How to send multiply time the same type in request soap mock services
<invoiceDatas>
<!--Zero or more repetitions:-->
<invoiceData>
<id>?</id>
<MPK>?</MPK>
<RK>?</RK>
<value>?</value>
</invoiceData>
</invoiceDatas>
i alwyas can send one row with this, but how to change to send for example 3 rows
cans omeone explain
in response i should have
<invoiceDatas>
<!--Zero or more repetitions:-->
<invoiceData>
<id>?</id>
<MPK>?</MPK>
<RK>?</RK>
<value>?</value>
</invoiceData>
<!--Zero or more repetitions:-->
<invoiceData>
<id>?</id>
<MPK>?</MPK>
<RK>?</RK>
<value>?</value>
</invoiceData>
<!--Zero or more repetitions:-->
<invoiceData>
<id>?</id>
<MPK>?</MPK>
<RK>?</RK>
<value>?</value>
</invoiceData>
</invoiceDatas>
how i can do that ?
i knwo the best oprion it is to copy this type but i want to this dynamic by groovy
I've read their documentation and I can't make heads or tails of it. It's so vague and assumes too much for it to be of much use. Using the manual request building process I don't think it's possible to create a repetitive expression in a Manual Request. You'd have to manually write out say 4 or 5 invoiceData nodes each with ? and then fill those in using their Form UI. But you couldn't create a repetition expression (forEach, each, etc) for N items using that method.
So you have to switch to Groovy script, but the documentation there is entirely unhelpful. Using a groovy script I couldn't even get to building a simple request equivalent to what the Manual Request gave you. I think you're best bet is to ask on their forum for help: https://community.smartbear.com/t5/SoapUI-Open-Source/ct-p/soapui-os-community
Beyond that I'd just cut my losses with that tool and go with another more programmer friendly library like: https://github.com/jwagenleitner/groovy-wslite
It's an older library, but I recently used it and I liked it. It was low barrier to get coding, worked without a lot of effort, and had a very low number of dependencies. It's not really supported and uses deprecated classes if you're working Groovy 3 or 4, but it's still quite usable and useful for SOAP.
Related
What is the recommended way in Saxon to load in an XML document from eXist-db via XQuery GET/POST within an XSL stylesheet? I want to run an XQL query in eXist-db, which should be simple enough to do as a GET with <xsl:variable name="test" select="doc('xmldb:exist:///db/test.xql')"/> or <xsl:variable name="test" select="doc('http://localhost:8080/exist/rest/db/test.xql')"/>. But the former doesn't exectute the query and tries to return the XQL source as XML, and the latter doesn't have the basic authentication to execute. Also, I really want to send an XML fragment using POST, and have the XQL use that posted XML fragment.
I can't find anything in the Saxon documentation about this. I did find an old EXPath article at http://expath.org/modules/http-client/samples, but the downloads there are 7 years old, and may not work with modern Saxon. So looking for the best known method to do this.
The first thing that comes to mind is the EXPath HTTP Client module. There's no way to persuade the doc() or document() functions to do POST instead of GET, AFAIK.
I have a Qt TCP Server and Client program which can interact with each other. The Server can send some function generated data to the socket using Qtextstream. And the Client reads the data from the socket using simple readAll() and displays to a QtextEdit.
Now my data from Server side is huge (around 7000+ samples ) and I need the data to appear on the Client side instantaneously. I have learned that using XML will help in my case. So, I made an Qt XML Server and it generates the whole xml data into a .xml file. I read the .xml file in Client side and I can get to display its contents. I used the DOM method for parsing. But I get the data to display only when all the 7000+ samples have been generated on the Server side.
I need clarifications on these questions:
How do I write each element of the XML Server side in to a String and send them through socket? I learnt tagName() can help me, but I have not been able to figure out how.
Is there any other way other than the String method to get a single element generated in the Server side to appear in the Client side.
PS: I am a newbie, forgive my ignorance. Thank you.
Most DOM XML parsers require a complete, well-formed XML document before they'll do anything with it. That's precisely what you see: your data is processed only after all of the samples have been received.
You need to use an incremental parser that doesn't care about the XML document not being complete yet.
On the other hand: if you're not requiring XML for interoperability with 3rd party systems, you're probably wasting a lot of resources by using it. I don't know where you've "learned" that XML will "help in your case". To me it's not learning, it's just following the crowd without understanding what's going on. Is your requirement to use XML or to move the data around? Moving data around has been a well understood problem for decades. Computers "speak" binary. No need to work around it, you know. If all you need is to move around some numbers, use QDataStream and be done with it. It'll be two orders of magnitude faster than the fastest XML parsers, you'll transmit an order of magnitude less data, and everyone will live happily ever after*.
*living happily ever after not guaranteed, individual results may vary.
I want to change the double quotes to single quotes for a single namespace declaration in my document, while leaving all other namespace declarations as double quotes. How can I do this?
Here's the response document from the server:
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><soapenv:Envelope
xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"><soapenv:Body><InquiryResponse
xmlns="http://www.openuri.org/"><Header><HeaderAttr1>abcd</HeaderAttr1><HeaderAttr2>xxx</HeaderAttr2><HeaderAttr3>string</HeaderAttr3></Header><Body><InquiryResult><ResultItem1>theresulttext</ResultItem1><ResultItem2>abcd</ResultItem2><ResultItem3>0</ResultItem3></InquiryResult></Body></InquiryResponse></soapenv:Body></soapenv:Envelope>
I need something like (note that open:InquiryResponse has ' not ").
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <SOAP-ENV:Envelope
xmlns:SOAP-ENV="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"> <SOAP-ENV:Body>
<open:InquiryResponse
xmlns:open='http://www.openuri.org/'><open:Header><open:HeaderAttr1>abcd</open:HeaderAttr1><open:HeaderAttr2>xxx</open:HeaderAttr2><open:HeaderAttr3>string</open:HeaderAttr3></open:Header><open:Body><open:InquiryResult><open:ResultItem1>theresulttext</open:ResultItem1><open:ResultItem2>abcd</open:ResultItem2><open:ResultItem3>0</open:ResultItem3></open:InquiryResult></open:Body></open:InquiryResponse>
</SOAP-ENV:Body> </SOAP-ENV:Envelope>
I have been able to do namespace prefix change, additional namespace declarations, whitespace fixups, character set change, all I need now is to change those two bytes.
I'm using Spring WS + Woodstox + Axiom to build a simple inquiry web service. It's a replacement for an existing service and I would like to make it byte-for-byte identical ($$ reasons). I can get the XML to identical type, but we don't know at this point which consumers use a grep or regex to find the data.
I am trying to attack this problem so far using an XSLT and PayloadTransformingInterceptor. I would be interested in other options as well.
Comments are pretty much correct: there is no "clean" programmatic solution to configuring low-levels with such precision. And given fragility, you are best off using textual mangling; most likely regexps would work well enough if this is for testing or such.
After re-reading your question and examples a few times I think I understand the problem :)
I think you should take a look at the PayloadTransformingInterceptor. You can transform the incoming and outgoing messages in that interceptor. A typical usage of that interceptor is to support an older version of your wsdl by transforming it to the new version. This interceptor can work both ways - in your case only outgoing.
I'm not sure if this can be fixed by using XSLT. If not, you can create your own Interceptor to provide the specific string replacement functionality you need.
The solution was to drop Spring-WS, and instead move to CXF. CXF allows interceptors at any stage of processing, and hence full access to the bytes of the message stream. Ugly, but working. Build an interceptor to hook the OutputStream at PRE_STREAM and then do the fix at PRE_STREAM_ENDING, and you will have full control over the SOAP Envelope.
Thank you all for your responses. It sucks but it works, and is reasonably easy to disconnect when we have the time to do it properly (!!).
I have a C++ application which has written for years. There are a lot of classes.
Every time we want to change some parameter values, we need to manually update them in the code and recompile it. It is not convenient as the growing demands of the users. We would like the values of the classes to be configured out side of the application. Probably, reading form an xml is the best? for each user, we can make an xml configuration setting and send it together with the application. Is it a good approach?
For every class e.g: Class classA, should we create another class called: ConfigClassA then classA will use the configuration setting from ConfigClassA? We dont want to make a lot of changes in the current implementation.
Suppose there is a structure of an xml file:
<classes>
<class name="ClassA">
<variable id="isUp" value="true" />
</class>
</classes>
In Xml, we can get the portion classA and parse it to ConfigClassA then classA has an instance of ConfigClass.
Or anybody has a better approach?
Thanks in advance.
In general I think that the whole configuration should be loaded when an application is launched, so you can immediately notify the user in case of an invalid configuration. In order to validate an XML file, you can use XML Schema.
However, if you don't want to make a lot of changes in the current implementation, your idea could be a valid solution.
Using JSON or YAML will be more lightweight than XML, since the parser of the config file will be simpler. Anyway, XML is also feasible.
It's actually quite common to have configuration files. The format in which they are stored is not important. They are usually loaded only once, at the beginning of the program, not queried each time a method requests something.
Also, you should make a tool available for editing these files (such as a "Preferences..." panel).
I need to write an application that fetches element name value (time-series data) pair from any xml source, be it file, web server, any other server. the application would consume the XML and take out values of interest, it has to be very very fast (lets say 50000 events/seconds or more) also the XML document size would be huge and frequency of these document could be high as well (for ex. 2500 files/min - more than 500MB of XML data/file).
I just want to see how you experienced people think I should approach this. I am a novice who just got started although I can do any solution you suggest me, no matter how tough/easy.
Thank you very much.
If you use SAX parsing, your bottleneck is the I/O involved, not the XML string processing. And given your 500 MB number, I'd say you'd have to do SAX parsing instead of DOM parsing. So, anything with a SAX type interface should be just fine.
I'm a fan of Xerces, I think you are going to have to try them out to see what has the best performance for your application. Like Warren said you will want to use SAX processing. Realistically if you truly need the performance you should use a specialized XML appliance to do the processing.
I use libxml2 in our projects. It supports both SAX and DOM.
As Warren Young said, you should use SAX. You could give Expat a try.