I work with warranty claims and got two sheets with different suppliers, priority and prices for different part numbers for our product.
One sheet with prices/suppliers is used for our repairs in Asia and other sheet is used for the rest of the world (WW)
Sheet 1: PN-List Asia
Sheet 2: PN-List WW
I've managed to make an IF-statement that find the right price, from the right list (PPU).
The formula I've used:
Price Per unit (PPU) =
IF (
SELECTEDVALUE ( 'Regress List'[Continent] ) = "Asia",
CALCULATE (
MAX ( 'PN-List Asia'[Price Per Unit] ),
FILTER ( 'PN-List Asia', 'PN-List Asia'[Prio] = MIN ( 'PN-List Asia'[Prio] ) )
),
CALCULATE (
MAX ( 'PN-List WW'[Price Per Unit] ),
FILTER ( 'PN-List WW', 'PN-List WW'[Prio] = MIN ( 'PN-List WW'[Prio] ) )
)
)
Now I need to get the suppliers name of the product/item, into my matrix in PowerBI.
Suppliers name can be found in the two different sheets (PN-List Asia & PN-List WW) under supplier name ('PN-list WW'[supplier name]).
My guess is that I need to use an IF statement to decide if I should search in PN-List Asia or PN-List WW, but I'm not sure how to find the right supplier name with Priority (prio) and/or Price Per Unit (PPU).
Answer to #Mik
Funny enough, I should be able to make an export (to excel) from PowerBI, that looks like this:
So I can know who to invoice for all the costs. If the supplier wants more information, we will have it in our PowerBI-matrix.
What if you change your visual, for example, like this? I mean getting of supplier name through measure.
used measures
Price Per unit (PPU) =
VAR partNo = SELECTEDVALUE('Claims List (Monthly refilled'[Used Part ])
VAR priority =
CALCULATE(
MIN('PN-List (static)'[Priority])
,TREATAS({partNo},'PN-List (static)'[Part no])
)
RETURN
CALCULATE(
SELECTEDVALUE('PN-List (static)'[Price Per Unit])
,TREATAS({partNo},'PN-List (static)'[Part no])
,'PN-List (static)'[Priority]=priority
)
Supplier =
VAR Usedpart = VALUES('Claims List (Monthly refilled'[Used Part ])
RETURN
CALCULATE(
SELECTEDVALUE(
'PN-List (static)'[Supplier name]
,IF(
ISBLANK(DISTINCTCOUNT('PN-List (static)'[Supplier name]))
,BLANK()
,"- " & DISTINCTCOUNT('PN-List (static)'[Supplier name]) & " Suppliers")
)
,TREATAS(Usedpart,'PN-List (static)'[Part no])
)
Related
I need to write a DAX measure that calculates (e.g., "Count Rows"), but only when another measure value is evaluated (e.g., filtering "[Sales]>100"). So if-- in the context of the selected filters-- Sales is great than 100, then the measure is executed only for those rows.
The measure I have defined works in the context of lower smaller grain. But the totals do not sum correctly.
Any suggestions?
DAX Measure
License Usage =
// Users with active viewership in 3 months
IF (
NOT ( ISBLANK (
CALCULATE (
[Activity Date NEWEST],
KEEPFILTERS ( DATESINPERIOD ( dimCalendar[Date], TODAY (), -90, DAY ) )
)
)), 1
)
Activity Date NEWEST =
MAX('PBI Activity'[Date])
Okay, I figured something out that works.
DAX
License Usage =
// Users with active viewership in 3 months
CALCULATE (
[Count Users],
FILTER ( 'PBI Activity', 'PBI Activity'[Date] >= TODAY () - 90 )
)
Count Users = COUNTROWS('Users')
Also, I later came across this article which looks like it also does what I was hoping to do: Execute calculate expression over filtered rows based upon measure filter.
Reference: Specifying multiple filter conditions in CALCULATE - SQLBI
DAX
DEFINE
MEASURE Sales[Big Sales Amount] =
CALCULATE (
[Sales Amount],
KEEPFILTERS (
FILTER (
ALL ( Sales[Quantity], Sales[Net Price] ),
Sales[Quantity] * Sales[Net Price] > 1000
)
)
)
EVALUATE
SUMMARIZECOLUMNS (
Sales[Quantity],
"Sales Amount", [Sales Amount],
"Big Sales Amount", [Big Sales Amount]
)
I'm working with claims where I use different key joins/sheets to get the whole truth.
Right now I got two different sheets with costs for each item (Price Per Unit), depending on where the repair occur. One for Asia and one for the rest of the world (WW)
Sheet 1: PN-List Asia and Sheet 2: PN-List WW
Inside the mentioned sheets there is a priority (1 - 3) of which supplier I should get prices from.
Column Prio.
I've made a column that either says Asia or WW for each job ID. Regress List [Continent].
Two problem has occurred, total cost for each ID is only the max value (most expensive item). See picture:
The total cost should be: 840,96 but it says 622,10 now.
The second problem is that my grand total is completely wrong, should be a lot more. See below picture:
The formula I've used:
Price Per unit =
IF (
SELECTEDVALUE ( 'Regress List'[Continent] ) = "Asia",
CALCULATE (
MAX ( 'PN-List Asia'[Price Per Unit] ),
FILTER ( 'PN-List Asia', 'PN-List Asia'[Prio] = MIN ( 'PN-List Asia'[Prio] ) )
),
CALCULATE (
MAX ( 'PN-List WW'[Price Per Unit] ),
FILTER ( 'PN-List WW', 'PN-List WW'[Prio] = MIN ( 'PN-List WW'[Prio] ) )
)
)
I just made a new measure:
Price Per Units = SUMX('Regress List', 'Regress List'[Qty] * [Price Per unit])
And it gave me the right answer
Thanks to Ozan Sen for leading me in the right way with Sumx
I'm trying to wrap my head around this conundrum and I'm drawing blanks.
I have Table Locals which is a list of locations each person is located in and during what dates:
Name Location Date Start Date End
Paul Las Vegas 2019/01/01 2020/12/31
Tom Los Angeles 2019/03/21 2020/02/14
Susan New York 2019/08/30 2020/06/28
Paul Chicago 2021/01/01 2021/12/31
and Table Contracts which is a table of contracts (each person can have more than one contract):
ID (unique) Person ID Type Date
1 345456345 Video 2019/02/05
2 867345315 Book 2019/05/14
3 345456345 Photo 2021/01/23
and Table Contacts which is a list of people and their contracts dates (each person can have more than one contract period):
Person ID (unique) Name
345456345 Paul
867345315 Tom
879316455 Susan
I need to determine the location of each contract.
So I established a relationship as follows:
Contracts/Person ID -> Contacts/Person ID
Contacts/Name -> Locals/Name
But from here, I am lost. My data visual (table containing Contract/Contract ID, Contacts/Name, Locals/Location) is broken because of the confusion in determining the location of Paul's contracts. The "Fix This" button is telling me that there is a missing relationship between the fields but autodetect isn't finding any relationships (obviously) and I don't know what other relationship I can create manually.
I know the secret is in determining whether the date on the contract falls within the Date Start and Date End of each location belonging to Paul but I don't know how to go about doing that.
Any ideas?
Ok, I took a closer look and I think I know what your problem is. You're trying to show in a visual, which contracts each person had in each location.
When you put Person's name and Location in a table, everything is fine. When you put Person's name and Contract ID everything is fine. The problem starts when you put it all together, as Power BI cannot determine, based on relationships, which contract was signed in which location.
To solve the issue, you would have to create a measure that would (for instance) count these contracts taking dates into account. Something like this:
#Contracts in Location =
var dateFrom = SELECTEDVALUE(Locals[Date Start])
var dateTo = SELECTEDVALUE(Locals[Date End])
return
COUNTROWS(FILTER(Contracts, Contracts[Date] >= dateFrom && Contracts[Date] <= dateTo))
If you place this measure in your visual, DAX will be able to figure out appropriate relationships based on row context and measure filters.
EDIT
Here's a measure that will also count contracts, when there is no person in the calculation context (by introducing it). I will assume that there is neither gap nor overlap for location dates for a single person.
#Contracts in Location =
SUMX (
Contacts,
CALCULATE (
COUNTROWS (
FILTER (
Contracts,
Contracts[Date] >= MIN ( Locals[Date Start] )
&& Contracts[Date] <= MAX ( Locals[Date End] )
)
)
)
)
It's possible to do it with your tables structure, but it would be better to change a bit your model.
That said, to obtain the following table visual, it's necessary to add also the contract ID set as "Don't summarize". This is needed to stop the table visual to try aggregate the rows, to allow the ContractLocation measure to work with the correct filter context, that must contain a single contract and a single contact.
and use a measure to set the relationship over the dates
ContractLocation =
VAR CurrentContractDate = SELECTEDVALUE( Contracts[Date] )
RETURN
IF(
NOT ISBLANK( CurrentContractDate ),
CALCULATE(
SELECTEDVALUE( Locals[Location] ),
FILTER( Locals, Locals[Date Start] <= CurrentContractDate && Locals[Date End] >= CurrentContractDate )
)
)
Edit: adding measure to also match location when there are no matching intervals
This measure uses the last known location. If the contract is before the first know location, then it uses the first known location. To be tested.
FuzzyContractLocation =
IF (
ISEMPTY ( Locals ) && NOT ISEMPTY(Contracts),
"Locale unknown",
VAR CurrentContractDate =
SELECTEDVALUE ( Contracts[Date] )
RETURN
IF (
NOT ISBLANK ( CurrentContractDate ),
VAR MinDateStart =
MIN ( Locals[Date Start] )
VAR MaxDateStart =
CALCULATE (
MAX ( Locals[Date Start] ),
Locals[Date Start] <= CurrentContractDate,
REMOVEFILTERS ( Locals[Date End] ),
REMOVEFILTERS ( Locals[Location] )
)
VAR DateStart =
IF ( ISBLANK ( MaxDateStart ), MinDateStart, MaxDateStart )
RETURN
CALCULATE ( SELECTEDVALUE ( Locals[Location] ), Locals[Date Start] = DateStart )
)
)
This would be better to be done in the data cleansing stage of the ETL, by building a consistent location table.
Hi I have been struggling with this for a bit now and I hope I didn't miss a previous question. I am trying to get a count of the vehicles we have based on an EOMONTH date. We are buying and selling cars on a regular basis and for reporting we need to know how many we had at the end of each month and the report is a rolling 12 months.
I've tried creating the relationship with the purchasedate of the vehicle to the date of my date table but when I create the measure (Used to calculate the number of vehicles purchased but haven't been sold):
SalesBlank = CALCULATE(
COUNT(Vehicles[MVANumber]),
FILTER(Vehicles, Vehicles[purchasedate] <= RELATED('Date'[EOMONTH]) && ISBLANK(Vehicles[saledate])))
I only get a count of vehicles purchased that month and don't have a sale date - I'm not surprised because my relationship with the date table is the purchase date.
How can I set up a measure to look at the date table and filter the vehicles table with this logic:
purchasedate <= date[EOMONTH] && ISBLANK(salesdate)
Any help would be greatly appreciated!!
Thanks,
Matt
Sample Data and Desired Results
Relationships
If I understand you correctly, you want to get a count of the vehicles on hand at the end of each month. That could be calculated by counting the vehicles with a purchase date less than or equal to the selected end of month and subtracting the count of vehicles with a sale date less than or equal to the selected end of month.
You can create an active relationship between Vehicle[PurchaseDate] and Date[Date]. Then create an inactive relationship based upon Vehicles[SaleDate] and Date[Date].
You could use a measure that is something like this:
Inventory Count =
VAR MaxDate =
MAX ( 'Date'[Date] )
VAR MinDate =
CALCULATE ( MIN ( 'Date'[Date] ), ALL ( 'Date' ) )
VAR Purch =
CALCULATE (
COUNT ( 'Vehicles'[VehicleID] ),
DATESBETWEEN ( 'Date'[Date], MinDate, MaxDate )
)
VAR Sales =
CALCULATE (
COUNT ( 'Vehicles'[VehicleID] ),
USERELATIONSHIP ( 'Date'[Date], Vehicles[Sale Date] ),
DATESBETWEEN ( 'Date'[Date], MinDate, MaxDate )
)
VAR MaxPurDt =
CALCULATE ( MAX ( 'Vehicles'[Purchase Date] ), ALL ( 'Vehicles' ) )
VAR MaxSlDt =
CALCULATE ( MAX ( 'Vehicles'[Sale Date] ), ALL ( 'Vehicles' ) )
RETURN
IF (
MIN ( 'Date'[Date] ) <= MaxPurDt
|| MIN ( 'Date'[Date] ) <= MaxSlDt,
Purch - Sales
)
This measure gets a cumulative count of purchases and a cumulative count of sales and then subtracts them. The IF check is to avoid propagation of cumulative totals beyond the maximum date in the Vehicle table.
I'm not sure how to interpret your showing of just 3 months in the desired results. This will produce the same answers as what you have, but without a filter applied to the table, it starts at 3/31/2016 (the date of the first sale).
Edit: There's probably a more efficient way along the lines you were thinking, but it is escaping me at the moment.
I have a table that people use in a filter and select multiple items from the for example the values in this table are
US Dollar
Canadian Dollar
Category 1
Category 2
The users will select US Dollars and Calendar Year, which I need to affect a 2 DAX measures. The first measure should be the sum 1 of 2 different columns, something similar to
Currency Amount = CALCULATE(
if(SELECTEDVALUE('Filter'[Description])="USD",
Sum(Test[USD Amount]),
Sum(Test[CD Amount])
))
Then the second measure should be something similar to the below, but what is below doesn't work and I'm fairly certain there is a better way to write this overall:
Currency Category Amount =
if(SELECTEDVALUE('Filter'[Description])="Cat 1",
CALCULATE(
[Currency Amount],
Filter(Test, Test[Category]="Cat 1")),
CALCULATE(
[Currency Amount],
Filter(Test, Test[Category]="Cat 2"))
)
The problem with this is that the slicer is multi select and the Selected Value function doesn't appear to work correctly with this.
I have come up with the following that matches what I'm looking for. If somebody can come up with a better solution I will gladly accept that instead. The main this I don't like about this is the duplication of the entire things. As I mentioned in the comment the actual filter that I would be using is much more complex, something more along the lines what is below.
Currency Category Amount = if(
Contains(Values('Filter'[Description]), 'Filter'[Description], "Cat 1"),
CALCULATE(
[Currency Amount],
Filter(Test, Test[Category]="Cat 1")),
CALCULATE(
[Currency Amount],
Filter(Test, Test[Category]="Cat 2"))
)
Cat 1
FILTER (
ALL ( 'Calendar' ),
'Calendar'[Month In Fiscal Year] <= MAX ( 'Calendar'[Month In Fiscal Year] )
&& 'Calendar'[Fiscal Year] = MAX ( 'Calendar'[Fiscal Year] )
)
Cat 2
FILTER (
ALL ( 'Calendar' ),
'Calendar'[Month In APY] <= MAX ( 'Calendar'[Month In APY] )
&& 'Calendar'[APY] = MAX ( 'Calendar'[APY] )
)
A way to have less code repetition is to encapsulate some of the calculations in different measures, in this way, if you need the same calculation logic you can just use the appropriate measure (the logic will be centralized in one point).
I've used the SWITCH (TRUE(), ...) to choose the appropriate measure since it allows you to have a cleaner code if the options are more than 2, and to set a default result if there are no selections or if the selected value is not valid/mapped.
Note that there might be some syntax errors since I don't have a datamodel to validate the formulas.
Currency Amount = CALCULATE(
--you probably have already replaced this with something different from SELECTEDVALUE
--If more than 2 currency exists, using SWITCH might be better (Pros above)
if(SELECTEDVALUE('Filter'[Description])="USD",
Sum(Test[USD Amount]),
Sum(Test[CD Amount])
))
Amount YTD (Fiscal Cal) =
CALCULATE(
[Currency Amount]
,ALL ( 'Calendar' )
,'Calendar'[Month In Fiscal Year] <= MAX ( 'Calendar'[Month In Fiscal Year] )
&& 'Calendar'[Fiscal Year] = MAX ( 'Calendar'[Fiscal Year] )
)
Amount YTD (APY) =
CALCULATE(
[Currency Amount]
,ALL ( 'Calendar' )
,'Calendar'[Month In APY] <= MAX ( 'Calendar'[Month In APY] )
&& 'Calendar'[APY] = MAX ( 'Calendar'[APY] )
)
Currency Category Amount =
SWITCH(
TRUE()
,Contains(Values('Filter'[Description]), 'Filter'[Description], "Cat 1")
,[Amount YTD (Fiscal Cal)]
,Contains(Values('Filter'[Description]), 'Filter'[Description], "Cat 1")
,[Amount YTD (APY)]
,BLANK() --If nothing match return blank (remove it if not needed)
)
I've noticed that your 'Filter' table contains several entities (currency, year/month), if viable/appropriate, splitting it into several filter tables 'FilterCurrency', 'FilterPeriod', etc... might help you by enabling the "always one selected" in slicers, Which in some cases is very useful.