Admin actions can act on the selected objects in the list page.
Is it possible to act on all the filtered objects?
For example if the admin search for Product names that start with "T-shirt" which results with 400 products and want to increase the price of all of them by 10%.
If the admin can only modify a single page of result at a time it will take a lot of effort.
Thanks
The custom actions are supposed to be used on a group of selected objects, so I don't think there is a standard way of doing what you want.
But I think I have a hack that might work for you... (meaning: use at your own risk and it is untested)
In your action function the request.GET will contain the q parameter used in the admin search. So if you type "T-Shirt" in the search, you should see request.GET look something like:
<QueryDict: {u'q': [u'T-Shirt']}>
You could completely disregard the querystring parameter that your custom action function receives and build your own queryset based on that request.GET's q parameter. Something like:
def increase_price_10_percent(modeladmin, request, queryset):
if request.GET['q'] is None:
# Add some error handling
queryset=Product.objects.filter(name__contains=request.GET['q'])
# Your code to increase price in 10%
increase_price_10_percent.short_description = "Increases price 10% for all products in the search result"
I would make sure to forbid any requests where q is empty. And where you read name__contains you should be mimicking whatever filter you created for the admin of your product object (so, if the search is only looking at the name field, name__contains might suffice; if it looks at the name and description, you would have a more complex filter here in the action function too).
I would also, maybe, add an intermediate page stating what models will be affected and have the user click on "I really know what I'm doing" confirmation button. Look at the code for django.contrib.admin.actions for an example of how to list what objects are being deleted. It should point you in the right direction.
NOTE: the users would still have to select something in the admin page, otherwise the action function would never get called.
This is a more generic solution, is not fully tested(and its pretty naive), so it might break with strange filters. For me works with date filters, foreign key filters, boolean filters.
def publish(modeladmin,request,queryset):
kwargs = {}
for filter,arg in request.GET.items():
kwargs.update({filter:arg})
queryset = queryset.filter(**kwargs)
queryset.update(published=True)
Related
I have to make dashboard like view in flask-admin that will use data retrieved from external API. I have already written a functions that get date ranges and return data from that range. I should use BaseView probably but I don't know how to actually write it to make filters work. This is example function that i have to use: charts = generate_data_for_dashboard('164', '6423FACA-FC71-489D-BF32-3A671AB747E3', '2018-03-01', '2018-09-01'). Those params should be chosen from 3 different dropdowns. So far I know only how to render views with pre coded data like this :
class DashboardView(BaseView):
kwargs = {}
#expose('/', methods=('GET',))
def statistics_charts(self):
user = current_user
company = g.company
offices = Office.query.filter_by(company_id=company.id)
self.kwargs['user'] = user
self.kwargs['company'] = company
charts = generate_data_for_dashboard('164', '6423FACA-FC71-489D-BF32-3A671AB747E3', '2018-03-01', '2018-09-01')
self.kwargs['chart1'] = charts[0]
self.kwargs['chart2'] = charts[1]
return self.render('stats/dashboard.html', **self.kwargs)
But I need some kind of form to filter it. In addition date filter dropdown should have dynamic options : current_week, last_week, current_month, last_month, last_year. Don't know where to start.
You should use WTForms to build a form. You then have to decide if you want the data to be fetched on Submit or without a reload of the page. In the former case, you can just return the fetched information on the response page in your statistics_charts view. But if you want the data to update without a reload, you'll need to use JavaScript to track the form field changes, send the AJAX request to the API, and then interpret the resulting JSON and update your dashboard graphs and tables as needed.
I have not used it, but this tutorial says you can use Dash for substantial parts of this task, while mostly writing in Python. So that could be something to check out. There is also flask_jsondash which might work for you.
Good day! I have the object list in admins's cabinet, I must add the flag in front of each item to select (True / False), for example, on this picture
How do I make this with standard methods of Django?
In my case, i have page, for example
I must create checkbox for multichoice and action
You just need to add at least one action. Standard "delete_selected" apparently removed.
class FakeAdmin(admin.ModelAdmin):
actions = ['fake_action']
def fake_action(self, request, queryset):
queryset.update()
So I'm new to Django...
First some background on how we do things now. We have a custom php system but I am constructing an improved inventory management system in django using only the admin interface. We store part numbers, and it is essential that we do not store duplicates. Part numbers can sometimes be entered with hypens, periods, spaces, etc. We need to be sure that duplicate parts are not added no matter what kind of formatting is entered. With our existing non-django system, we use a regex to strip anything from the string that is not a-zA-Z0-9. The actual entered part number is persisted, and the cleaned number is persisted to the db as well. Then when someone is adding a new part or even searching for a part, this cleaned version of the part number helps to avoid this ambiguity. We do the same for the manufacturer name.
My way of emulating this in django was to add the part_number_clean field along with the part_number field to the model. Then I overrode the save method to calculate the clean part number like so (manufacturer as well):
def save(self, *args, **kwargs):
self.manufacturer_clean = re.sub(r'[^a-zA-Z0-9]', '', self.manufacturer).lower()
self.part_number_clean = re.sub(r'[^a-zA-Z0-9]', '', self.part_number).lower()
super(CatalogProduct, self).save(*args, **kwargs)
The problem is, I need to unique on a combination of part number and manufacturer:
class Meta:
unique_together = ('part_number_clean ', 'manufacturer_clean ')
When I try to save a duplicate record, I get a database integrity violation. So it seems like django is evaluating the unique fields before the save function is called (which makes sense). I just need to know how or which method I should override to calculate these fields BEFORE any validation.
Additionally, I am interested in adding a third field to the unique_together mix that may or may not be filled out. If it is not filled it will just have an empty default value. I hope this will not cause any issues.
It would also be great if when the user tabbed-out of the manufacturer and part number fields, and both were not empty, some js would see if that product exists already, and offer the user the option to click a button and be whisked away to that record, before they waste their time filling out the rest of the data only to find that it already exists. I'm guessing this lies way outside the realm of the admin interface without serious hacking. Is there any way to somehow integrate this with the admin interface? Its working great for me up till now...
I figured it out. I'm posting the answer for anyone else that is curious. This was actually very simple in the end to implement in the model. All one needs to do is implement (override?) the clean() method of the model. In the method, I calculate and set my special fields, then be sure to call self.validate_unique() after. Works like a charm! No need to raise any exceptions, the form will display the error on top perfectly. Doing this in the save method will not work, as the exception cannot be thrown by your code or django at that point. Here is the code:
class CatalogProduct(models.Model):
manufacturer = models.CharField(max_length=100)
manufacturer_clean = models.CharField('Manufacturer',max_length=100,blank=True,editable=False)
part_number = models.CharField(max_length=100)
part_number_clean = models.CharField('Part number',max_length=100,blank=True,editable=False)
def clean(self):
# Calculate manufacturer_clean and part_number_clean
self.manufacturer_clean = re.sub(r'[^a-zA-Z0-9]', '', self.manufacturer).lower()
self.part_number_clean = re.sub(r'[^a-zA-Z0-9]', '', self.part_number).lower()
self.validate_unique()
The model is only responsible for describing data and how that data should be represented between your Python and database environment. It's because of this atomic role that models don't care about validation and what you've just went in there and introduced it.
You need a model form. It can clean the manufacturer and part number and also ensure that uniqueness constraints are satisfied as part of the validation process.
I've been using django-notification (https://github.com/jtauber/django-notification.git) but the documentation is a little brief for a beginner.
I want to be able to have users keep a watch on searches (a results page with product listings) that have no results at the time of search. Then if a record is added that matches the search, the user should be notified.
I can't find any online explanation of how to use 'observe', which I think is what i'd need to use to watch for records appearing (in search results)? Perhaps, this is the wrong approach (using django-notification) as I need a signal to await the occurrence of a filter result that would initially contain no objects...
(the project is too developed to consider an option like Pinax to provide a template for things like this)
I suppose I need to evaluate
f=Products.objects.filter({search_request_args})
if f:
notification.send([request.user], "product_match", {"from_user": settings.FROM_DEFAULT})
Perhaps as a chron job?
It looks like you want to use django signals (see: https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/topics/signals/)
let's say you want to watch the creation of Product objects
from django.db.models.signals import post_save
from my_app.models import Product
def new_product(sender, instance, created, **kwargs):
# short-circuit the function if it isn't a new product (it's
# being updated not created)
if not created: return
# note: instance is the newly saved Product object
if (check_if_the_new_product_matches_searches_here):
notification.send(...)
post_save.connect(new_product, sender=Product)
I want to use django's admin filter on the list page.
The models I have are something like this:
class Location(model):
name = CharField()
class Inquiry(Model):
name = CharFiled()
location = ManyToManyField(Location)
Now I want to filter Inquiries, to display only those that contain relation to specific Location object. If I use
class InqAdmin(ModelAdmin):
list_filter = ['location', ]
admin.site.register(Inquiry, InqAdmin)
the admin page displays me the list of all Locations and allows to filter.
What I would like to get, is to get list of only those locations that have some Inquiries in relation to them (so I don't ever get the empty list result after filtering).
How can this be done?
You could create a custom manager for Locations that only returns Locations that have an Inquiry associated with them. If you make this the default manager, the admin will use it.
Only caveat is that you'll need create another manager that returns all Locations and use that in the rest of your app whenever you want to retrieve Locations that don't have an associated Inquiry.
The managers section in the Django docs is quite good, and should be all you need to get this set up.
EDIT:
sienf brings up a good point. Another way to accomplish this would be to define a subclass of django.contrib.admin.SimpleListFilter, and write the queryset method to filter out Inquiries with empty Locations. See https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/ref/contrib/admin/#django.contrib.admin.ModelAdmin.list_filter