Accessing Amazon Connect from inside of VPC - amazon-web-services

I'm trying to make a call from a lambda function within VPC using boto3.start_outbound_voice_contact(). Since the lambda function cannot reach whatever outside the VPC, simply invoking the boto3.start_outbound_voice_contact() function.
I have came up with placing a VPC endpoint between lambda and Amazon Connect. But I am not sure which of the following types of endpoint boto3.start_outbound_voice_contact() belongs to.
Amazon AppIntegrations
Customer Profiles
Outbound campaigns
Voice ID
Wisdom
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/connect/latest/adminguide/vpc-interface-endpoints.html

Related

AWS Lambda can't retrieve file from an Amazon S3 Bucket in same network

I have a AWS project that contains a S3 bucket, RDS database and Lambda functions.
I want Lambda to have access to both the S3 bucket and the RDS database.
The Lambda functions connects to the RDS database correctly but it times out when trying to retrieve an object from the S3 bucket:
Event needs-retry.s3.GetObject: calling handler <bound method S3RegionRedirectorv2.redirect_from_error of <botocore.utils.S3RegionRedirectorv2 object at 0x7f473a4ae910>>
...
(some more error lines)
...
botocore.exceptions.ConnectTimeoutError: Connect timeout on endpoint URL: "https://{bucket name}.s3.eu-west-3.amazonaws.com/{file name}.tar.gz"
So I understand that the reason would be that Lambda doesn't have internet access and therefor my options are:
VPC endpoint (privatelink): https://aws.amazon.com/privatelink
NAT gateway for Lambda
But both go over the cloud (in same region), which doesn't make any sense as they are both in the same project.
It's just a redundant cost for such a detail and there must be a better solution right?
Maybe it helps you to think of the S3 bucket "in the same project" as having permission to use an object system that resides in a different network outside your own. Your lambda is in VPC but S3 objects are not in your VPC. You access them using either public end-points (over the internet) or privately by establishing S3 Gateway endpoint or VPC Interface Endpoint. Neither uses public internet.
As long as you are staying in the same region, S3 gateway endpoint actually does not cost you money but if you need to cross regions, you will need to use VPC Interface endpoint. The differences are documented here: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/userguide/privatelink-interface-endpoints.html
If you are trying to avoid costs, S3 gateway might work for you, however, you will need to update your route tables that's associated with the gateway. The process is documented here: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/vpc/latest/privatelink/vpc-endpoints-s3.html

AWS Lambda access to Redshift, S3 and Secrets Manager

I am new to AWS and trying to wrap my head around how I can build a data pipeline using Lambda, S3, Redshift and Secrets Manager. I have searched the web, read a number of documents/tutorials, yet I am still a bit confused as to how I can configure this properly.
In my stack, Lambda will be the core of the tooling, where lambda will need to call out to external APIs, write/read data to S3, access Secrets Manager and be able to connect to redshift for data loading and querying.
My question. What do I have for options to configure this setup and allow for lambda to access all of the necessary tools/services?
For context, I have been able to poke around and get most things working, but access to Redshift is what has slowed me down. If I put the lambda into the same VPC as Redshift (default), I lose access to everything else, so I am not certain as to how to proceed.
For context, I have been able to poke around and get most things working, but access to Redshift is what has slowed me down. If I put the lambda into the same VPC as Redshift (default), I lose access to everything else, so I am not certain as to how to proceed.
A Lambda running in a VPC does not ever get a public IP address. This causes issues when it tries to access things outside the VPC, such as S3 and Secrets Manager.
There are two ways to fix this access issue:
Move the Lambda function to private VPC subnets with a route to a NAT Gateway.
Add VPC Gateways to your VPC for the AWS services you need.
Since you only need your Lambda function to access other AWS services, and not the Internet, you should add an S3 VPC Gateway, and a Secrets Manager VPC Gateway to your VPC.

Create s3 endpoint to a different region than current one

I have an account in region ca-central. I wish to make call to a Public S3 bucket located in us-east.
As much as possible, these call have to be make through https (I am actually using apt-get), but if not possible I can try to use CLI call to download my data.
I can not exit public network due to firewall limitations, I need to stay internal to AWS network.
Can I do it through a S3 endpoint? The only endpoint I can create are connected to my current region (so ca-central). Or the only way is to do it through public network?
Yes, regardless of which region the bucket lives in, you will be able to reach it via AWS private link with either a VPC interface or gateway endpoint deployed correctly in the region you're working in.

AWS Lambda timesout with boto3.resource('s3')

I have created a lambda to react when files are uploaded to a bucket.
One of my first actions is to retrieve the version_id of the file using boto3.
Below is a function which get the version_id based on bucket and key.
The s3_resource.Object call seems to work fine. But if I un-comment the line which prints the actual version_id, then my lambda times out (timeout is set to 120s).
The print of the object itself seems to work fine, it's only if I try to print the version_id that it times out. Would this have something do the with the NAT gateway?
def get_file_version_id(bucket, key):
s3_resource = boto3.resource('s3')
file_obj = s3_resource.Object(bucket,key)
print(f'file_obj: {file_obj}')
#print(f'version_id: {file_obj.version_id}')
#return file_obj.version_id
return "Some Return Value"
You are using the high-level Resource API calls rather than the low-level Client API calls.
Resources, such as s3.Bucket have attributes and these are lazy-loaded properties. So, when you create an s3.Object, that's a purely local thing. But when you try to access one of its properties, e.g. the content of an existing object or its version ID, the boto3 SDK will then make an actual API call to the S3 service.
The reason that your code times out is most likely that you do not have a network path to the S3 service. That probably means that you are running your Lambda function in a VPC and you have either deployed it in a public subnet or in a private subnet without also giving that subnet a default route to the internet via a NAT and Internet Gateway or an S3 VPC Endpoint.
So, either deploy your Lambda function outside of VPC. Or, if you need it to be in a VPC, then deploy it into a private subnet of your VPC (not a public subnet) and then ensure you have IGW and NAT in your public subnet and a default route from the Lambda's private subnet to the NAT. Or alternatively go the private subnet and S3 VPC Endpoint route.
PS check the event parameter passed into your Lambda function handler, just in case it actually provides you with the version ID. I'm not sure if it does or not, but it would be good to check.

Access AWS S3 from Lambda within VPC

Overall, I'm pretty confused by using AWS Lambda within a VPC. The problem is Lambda is timing out while trying to access an S3 bucket. The solution seems to be a VPC Endpoint.
I've added the Lambda function to a VPC so it can access an RDS hosted database (not shown in the code below, but functional). However, now I can't access S3 and any attempt to do so times out.
I tried creating a VPC S3 Endpoint, but nothing has changed.
VPC Configuration
I'm using a simple VPC created by default whenever I first made an EC2 instance. It has four subnets, all created by default.
VPC Route Table
_Destination - Target - Status - Propagated_
172.31.0.0/16 - local - Active - No
pl-63a5400a (com.amazonaws.us-east-1.s3) - vpce-b44c8bdd - Active - No
0.0.0.0/0 - igw-325e6a56 - Active - No
Simple S3 Download Lambda:
import boto3
import pymysql
from StringIO import StringIO
def lambda_handler(event, context):
s3Obj = StringIO()
return boto3.resource('s3').Bucket('marineharvester').download_fileobj('Holding - Midsummer/sample', s3Obj)
There is another solution related to VPC endpoints.
On AWS Console, choose VPC service and then Endpoints. Create a new endpoint, associate it to s3 service
and then select the VPC and Route Table.
Then select access level (full or custom) and it will work.
With boto3, the S3 urls are virtual by default, which then require internet access to be resolved to region specific urls. This causes the hanging of the Lambda function until timeout.
To resolve this requires use of a Config object when creating the client, which tells boto3 to create path based S3 urls instead:
import boto3
import botocore
client = boto3.client('s3', 'ap-southeast-2', config=botocore.config.Config(s3={'addressing_style':'path'}))
Note that the region in the call must be the region to which you are deploying the lambda and VPC Endpoint.
Then you will be able to use the pl-xxxxxx prefix list for the VPC Endpoint within the Lambda's security group, and still access S3.
Here is a working CloudFormation script that demonstrates this. It creates an S3 bucket, a lambda (that puts records into the bucket) associated to a VPC containing only private subnets and the VPC Endpoint, and necessary IAM roles.
There's another issue having to do with subnets and routes that is not addressed in the other answers, so I am creating a separate answer with the proviso that all the above answers apply. You have to get them all right for the lambda function to access S3.
When you create a new AWS account which I did last fall, there is no route table automatically associated with your default VPC (see Route Tables -> Subnet Associations in the Console).
So if you follow the instructions to create an Endpoint and create a route for that Endpoint, no route gets added, because there's no subnet to put it on. And as usual with AWS you don't get an error message...
What you should do is create a subnet for your lambda function, associate that subnet with the route table and the lambda function, and then rerun the Endpoint instructions and you will, if successful, find a route table that has three entries like this:
Destination Target
10.0.0.0/16 Local
0.0.0.0/0 igw-1a2b3c4d
pl-1a2b3c4d vpce-11bb22cc
If you only have two entries (no 'pl-xxxxx' entry), then you have not yet succeeded.
In the end I guess it should be no surprise that a lambda function needs a subnet to live on, like any other entity in a network. And it's probably advisable that it not live on the same subnet as your EC2 instances because lambda might need different routes or security permissions. Note that the GUI in lambda really wants you to have two subnets in two different AZs which is also a good idea.
The cause of my issue had been not properly configuring the Outbound Rules of my security group. Specifically, I needed to add Custom Protocol Outbound Rule with a destination of pl-XXXXXXXX (the S3 service. The actual value was provided by the AWS Console).
I just wanted to add one other answer amongst the others, which might affect those running functions with slow cold start times.
I'd followed all the instructions about setting up a gateway for S3, but still it didn't work. I created a test Node.js function which simply listed the buckets - I verified that this didn't work without the S3 gateway, but did once the gateway was established. So I knew that part of things was working fine.
As I was debugging this I was changing the timeout of the function to ensure the function was updated and I was using the latest version of the code when invoking and testing.
I'd reduced the timeout to 10s, only it turned out my function needed more like 15s on cold boot. Once I'd increased the timeout again, it worked.
Adding to the answer from Luis RM, this is a construct that can be used in CDK:
const vpcEndpoint = new ec2.GatewayVpcEndpoint(this, 'S3GatewayVpcEndpoint', {
vpc: myVpc,
service: { name: 'com.amazonaws.us-west-1.s3' },
})
const rolePolicies = [
{
Sid: 'AccessToSpecificBucket',
Effect: 'Allow',
Action: [
's3:ListBucket',
's3:GetObject',
's3:PutObject',
's3:DeleteObject',
's3:GetObjectVersion',
],
Resource: ['arn:aws:s3:::myBucket', arn:aws:s3:::myBucket/*'],
Principal: '*',
},
]
rolePolicies.forEach((policy) => {
vpcEndpoint.addToPolicy(iam.PolicyStatement.fromJson(policy))
})
To access S3 from within the Lambda function which is within a VPC, you can use a Natgateway (a much expensive solution in comparison to the VPC endpoint ). If you have two private subnets within the VPC, (where subnets are having a route to a NAT gateway ) and associate them with the Lambda, it can access the S3 bucket like any Lambda which are outside the VPC.
Gotchas
If you associate a public subnet with the Lambda expect it to work, it will not.
Make sure your security group is in place to accept ingress.
This approach will make any service available in the internet accessible to the Lambda function . For detailed steps you can follow this blog https://blog.theodo.com/2020/01/internet-access-to-lambda-in-vpc/
There are 3 ways to access S3 from within private subnet in a VPC
NAT Gateway
Gateway Endpoint
Interface Endpoint
I assume that you don't want to use NAT Gateway.
If you're using Gateway endpoint - you don't need to change the endpoint that you connect to S3. But if you're using interface endpoint, you need to update the s3 endpoint.
There is a detailed step-by-step guide on doing the same here - https://www.cloudtechsimplified.com/aws-lambda-vpc-s3/