I want to show a List using ICEFaces, and I want to output it like:
TAG1, TAG2, TAG3.
But without using , or <% for (...) { ... } %>, is there a way to do this?
Thanks!
ICEfaces doesn't provide any mechanism for putting "logic" inside views (the rendered property is the only kind-of way).
However, I would propose you to take a look at two other JSF tags: c:forEach and ui:repeat
You'll find them in the following two namespaces:
xmlns:ui="http://java.sun.com/jsf/facelets"
xmlns:c="http://java.sun.com/jstl/core"
There are fundamental differences, since c:forEach is a TagHandler and ui:repeat a Component. It will basically depend on the content you want to output within the loop, which way you choose. They'll be evaluated at different phases when the view is built.
I'd recommend a blog post by Roger Keays which compares c:forEach and ui:repeat and lists some typical issues:
Roger Keays, 2007. c:forEach vs ui:repeat in Facelets
Update:
There's the ice:panelSeries component which iterates over a given collection of objects.
<ice:panelSeries var="item" value="#{myList}">
<h:outputText value="#{item.printThisText}"/>
</ice:panelSeries>
Related
I created a lot of Thymeleaf templates during the last weeks, using both html5 and textual mode. In these templates I need to use a lot of th:each statements that iterate over the Context variables.
On these variables I ofter access their getters which in turn return other objects which I have to use getters on and so on.
In order to process the data returned I need to apply stuff like strings.defaultString(...)
All these combined statements make it difficult to read and comprehend what is going on. Many lines of my templates are so long that they can't be read without scrolling horizontally.
I searched for best practices but only found some that describe how to create "base templates" that give general advice on using Thymeleaf in combination with Spring or mention how to include common fragements.
Is there best practice how to format / wrap Thymeleaf statements without causing negative effects on created html or text (for example unwanted line breaks) ?
You can create variables using th:with so that you dont have to do frequent objA.propB.propC. So you assign th:with="propB=${objA.propB}"
Then creating reusable fragments with parameters in another good approach so any HTML which is getting repeated can be extracted into a fragment and the data required for that fragment can be passed as argument.
Update:
<div class="profile-user-info">
<th:block th:insert='~{::profileInfoRow("Name", ${user.name}) }' />
<th:block th:insert='~{::profileInfoRow("Age", ${user.age}) }' />
<th:block th:insert='~{::profileInfoRow("Location", ${user.location}) }' />
</div>
<div th:fragment="profileInfoRow(label, value)">
<div class="profile-info-row">
<div class="profile-info-name">[[${label}]]</div>
<div class="profile-info-value">[[${value}]]</div>
</div>
</div>
So above is a simple way you can create a reusable section of HTML and then use thymeleaf directives to include the reusable section by passing in the values for dynamic arguments.
I am trying to develop a multistep webform in Drupal 8 using Webform 8.x-5.1. I have written a WebformHandler that extends Drupal\webform\Plugin\WebformHandlerBase and made it available to the webform.
In the first step of the webform, I collect a text-field. I would like to display the value of that text-field in an HTML element (Advanced HTML/Text or Basic HTML) on the second page after doing some computation.
I have overwritten submitForm() in the WebformHandler and in it assign the value I want to the HTML element as follows:
$form['elements']['page_name']
['advanced_html_element']['#text'] = '...my HTML...';
Using ksm() I can see that this assignment works, but the the HTML element is not rendered with my HTML: the element is either invisible or contains the initial value set up in the form editor.
Clearly I'm missing something. Should I be using something other than submitForm? Can anyone help me?
It's been a long haul, but I've finally worked out how to do what I want to. The following works for me.
Firstly, I discovered the method validateForm in WebformHandlerBase. On each page in a form with multiple pages, you will find that the following methods are called in the order given here:
submitForm (called once)
alterForm(called possibly more than once)
validateForm (called once)
The name validateForm leads me to believe I may be misusing this method, but that is where I set up the elements on the following page that I wish to programmatically initialise. It works, so what the hey!
In validateForm, I initialise the elements that appear on the following page as follows:
$form_state->setValue(<element name>, <data structure>);
The <element name> is the name you give the element in the form editor ("Build" tab). The <data structure> has to be correct, of course: I suggest you find the appropriate structure by first filling in the element on the next page manually and seeing what turns up in $form_state.
There is also a $form_state->getValue(<element name>), which seems to me to mean that $form_state can also be used for storing session data, say in hidden fields. I initially used Drupal::service('tempstore.private')->get('xxx') for storing data that had to be available across page boundaries, but $form_state might be a cleaner solution.
I hope this helps someone: I spent a horribly long time trying to get this to work.
i´m developing a theme and for some reason i need to move the default position for breadcrubms (also for many other things) over woocommerce themes. Then i realised to do something like this on my functions.php:
function woocommerce_remove_breadcrumb(){
remove_action( 'woocommerce_before_main_content', 'woocommerce_breadcrumb', 20);
}
add_action('woocommerce_before_main_content', 'woocommerce_remove_breadcrumb');
function woocommerce_custom_breadcrumb(){
woocommerce_breadcrumb();
}
add_action( 'woo_custom_breadcrumb', 'woocommerce_custom_breadcrumb' );
And then on any template file, output the breadcrumb just with:
<? do_action('woo_custom_breadcrumb'); ?>
And works. My question is more than that. Is this the correct approach for something like this? I mean for anything over woocommerce, not just breadcrumb, for any pice, ratings, titles, buttons, sidebar, and so on.
What i´m thinking on is why woocommerce templates don´t come with more deep code. I mean, why there´s no such a single-content-loop.php template where you can just change the order of things, title, category, content, images, etc. in an easy way rather that hooking into functions?
I think that is an acceptable way to call the breadcrumbs explicitly. Sometimes it is easier to call a specific function than remove everything around it!
As for changing the order of things and getting into advanced customization; there isn't a single file, but a number of files working together. Create a folder in your themes root called 'woocommerce' and copy the following files for a safe override:
woocommerce/woocommerce-hooks.php:
Here are your hooks, including the ones you are overriding in your themes functions.php. Here is where you can experiment with removing and repositioning certain elements on your product page. Search for 'Sidebar' and you will see where the 'woocommerce_sidebar' action is added with the function it references in...
woocommerce/woocommerce-template.php:
Here are the functions used in template files to output content based on conditional statements. For instance, search for the 'Single Product' series and you can see which template files are used for which functions. For instance 'woocommerce_template_single_title' uses 'single-product/title.php' - if you copy over this folder and file you can make very specific edits to just the title section
Between these two files and their accompanying references (like title.php) I believe you can do the things you described. Let me know how it works out! I'm new to woocommerce too!
I have a page template in Tridion 2011 with Razor code that prints information based on RenderComponentPresentation() as the first thing in the page. No other markup comes before it, because the component, not the page, contains the initial markup. Unless I put at least one character before the first RenderComponentPresentation in the published output, the template refuses to render any presentations.
So, for example, if this is all that is in the layout TBB this works (in my real code the tcms are real of course):
<
#RenderComponentPresentation("tcm:mytcm","tcm:myothertcm")
but this does not
#RenderComponentPresentation("tcm:mytcm","tcm:myothertcm")
The first prints the contents of the component preceded by the "<", whereas the second does nothing at all. I don't want to have ANY markup directly at the start of the page template, I want the first thing to be the component. Is it possible?
I've just done a quick test in Template Builder using the latest version of the Razor Mediator (1.2) and couldn't replicate your issue.
Maybe you could try:
<text></text>
#RenderComponentPresentation("tcm:mytcm","tcm"myothertcm")
It won't render any additional markup but may trick the mediator into doing what you want (though like I said, I can't replicate your problem so can't verify whether it does).
Normally with Razor you iterate over any and all Component Presentations on the page, and right now I'm working with
#foreach(var cp in ComponentPresentations){
#cp.RenderComponentPresentation()
}
This will render every component on the page, regardless of predefined schema's or templates. Your issue however suggest a problem elsewhere. What kind of output does your page template generate (do mind its the page template using a compound template which in turn includes the Razor TBB you describe here). Is it .aspx, HTML or other? And what is the Component templates' output? is it an HTML fragment, or anything else?
As far as you syntax goes, that should be just fine other than the template invocation:
#RenderComponentPresentation("tcm:x-xxx-xx", "tcm:xx-xxx-xx")
I have a feeling this code only works when used within HTML tags, though, but that's just a hunch.
Bit of a hack but have you tried:
<text>#RenderComponentPresentation("tcm:x-xxx-xx", "tcm:xx-xxx-xx")</text>
or
#Html.Raw(RenderComponentPresentation("tcm:x-xxx-xx", "tcm:xx-xxx-xx"))
Disclaimer: not really used Razor mediator. Just Razor.
I've implemented this in a recursive fashon but as most xml editors seem to run out of stack space I thought there should be a more efficient solution out there.
I've looked at Jenni Tenison's set difference template:
http://www.exslt.org/set/functions/difference/set.difference.template.xsl
but need something slightly different. I need node equality to be defined
as concat(node(.),#name).
There is a predefined set of nodes:
<a name="Adam"><!-- don't care about contents for equality purposes --></a>
<b name="Berty"><!-- don't care about contents for equality purposes --></b>
<a name="Charly"><!-- don't care about contents for equality purposes --></a>
I want to find out the subset of the below nodes that are not in the above list:
<b name="Berty"><!-- different contents --></b>
<b name="Boris"><!-- different contents --></b>
The result I'm after would be a node set of:
<b name="Boris"><!-- different contents --></b>
To complicate things I can't use Key as the nodes are in different documents (overriding imported definitions are the reason I'm trying to process this).
Also this needs to be XSLT 1.0 as I need to render in IE / Firefox.
Any thoughts / suggestions / guidence wellcome!
Have you taken a look at the technique in the XSLT Cookbook?
http://books.google.com/books?id=POJkiuHIAfoC&lpg=PP1&pg=PA324#v=onepage&q=&f=false
Mr. Mangano has a recipe for set difference, and a fairly well written explanation as well. Mind you, when you are comparing two elements that seem to be the same but have two different source documents, XSLT will usually report them as different, so you must test by the value of the element, attributes, etc.
You might want to poke at the example code from the book, provided here:
http://oreilly.com/catalog/9780596009748