I am not able to understand the following statement from the file limits.h. What is the use of this statement and what does it accomplishes?
/* If we are not using GNU CC we have to define all the symbols ourself.
Otherwise use gcc's definitions (see below). */
#if !defined __GNUC__ || __GNUC__ < 2
It checks if your program is compiled by some other compiler than GCC, or some very old GCC version.
It checks whether you are not using a Gcc compiler Version 2 or Gcc some other versions.
using this pre-processor macro we can some portable codes.
Related
There is CLang-CL which is a drop-in replacement for MSVC's CL.
Does anyone know how to distinguish if my code is currently compiled by clang-cl or msvc's cl? Without passing any extra defined macros on command line.
Using
#ifdef _MSC_VER
//.....
#endif
doesn't work, both compilers define _MSC_VER.
Also in regular CLang on Linux (Windows too) it was possible to do clang -dM -E - < /dev/null which dumps all defined macros. But clang-cl and msvc-cl both don't have such option to dump all defined macros as far as I know, so I don't know of a way to see a difference in list of defined macros for both compilers to figure out which macro to use to distinguish between these compilers.
The macro you're looking for is __clang__.
Note that the regular Clang (not only Clang-CL) also defines it, so you want to check for both __clang__ and _MSC_VER at the same time.
I am working on a project that has been built with both gcc and msvc so far. We recently started building with clang as well.
There are some parts in the code, where platform-specific things are done:
#ifndef _WIN32
// ignore this in msvc
#endif
Since gcc has previously been the only non-windows build, this was equivalent to saying "do this only for gcc". But now it means "do this only for gcc and clang".
However there are still situations, where I would like to handle something specifically for gcc, and not for clang. Is there a simple and robust way to detect gcc, i.e.
#ifdef ???
// do this *only* for gcc
#endif
__GNUC__
__GNUC_MINOR__
__GNUC_PATCHLEVEL__
These macros are defined by all GNU compilers that use the C preprocessor: C, C++, Objective-C and Fortran. Their values are the major version, minor version, and patch level of the compiler, as integer constants. For example, GCC 3.2.1 will define __GNUC__ to 3, __GNUC_MINOR__ to 2, and __GNUC_PATCHLEVEL__ to 1. These macros are also defined if you invoke the preprocessor directly.
Also:
__GNUG__
The GNU C++ compiler defines this. Testing it is equivalent to testing (__GNUC__ && __cplusplus).
Source
Apparently, clang uses them too. However it also defines:
__clang__
__clang_major__
__clang_minor__
__clang_patchlevel__
So you can do:
#ifdef __GNUC__
#ifndef __clang__
...
Or even better (note the order):
#if defined(__clang__)
....
#elif defined(__GNUC__) || defined(__GNUG__)
....
#elif defined(_MSC_VER)
....
I use this define:
#define GCC_COMPILER (defined(__GNUC__) && !defined(__clang__))
And test with it:
#if GCC_COMPILER
...
#endif
With Boost, this becomes very simple:
#include <boost/predef.h>
#if BOOST_COMP_GNUC
// do this *only* for gcc
#endif
See also the Using the predefs section of the boost documentation.
(credit to rubenvb who mentioned this in a comment, to Alberto M for adding the include, and to Frederik Aalund for correcting #ifdef to #if)
I have some code that requires a certain gcc compiler option (otherwise it won't compile). Of course, I can make sure in the makefile that for this particular source file the required option is set. However, it would much more helpful, if this option could be set for the respective compilation unit (or part of it) from within the source_file.cpp.
I know that warning messages can be switched on or off using #pragma GCC diagnostic, but what about the -fsomething type of options? I take it from this question that this is impossible.
But perhaps there is at least a way to check from within the code whether a certain -f option is on or not?
Note I'm not interested in finding the compiler flags from the binary, as was asked previously, nor from the command line.
In my experience, no. This is not the way you go about this. Instead, you put compiler/platform/OS specific code in your source, and wrap it with the appropriate ifdef statements. These include:
#ifdef __GNUC__
/*code for GNU C compiler */
#elif _MSC_VER
/*usually has the version number in _MSC_VER*/
/*code specific to MSVC compiler*/
#elif __BORLANDC__
/*code specific to borland compilers*/
#elif __MINGW32__
/*code specific to mingw compilers*/
#endif
Within this, you can have version-specific requirements and code:
#ifdef __GNUC__
# include <features.h>
# if __GNUC_PREREQ(4,0)
// If gcc_version >= 4.0
# elif __GNUC_PREREQ(3,2)
// If gcc_version >= 3.2
# else
// Else
# endif
#else
// If not gcc
#endif
From there, you have your makefile pass the appropriate compiler flags based on the compiler type, version, etc, and you're all set.
You can try using some #pragma. See GCC diagnostic pragmas & GCC function specific pragmas.
Otherwise, develop your GCC plugin or your MELT extension and have it provide a pragma which sets the appropriate variables or compiler state inside GCC (actually cc1plus)
How to detect at compile time if I'm using gcc or icc?
(I was quite puzzled to find out that icc defines __GNUC__ -- and even __GNUC_MINOR__ and __GNUC_PATCHLEVEL__ ! why?)
We use
#ifdef __INTEL_COMPILER
to split icc off, assuming gcc as a default.
I believe you could check for __INTEL_COMPILER according to this.
The reason ICC defines __GNUC__ etc. is because of code like yours that is inspecting compiler-specific macros and expects to see them...
Traditionally, compilers have defined a symbol of their own as well as their version as preprocessor symbols so that the code could be adapted (generally to work around bugs or specificities).
CLang has introduced a mechanism I had not seen so far, under the form of the __has_feature query. It does not replace the "work around bugs" practices (which is why CLang still exposes specific symbols) but allows a more natural style for querying the compiler capacities. I don't know if other compilers plan on defining such a facility.
You can make the processor output the defined macros in the preprocessor output and look for a macro that suits you. You can generated the preprocessor output like this:
icc -dM -E -o foo.P foo.c
Then look at foo.P (since it is a text file). In my case, I found icc defined an __ICC macro with the version of the compiler. It didn't define any __INTEL_COMPILER though.
I'm trying to determine if C++0x features are available when compiling. Is there a common preprocessor macro? I'm using Visual Studio 2010's compiler and Intel's compiler.
The macro __cplusplus will have a value greater than 199711L.
That said, not all compilers will fill this value out. Better to use Roger's solution.
The usual way to do this is determine it in the build system, and pass "configuration macros", commonly named HAS_*, when compiling. For example: compiler -DHAS_LAMBDA source.cpp.
If you can determine this from compiler version macro, then you can define these macros in a configuration header which checks that; however, you won't be able to do this for anything controlled by a command-line option. Your build system does know what options you specify, however, and can use that info.
See boost.config for a real example and lots of details about specific compilers, versions, and features.
We've had similar problems with nullptr and auto_ptr. Here's what we're trying to use until somehing is standardized:
#include <cstddef>
...
// GCC: compile with -std=c++0x
#if defined(__GNUC__) && ((__GNUC__ == 4 && __GNUC_MINOR__ >= 6) || (__GNUC__ >= 5))
# define HACK_GCC_ITS_CPP0X 1
#endif
#if defined(nullptr_t) || (__cplusplus > 199711L) || defined(HACK_GCC_ITS_CPP0X)
# include <memory>
using std::unique_ptr;
# define THE_AUTO_PTR unique_ptr
#else
# include <memory>
using std::auto_ptr;
# define THE_AUTO_PTR auto_ptr
#endif
It works well on GCC and Microsoft's Visual Studio. By the way, nullptr is a keyword and can't be tested - hence the reason for the nullptr_t test.