Using Perl to spit out HTML text, I'd like to highlight in yellow an asterisk and leading/trailing letter if there's no space in between. Otherwise, if there are spaces around the asterisk, I want to highlight the asterisk in cyan. Here's what I'd like as far as inputs / outputs.
Input 1 : word*
Output 1: wor<span class='bcy'>d*</span>
Input 2 : *word
Output 2: <span class='bcy'>*w</span>ord
Input 3 : word * word
Output 3: word <span class='bcc'>*</span> word
I'm using the following, but losing that leading/trailing letter and asterisk since $1 is used in execution instead of capturing. Is there a way to do both ?
$phr =~ s/(\*\S|\S\*)|\*/$1 ? '<span class=\'bcy\'>$1<\/span>' : '<span class=\'bcc\'>*<\/span>'/eg;
What comes in the replacement side with /e modifier must be correct Perl code, and I am getting a little lost trying to trace through your (well meant) quotes and escapes.†
Here is a fresh take on it
use warnings;
use strict;
use feature 'say';
my $span_beg_1 = q(<span class='bcy'>);
my $span_beg_2 = q(<span class='bcc'>);
my $span_end = q(</span>);
while (<DATA>) {
chomp;
s{ (\*\S|\S\*) | \* }
{ $1 ? $span_beg_1 . $1 . $span_end : $span_beg_2 . q(*) . $span_end }egx;
say
}
__DATA__
word*
*word
word * word
The DATA is Perl's builtin filehandle which reads line by line data appearing after __DATA__.
The q() is an operator form of single quotes, very handy for cleanly quoting string literals which may then freely use quotes.
The exact structure of constants I set up above can surely be simplified and/or improved.
This prints
wor<span class='bcy'>d*</span>
<span class='bcy'>*w</span>ord
word <span class='bcc'>*</span> word
† For one, '<span class=\'bcy\'>$1<\/span>' won't do what is expected (consider 'a$1c'), as $1 isn't interpolated. Perhaps "a${1}b" would do it, and then given the special nature of $1 even "a$1b" goes.
So it appears that if you just replace the single quotes around the HTML elements with the double ones, so to interpolate the $1 inside, that it works. Then you can remove the escapes in front of single quotes in those elements, as well.
But then just better extract those constants anyway. It's so much easier to read and ensure that it's all the way you want it.
I find separate regexes for such problems much easier to understand and maintain as a case distinction is necessary anyway. Up to your use case the [a-z] character class should maybe be replaced by [A-Za-z] or \w.
The e modifier is also not needed in the following code:
$phr =~ s{([a-z])\b\*} {<span class='bcy'>$1*</span>}g;
$phr =~ s{\*\b([a-z])} {<span class='bcy'>*$1</span>}g;
$phr =~ s{\b \* \b} { <span class='bcc'>*</span> }g;
Related
I'm having difficulty writing a Perl program to extract the word following a certain word.
For example:
Today i'm not going anywhere except to office.
I want the word after anywhere, so the output should be except.
I have tried this
my $words = "Today i'm not going anywhere except to office.";
my $w_after = ( $words =~ /anywhere (\S+)/ );
but it seems this is wrong.
Very close:
my ($w_after) = ($words =~ /anywhere\s+(\S+)/);
^ ^ ^^^
+--------+ |
Note 1 Note 2
Note 1: =~ returns a list of captured items, so the assignment target needs to be a list.
Note 2: allow one or more blanks after anywhere
In Perl v5.22 and later, you can use \b{wb} to get better results for natural language. The pattern could be
/anywhere\b{wb}.+?\b{wb}(.+?\b{wb})/
"wb" stands for word break, and it will account for words that have apostrophes in them, like "I'll", that plain \b doesn't.
.+?\b{wb}
matches the shortest non-empty sequence of characters that don't have a word break in them. The first one matches the span of spaces in your sentence; and the second one matches "except". It is enclosed in parentheses, so upon completion $1 contains "except".
\b{wb} is documented most fully in perlrebackslash
First, you have to write parentheses around left side expression of = operator to force array context for regexp evaluation. See m// and // in perlop documentation.[1] You can write
parentheses also around =~ binding operator to improve readability but it is not necessary because =~ has pretty high priority.
Use POSIX Character Classes word
my ($w_after) = ($words =~ / \b anywhere \W+ (\w+) \b /x);
Note I'm using x so whitespaces in regexp are ignored. Also use \b word boundary to anchor regexp correctly.
[1]: I write my ($w_after) just for convenience because you can write my ($a, $b, $c, #rest) as equivalent of (my $a, my $b, my $c, my #rest) but you can also control scope of your variables like (my $a, our $UGLY_GLOBAL, local $_, #_).
This Regex to be matched:
my ($expect) = ($words=~m/anywhere\s+([^\s]+)\s+/);
^\s+ the word between two spaces
Thanks.
If you want to also take into consideration the punctuation marks, like in:
my $words = "Today i'm not going anywhere; except to office.";
Then try this:
my ($w_after) = ($words =~ /anywhere[[:punct:]|\s]+(\S+)/);
I want to create extract the first two words from a sentence using a Perl function in PostgreSQL. In PostgreSQL, I can do this with:
text = "I am trying to make this work";
Select substring(text from '(^\w+-\w+|^\w+(\s+)?(!|,|\&|'')?(\s+)?\w+)');
It would return "I Am"
I tried to build a Perl function in Postgresql that does the same thing.
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION extract_first_two (text)
RETURNS text AS
$$
my $my_text = $_[0];
my $temp;
$pattern = '^\w+-\w+|^\w+(\s+)?(!|,|\&|'')?(\s+)?\w+)';
my $regex = qr/$pattern/;
if ($my_text=~ $regex) {
$temp = $1;
}
return $temp;
$$ LANGUAGE plperl;
But I receive a syntax error near the regular expression. I am not sure what I am doing wrong.
Extracting words is none trivial even in English. Take the following contrived example using Locale::CLDR
use 'Locale::CLDR';
my $locale = Locale::CLDR->new('en');
my #words = $locale->split_words('adf543. 123.25');
#words now contains
adf543
.
123.25
Note that the full stop after adf543 is split into a separate word but the one between 123 and 25 is kept as part of the number 123.25 even though the '.' is the same character
If gets worse when you look at non English languages and much worse when you use non Latin scripts.
You need to precisely define what you think a word is otherwise the following French gets split incorrectly.
Je avais dit «Elle a dit «Il a dit «Ni» il ya trois secondes»»
The parentheses are mismatched in our regex pattern. It has three opening parentheses and four closing ones.
Also, you have two single quotes in the middle of a singly-quoted string, so
'^\w+-\w+|^\w+(\s+)?(!|,|\&|'')?(\s+)?\w+)'
is parsed as two separate strings
'^\w+-\w+|^\w+(\s+)?(!|,|\&|'')?(\s+)?\w+)'
and
'^\w+-\w+|^\w+(\s+)?(!|,|\&|'
')?(\s+)?\w+)'
But I can't suggest how to fix it as I don't understand your intention.
Did you mean a double quote perhaps? In which case (!|,|\&|")? can be written as [!,&"]?
Update
At a rough guess I think you want this
my $regex = qr{ ^ \w++ \s* [-!,&"]* \s* \w+ }x;
$temp = $1 if $my_text=~ /($regex)/;
but I can't be sure. If you describe what you're looking for in English then I can help you better. For instance, it's unclear why you don't have question marks, full stops, and semicolons in the list of intervening punctuation.
I have a file with submissions like this
%TRYYVJT128F93506D3<SEP>SOYKCDV12AB0185D99<SEP>Rainie Yang<SEP>Ai Wo Qing shut up (OT: Shotgun(Aka Shot Gun))
%TRYYVHU128F933CCB3<SEP>SOCCHZY12AB0185CE6<SEP>Tepr<SEP>Achète-moi
I am stripping everything but the song name by using this regex.
$line =~ s/.*>|([([\/\_\-:"``+=*].*)|(feat.*)|[?¿!¡\.;&\$#%#\\|]//g;
I want to make sure that the only strings printed are ones that contain only English characters, so in this case it would the first song title Ai Wo Quing shut up and not the next one because of the è.
I have tried this
if ( $line =~ m/[^a-zA-z0-9_]*$/ ) {
print $line;
}
else {
print "Non-english\n";
I thought this would match just the English characters, but it always prints Non-english. I feel this is me being rusty with regex, but I cannot find my answer.
Following from the comments, your problem would appear to be:
$line =~ m/[^a-zA-z0-9_]*$/
Specifically - the ^ is inside the brackets, which means that it's not acting as an 'anchor'. It's actually a negation operator
See: http://perldoc.perl.org/perlrecharclass.html#Negation
It is also possible to instead list the characters you do not want to match. You can do so by using a caret (^) as the first character in the character class. For instance, [^a-z] matches any character that is not a lowercase ASCII letter, which therefore includes more than a million Unicode code points. The class is said to be "negated" or "inverted".
But the important part is - that without the 'start of line' anchor, your regular expression is zero-or-more instances (of whatever), so will match pretty much anything - because it can freely ignore the line content.
(Borodin's answer covers some of the other options for this sort of pattern match, so I shan't reproduce).
It's not clear exactly what you need, so here are a couple of observations that speak to what you have written.
It is probably best if you use split to divide each line of data on <SEP>, which I presume is a separator. Your question asks for the fourth such field, like this
use strict;
use warnings;
use 5.010;
while ( <DATA> ) {
chomp;
my #fields = split /<SEP>/;
say $fields[3];
}
__DATA__
%TRYYVJT128F93506D3<SEP>SOYKCDV12AB0185D99<SEP>Rainie Yang<SEP>Ai Wo Qing shut up (OT: Shotgun(Aka Shot Gun))
%TRYYVHU128F933CCB3<SEP>SOCCHZY12AB0185CE6<SEP>Tepr<SEP>Achète-moi
output
Ai Wo Qing shut up (OT: Shotgun(Aka Shot Gun))
Achète-moi
Also, the word character class \w matches exactly [a-zA-z0-9_] (and \W matches the complement) so you can rewrite your if statement like this
if ( $line =~ /\W/ ) {
print "Non-English\n";
}
else {
print $line;
}
I have a question I am hoping someone could help with...
I have a variable that contains the content from a webpage (scraped using WWW::Mechanize).
The variable contains data such as these:
$var = "ewrfs sdfdsf cat_dog,horse,rabbit,chicken-pig"
$var = "fdsf iiukui aawwe dffg elephant,MOUSE_RAT,spider,lion-tiger hdsfds jdlkf sdf"
$var = "dsadp poids pewqwe ANTELOPE-GIRAFFE,frOG,fish,crab,kangaROO-KOALA sdfdsf hkew"
The only bits I am interested in from the above examples are:
#array = ("cat_dog","horse","rabbit","chicken-pig")
#array = ("elephant","MOUSE_RAT","spider","lion-tiger")
#array = ("ANTELOPE-GIRAFFE","frOG","fish","crab","kangaROO-KOALA")
The problem I am having:
I am trying to extract only the comma-separated strings from the variables and then store these in an array for use later on.
But what is the best way to make sure that I get the strings at the start (ie cat_dog) and end (ie chicken-pig) of the comma-separated list of animals as they are not prefixed/suffixed with a comma.
Also, as the variables will contain webpage content, it is inevitable that there may also be instances where a commas is immediately succeeded by a space and then another word, as that is the correct method of using commas in paragraphs and sentences...
For example:
Saturn was long thought to be the only ringed planet, however, this is now known not to be the case.
^ ^
| |
note the spaces here and here
I am not interested in any cases where the comma is followed by a space (as shown above).
I am only interested in cases where the comma DOES NOT have a space after it (ie cat_dog,horse,rabbit,chicken-pig)
I have a tried a number of ways of doing this but cannot work out the best way to go about constructing the regular expression.
How about
[^,\s]+(,[^,\s]+)+
which will match one or more characters that are not a space or comma [^,\s]+ followed by a comma and one or more characters that are not a space or comma, one or more times.
Further to comments
To match more than one sequence add the g modifier for global matching.
The following splits each match $& on a , and pushes the results to #matches.
my $str = "sdfds cat_dog,horse,rabbit,chicken-pig then some more pig,duck,goose";
my #matches;
while ($str =~ /[^,\s]+(,[^,\s]+)+/g) {
push(#matches, split(/,/, $&));
}
print join("\n",#matches),"\n";
Though you can probably construct a single regex, a combination of regexs, splits, grep and map looks decently
my #array = map { split /,/ } grep { !/^,/ && !/,$/ && /,/ } split
Going from right to left:
Split the line on spaces (split)
Leave only elements having no comma at the either end but having one inside (grep)
Split each such element into parts (map and split)
That way you can easily change the parts e.g. to eliminate two consecutive commas add && !/,,/ inside grep.
I hope this is clear and suits your needs:
#!/usr/bin/perl
use warnings;
use strict;
my #strs = ("ewrfs sdfdsf cat_dog,horse,rabbit,chicken-pig",
"fdsf iiukui aawwe dffg elephant,MOUSE_RAT,spider,lion-tiger hdsfds jdlkf sdf",
"dsadp poids pewqwe ANTELOPE-GIRAFFE,frOG,fish,crab,kangaROO-KOALA sdfdsf hkew",
"Saturn was long thought to be the only ringed planet, however, this is now known not to be the case.",
"Another sentence, although having commas, should not confuse the regex with this: a,b,c,d");
my $regex = qr/
\s #From your examples, it seems as if every
#comma separated list is preceded by a space.
(
(?:
[^,\s]+ #Now, not a comma or a space for the
#terms of the list
, #followed by a comma
)+
[^,\s]+ #followed by one last term of the list
)
/x;
my #matches = map {
$_ =~ /$regex/;
if ($1) {
my $comma_sep_list = $1;
[split ',', $comma_sep_list];
}
else {
[]
}
} #strs;
$var =~ tr/ //s;
while ($var =~ /(?<!, )\b[^, ]+(?=,\S)|(?<=,)[^, ]+(?=,)|(?<=\S,)[^, ]+\b(?! ,)/g) {
push (#arr, $&);
}
the regular expression matches three cases :
(?<!, )\b[^, ]+(?=,\S) : matches cat_dog
(?<=,)[^, ]+(?=,) : matches horse & rabbit
(?<=\S,)[^, ]+\b(?! ,) : matches chicken-pig
As stated in the title, is there a way, using regular expressions, to match a text pattern for text that appears outside of quotes. Ideally, given the following examples, I would want to be able to match the comma that is outside of the quotes, but not the one in the quotes.
This is some text, followed by "text, in quotes!"
or
This is some text, followed by "text, in quotes" with more "text, in quotes!"
Additionally, it would be nice if the expression would respect nested quotes as in the following example. However, if this is technically not feasible with regular expressions then it wold simply be nice to know if that is the case.
The programmer looked up from his desk, "This can't be good," he exclaimed, "the system is saying 'File not found!'"
I have found some expressions for matching something that would be in the quotes, but nothing quite for something outside of the quotes.
Easiest is matching both commas and quoted strings, and then filtering out the quoted strings.
/"[^"]*"|,/g
If you really can't have the quotes matching, you could do something like this:
/,(?=[^"]*(?:"[^"]*"[^"]*)*\Z)/g
This could become slow, because for each comma, it has to look at the remaining characters and count the number of quotes. \Z matches the end of the string. Similar to $, but will never match line ends.
If you don't mind an extra capture group, it could be done like this instead:
/\G((?:[^"]*"[^"]*")*?[^"]*?)(,)/g
This will only scan the string once. It counts the quotes from the beginning of the string instead. \G will match the position where last match ended.
The last pattern could need an example.
Input String: 'This is, some text, followed by "text, in quotes!" and more ,-as'
Matches:
1. ['This is', ',']
2. [' some text', ',']
3. [' and followed by "text, in quotes!" and more ', ',']
It matches the string leading up to the comma, as well as the comma.
This can be done with modern regexes due to the massive number of hacks to regex engines that exist, but let me be the one to post the "Don't Do This With Regular Expressions" answer.
This is not a job for regular expressions. This is a job for a full-blown parser. As an example of something you can't do with (classical) regular expressions, consider this:
()(())(()())
No (classical) regex can determine if those parenthesis are matched properly, but doing so without a regex is trivial:
/* C code */
char string[] = "()(())(()())";
int parens = 0;
for(char *tmp = string; tmp; tmp++)
{
if(*tmp == '(') parens++;
if(*tmp == ')') parens--;
}
if(parens > 0)
{
printf("%s too many open parenthesis.\n", parens);
}
else if(parens < 0)
{
printf("%s too many closing parenthesis.\n", -parens);
}
else
{
printf("Parenthesis match!\n");
}
# Perl code
my $string = "()(())(()())";
my $parens = 0;
for(split(//, $string)) {
$parens++ if $_ eq "(";
$parens-- if $_ eq ")";
}
die "Too many open parenthesis.\n" if $parens > 0;
die "Too many closing parenthesis.\n" if $parens < 0;
print "Parenthesis match!";
See how simple it was to write some non-regex code to do the job for you?
EDIT: Okay, back from seeing Adventureland. :) Try this (written in Perl, commented to help you understand what I'm doing if you don't know Perl):
# split $string into a list, split on the double quote character
my #temp = split(/"/, $string);
# iterate through a list of the number of elements in our list
for(0 .. $#temp) {
# skip odd-numbered elements - only process $list[0], $list[2], etc.
# the reason is that, if we split on "s, every other element is a string
next if $_ & 1;
if($temp[$_] =~ /regex/) {
# do stuff
}
}
Another way to do it:
my $bool = 0;
my $str;
my $match;
# loop through the characters of a string
for(split(//, $string)) {
if($_ eq '"') {
$bool = !$bool;
if($bool) {
# regex time!
$match += $str =~ /regex/;
$str = "";
}
}
if(!$bool) {
# add the current character to our test string
$str .= $_;
}
}
# get trailing string match
$match += $str =~ /regex/;
(I give two because, in another language, one solution may be easier to implement than the other, not just because There's More Than One Way To Do It™.)
Of course, as your problems grow in complexity, there will arise certain benefits of constructing a full-blown parser, but that's a different horse. For now, this will suffice.
As mentioned before, regexp cannot match any nested pattern, since it is not a Context-free language.
So if you have any nested quotes, you are not going to solve this with a regex.
(Except with the "balancing group" feature of a .Net regex engine - as mentioned by Daniel L in the comments - , but I am not making any assumption of the regex flavor here)
Except if you add further specification, like a quote within a quote must be escaped.
In that case, the following:
text before string "string with \escape quote \" still
within quote" text outside quote "within quote \" still inside" outside "
inside" final outside text
would be matched successfully with:
(?ms)((?:\\(?=")|[^"])+)(?:"((?:[^"]|(?<=\\)")+)(?<!\\)")?
group1: text preceding a quoted text
group2: text within double quotes, even if \" are present in it.
Here is an expression that gets the match, but it isn't perfect, as the first match it gets is the whole string, removing the final ".
[^"].*(,).*[^"]
I have been using my Free RegEx tester to see what works.
Test Results
Group Match Collection # 1
Match # 1
Value: This is some text, followed by "text, in quotes!
Captures: 1
Match # 2
Value: ,
Captures: 1
You should better build yourself a simple parser (pseudo-code):
quoted := False
FOR char IN string DO
IF char = '"'
quoted := !quoted
ELSE
IF char = "," AND !quoted
// not quoted comma found
ENDIF
ENDIF
ENDFOR
This really depends on if you allow nested quotes or not.
In theory, with nested quotes you cannot do this (regular languages can't count)
In practice, you might manage if you can constrain the depth. It will get increasingly ugly as you add complexity. This is often how people get into grief with regular expressions (trying to match something that isn't actually regular in general).
Note that some "regex" libraries/languages have added non-regular features.
If this sort of thing gets complicated enough, you'll really have to write/generate a parser for it.
You need more in your description. Do you want any set of possible quoted strings and non-quoted strings like this ...
Lorem ipsum "dolor sit" amet, "consectetur adipiscing" elit.
... or simply the pattern you asked for? This is pretty close I think ...
(?<outside>.*?)(?<inside>(?=\"))
It does capture the "'s however.
Maybe you could do it in two steps?
First you replace the quoted text:
("[^"]*")
and then you extract what you want from the remaining string
,(?=(?:[^"]*"[^"]*")*[^"]*\z)
Regexes may not be able to count, but they can determine whether there's an odd or even number of something. After finding a comma, the lookahead asserts that, if there are any quotation marks ahead, there's an even number of them, meaning the comma is not inside a set of quotes.
This can be tweaked to handle escaped quotes if needed, though the original question didn't mention that. Also, if your regex flavor supports them, I would add atomic groups or possessive quantifiers to keep backtracking in check.