I'm not familiar with Filnet P8.
My assumptions from reading some online docs is that it has a central web-based user interface called Workplace which is implemented on the Java web stack and communicates with the core parts of Filenet through Java APIs.
Also it seems you can extend the Workplace trough JSR 186 compliant portlets. - from what I've read Filnet P8 Workplace is not a portal itself and cannot host portlets, but provides some of the functionality as portlets which can be used with 3rd party portals.
Filenet also seems to have a lot of extensibility points which don't require coding, but I'm considering a highly-customized application with custom dynamic grids and forms.
Is it possible to extend the Workplace using portlets and/or plain JSP/Servlet approach with custom GUI for a custom workflow? (Probably the "Web Application Toolkit" is the tool)
The GUI can contain grids with filtering and column selection, forms (not paper once) with dynamically disabling/enabling fields, custom search forms, dynamic context and dropdown menus.
The GUI should be able to integrate with the Content and Process engines of course.
A link to an existing Filenet P8 based solution which proves such a custom Workplace GUI extension possible would be great.
Thanks!
This is possible. First of all Workplace comes with FULL source code. Look in the AESource directory (usually in c:\Program Files\FileNet\AE if you are running it on Windows). What you need to decide first of all is where you want to plug in (for example do you want to create a new Wokrplace page altogether like the Browse and Search pages or do you want to splice it in as a new action like Checkout, Get-Info etc).
Once you figure that out, I can provide more specific information of where you want to look to add your new code. Once you can display an entry point to your own feature in Workplace, then you can use whatever you want as far as controls etc. You can use JSF grids or just classic JSP stuff or even JQuery controls (provided you link the right libs etc).
Another thing to keep in mind is that you are going to need to get familiar with the Web Application Toolkit (WAT) so that you can make sure you are getting the right state information from Workplace (like the user token of who is logged in, maybe what doc id the user clicked on, what folder they were in when they entered your UI).
Anyways, here is some info to get you started. If you provide more info about where you want to splice your UI in, I can provide some guidance as what you need to change etc.
Related
In our company we use a native win32 UI framework written in C++. There are several controlls where Ranorex Spy doesn't "see" any useful information for identification or verification.
Is there some API in Ranorex that can be used to make it compatible with such a framework?
Changing the framework to make it more Ranorex-friendly is not going to happen (company politics).
I've had a similar issue where the application I'm testing has a list box, with items in it, however Ranorex was not picking up anything beyond the list box. In fact, it actually recognized it as a plain 'Element', rather than a list box.
To fix, try this...
Right click the object (in my case it was the Element)and click "Add process name to GDI capture list".
In my case, it added a bunch of text objects under the Element, which enabled me to actually "See" the info I needed.
I have JSP project which uses Liferay framework. There are default Liferay cookies named COOKIE_SUPPORT and GUEST_LANGUAGE_ID in Liferay. I dont want hackers to view any of my technology information by any means. How can I rename these cookie?
If you want to protect the framework you're using, you won't have to worry about the names of the cookies. Worry about server identification, elements of the DOM, structure and mechanics of URLs, secure&hardened setup of your server, common translations, default content, standard error messages, etc.
In other words: If you don't want to give away, which standard framework you're using (and this is not limited to Liferay) you'll have to roll your own. Good luck with getting this as powerful and as well tested as any standard framework.
Rather worry about keeping your systems updated all the time and protect from well known vulnerabilities in older systems. For hardening Liferay specifically, you might want to start with my blog series on securing Liferay (linking chapter 1 which refers to the other chapters)
Promoting a comment into this answer: One way to find out how to change them is to search for their names in the source code and identify the kind of plugin you need to provide different values - most likely this will be an ext-plugin. After all, Liferay's source is available. I don't see anything short of this.
I'm creating a bukkit plugin that's making a world in Minecraft outside the ordinary and that includes having NPCs (bots) entities that look like actually players and not villagers. I've already got the bots working programming wise but I want to have each bot have a different skin based upon it's name. Can I do this with maybe a resource pack or something? currently they take the names of Minecraft players with the same name but I'd like to override this.
TL;DR
Can I change the appearance of player entities by name with:
a Resourcepack?
a server side command?
playerConnection.sendPacket?
This is currently not possible without modifications to the client. If you want to, you can use Spoutcraft, but this requires users of the plugin to have the Spoutcraft launcher for the textures to show correctly.
There's no way to do this with the vanilla client, however, short of buying a bunch of Minecraft accounts and assigning them appropriate skins.
You should try out the DisguiseCraft plugin for a quick fix. DisguiseCraft is currently available on the Bukkit website. Do keep in mind that it also requires ProtocolLib to function properly, and you will need to have both installed on your server. You may find a link for ProtocolLib through the DisguiseCraft page. I currently use the two on my server and have had no issues with functionality.
If you would prefer a more direct approach however, since you are coding your own plugin, consider looking over the Lib's Disguises Developer API. Like DisguiseCraft, it too requires ProtocolLib, but the source for Lib's is publicly available and is intended to target developers. Just like DisguiseCraft, you may find a link for ProtocolLib through the Lib's page.
I just started to look into Sitecore and I was wondering if anyone can help me enlighten what / how it is exactly from a developer perspective.
I've gone through bunch of their documentation and also their SDN - seems to me so far most of them are just drag/drop click here and there through their interface (ie. through their "Sitecore Desktop") with very minor actual programming.
Is this true? or are their actual C# / ASP.Net programming behind the scene to implement business logic and such?
I went through their basic tutorial (creating basic site for Product), and like I mentioned above, it's all mostly done through their interface without any real programming - as opposed to working with the ASP.Net MVC3 Music Store tutorial where you can see some C# programming.
Thanks!
A Sitecore developer should have the most intense and deepest understanding of Sitecore in general. Developers need to understand the CMS user's perspective (i.e. content editor's POV), they need to understand the architecture of content within the content tree, and they need to know the code, which they build. A developer should have the most intimate knowledge of a Sitecore solution because you need to know the architecture to know how to code. And to know the architecture means you know how content editors will interact with the content.
Architecture
Sitecore is a souped up database. Think of it like that. You can architecture a site how you want. But once you start to learn the principles of Sitecore architecture and best practices you'll notice a pattern. Everything in the content tree is an item. The model for each item (called a template in Sitecore terms) is defined by an architect (which is often often a developer). In fact, even if there's a separate person for the architect role, they likely have developer knowledge as architecture defines the way things are developed. In fact, the architecture is one of the most important things.
Code
Code is broken down into various types, but in its simplest form there are two main things: layouts and sublayouts.
Think of a layout as what a normal a ASP.NET application uses a MasterPage for. In Sitecore, a layout is actually a ASPX WebForm, but it acts as a master page. Some examples of layouts you could have on your site are: One Column Layout, Two Column Layout, Print Layout. These would respectively translate to a header and footer with one main content area, a header and footer with a main column and side bar, and a print-optimized layout with maybe a logo and just main content.
Sublayouts are all of the little components that make up a page. Examples include: main navigation, a promo box in your side bar, a list of 5 recent news pieces, a CTA for a promotion, a sidebar slide show, etc. These components could be modular and moved around by content editors, or they can be fixed within the location of layouts, e.g. a promo box could always appear in the sidebar of the Two Column layout as a business rule defined in the code.
To answer your question about is there actual coding, yes. You write code using ASP.NET controls for Sitecore and Sitecore's C# API to access data that is populated into the templates on each item. So, if you had an item for a page that had a page title for the title tag, your code would use the Sitecore API to access the field "Title Tag" from the template (remember a template in Sitecore speak is a data model) in Sitecore.
Coding For Sitecore
I'd say there are two approaches to coding. I believe you identified one of them, which is using the internal tools within Sitecore's interface. Sitecore has a section called Developer Center that lets you create layouts and sublayouts. Frankly, compare this to using Visual Studio in Design Mode all of the time. I have never once used the Developer Center to do my coding. Instead, I code in Visual Studio which is the most common technique for people to code for Sitecore (at least I think it is). Now if you're wondering, how does the coding connect to Sitecore's data... well the answer is within Sitecore. There's a section of the tree called Layouts. In here are the names of your layouts and sublayouts. Each layout and sublayout item has a path that maps to either a ASPX WebForm or ASCX User Control, respectively. This is how the code on the file system that you write in Visual Studio actually gets used by Sitecore. These layout and sublayout items are then used via the Presentation > Details tabs for each item in Sitecore.
Beginners
One of the hardest things with Sitecore is the learning curve. I've been using Sitecore for years now and love it. In fact, its all I really do. It's by far my favorite CMS as its completely customizable and very developer-friendly. Sitecore recommends that new developers take the developer training classes so they can basically explain what I explained above in an actual training curriculum. In this training you will learn the architecture, and then how the code connects to it. Training involves hand-on architecture work within the content tree and hands-on coding. The recommend training courses for new developers are:
Getting Started With Sitecore Development: Sitecore XP 8 Website Development for .NET Developers (4 days, certification)
Further Training for Sitecore Certified Developers - Sitecore XP 8 Livefire MVC Workshop (1 day, no certification)
Sitecore is an ASP.NET application. That means that you can write any code you like. Our team creates all of the Sublayouts (ASCX files) and Layouts (ASPX files) ourselves in Visual Studio, not the editors built in to Sitecore.
Some installations of Sitecore that I have seen barely rely on the CMS to do the rendering. Instead values are pulled via the codebehind as if Sitecore was just a database. That can work fine in some situations.
The most impressive Sitecore instances use all of the available tools that the developer has access to. Using the Sitecore tools the way they were designed to be used allows some pretty impressive editing options for the (often non-technical) content editors.
For example: Using a Sitecore Fieldrenderer instead of just a placeholder or label will not only automatically render content appropriately (whether they are images or rich text), but it will allow the content editor to edit the content right on the web page as opposed to the only on back end that all CMS systems have.
Workflow is another killer feature for a customer that is the right size to afford Sitecore. It lets you build an approval process for items in the tree. That way legal, marketing and the graphics team call all sign off on a new page before it goes live. Then when all of the approvals are finalized, the site publishes automatically.
To sum up: Sitecore is a .NET application, you can code whatever you want. That means you should focus on the CMS features and make sure it is a good fit for you from a content editor perspective and a financial perspective.
Sitecore is in most cases just drag & drop as you've described in terms of content authoring but to actually turn this content into a webpage you need to implement layouts, sublayouts and so on.
Layouts are generic ASP.NET pages (aspx), sublayouts are just web controls (ascx) and if you prefer you can also use XSLT to generate HTML but it's useful only for basics (Sitecore only supports XSLT 1 at this moment). These ASP.NET controls are more less the same as standard web forms controls with code behind and so on. The difference is that Sitecore is your datasource and it gives you an APIs to access all relevant applications.
But Sitecore APIs also goes beyond that and allows you programatic access to virtually any component of the framework. The APIs are well docummented and quite easy to understand and they can be used for more complex scenarios.
Latest version of Sitecore (6.4) allows you to also use MVC framework for layouts/sublayouts creation if you don't like web forms that much.
Layouts and sublayouts are a great way todo any customizations from a coding standpoint but there is a third way that is not mentioned here. We call it sitecore extensions. I often find that to meet customer requirements, creating custom assembly's for workflow actions or template commands is the only way.
For example, a standard email notification upon entry into a workflow state only allows for you to apply server, recipient, description etc.. to action item field. In our case these values constantly change so we need to be more dynamic. A custom assembly applied to the action allows us the flexibility to do a number of things that the standard action will not. Another example was that we needed to have a treelist in an item scroll to and highlight the current item. The way todo this was to override the core treelist action with our custom assembly.
Keep in mind that adding alot of code to the layout (which could be a master page for a ton of pages) ramps up the runtime overhead.
From a UX perspective, Sitecore is impractical, overpowered and too complex to be effectively implemented for teams with typical content contributors and editors. No thought has been put into streamlining content creation or simple page template maintenance. I would never recommend Sitecore to a team without:
HTML authoring/editing skills
FTP concepts & Site tree understanding
Data management skills
The system is built for developers, with users as a very distant after-thought. In my experience, it offers a huge number of benefits — being a usable system for every-day content authors is not one of those benefits. The system is so modular and over-managed, it forces users on every level to make decisions that only complicate otherwise simple operations. Content publishing is extremely modular, and a big benefit for developers; it is a catastrophe for everyday users.
If you're a developer, Sitecore is a wonderful building environment. It's powerful and flexible.
If you're a user, Sitecore is task-heavy and offers the steepest learning curve I've ever encountered with a CMS. UAT has been a nightmare.
I am a computer programmer by training but have been away from web development for a while. I am doing a little bit of background research on various Python web development frameworks. I understand that Django, Grok / Zope 3, and Pylons are all good solid frameworks, but have little in the way of background working with them. Can someone explain to me the difference in approach of the each of the frameworks, and where one shines when compared to the others?
My specific use case is in building a web application that will recommend products to users based on a variety of user supplied information. Thus, it will take a fair bit of user input in the shape of a basic profile, product preferences, attempt to establish social relationships between users. It will also need to support staff uploading products into the system with labeled features that can be then matched to users.
On the last point, would parts of Plone help with providing an interface for non-tech people to upload products and descriptions of the products? Are piece of Plone easy to borrow? Seems like I shouldn't have to reinvent the wheel in terms of having a way for people to upload items for sale / recommendation along with some metadata to describe the items. Thanks for the help.
Based on your background and requirements, I'd advise you to go with something like http://pinaxproject.com/ which is based on Django.
Pyramid (the successor to Pylons) is a very low-level framework and you need to either choose the libraries or write all your application code yourself. For someone experienced this makes sense and gives you full control over your code. But it is a bit of a hurdle if you start from scratch and aren't familiar with the available libraries.
Django and Grok are both high level frameworks, with Django being the more popular choice. If you aren't familiar yet with using object databases or URL traversal, Grok is more time consuming to learn.
Plone is not suited for your use-case. It's a content management system and not a general web framework. Very little of the libraries it uses can be reused in a different context, certainly none of its UI. If you want to provide an engaging user experience with personalized content, Plone isn't for you - that's not what its been build to handle.
Disclaimer: I'm a release manager for Plone and Zope 2 / Zope Toolkit and have used Pyramid but not Django.
Dolmen project is a CMS built on top of Grok. Is very simple, but there are very few that use it. If you go with Grok, you could be able to reuse the GUI.
But As Hanno said, Grok is more time-consuming to learn than Django. Also Django has far more users than Grok.
The advantage of using Grok is that you can profit from Zope Component Architecture almost without writing ZCML and using decorators instead.
With Pyramid/Pylons you get a very simple framework and nothing else. It is a decoupled framework, so you are free to use whatever templating enginge you want (Mako, Genshi, Jinja, Cheetah), you are free to choose sqlalchemy, zodb, mongoDb, etc., and you are also free to choose the url mapping scheme (traversal vs. django-style mapping or a combination of both). You can also use ZCA here if you want. For starters this might become quite confusing or verbose.
Django is a kind of monolithic framework that gives you one way to do stuff. That's why it's easy to learn and a very good option. But, in my experience, you sometimes get to a point where you want to deviate from Django standards and it simply cannot be done without patching a bunch of stuff.
And, as for Zope3, I'd recommend you to download a copy of BlueBream and se how it does for you.
As a Plone user I can say that creating Content Objects in Plone is difficult. There is not much documentation on how to do it and it is complicated. Some recommend using UML and specialized Plone products to make it easier but that introduces yet another dependency.
I mention the problem with content objects because your "products" (not the same as a Plone product) would probably be represented in Plone as a content object which you would need to write yourself.
Plone is best when users and editors are entering and approving text in the form of news articles, press releases, photos etc. When that is the use case there are predefined content objects for such things so one does not need to write them oneself.
--Jonathan Mark