Is there a way to stop the inferior without using Ctrl+C (or an equivalent signal sent from another process?) I'm using a windows platform and am managing GDB from another process, so with no notion of signals, it seems that there isn't a good way to break execution of my program when it's free running without any breakpoints.
EDIT FOR CLARITY:
There are 2 processes involved here. There's process A, which is the parent of GDB. GDB is managing a process, but it's on a remote host, and we'll call that process C.
When I tell GDB to "run" it kicks off process C on the remote host and blocks either until a breakpoint is hit, process C encounters an error or a fatal signal, or GDB itself receives an interrupt signal. If working interactively, you would simply press CTRL+C at the GDB command console, which GDB interprets as a SIGINT (somehow), triggering GDB to halt process C. Since I'm actually managing GDB with process A (and not dealing with it interactively at the shell) I can't very well press Ctrl+C, and since windows has no native notion of "Signals" like you have in UNIX, I can't figure out how to interrupt GDB when it's blocking waiting for process C to interrupt or hit a breakpoint.
Did you try to take a look at the remote control protocols? for instance, EMACS uses MI to control GDB, you should check how/if they offer such a ctrl-C mechanism, and how they implement it.
EDIT: it seems to be -exec-interrupt which interrupts the execution.
Related
If I run a program under gdb, how do I break at an arbitrary point? Pressing Ctrl+C kills the program. Ctrl+Break does nothing.
I can't enter gdb commands because my program is itself sitting in a REPL loop so anything I enter goes to my program, not to gdb.
My program uses linenoise to implement the REPL; I assume that this is hiding Ctrl+C, etc., from gdb.
Ctrl+\ results in a 001C square blob thingy in my program, rather than SIGUSR1.
Pressing Ctrl+C kills the program.
That is not the default GDB behavior.
Did you set handle SIGINT nostop pass?
You can examine current signal disposition with:
(gdb) handle SIGINT
Signal Stop Print Pass to program Description
SIGINT Yes Yes No Interrupt
Update:
My program is using linenoise for console input. I assume that it has done something to Ctrl+C
If your program is modifying terminal settings, you are going to have a very bad time debugging it from the same terminal.
For example, suppose the program sets no echo, and then hits a breakpoint. I think you would get a (gdb) prompt, but would not see any commands you are typing into GDB.
It seems that you would be much better off debugging this program from a different terminal. Use gdb -p $PID to attach to it from "outside".
I'm debugging a C++ application which creates trees of forks. Using GDB defaults, the child processes will be detached on the fork and as a result I see only one inferior shown afterwards.
I tried to attach to one of the child processes and despite it not being listed as an inferior for the other GDB process, in the new GDB session I get an error that the process is already being traced (by the first GDB session).
Is this expected behavior? What steps can I take to debug the forked process in a separate GDB session? What steps can I take to debug the problem further?
I have written a C++ program and I am executing in the gnome terminal (I am on Ubuntu). I press Ctrl + Z, which suspends the process. Later on, I execute % on the same terminal, which resumes execution.
From what I've read, Ctrl+Z sends a TSTP signals to the process, which tells it to stop execution. But TSTP is polite, in the sense that the process is allowed to continue until it decides it can stop. In my C++ program code, I didn't do anything to explicitly deal with TSTP signals. So, my question is, what things inside my C++ code will continue running in spite of the TSTP signal? For example, if I have a file stream open, will it wait until it is closed? I expect an overall answer, not too deep or covering all the details. I just want an idea of how this happens.
Your program continues running while the SIGTSTP handler executes. Since you haven't set one up, you get the default signal handling behavior, which is for the process to be stopped.
While your process is stopped, it simply isn't scheduled for execution. Files don't get closed, nor is stopping delayed until files get closed (unless done in the signal handler).
This website looks like it has a helpful explanation of how a handler can be installed to perform some tasks and then have the default stopping behavior:
http://man7.org/tlpi/code/online/dist/pgsjc/handling_SIGTSTP.c.html
When one is interactively using cmd.exe to run all sort of windows CLI application, one can easily stop them by pressing CTRL+C or CTRL+BREAK . this is implemented by signaling the process as can be read here. As for cmd.exe itself, it does not terminate in these conditions as can be explained in a comment of this question.
Now, consider the following scenario. My application open a cmd.exe using CreateProcess(), and the user has started another application b.exe through it. Say that my application want to fold before b.exe has ended , and it doesn't really care about the graceful termination of it. optimally, I'd like to mimic the user pressing CTRL+C and then send exit to the cmd.exe (let's say I can do it IO-wise). the windows api offers GenerateConsoleCtrlEvent() for that (almost) exact purpose, but it can be ignored by the process (cmd.exe in that case) and in particular , it won't forward the signal to b.exe.
I'm developing an application (a service/daemon, really) on Linux in C++ that needs to interface with a piece of hardware. If my program doesn't release the resources for this peice of hardware cleanly when terminating, then I have to reload the device driver, a process that takes about 10 minutes and for obvious reasons having to wait 10 minutes between each test of the program would be frustrating.
So I have used the sigaction() function to catch a SIGINT (a ctrl-c) so that my program can cleanly shutdown when I'm finished with it. When running the program from the console, this works fine. However, when debugging in Netbeans or Eclipse (I've tried both) things don't work.
In Eclipse, if I hit ctrl-c in the console it provides, it doesn't seem to register that a SIGINT ever occurred
In Eclipse, if I run the program in debug mode and then use kill -SIGINT <pid>, the program just breaks as if it hit a breakpoint
Netbeans actually seems to realise a signal has been sent when I hit ctrl-c in the console, and pops up a dialog asking if I want to forward it to the application. Clicking "Forward and continue" just seems to break the program and the signal is not received by the application. It also says I can configure this stuff in Debug -> Dbx configure, a menu item that doesn't exist
In Netbeans, if I run the program in debug mode and then use kill -SIGINT <pid>, the behaviour is the same as above
I then added a SIGQUIT handler and tried sending that via kill when debugging in Netbeans. This time, no dialog appears and the signal handler is never tripped.
I need some way to cleanly shutdown my app while I'm debugging. Any ideas?
It turns out the problem had nothing to do with Netbeans or Eclipse, but rather gdb.
gdb can be configured to handle signals in a variety of ways. If you run:
gdb
then type:
info signals
You'll get a list of signals and gdb actions on what to do if it receives that signal:
Signal Stop Print Pass to program Description
SIGHUP Yes Yes Yes Hangup
SIGINT Yes Yes No Interrupt
SIGQUIT Yes Yes Yes Quit
SIGILL Yes Yes Yes Illegal instruction
SIGTRAP Yes Yes No Trace/breakpoint trap
etc...
My temporary work around has been to use SIGALRM which gdb defaults to not breaking and sending to the process. However, you can also customise the default gdb settings by creating a .gdbinit file where you can set these
Even this post is old, hope it can help others.
To prevent Eclipse from catching the Ctrl+C, you can configure your gdb using .gbdinit file.
You create a .gdinit with this content
#we want Ctrl+C to be no break, pass to application and printed by the debugger
handle SIGINT nostop
handle SIGINT pass
handle SIGINT print
In your eclipse configuration, you can define where is your .gdbinit file to use in your Debug configuration
Simple solution.. Try using DEBUG macros to handle your situation.
// Register the signal handler to stop service.
#ifdef _DEBUG
signal(SIGKILL, <your signal handler>);
#endif
Also, you may try to clean up your app before exiting.