We've got some clients sending a custom POST of a data blob to our django servers.
They do things in a rather funky way that I'd rather not get into - and we've since moved on from making that particular format the norm. To make further implementations of our upload protocol more streamlined, I was looking to roll a custom UploadHandler in django to make our data handling in the views a bit more streamlined.
So, moving forward, we want all code in the views to access our POSTs via the:
data = request.FILES['something']
So, for our new submissions, we're handling that dandily.
What I'd like to be able to do is get the upload handler we've made, affectionately called LegacyUploadHandler(), to populate the request.FILES dictionary with the right parts, so the code in our view can access the parts the same way.
So, my question:
How does a custom uploadhandler actually populate the request.FILES dictionary? The django documentation doesn't really give a descriptive example of doing that.
Our particular desire is that we have a singular blob of data coming in. We custom parse it and want it to appear as the request.FILES dictionary.
The current code as it stands right now does this:
def handle_raw_input(self, input_data, META, content_length, boundary, encoding=None):
files_dict = {}
files_dict = magic_parser(input_data.read())
#now what do I do?
I see examples of setting a files MultiValueDict in the http.MultiPartParser, but that seems to be outside the scope/control of where I am in my handlers.
Any ideas of how to actually do the return value? Or am I trying to populate the request.FILES object the completely wrong way?
From handle_raw_input you have to return a tuple of what will be POST and FILES on the requst. So in your case it's something like:
def handle_raw_input(self, input_data, META, content_length, boundary, encoding=None):
files_dict = magic_parser(input_data.read())
return QueryDict(), files_dict
The magic_parser should return a MultiValueDict of the form {'filename': fileobj}. A fileobj is an instance of some suitable django.core.files.File subclass (or may be that class itself).
Related
I'm working on Django website and I have problem in figuring out correct/good way to handle delete view. From what I found out there are two ways to approach it:
1
class ObjectDeleteView(DeleteView):
model = Object
def get_success_url(self):
objectid = self.kwargs['object_id']
object = Object.objects.get(id = objectid)
container = object.container
containerid = container.id
url = reverse('Containers:showContainerContent', args=[containerid])
return url
def get_object(self):
return get_object_or_404(Object, pk=self.kwargs['object_id'])
2
def objectDelete(request, object_id):
object = Object.objects.get(id = object_id)
container = object.container
containerid = container.id
url = reverse('Containers:showContainerContent', args=[containerid])
return HttpResponseRedirect(url)
From what I can tell both are doing exactly the same thing - once object is deleted present user with page under Containers:showContainerContent.
The big difference I am experiencing is error I am getting when running unit test for this (simple call of the website and check of response code). With option 1 I end up getting error
django.template.exceptions.TemplateDoesNotExist: ContainerApp/object_confirm_delete.html
Which I understand - I don't have this template, this is default template for DeleteView, hence error is correct. The thing is I don't want to have any extra page. Just redirect user and that's it.
Also, I tested changing return url to return HttpResponseRedirect(url) in option 1, but result is the same.
What should I do here? Should I just continue with option 2? What are or might be the drawbacks for this approach?
There is a major difference between two class based delete view and function based view (the way you declared it).
CBV accepts get, post and delete http methods. When you send a get request to class based view, it does not delete the object. Instead it renders template with object to be deleted in context. This is basically used to have confirmation. For example you can send a get request and it will render a template with text "Do you really want to delete?" or "Please confirm blah blah..". And if you send a post or delete request, it will actually delete the object and redirect to next page.
FBV, on the other hand, give you full control over what you want to do. And as you declared it, it will accept any request type and delete the object and redirect to next page because you have not done any request type check in your view which is not a great idea IMHO. You should not allow deletion on get requests. They should be idempotent. There are plenty of otherthings that CBV provides. For example in case the object does not exist your FBV will crash. CBV, on contrary, will return proper 404 response if object does not exist.
So I think there is no bad in using FBV, but make is strong and secure enough that it handles every case (what if object does not exist?, what about confirmation?, GET should be idempotent only allow deletion with post? etc etc). Or simply use CBV.
I have to make dashboard like view in flask-admin that will use data retrieved from external API. I have already written a functions that get date ranges and return data from that range. I should use BaseView probably but I don't know how to actually write it to make filters work. This is example function that i have to use: charts = generate_data_for_dashboard('164', '6423FACA-FC71-489D-BF32-3A671AB747E3', '2018-03-01', '2018-09-01'). Those params should be chosen from 3 different dropdowns. So far I know only how to render views with pre coded data like this :
class DashboardView(BaseView):
kwargs = {}
#expose('/', methods=('GET',))
def statistics_charts(self):
user = current_user
company = g.company
offices = Office.query.filter_by(company_id=company.id)
self.kwargs['user'] = user
self.kwargs['company'] = company
charts = generate_data_for_dashboard('164', '6423FACA-FC71-489D-BF32-3A671AB747E3', '2018-03-01', '2018-09-01')
self.kwargs['chart1'] = charts[0]
self.kwargs['chart2'] = charts[1]
return self.render('stats/dashboard.html', **self.kwargs)
But I need some kind of form to filter it. In addition date filter dropdown should have dynamic options : current_week, last_week, current_month, last_month, last_year. Don't know where to start.
You should use WTForms to build a form. You then have to decide if you want the data to be fetched on Submit or without a reload of the page. In the former case, you can just return the fetched information on the response page in your statistics_charts view. But if you want the data to update without a reload, you'll need to use JavaScript to track the form field changes, send the AJAX request to the API, and then interpret the resulting JSON and update your dashboard graphs and tables as needed.
I have not used it, but this tutorial says you can use Dash for substantial parts of this task, while mostly writing in Python. So that could be something to check out. There is also flask_jsondash which might work for you.
I'm very new to programming and especially to Django but can't work out how to use any previous answers to my advantage....
Apologies if my question is too vague but essentially, I have two different apps, let's call them app A and app B, with data on two different databases but apps contain information on the same individual item.
I want to edit this information on my 'edit details' page while keeping the apps as separate as possible (well AppB can know about functions in AppA but not vice-versa)...I guess what I really want is a signal which works like so:
A 'submit' view within AppA which is called when I submit changes to the data (using text boxes). The data for AppA is then saved..
And a signal then sent to AppB which ideally would update its data, before the HttpResponseRedirect is performed.
Unfortunately I can't really get this to work. My problem is that if I put 'request' into the arguments for save_details, I get errors like "save_details() takes exactly 3 arguments (2 given)"....does anyone know a clever way of getting something like this to work?
My submit function in AppA looks something like this...
def submit(self, request, id):
signal_received.send(sender=self, id=id)
q = get_object_or_404(AppA, pk=id)
q.blah = request.POST.get('wibble from the form')
...
return Http.....
in my AppB signals.py file, I have put.
signal_received = django.dispatch.Signal(providing_args=['id'])
def save_details(sender, uid, **kwargs):
p = AppB.objects.get(id=id)
p.wobble = request.POST.get('wobble from the form')
...
signal.received.connect(save_details)
Obviously the above doesn't mention request in its arguments which seems to be necessary but if I add that, I get problems with the number of arguments.
(I have imported all the right things at the top of each file I think...hence me leaving that off.)
Any point about the above would be appreciated....e.g. does "request" need to be the first argument? It didn't seem to like me using "self" before but I have tried to copy as much as possible the example at the bottom of the documentation (https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/topics/signals/) but the extra functionality I need in the signal receiving function is flumoxing me.
Thanks in advance...
I have a following situation. I created a simple backend in Flask that handles file uploads. With files received, Flask does something (uploads them), and returns the data to the caller. There are two scenarios with the app, to upload one image and multiple images. When uploading one image, I can simply get the response and voila, I'm all set.
However, I am stuck on handling multiple file uploads. I can use the same handler for the actual file upload, but the issue is that all of those files need to be stored into a list or something, then processed, and after doing that, a single link (album) containing all those images, needs to be delivered.
Here is my upload handling code:
#app.route('/uploadv3', methods=['POST'])
def upload():
if request.method == 'POST':
data_file = request.files["file"]
file_name = data_file.filename
path_to_save_to = os.path.join(app.config['UPLOAD_FOLDER'], file_name)
data_file.save(path_to_save_to)
file_url = upload_image_to_image_host(path_to_save_to)
return file_url
I was experimenting with session in flask, but I dont know can I create a list of items under one key, like session['links'], and then get all those, and clear it after doing the work. Or is there some other simpler solution?
I assume that I could probably do this via key for each image, like session["link1"], and so on, but that would impose a limit on the images (depending on how much of those I create), would make the code very ugly, make the iteration over each in order to generate a list that is passed to an album building method problematic, and session clearing would be tedious.
Some code that I wrote for getting the actual link at the end and clearing the session follows (this assume that session['link'] has a list of urls, which I can't really achieve with my knowledge of session management in Flask:
def create_album(images):
session.pop('link', None)
new_album = im.create_album(images)
return new_album.link
#app.route('/get_album_link')
def get_album_link():
return create_album(session['link'])
Thanks in advance for your time!
You can assign anything to a session including individual value or list/dictionary etc. If you know the links, you can store them in the session as follows:
session['links'] = ['link1','link2'...and so on]
This way, you have a list of all the links. You can now access a link by:
if 'links' in session:
for link in session['links']:
print link
Once you are done with them, you can clear the session as:
if 'links' in session:
del session['links']
To clarify what I have done to make this work. At the end, it appeared that the uploading images and adding them to the album anonymously had to be done "reversely", so not adding images to an album object, but uploading an image object to an album id.
I made a method that gets the album link and puts it in the session:
#app.route('/get_album_link')
def get_album_link():
im = pyimgur.Imgur(CLIENT_ID)
new_album = im.create_album()
session.clear()
session['album'] = new_album.deletehash
session['album_link'] = new_album.link
return new_album.link
Later on, when handling uploads, I just add the image to the album and voila, all set :)
uploaded_image = im.upload_image(path_of_saved_image, album=session['album'])
file_url = uploaded_image.link
return file_url
One caveat is that the image should be added to the "deleteahash" value passed as the album value, not the album ID (which is covered by the imgur api documentation).
I understand that Django want to generate forms automatically so you don't have to do so in your template, and I do understand that many people find it cool.
But I have specific requirements and I have to write my forms on my own. I just need something to parse the data, be it a form submitted using a user interface, or an API request, or whatever.
I tried to use ModelForm, but it doesn't seem to work as I want it to work.
I'd like to have something with the following behavior:
possibility to specify the model of the object I am going to create/update
possibility to specify an object in case of an update
possibility to provide new data in a dictionary
if I am creating a new object, missing fields in my data should be replaced by their default values as specified in my model definition
if I am updating an existing object, missing fields in my data should be replaced by the current values of the object I am updating. Another way of saying is, do not update values that are missing in my data dictionary.
data validation should be performed before calling save(), and it should throw a ValidationError with the list of erroneous fields and errors.
Currently, I prefer to do everything manually :
o = myapp.models.MyModel() # or o = myapp.Models.MyModel.objects.get(pk = data['pk'])
o.field1 = data['field1']
o.field2 = data['field2']
…
o.full_clean()
o.save()
It would be nice to have a shortcut :
o = SuperCoolForm(myapp.models.MyModel, data)
o.save()
Do you know if Django does provide a solution for this or am I asking too much?
Thank you!