert(fd >= 0);
if (0 != posix_fadvise(fd, 0, 0, POSIX_FADV_SEQUENTIAL)) {
ifs.close();
return false;
}
return true;
}
The call to posix_fadvise() demonstrates a potential use. Also note that the example uses static_assert and using which are C++ 11, other than that it should build just fine in C++ 03 mode.
Another non-portable solution is to use mmap (or its Windows' analogue) and then construct std::iostream from a pointer that mmap gave like so.
Yeah, it does not construct exactly an std::fstream, but this requirement rarely needs to be met because every piece of code should depend on stream interfaces (e.g. std::istream) rather than on their implementations.
I think this solution is more portable than use of STL implementation-specific hacks, because this way you only depend on an operating system, rather than on a specific implementation of STL for the same OS.
My understanding is that there is no association with FILE pointers or file descriptors in the C++ iostream object model in order to keep code portable.
That said, I saw several places refer to the mds-utils or boost to help bridge that gap.
#include <iostream>
#include <clocale>
#include <string>
int main() {
std::setlocale(LC_ALL, "en_US.utf8");
std::wstring str(L"Τὴ γλῶσσα μοῦ ἔδωσαν");
std::wcout << str << std::endl;
std::wcerr << str << std::endl;
}
This produces no output on the terminal.
How can I get it to produce UTF-8 output? I figure that ought to be something supported by C++.
I am aware of the utfcpp library, which I am using, but the question is specifically whether there is a stdlib way to print out UTF8.
I got it by following this.
std::setlocale(LC_ALL, ""); is the magic incantation.
This worked on my trivial test program. However my full program still completely fails at printing out wstrings.
That is fine (well, no, it is still somewhat alarming), I will avoid relying on stdlib, and do it myself with the help of utfcpp library, which is excellent. This way I can use cout and cerr for everything and all will be well.
I have a basic program that compares two strings :
#include <string>
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
int main (int argc, char *argv[]) {
if(strcmp (argv[0],"./test") != 0) {
cout << "not equal" << endl;
} else {
cout << "equal" << endl;
}
return 0;
}
it compiles with gcc but not with clang :
> clang -o test test_clang.cpp
test_clang.cpp:7:6: error: use of undeclared identifier 'strcmp'
if(strcmp (argv[0],"./test") != 0) {
^
1 error generated.
Why doesn't it compile with clang ?
EDIT: People are getting harsh on stack overflow, up to the point that I am hesitating to post a question. The question above has a simple answer, fine, but is it normal to down-vote questions (twice in the first minute!) because they have a simple, yet non obvious, answer ?
Use
#include <string.h>
or
#include <cstring>
instead of
#include <string>
The string header is for the std::string from C++. string.h is for C zero terminated char* strings. cstring is like string.h but for C++.
The reason it worked with gcc is probably different warning/error level settings. It is possible to compile the code without #including the header and having the declaration of strcmp. The compiler will not be able to do type checking but the symbol still gets resolved by the linker.
You can also avoid using strcmp completely and write
#include <string>
#include <iostream>
int main (int argc, char *argv[]) {
std::string command = argv[0];
if( command != "./test" ) {
std::cout << "not equal" << endl;
} else {
std::cout << "equal" << endl;
}
return 0;
}
Using a std::string on one side of the comparison will cause the "./test" string to be converted into a std::string as well and the comparison will be done by the == operator of the std::string class.
You're not including the correct header file
#include <cstring>
You need to #include <cstring> (or possibly #include <string.h>.)
Many compilers include extra standard headers when you include another. The Standard allows this; it's your responsibility to use the headers that guarantee declarations for what you use, not just headers that happen to have the declarations for your compiler.
You have to include <cstring>. <string> is the header for C++ strings.
I'm using eclipse and I'm building a simple program, but I get an error saying function sleep could not be resolved
#include <time.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <conio.h>
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
int main() {
cout << "!!!Hello World!!!" << endl; // prints !!!Hello World!!!
printf("ciao");
sleep(20);
return 0;
}
I don't know if I need other libraries or something else.
MinGW should be installed properly, so I have no idea
The sleep() function is defined by POSIX, not by the C++ standard.
If you're on a Unix-like system, you need
#include <unistd.h>
If you're not, then the sleep() function might not even be available.
Oh, and mixing cout << ... and printf() is probably not a good idea, and you don't need the #include <conio.h>.
If you are using MinGW as stated, then you may need to include windows.h. The sleep implementation I think uses the Win API Sleep().
For example:
#include <windows.h>
#include <iostream>
int main() {
std::cout << "!!!Hello World!!!" << std::endl;
Sleep(20000);
std::cout << "Text Will Appear After 2 Sec.." << std::endl;
return 0;
}
When developing portable code that must run on unix and windows, I've always defined a sleep() macro for windows that calls the windows Sleep() that looks like this:
#define sleep(a) Sleep(a * 1000)
It's simple enough to do.
I'm basically looking for a C++ version of fdopen(). I did a bit of research on this and it is one of those things that seems like it should be easy, but turns out to be very complicated. Am I missing something in this belief (i.e. it really is easy)? If not, is there a good library out there somewhere to handle this?
EDIT: Moved my example solution to a separate answer.
From the answer given by Éric Malenfant:
AFAIK, there is no way to do this in
standard C++. Depending on your
platform, your implementation of the
standard library may offer (as a
nonstandard extension) a fstream
constructor taking a file descriptor
as input. (This is the case for
libstdc++, IIRC) or a FILE*.
Based on above observations and my research below there's working code in two variants; one for libstdc++ and another one for Microsoft Visual C++.
libstdc++
There's non-standard __gnu_cxx::stdio_filebuf class template which inherits std::basic_streambuf and has the following constructor
stdio_filebuf (int __fd, std::ios_base::openmode __mode, size_t __size=static_cast< size_t >(BUFSIZ))
with description This constructor associates a file stream buffer with an open POSIX file descriptor.
We create it passing POSIX handle (line 1) and then we pass it to istream's constructor as basic_streambuf (line 2):
#include <ext/stdio_filebuf.h>
#include <iostream>
#include <fstream>
#include <string>
using namespace std;
int main()
{
ofstream ofs("test.txt");
ofs << "Writing to a basic_ofstream object..." << endl;
ofs.close();
int posix_handle = fileno(::fopen("test.txt", "r"));
__gnu_cxx::stdio_filebuf<char> filebuf(posix_handle, std::ios::in); // 1
istream is(&filebuf); // 2
string line;
getline(is, line);
cout << "line: " << line << std::endl;
return 0;
}
Microsoft Visual C++
There used to be non-standard version of ifstream's constructor taking POSIX file descriptor but it's missing both from current docs and from code. There is another non-standard version of ifstream's constructor taking FILE*
explicit basic_ifstream(_Filet *_File)
: _Mybase(&_Filebuffer),
_Filebuffer(_File)
{ // construct with specified C stream
}
and it's not documented (I couldn't even find any old documentation where it would be present). We call it (line 1) with the parameter being the result of calling _fdopen to get C stream FILE* from POSIX file handle.
#include <cstdio>
#include <iostream>
#include <fstream>
#include <string>
using namespace std;
int main()
{
ofstream ofs("test.txt");
ofs << "Writing to a basic_ofstream object..." << endl;
ofs.close();
int posix_handle = ::_fileno(::fopen("test.txt", "r"));
ifstream ifs(::_fdopen(posix_handle, "r")); // 1
string line;
getline(ifs, line);
ifs.close();
cout << "line: " << line << endl;
return 0;
}
AFAIK, there is no way to do this in standard C++. Depending on your platform, your implementation of the standard library may offer (as a nonstandard extension) a fstream constructor taking a file descriptor (This is the case for libstdc++, IIRC) or a FILE* as an input.
Another alternative would be to use a boost::iostreams::file_descriptor device, which you could wrap in a boost::iostreams::stream if you want to have an std::stream interface to it.
There's a good chance your compiler offers a FILE-based fstream constructor, even though it's non-standard. For example:
FILE* f = fdopen(my_fd, "a");
std::fstream fstr(f);
fstr << "Greetings\n";
But as far as I know, there's no portable way to do this.
Part of the original (unstated) motivation of this question is to have the ability to pass data either between programs or between two parts of a test program using a safely created temporary file, but tmpnam() throws a warning in gcc, so I wanted to use mkstemp() instead. Here is a test program that I wrote based on the answer given by Éric Malenfant but using mkstemp() instead of fdopen(); this works on my Ubuntu system with Boost libraries installed:
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <assert.h>
#include <string>
#include <iostream>
#include <boost/filesystem.hpp>
#include <boost/iostreams/device/file_descriptor.hpp>
#include <boost/iostreams/stream.hpp>
using boost::iostreams::stream;
using boost::iostreams::file_descriptor_sink;
using boost::filesystem::path;
using boost::filesystem::exists;
using boost::filesystem::status;
using boost::filesystem::remove;
int main(int argc, const char *argv[]) {
char tmpTemplate[13];
strncpy(tmpTemplate, "/tmp/XXXXXX", 13);
stream<file_descriptor_sink> tmp(mkstemp(tmpTemplate));
assert(tmp.is_open());
tmp << "Hello mkstemp!" << std::endl;
tmp.close();
path tmpPath(tmpTemplate);
if (exists(status(tmpPath))) {
std::cout << "Output is in " << tmpPath.file_string() << std::endl;
std::string cmd("cat ");
cmd += tmpPath.file_string();
system(cmd.c_str());
std::cout << "Removing " << tmpPath.file_string() << std::endl;
remove(tmpPath);
}
}
It actually is quite easy. Nicolai M. Josuttis has released fdstream in conjunction with his book The C++ Standard Library - A Tutorial and Reference. You can find the 184 line implementation here.
I've tried the solution proposed above for libstdc++ by Piotr Dobrogost, and found that it had a painful flaw: Due to the lack of a proper move constructor for istream, it's very difficult to get the newly constructed istream object out of the creating function. Another issue with it is that it leaks a FILE object (even thought not the underlying posix file descriptor). Here's an alternative solution that avoids these issues:
#include <fstream>
#include <string>
#include <ext/stdio_filebuf.h>
#include <type_traits>
bool OpenFileForSequentialInput(ifstream& ifs, const string& fname)
{
ifs.open(fname.c_str(), ios::in);
if (! ifs.is_open()) {
return false;
}
using FilebufType = __gnu_cxx::stdio_filebuf<std::ifstream::char_type>;
static_assert( std::is_base_of<ifstream::__filebuf_type, FilebufType>::value &&
(sizeof(FilebufType) == sizeof(ifstream::__filebuf_type)),
"The filebuf type appears to have extra data members, the cast might be unsafe");
const int fd = static_cast<FilebufType*>(ifs.rdbuf())->fd();
assert(fd >= 0);
if (0 != posix_fadvise(fd, 0, 0, POSIX_FADV_SEQUENTIAL)) {
ifs.close();
return false;
}
return true;
}
The call to posix_fadvise() demonstrates a potential use. Also note that the example uses static_assert and using which are C++ 11, other than that it should build just fine in C++ 03 mode.
Another non-portable solution is to use mmap (or its Windows' analogue) and then construct std::iostream from a pointer that mmap gave like so.
Yeah, it does not construct exactly an std::fstream, but this requirement rarely needs to be met because every piece of code should depend on stream interfaces (e.g. std::istream) rather than on their implementations.
I think this solution is more portable than use of STL implementation-specific hacks, because this way you only depend on an operating system, rather than on a specific implementation of STL for the same OS.
My understanding is that there is no association with FILE pointers or file descriptors in the C++ iostream object model in order to keep code portable.
That said, I saw several places refer to the mds-utils or boost to help bridge that gap.