I have a pretty flat XML structure that I need to reorder into categorised sections and, for the life of me, I can't figure out how to do it in XSLT (not that I'm by any means an expert.)
Basically, the original XML looks kinda like:
<things>
<thing>
<value>one</value>
<type>a</type>
</thing>
<thing>
<value>two</value>
<type>b</type>
</thing>
<thing>
<value>thee</value>
<type>b</type>
</thing>
<thing>
<value>four</value>
<type>a</type>
</thing>
<thing>
<value>five</value>
<type>d</type>
</thing>
</things>
And I need to output something like:
<data>
<a-things>
<a>one</a>
<a>four</a>
</a-things>
<b-things>
<b>two</b>
<b>three</b>
</b-things>
<d-things>
<d>five</d>
</d-things>
</data>
Note that I can't output <c-things> if there aren't any <c> elements, but I do know ahead of time what the complete list of types is, and it's fairly short so handcoding templates for each type is definitely possible. It feels like I could probably hack something together using <xsl:if> and <xsl:for-each> but it also feels like there must be a more ... 'templatey' way to do it. Can anyone help?
Cheers.
As you are using Saxon, use the native XSLT 2.0 grouping.
<xsl:stylesheet version="2.0" xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform">
<xsl:output method="xml" indent="yes" />
<xsl:template match="things">
<data>
<xsl:for-each-group select="thing" group-by="type">
<xsl:element name="{concat(current-grouping-key(),'-things')}">
<xsl:for-each select="current-group()">
<xsl:element name="{current-grouping-key()}">
<xsl:value-of select="value" />
</xsl:element>
</xsl:for-each>
</xsl:element>
</xsl:for-each-group>
</data>
</xsl:template>
</xsl:stylesheet>
In XSLT 1.0 you can group with keys. This approach is called Muenchian Grouping.
The xsl:key defines an index containing thing elements, grouped by the string value of their type element. Function key() returns all nodes from the key with the specified value.
The outer xsl:for-each selects the thing elements that are the first returned by key() for their value.
<xsl:stylesheet version="1.0" xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform">
<xsl:output method="xml" indent="yes" />
<xsl:key name="thing" match="thing" use="type" />
<xsl:template match="things">
<data>
<xsl:for-each select="thing[generate-id(.)=generate-id(key('thing',type)[1])]">
<xsl:element name="{concat(type,'-things')}">
<xsl:for-each select="key('thing',type)">
<xsl:element name="{type}">
<xsl:value-of select="value" />
</xsl:element>
</xsl:for-each>
</xsl:element>
</xsl:for-each>
</data>
</xsl:template>
</xsl:stylesheet>
The generic solution is to use an XSL key:
<xsl:key name="kThingByType" match="thing" use="type" />
<xsl:template match="things">
<xsl:copy>
<xsl:apply-templates select="thing" mode="group">
<xsl:sort select="type" />
</xsl:apply-templates>
</xsl:copy>
</xsl:template>
<xsl:template match="thing" mode="group">
<xsl:variable name="wholeGroup" select="key('kThingByType', type)" />
<xsl:if test="generate-id() = generate-id($wholeGroup[1])">
<xsl:element name="{type}-thing">
<xsl:copy-of select="$wholeGroup/value" />
</xsl:element>
</xsl:if>
</xsl:template>
The above yields:
<things>
<a-thing>
<value>one</value>
<value>four</value>
</a-thing>
<b-thing>
<value>two</value>
<value>thee</value>
</b-thing>
<d-thing>
<value>five</value>
</d-thing>
</things>
In XSLT 2, you can do this very elegantly. Say you have a template for formatting each thing before it is wrapped in an <a> element:
<xsl:template match="thing" mode="format-thing">
<xsl:value-of select="value/text()"/>
</xsl:template>
Then you can apply that to each thing of some $type to build the <a-things> elements via a function:
<xsl:function name="my:things-group" as="element()">
<xsl:param name="type" as="xs:string"/>
<xsl:param name="things" as="element(thing)*"/>
<xsl:element name="{ concat($type, '-things') }">
<xsl:for-each select="$things[type/text() eq $type]">
<xsl:element name="{ $type }">
<xsl:apply-templates select="." mode="format-thing"/>
</xsl:element>
</xsl:for-each>
</xsl:element>
</xsl:function>
Then you can call that function for each unique type (a, b, d in your sample input) to build the entire output and you're done:
<xsl:template match="/">
<data>
<xsl:sequence select="
for $type in distinct-values(things/thing/type/text())
return my:things-group($type, /things/thing)
"/>
</data>
</xsl:template>
Of course, asking the question made it obvious...
My solution does use an <xsl:if>, but I can't see how it couldn't now I think about it. My solution looks basically like:
<xsl:if test="/things/thing/type = 'a'">
<a-things>
<xsl:apply-templates select="/things/thing[type='a']" mode="a" />
</a-things>
</if>
<xsl:template match="/things/thing[type='a']" mode="a">
<a><xsl:value-of select="value"/>
</xsl:template>
And repeat for the other types. I've coded it up, and it seems to work just fine.
<a-things>
<xsl:for-each select="thing[type = 'a']">
<a><xsl:value-of select="./value" /></a>
</xsl:for-each>
</a-things>
If you want to get really snazzy, replace the <a-things> and the predicate with parameters and use attribute value templates:
<xsl:param name="type" />
<xsl:element name="{$type}-things">
<xsl:for-each select="thing[type = $type]">
<xsl:element name="{$type}"><xsl:value-of select="./value" /></xsl:element>
</xsl:for-each>
</xsl:element>
And using grouping, you can do it without the if:
<xsl:stylesheet version="1.0" xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform">
<xsl:template match="things">
<data>
<xsl:for-each select="thing[not(type=preceding-sibling::thing/type)]">
<xsl:variable name="type"><xsl:value-of select="type" /></xsl:variable>
<xsl:element name="concat($type, '-things')">
<xsl:for-each select="../thing[type=$type]">
<xsl:element name="$type">
<xsl:value-of select="value" />
</xsl:element>
</xsl:for-each>
</xsl:element>
</xsl:for-each>
</data>
</xsl:template>
</xsl:stylesheet>
Related
With XSLT 2.0, I am trying to create a list of relations between all children of given elements, in a document such as:
<doc>
<part1>
<name>John</name>
<name>Paul</name>
<name>George</name>
<name>Ringo</name>
<place>Liverpool</place>
</part1>
<part2>
<name>Romeo</name>
<name>Romeo</name>
<name>Juliet</name>
<fam>Montague</fam>
<fam>Capulet</fam>
</part2>
</doc>
The result I would like to obtain, ideally by conflating and weighing the identical relations, would be (in whatever order) something like:
<doc>
<part1>
<rel><name>John</name><name>Paul</name></rel>
<rel><name>John</name><name>George</name></rel>
<rel><name>John</name><name>Ringo</name></rel>
<rel><name>Paul</name><name>George</name></rel>
<rel><name>Paul</name><name>Ringo</name></rel>
<rel><name>George</name><name>Ringo</name></rel>
<rel><name>John</name><place>Liverpool</place></rel>
<rel><name>Paul</name><place>Liverpool</place></rel>
<rel><name>George</name><place>Liverpool</place></rel>
<rel><name>Ringo</name><place>Liverpool</place></rel>
</part1>
<part2>
<rel weight="2"><name>Romeo</name><name>Juliet</name></rel>
<rel weight="2"><name>Romeo</name><fam>Montague</fam></rel>
<rel weight="2"><name>Romeo</name><fam>Capulet</fam></rel>
<rel><name>Juliet</name><fam>Montague</fam></rel>
<rel><name>Juliet</name><fam>Capulet</fam></rel>
<rel><fam>Montague</fam><fam>Capulet</fam></rel>
</part2>
</doc>
—but I'm not sure how to proceed. Many thanks in advance for your help.
You still haven't explained the logic that needs to be applied here, so this is based largely on a guess:
XSLT 2.0
<xsl:stylesheet version="2.0"
xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform">
<xsl:output method="xml" version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" indent="yes"/>
<xsl:strip-space elements="*"/>
<!-- identity transform -->
<xsl:template match="/">
<xsl:copy>
<xsl:apply-templates select="#*|node()"/>
</xsl:copy>
</xsl:template>
<xsl:template match="doc/*">
<!-- first pass-->
<xsl:variable name="unique-items">
<xsl:for-each-group select="*" group-by="concat(name(), '|', .)">
<item name="{name()}" count="{count(current-group())}" value="{.}"/>
</xsl:for-each-group>
</xsl:variable>
<!-- output -->
<xsl:copy>
<xsl:for-each select="$unique-items/item">
<xsl:variable name="left" select="."/>
<xsl:for-each select="following-sibling::item">
<xsl:variable name="weight" select="$left/#count * #count" />
<rel>
<xsl:if test="$weight gt 1">
<xsl:attribute name="weight" select="$weight"/>
</xsl:if>
<xsl:apply-templates select="$left | ." />
</rel>
</xsl:for-each>
</xsl:for-each>
</xsl:copy>
</xsl:template>
<xsl:template match="item">
<xsl:element name="{#name}">
<xsl:value-of select="#value"/>
</xsl:element>
</xsl:template>
</xsl:stylesheet>
The idea here is to remove duplicates in the first pass, then enumerate all combinations in the second (final) pass. The weight is computed by multiplying the number of occurrences of each member of a combination pair and shown only when it exceeds 1.
At least the combinatoric part of your problem could be solved with the following XSLT script. It does not solve the elimination of duplicates, but that could possibly be done in a second transformation.
<xsl:stylesheet version="1.0"
xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform">
<!-- standard copy template -->
<xsl:template match="node()|#*">
<xsl:copy>
<xsl:apply-templates select="node()|#*" />
</xsl:copy>
</xsl:template>
<xsl:template match="doc/*">
<xsl:copy>
<xsl:variable name="l" select="./*"/>
<xsl:for-each select="$l">
<xsl:variable name="a" select="."/>
<xsl:variable name="posa" select="position()"/>
<xsl:variable name="namea" select="name()"/>
<xsl:for-each select="$l">
<xsl:if test="position() > $posa and (. != $a or name() != $namea)">
<rel>
<xsl:copy-of select="$a"/>
<xsl:copy-of select="."/>
</rel>
</xsl:if>
</xsl:for-each>
</xsl:for-each>
</xsl:copy>
</xsl:template>
</xsl:stylesheet>
When applied to the first part of your example, this produces:
<part1>
<rel><name>John</name><name>Paul</name></rel>
<rel><name>John</name><name>George</name></rel>
<rel><name>John</name><name>Ringo</name></rel>
<rel><name>John</name><place>Liverpool</place></rel>
<rel><name>Paul</name><name>George</name></rel>
<rel><name>Paul</name><name>Ringo</name></rel>
<rel><name>Paul</name><place>Liverpool</place></rel>
<rel><name>George</name><name>Ringo</name></rel>
<rel><name>George</name><place>Liverpool</place></rel>
<rel><name>Ringo</name><place>Liverpool</place></rel>
</part1>
Which seems about correct. If have no idea if the duplicate elimination (or weighting, as you call it) could be done in the same transformation.
Silly, simple question. When I output text, it still get the tabs based on my formatted/indented XSL structure. How do I instruct the transformer to ignore the spacing in the stylesheet while still keeping it neatly formatted?
<xsl:stylesheet version="1.0" xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform">
<xsl:output method="text"/>
<xsl:template match="/">
<xsl:apply-templates select="Foo/Bar"></xsl:apply-templates>
</xsl:template>
<xsl:template match="Bar">
<xsl:for-each select="AAA"><xsl:for-each select="BBB"><xsl:value-of select="Label"/>|<xsl:value-of select="Value"/><xsl:text>
</xsl:text></xsl:for-each></xsl:for-each>
</xsl:template>
</xsl:stylesheet>
Produces output line by line with no tabs:
SomeLabel|SomeValue
SomeLabel|SomeValue
SomeLabel|SomeValue
<xsl:stylesheet version="1.0" xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform">
<xsl:output method="text"/>
<xsl:template match="/">
<xsl:apply-templates select="Foo/Bar"></xsl:apply-templates>
</xsl:template>
<xsl:template match="Bar">
<xsl:for-each select="AAA">
<xsl:for-each select="BBB">
<xsl:value-of select="Label"/>|<xsl:value-of select="Value"/>
<xsl:text>
</xsl:text>
</xsl:for-each>
</xsl:for-each>
</xsl:template>
</xsl:stylesheet>
Produces output with tabs:
SomeLabel|SomeValue
SomeLabel|SomeValue
SomeLabel|SomeValue
Update:
Adding this does not fix it:
<xsl:output method="text" indent="no"/>
<xsl:strip-space elements="*"></xsl:strip-space>
This is contrived, but you can imagine the XML looks like this:
<Foo>
<Bar>
<AAA>
<BBB>
<Label>SomeLabel1</Label>
<Value>SomeValue1</Value>
</BBB>
<BBB>
<Label>SomeLabel2</Label>
<Value>SomeValue2</Value>
</BBB>
<BBB>
<Label>SomeLabel3</Label>
<Value>SomeValue3</Value>
</BBB>
</AAA>
</Bar>
</Foo>
What you could try is wrapping all your current text nodes in xsl:text. For example, try this
<xsl:for-each select="BBB">
<xsl:value-of select="Label"/>
<xsl:text>|</xsl:text>
<xsl:value-of select="Value"/>
<xsl:text>|</xsl:text>
</xsl:for-each>
Alternatively, you could make use of the concat function.
<xsl:for-each select="BBB">
<xsl:value-of select="concat(Label, '|')"/>
<xsl:value-of select="concat(Value, '|')"/>
</xsl:for-each>
You could even combine the two statements into one if you wanted
<xsl:for-each select="BBB">
<xsl:value-of select="concat(Label, '|', Value, '|')"/>
</xsl:for-each>
EDIT: If you prefer not to enter the separator | so many times, you make use of template matching to output the fileds. First, replace the value-of with apply-templates like so
<xsl:for-each select="BBB">
<xsl:apply-templates select="Label"/>
<xsl:apply-templates select="Value"/>
<xsl:text>
</xsl:text>
</xsl:for-each>
Then you would have one specific template to match Label, where you wouldn't need to output the separator, and another more generic template matching any child of BBB
<xsl:template match="BBB/Label" priority="1">
<xsl:value-of select="." />
</xsl:template>
<xsl:template match="BBB/*">
<xsl:text>|</xsl:text><xsl:value-of select="." />
</xsl:template>
(The priority here is needed to ensure Label is matched by the first template, and not the general one). Of course, you could also not do apply-templates on Label in this case, and just do xsl:value-of for that one.
Furthermore, if the fields were being output in the order they appear in the XML, you could simplify the for-each to just this
<xsl:for-each select="BBB">
<xsl:apply-templates />
<xsl:text>
</xsl:text>
</xsl:for-each>
i am trying to write an xslt code that will check whether the description element exist or not if it exist then it will show the description element but if it does not exist then it should not show the description element.but my code below still show element although there is no value in it.how can we code it so that it wont show out the description element if there is no description for a services.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<xsl:stylesheet version="1.0" xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform">
<xsl:template match="Service">
<xsl:element name="equipment">
<xsl:if test="description !='' ">
<xsl:value-of select="description" />
</xsl:if>
<xsl:if test="not(description)">
</xsl:if>
</xsl:element>
</xsl:template>
</xsl:stylesheet>
as there is the an empty equipment element being returned.i want it to return only the first 2 equipment element that is not empty.
Updated solution is follows; please check
<xsl:template match="Services">
<xsl:for-each select="Service">
<xsl:if test="count(description) > 0 and description!=''">
<equipment>
<xsl:value-of select="description"/>
</equipment>
</xsl:if>
</xsl:for-each>
</xsl:template>
</xsl:stylesheet>
<xsl:template match="/">
<xsl:apply-templates select="//Service"/>
</xsl:template>
<xsl:template match="Service">
<xsl:if test="description !='' ">
<xsl:element name="equipment">
<xsl:value-of select="description" />
</xsl:element>
</xsl:if>
</xsl:template>
or
<xsl:template match="/">
<xsl:apply-templates select="//Service"/>
</xsl:template>
<xsl:template match="Service">
<xsl:if test="child::description[text()]">
<xsl:element name="equipment">
<xsl:value-of select="description" />
</xsl:element>
</xsl:if>
</xsl:template>
Does this work for you?
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<xsl:transform version="1.0" xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform">
<!-- place <result /> as root to produce wellformed XML -->
<xsl:template match="/">
<result><xsl:apply-templates /></result>
</xsl:template>
<!-- rewrite those <Service /> that have a <description /> -->
<xsl:template match="Service[./description]">
<equipment><xsl:value-of select="description" /></equipment>
</xsl:template>
<!-- remove those who do not -->
<xsl:template match="Service[not(./description)]" />
</xsl:transform>
is it possible to do the following in xsl. I'm tring to split the contents of an element and create sub-elements based on the split. To make things trickier there are the occasional exception (ie node-4 doesn't get split). I'm wondering if there is a way i can do this without explicit splits hardcoded for each element. Again, not sure if this is possible. thanks for the help!
original XML:
<document>
<node>
<node-1>hello world1</node-1>
<node-2>hello^world2</node-2>
<node-3>hello^world3</node-3>
<node-4>hello^world4</node-4>
</node>
</document>
transformed XML
<document>
<node>
<node-1>hello world1</node-1>
<node-2>
<node2-1>hello</node2-1>
<node2-2>world2</node2-2>
</node-2>
<node-3>
<node3-1>hello</node3-1>
<node3-2>world3</node3-2>
</node-3>
<node-4>hello^world4</node-4>
</node>
</document>
To make things trickier there are the
occasional exception (ie node-4
doesn't get split). I'm wondering if
there is a way i can do this without
explicit splits hardcoded for each
element.
Pattern matching text nodes to tokenize, this more semantic stylesheet:
<xsl:stylesheet version="1.0" xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform">
<xsl:template match="node()|#*">
<xsl:copy>
<xsl:apply-templates select="node()|#*"/>
</xsl:copy>
</xsl:template>
<xsl:template match="text()[contains(.,'^')]" name="tokenize">
<xsl:param name="pString" select="concat(.,'^')"/>
<xsl:param name="pCount" select="1"/>
<xsl:if test="$pString">
<xsl:element name="{translate(name(..),'-','')}-{$pCount}">
<xsl:value-of select="substring-before($pString,'^')"/>
</xsl:element>
<xsl:call-template name="tokenize">
<xsl:with-param name="pString"
select="substring-after($pString,'^')"/>
<xsl:with-param name="pCount" select="$pCount + 1"/>
</xsl:call-template>
</xsl:if>
</xsl:template>
<xsl:template match="node-4/text()">
<xsl:value-of select="."/>
</xsl:template>
</xsl:stylesheet>
Output:
<document>
<node>
<node-1>hello world1</node-1>
<node-2>
<node2-1>hello</node2-1>
<node2-2>world2</node2-2>
</node-2>
<node-3>
<node3-1>hello</node3-1>
<node3-2>world3</node3-2>
</node-3>
<node-4>hello^world4</node-4>
</node>
</document>
Note: A classic tokenizer (In fact, this use a normalized string allowing empty items in sequence). Pattern matching and overwriting rules (preserving node-4 text node).
Here's an XSL 1.0 solution. I presume that the inconsistency in node-4 in your sample output was just a typo. Otherwise you'll have to define why node3 was split and node4 wasn't.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<xsl:stylesheet xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform"
xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" version="1.0">
<xsl:output method="xml" indent="yes"/>
<xsl:template match="/">
<document>
<node>
<xsl:apply-templates select="document/node/*"/>
</node>
</document>
</xsl:template>
<xsl:template match="*">
<xsl:variable name="tag" select="name()"/>
<xsl:choose>
<xsl:when test="contains(text(),'^')">
<xsl:element name="{$tag}">
<xsl:element name="{concat($tag,'-1')}">
<xsl:value-of select="substring-before(text(),'^')"/>
</xsl:element>
<xsl:element name="{concat($tag,'-2')}">
<xsl:value-of select="substring-after(text(),'^')"/>
</xsl:element>
</xsl:element>
</xsl:when>
<xsl:otherwise>
<xsl:copy-of select="."/>
</xsl:otherwise>
</xsl:choose>
</xsl:template>
</xsl:stylesheet>
This works as long as all the nodes you want split are at the same level, under /document/node. If the real document structure is different you will have to tweak the solution to match.
Can you use XSLT 2.0? If so, it sounds like <xsl:analyze-string> is right up your alley. You can split based on a regexp.
If you need further details, ask...
solution i used:
<xsl:output omit-xml-declaration="yes" method="xml" indent="yes"/>
<xsl:preserve-space elements="*"/>
<xsl:template match="node()|#*" name="identity">
<xsl:copy>
<xsl:apply-templates select="node()[1]|#*"/>
</xsl:copy>
<xsl:apply-templates select="following-sibling::node()[1]"/>
</xsl:template>
<xsl:template match="node()" mode="copy">
<xsl:call-template name="identity"/>
</xsl:template>
<xsl:template match="node-2 | node-3" name="subFieldCarrotSplitter">
<xsl:variable name="tag" select="name()"/>
<xsl:element name="{$tag}">
<xsl:for-each select="str:split(text(),'^')">
<xsl:element name="{concat($tag,'-',position())}">
<xsl:value-of select="text()"/>
</xsl:element>
</xsl:for-each>
</xsl:element>
<xsl:apply-templates select="following-sibling::node()[1]"/>
</xsl:template>
Given the following XML fragment:
<foo>
<bar>1</bar>
<bar>2</bar>
<bar>3</bar>
</foo>
The following XSL should work:
<xsl:template match="/">
<xsl:apply-templates
mode="items"
select="bar" />
</xsl:template>
<xsl:template mode="items" match="bar">
<xsl:value-of select="." />
</xsl:template>
Is there a way I can use a similar format to this to apply a template when there are no <bar/> entities? For example:
<xsl:template match="/">
<xsl:apply-templates
mode="items"
select="bar" />
</xsl:template>
<xsl:template mode="items" match="bar">
<xsl:value-of select="." />
</xsl:template>
<xsl:template mode="items" match="none()">
There are no items.
</xsl:template>
Yes.
But the logic should be:
<xsl:template match="foo">
<xsl:apply-templates select="bar"/>
</xsl:template>
<xsl:template match="foo[not(bar)]">
There are no items.
</xsl:template>
Note: It's foo element which is having or not having bar children.
One could also use this pattern to avoid extra chooses:
<xsl:template match="/*">
<xsl:apply-templates select="bar" mode="items"/>
<xsl:apply-templates select="(.)[not(bar)]" mode="show-absence-message"/>
</xsl:template>
<xsl:template match="bar" mode="items">
<xsl:value-of select="."/>
</xsl:template>
<xsl:template match="/*" mode="show-absence-message">
There are no items.
</xsl:template>
No, when you have apply-templates select="bar" and the context node does not have any bar child elements then no nodes are processed and therefore no templates are applied. You could however change your code in the template doing the apply-templates to e.g.
<xsl:choose>
<xsl:when test="bar">
<xsl:apply-templates select="bar"/>
</xsl:when>
<xsl:otherwise>There are not items.</xsl:otherwise>
</xsl:choose>
Given the following XML fragment:
<foo>
<bar>1</bar>
<bar>2</bar>
<bar>3</bar>
</foo>
The following XSL should work:
<xsl:template match="/">
<xsl:apply-templates mode="items" select="bar" />
</xsl:template>
<xsl:template mode="items" match="bar">
<xsl:value-of select="." />
</xsl:template>
No, the <xsl:apply-templates> above doesn't select any node at all.
Is there a way I can use a similar
format to this to apply a template
when there are no entities?
Yes:
<xsl:stylesheet version="1.0"
xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform">
<xsl:output omit-xml-declaration="yes" indent="yes"/>
<xsl:template match="/*[not(bar)]">
No <bar/> s.
</xsl:template>
<xsl:template match="/*[bar]">
<xsl:value-of select="count(bar)"/> <bar/> s.
</xsl:template>
</xsl:stylesheet>
when applied to the provided XML document:
<foo>
<bar>1</bar>
<bar>2</bar>
<bar>3</bar>
</foo>
the result is:
3<bar/> s.
When applied to this XML document:
<foo>
<baz>1</baz>
<baz>2</baz>
<baz>3</baz>
</foo>
the result is:
No <bar/> s.