testing with selenium - unit-testing

I'm a complete selenium newbie. Where should I start if I want to learn how to use it?

I've used Selenium in two different ways:
Selenium Remote Control - Great at scripting tests that manipulate a large amount of data to hit or insert into a website because you can manipulate the Selenium commands from a real programming language (I used Ruby).
Selenium IDE - Excellent at making quick scripts to demonstrate problems and single path execution of a website. The Firefox plugin integration is excellent and easy to use. Non-developers can even create and submit scripts to demonstrate problems.
Pick one of the two ways and write a script to do something routine on the web (check for latest Hockey scores from NHL.com, etc). After you have that super-simple script running, try something more complex.

Download the firefox plugin to begin. You can record, replay some tests. There are some video tutorials.
Look at this intro

You can get this book Selenium 2 Testing Tools Beginner’s Guide.
Really helpful book, especially for a newbie. I had a good experience, learning Selenium with it.

I would suggest to start from an overview automated web testing with selenium presentation on scribd

Better idea, to start selenium IDE, which is record and playback method like other tools.
Once familiar, then can start using selenium RC, Grid, Webdriver.
Selenium IDE is firefox extension.
more help http://seleniumhq.org/docs/02_selenium_ide.html

Really depends on what you want to do with Selenium.
I definitely recommend getting Selenium IDE if you don't know what you're doing because it does most things automatically and gives you an intro to how you would use Selenium Remote Control.
Selenium Remote Control lets you use Selenium from your favourite language. From there it depends on what language you want to use for where you get help. I use Java/JUnit and I just use google/documentation/stackoverflow whenever there's something I'm not sure how to do and that Selenium IDE won't tell me how to do.

Aside from the other suggestions on this page, one of the most useful sites I've used to get up to speed with Selenium was this one: Selenium Training from theautomatedtester.com
He covers
Record & Playback,
Javascript & Variables,
XPaths,
Regular Expressions and more;
However, I think I only needed those first few ones.
Also, there are many extensions/addons/plug-ins for Selenium IDE, so be sure to check for any of those if you get stuck in some way.
For example, I thought I needed to start using the Selenium Remote Control (and code in C#) because I wanted to create tests with logical flows and loops...but there is a plug-in for incorporating that in the IDE (goto & while loops extension), so I didn't need to!
Hope this helps!

Where to start?
Go to: http://seleniumhq.org/docs/
Read the docs from the beginning to the end.
Estimated time 8 hours.

Related

How to unit test GWT+SmartGWT?

I am Unit testing on the client side of a GWT+SmartGWT application.
First I tested with GwtTestCase. Too long for unit testing a huge application. GwtTestSuite doesn't help. It still takes too much time to execute. (more, it asked me to start a browser when it's testing)
Then gwt-test-utils : Great framework. Sadly, my javassist version is 3.5 and need at least the 3.11. Javassist is used by gilead so I can't touch this. So, no gwt-test-utils...
I saw Selenium. That's just great. With htmlunit driver, it's fast and useful. Simplest way to test a webapp. Problem here is SmartGWT generates it's own IDs when it generates the web page. So I can't get the TextItems and fill them since those IDs are constantly changing. I found that it could be solved by using setID() before the initialization of the widget. But that's the ID of the scLocator and not an HTML ID. Selenium doesn't want to work with scLocator.
=> Is there a simple way to accept scLocator with Selenium ?
(And when I say simple, it must be simple... I'm not a specialist in Java...)
Could someone help me to unit test the application ? It's coded in Java, it's huge and I have to cover ~70% of the code (25k lines of code)
Some more specs :
Maven is used to compile.
I'm not touching at the server side.
Tests must be faster than GwtTestCase and Suite :/
I hope my problem is clear, I'm not a native english so sorry for mistakes I may do :x
We provide Selenium extensions and a user guide for them in the SDK, under the "selenium" directory at top level.
If you download 3.1d (from smartclient.com/builds) there's even more documentation including some samples for JUnit.
Do not use ensureDebugId() (won't have an effect at all). Never try to work with DOM IDs (won't work).
Best practices information in the Selenium user guide explains when you should use setID().
I found that it could be solved by using setID() before the
initialization of the widget. But that's the ID of the scLocator and
not an HTML ID.
Why don't you try:
widget.ensureDebugId("some-id");
From the Java docs for ensureDebugId():
Ensure that the main Element for this UIObject has an ID property set,
which allows it to integrate with third-party libraries and test tools
< defaultUserExtensionsEnabled>true< /defaultUserExtensionsEnabled>
< userExtensions>[path to user-extensions.js]< /userExtensions>
There we go. I managed to make it work. (With the selenium-maven-plugin in the < configuration> tag)
Thanks for your help though.

Any way to display C++ on a webpage?

Is there a relatively easy way to display the output of a C++ program on a webpage? And I don't mean manually, in other words, you see it on a webpage as it runs not as in I make a code tag and write it in myself.
EDIT: Just so everybody can get this clear I am going to post this up here. I am NOT trying to make a webpage in C++. Please excuse me if this sounds spiteful or anything but I am getting a lot of answers relating to that.
Step one, get yourself a server-side language. Be that PHP, ASP, Python, Ruby, whatever. Get it set up so you can serve it.
Step two, find your language's exec equivalent. Practically all of them have them. It'll let you run a command as if it were from the command line, usually with arguments and capture the output. Here's PHP's:
http://php.net/manual/en/function.exec.php
Of course, if you're passing user-input as arguments, sanitise!
I've just seen that you accepted Scott's answer. I usually wouldn't chase up a SO thread so persistently but I fear you're about to make a mistake that you'll come to regret down the line. Giving direct access to your program and its own built-in server is a terrible idea for two reasons:
You waste a day implementing this built-in server and then getting it to persist and testing it
More importantly, you've just opened up another attack vector into your server. When it comes to security, keep it simple.
You're far better having your C++ app running behind another (mature) server side language as all the work is done for you and it can filter the input to keep things safe.
You could write a CGI app in C++, or you could use an existing web server language to execute the command and send the output to the client.
You want to use Witty.
Wt (pronounced 'witty') is a C++
library for developing interactive web
applications.
The API is widget-centric and similar
to desktop GUI APIs. To the developer,
it offers complete abstraction of any
web-specific implementation details,
including event handling, graphics
support, graceful degradation (or
progressive enhancement), and pretty
URLs.
Unlike many page-based frameworks, Wt
was designed for creating stateful
applications that are at the same time
highly interactive (leveraging
techinques such as AJAX to their
fullest) and accessible (supporting
plain HTML browsers), using automatic
graceful degradation or progressive
enhancement.
The library comes with an application
server that acts as a stand-alone web
server or integrates through FastCGI
with other web servers.
I am not sure this is what you are looking for but you may want CGI You may want to look at this SO question, C++ may not be the best language for what you want to do.
based off the questions you posted Writing a web app like what you want is no simple task. What I would recommend is use some other library (this is one i found with a quick google) to get a web console on your server and give the user it is running under execute deny permissions on every folder except the folder you have your app installed.
This is still is a risky method if you don't set up the security correctly but it is the easiest solution without digging around too much on existing libraries to just have the application interactive.
EDIT --
The "Best" solution is learn AJAX and have your program post its own pages with it but like I said, it will not be easy.
It sounds like you want something like a telnet session embedded in a webpage. A quick google turns up many Java telnet apps, though I'm not qualified to evaluate which would be most ideal to embed in html.
You would set up the login script on the host machine to run your c++ app and the user would interact with it through the shell window. Note though that this will only work for pure command line apps. If you want to use a GUI app in this way, then you should look into remote desktop software or VNC.
It may be worth looking into Adobe's "Alchemy" project on Adobe Labs
This may help you with what you're trying to achieve.
:)
Are you looking for something like what codepad.org does? I believe they explain how they did it here.
There is a library called C++ Server Pages - Poco. I used it for one of my college project, its pretty good. There is also good documentation to get started with, u can find it here http://pocoproject.org/docs/

Web Application Frameworks: C++ vs Python

I am familiar with both Python and C++ as a programmer. I was thinking of writing my own simple web application and I wanted to know which language would be more appropriate for server-side web development.
Some things I'm looking for:
It has to be intuitive. I recognize that Wt exists and it follows the model of Qt. The one thing I hate about Qt is that they encourage strange syntax through obfuscated means (e.g. the "public slots:" idiom). If I'm going to write C++, I need it to be standard, recognizable, clean code. No fancy shmancy silliness that Qt provides.
The less non-C++ or Python code I have to write, the better. The thing about Django (Python web framework) is that it requires you pretty much write the HTML by hand. I think it would be great if HTML forms took more of a wxWidgets approach. Wt is close to this but follows the Qt model instead of wxWidgets.
I'm typically writing video games with C++ and I have no experience in web development. I want to write a nice web site for many reasons. I want it to be a learning experience, I want it to be fun, and I want to easily be able to concentrate on "fun stuff" (e.g. less boilerplate, more meat of the app).
Any tips for a newbie web developer? I'm guessing web app frameworks are the way to go, but it's just a matter of picking one.
I would go with Wt because:
You already know C++
It has a nice layout system, so you don't need to know lots of HTML
It is very well written and a pleasure to code in
Your deployed apps will handle 50 times the load of the python app on less hardware (from experience with pylons apps, 10,000 times the load of a plone app :P)
It has all the libraries that the guy in the first question says it doesn't and more
In built development webserver
Templating language
ORM
unit testing help
open-id and user+password authentication
A brilliant widget library
Web 2.0 isn't an after thought; it wasn't designed on a Request+Response model like all the python frameworks (as far as I know), but on an event driven interactive model.
It uses WebSockets if available
Falls back to normal ajax gracefully if not
Falls back to http for browsers like linx
It is more like coding a gui app than a web app, which is probably what you're used to
It is statically typed and therefore less error prone. Does def delete(id): take an int or a string ?
The unit tests (on my apps at least) take 10-100 times less time than my python app unit tests to run (including the compile time)
It has a strong and friendly community. All my email list posts are answered in 0-3 days.
If you'd like to avoid writing HTML, you could try GWT. However, in my experience, using an intermediate framework to generate HTML and ECMAScript never works anywhere near as well as hand-writing the pages.
[edit] nikow mentions in the comments that Pyjamas is a port of GWT to Python.
Regarding the language, if given the choice between C++ and Python I would pick Python 100% of the time. Even ignoring the obvious difference in abstraction between those languages, Python simply has more useful libraries than C++. You don't have to write your own development-oriented web server -- Django comes with one. You don't need to write a custom template library -- Python has Genshi. Django comes with a capable ORM layer, or for even more control you can use SQLAlchemy. It's barely a contest.
Django is good point to start web development it is great framework
If you look for C++ take a look on CppCMS, it is much more close to Django, it is not like Wt that mimics Qt.
In any case, it is really depends on your needs. C++ can be used for embedded or high performance web applications, but for medium range web sites Django would be better. (and I'm developer of CppCMS)
I think you better go firt python in your case, meanwhile you can extend cppCMS functionalities and write your own framework arround it.
wt was a good idea design, but somehow not that suitable.
If you are exploring Python frameworks (based on the excepted answer I think you are) I think you really owe it to yourself to check out CherryPy. When you write CherryPy apps, you really are just writing Python apps. The framework gets out of your way in a real hurry. Your free to choose your own templating, ORM (if you choose to use ORM), etc. Seriously, take 10 or 20 minutes and give it a look.
The only reason you might want to use C++ over Python is when speed is paramount.
If this is going to be your first web-app, you'll probably be ok with just Python, and your development speed will be orders of magnitude better than with CPP.
Django's templating language is far from powerless, to me it actually seems very pythonic. You actually can write pure python in a template(although this is generally not recommended).
Even better, it's possible to replace Django's templating system with the one you like.
My personal favourite language for this is HAML.
Here's some data on this:
Is there a HAML implementation for use with Python and Django
Having looked several ones, like django, pylos, web2py, wt. My recommendation is web2py. It's a python version of "ruby on rails" and easy to learn.

Looking for the ways for test automation of web site

We develop custom survey web sites and I am looking for a way to automate the pattern testing of these sites. Surveys often contain many complex rules and branches which are triggered on how items are responded too. All surveys are rigorously tested before being released to clients. This testing results in a lot of manual work. I would like to learn of some options I could use to automate these tests by responding to questions and verifying the results in the database. The survey sites are produced by an engine which creates and writes asp pages and receives the responses to process into a database. So the only way I can determine to test the site is to interact with the web pages themselves. I guess in a way I need to build some type of bot; I really don't know much about the design behind them.
Could someone please provide some suggestions on how to achieve this? Thank you for your time.
Brett
Check out selenium: http://selenium.openqa.org/
Also, check out the answers to this other question: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/484/how-do-you-test-layout-design-across-multiple-browsersoss
You could also check out WatiN.
Sounds like your engine could generate a test script using something like Test::WWW::Mechanize
Usual test methodologies applies; white box and black box.
White box testing for you may mean instrumenting your application to be able to make it go into a particular state, then you can predict the the result you expect.
Black box may mean that you hit a page, then consider of the possible outcomes valid. Repeat and rinse till you get sufficient coverage.
Another thing we use is monitoring statistics for our service. Did we get the expected number of hits on this page. We routinely run a/b tests, and I have run a/b tests against refactored code to verify that nothing changed before rolling things out.
/Allan
I can think of a couple of good web application testing suites that should get the job done - one free/open source and one commercial:
Selenium (open source/cross platform)
TestComplete (commercial/Windows-based)
Both will let you create test suites by verifying database records based on interactions with the web app.
The fact that you're Windows/ASP based might mean that TestComplete will get you up and running faster, as it's native to Windows and .NET. You can download a free trial to see if it'll work for you before making the investment.
Check out the unit testing framework 'lime' that comes with the Symfony framework. http://www.symfony-project.org/book/1_0/15-Unit-and-Functional-Testing. You didn't mention you language, lime is php.
I would suggest the mechanize gem,available for ruby . It's pretty intuitive to use .
I use the QEngine(commerical) for the same purpose. I need to add a data and check the same in the UI. I write one script which does this and call that in a loop. the data can be passed via either csv or excel.
check that www.qengine.com , you can try Watir also.
My proposal is QA Agent (http://qaagent.com). It seems this is a new approach because you do not need to install anything. Just develop your web tests in the browser based ide. By the way you can develop your tests using jQuery and java script. Really cool!

What do you use to Unit-Test your Web UI? [closed]

As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance.
Closed 10 years ago.
The company I'm currently working for is using Selenium for Uniting-Testing our User Interface. What do you use to Unit-Test your Web UI and how effective do you find it?
I'm a huge fan of Selenium. Saying 'unit-testing your web ui' isn't exactly accurate as some of the comments have mentioned. However, I do find Selenium to be incredibly useful for performing those sort of acceptance and sanity tests on the UI.
A good way to get started is using Selenium IDE as part of your development. Ie, just have the IDE open as you're developing and write your test as you go to cut down on your dev time. (Instead of having to manually go through the UI to get to the point where you can test whatever you're working on, just hit a button and Selenium IDE will take care of that for you. It's a terrific time-saver!)
Most of my major use case scenarios have Selenium RC tests to back them up. You can't really think of them as unit-tests along the lines of an xUnit framework, but they are tests targetted to very specific functionality. They're quick to write (especially if you implement common methods for things like logging in or setting up your test cases), quick to run, and provide a very tight feedback loop. In those senses Selenium RC tests are very similar to unit-tests.
I think, like anything else, if you put the effort into properly learning a test tool (eg, Selenium), your effort will pay off in spades. You mention that your company already uses Selenium to do UI testing. This is great. Work with it. If you find Selenium hard to use, or confusing, stick with it. The learning curve really isn't all that steep once you learn the API a little bit.
If I'm working on a web app, its rare for me to write a significant amount of code without Selenium RC tests to back it up. That's how effective I find Selenium. :) (Hopefully that'll answer your question..)
We use Watin at my place of employment, we are a .net shop so this solution made a lot of sense. We actually started with Watir (the original ruby implementation) and switched after. It's been a pretty good solution for us so far
Well, if you've designed your application properly, you won't have scads of logic inside the UI anyway. It makes much more sense to separate the actual work getting done into units separate from the UI, and then test those.
If you do that, then the only code in the UI will be code that invokes the backend, so simply testing the backend is sufficient.
I have used NUnit ASP in the past (at my job), and if you insist on unit testing your UI, I would strongly advise you to use ANYTHING but NUnit ASP. It's a pain to work with, and tests tend to be invalidated (needing to be revised) after even the most minor UI changes (even if the subjects of the tests don't actually change).
We are using QuickTestPro. So far it is effective, but the browser selection is limited. The nicest part is the ability to record your browser's activity, and convert it into a scriptable set of steps. There is also a nice .Net addin so if you have any validation code you need to do for the different stages of your test, you can write methods in an assembly and call them from your script.
We use Visual Studio 2008 Tester Edition.
Pros:
Very good at capturing user interaction
Captures Ajax calls
It is very easy to map user input to a database, XML or CSV file
The captured test can be converted to C# for more control
The same tests can be used for load testing and code coverage
Cons:
VS2008 Tester Edition is a seperate SKU from the normal Developer Edition, which means extra cost
You may be alergic to Microsoft ;-)
We have used it very effectively on projects, however there a lot of effort involved in keeping tests up to date, every time you change a screen the test may need to be re-recorded
We tend to keep the tests short and sharp, do one thing and get out instead of recording 10 minutes worth of clicking around in a single test.
We have a few standard UI test types:
Menu Test: Log in as a specific user (or user type/role) and make sure all the required menu items are available
Validation Test: Open a page and click save without entering any data, ensure that all the validation warnings appear. Complete required fields one at a time and check that the warning messages disappear when they are supposed to.
Search Test: Search using data from your database or a data file and ensure the correct data is returned by the search
Data Entry Test: Create new recrords from a data file, cleanup the database to allow tests to run multiple times
UI Testing is quite time consuming but the comfort feeling you get when a few hundred tests pass before you release a new version is priceless.
We have been using JSunit for a while to do unit tests... it may not be the same kinds of tests you are talking about, but it is great for ensuring your JavaScript works as you expect.
You run it in the browser, and it can be set in an Ant build to be automatically run against a bunch of browsers on a bunch of platforms remotely (so you can ensure your code is cross-browser as well as ensure the logic is correct).
I don't think it replaces Selenium, but it complements it well.
We use Selenium Core, but are switching gradually to Selenium RC which is much nicer and easier to manage. We have written lots of custom code to make the tests run on our Continuous Integration servers, some of them in parallel suites to run faster.
One thing you'll find is that Selenium seems to restart the browser for each test (you can set it not to do this, but we got memory problems when we did that). This can be slow in Firefox, but is not too bad in IE (one time I'm thankful for Bill Gates's OS integraion).
I've used WATIR, which is pretty good. I liked it because it's Ruby and allows for testing interactivity, available elements and source code parsing. I haven't used it for a while but I assume it's gotten better.
It's supposedly being ported to Firefox and Safari, but that's been happening for a while now.
Check out Canoo Web Test. It is open source and built on the ANT framework.
I spent some time working with it for a graduate course on Software QA and it seems to be a pretty powerful testing tool.
Selenium Grid can run your web tests across multiple machines in parallel, which can speed up the web testing process
I mostly use CubicTest, which is an eclipse plugin that lets you define tests graphically. It can export/run tests through several libraries, including watir and selenium. Most people just use the Selenium runner though.
Full disclosure: I'm one of the developers, so I'm kind of biased :)
Take a closer look here: cubictest.openqa.org
-Erlend
Selenium is for Integration testing, not Unit testing. It's a subtle, but important difference. The usage I usually see is for sanity checking a build. i.e., have a test that logs in, a test that (for example) submits a story, makes a comment, etc.
The idea is that you're testing to see if the whole system is working together before deployment, rather than have a user discover that your site is broken.
We currently use Silk4J - a Java centric approach to testing Web UI. It can test Flash, Flex, AIR, Silver Light, Win32, HTML, and a few other applications.
Since Silk4J can control Win32 apps it can control browser dialogs directly, which is a step above what Selenium can control and is especially useful for download prompts.
We use WatiN for system testing, and QUnit for JavaScript unit testing.
Molybdenum is built over Selenium and has some additional features.