Closed. This question needs details or clarity. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Add details and clarify the problem by editing this post.
Closed 4 months ago.
The community reviewed whether to reopen this question 4 months ago and left it closed:
Opinion-based Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Improve this question
I have been using Clojure, ClojureScript, lein, shadow-cljs, re-frame, reagent, Emacs, and CIDER to work on a Clojure/ClojureScript dynamic web app project.
For the last several weeks, I have been focusing on a Continuous Integration effort.
After setting up the build via GitHub Actions, now I want to integrate cljft (a formatter tool) and clj-kondo (a linter).
To my naive eyes, both feel like fully complementary tools/extensions. This was my understanding by reading the documentation and running locally some commands to fix files.
But, I would like to ask: is there some overlap between them?
Is there any chance that one of them could overwrite the "fixes" (the work in general) automatically generated by the other? If so, in which circumstances?
I asked this question on Clojurians Slack. A user called "borkdude" (Michiel Borkent who is the creator of clj-kondo, babashka and SCI) answered the following:
clj-kondo doesn't fix anything automatically, but clojure-lsp can do that for you based on what clj-kondo finds. it also has integration with cljfmt I think
but to answer directly: no, there aren't any conflicts between cljfmt and clj-kondo
Related
Closed. This question needs details or clarity. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Add details and clarify the problem by editing this post.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
I'm building my new website using the great Django framework and I would like to bundle all
js/css/html together for external design work.
Do you know any tool that might come up handy?
Or maybe there is another option for external designer to work on my project?
10x
The normal option is to use a revision control software which not only will let you share the needed code but also continuously integrate the changes without conflicts when one of the developers changes something. Of course compression of resources is automatically done by those software.
No serious developer, even alone, works without such a source control software.
There are online solutions if you can't set up a server, for example https://github.com/
Closed. This question needs details or clarity. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Add details and clarify the problem by editing this post.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
I am not finding the different names of the different software which generate a documentation (Readme.txt) from the comments mentioned on the different Header and Cpp files, directly extracted from a visual studio solution C++ / project.
Already answered within this SO url
Another point of view, consideration of Natural Docs (only applied for Perl in my case but usable for C# in addition)
A couple of years ago, NDoc was suitable. Maybe that would not be working for VS 10.
You should look at Sandcastle help file builder. It is a set of tools that generate documentation in different formats from the XML comments in the source files.
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
What are the main differences between these two testing frameworks?
I am a totally new to Test Driven Development and starting from the very beginning.
QUnit is very easy to get started with, as you only need to include two files and a little bit of markup, then you can start writing tests.
Jasmine strength, afaik is its BDD-style syntax, if that is something that you prefer (probably not a selling point for you) and tight integration into Ruby/Rails tools.
In the end both get the job done. I recommend to start with QUnit. Once you're feeling comfortable, try Jasmine and check if the BDD style fits better. If it does and you still want to keep using QUnit, you can add Pavlov to the mix, which provides BDD-style methods for QUnit.
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
Is it starting from WSDL or from coding?
I believe what you are asking is what is better: bottom up (coding first) vs top down (wsdl first).
There are many, many articles on the topic, so you can do a quick google search. This looks like a good article I found by searching.
It is depends on requirement and feasibilty.But mostly in case of service provider,first we write the code then generate the wsdl and publish it..When consumer wants to consumes the service then ,they generate the client code from wsdl and invoke the services....That how most application works......
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
I consider to use Mantis or Redmine to manage projects. (Issue Tracking)
I know both are really good.
For now, I won't connect it with SVN or Git.
(It may happen later)
The main purpose is issue tracking on business with co-workers.
Please recommend one of them, or you can recommend the other one.
Thanks.
I can recommend redmine. I've been using it for more than 2 years, with 25-50 simultaneous users and more than 50 projects.
I went through a lot of updates without ever having any problems.
The database is properly normalized, so if you ever need to retrieve any data, you will be able to do so.
Numerous plugins exists which may cover special needs if there are any.
Edit: In the meantime, I had to change over to Jira, but I'd go back to redmine anytime if I could.
Never used Redmine, but we've been using Mantis for about 7-8 years for many projects for our distributed team. One of the benefits is its simplicity. We've even wrote a couple of our own extensions, e.g. widely used in our process Kanban board (one of the Agile approaches).
Sometimes I think it looks slightly outdated among other modern tools but it really works for us and we can extend it with our own PHP code.