Hey I want to use intersection observer to change the background color on different sections.
However if I use an if statement inside a foreach to select the first, second, third entry, Its only selecting the first two section for every other.
HTML CODE
<section id="s1" class="section intro"></section>
<section id="s2" class="section about"></section>
<section id="s3" class="section lino"></section>
<section id="s4" class="section work"></section>
<section id="s5" class="section contact"></section>
THE WORKING JAVSCRIPT CODE
const sections = document.querySelectorAll(".section"),
options = {
root: null,
threshold: 0,
};
// new object with screen as root element
const observer = new IntersectionObserver(function (entries, observer) {
entries.forEach((entry) => {
console.log(entry.target);
});
}, options);
// observing a target element
sections.forEach((section) => {
observer.observe(section);
});
MY TRY which not functioning correctly:
const observer = new IntersectionObserver(function (entries, observer) {
entries.forEach((entry) => {
if (entries[0].isIntersecting) {
console.log("intro");
} else if (entries[1].isIntersecting) {
console.log("about");
} else if (entries[2].isIntersecting) {
console.log("lino");
} else if (entries[3].isIntersecting) {
console.log("work");
} else {
console.log("contact");
}
});
}, options);
In the console I only get the 'Intro' and 'About' for all the sections.
Related
I'm trying to test my component that has the following conditional rendering:
const MyComponent = () => {
const [isVisible, setIsVisible] = (false);
if(selectedOption == 'optionOne')
setIsVisible(true);
else
setIsVisible(false);
return (
<div>
<Select data-testid="select1" selectedOption={selectedOption} />
{isVisible ? <Select data-testid="select2" selectedOption={anotherSelectedOption} /> : null }
</div>
)}
If selectedOption in select1 is 'optionOne', then select2 shows up.
Here is how I am testing it:
describe('Testing', () => {
let container: ElementWrapper<HTMLElement>;
const testState = {
userChoice1: {
selectedOption: ['optionOne'],
},
userChoice2: {
selectedOption: ['test1', 'test2'],
},
} as AppState;
beforeEach(() => {
container = render(<MyComponent/>, testState);
});
it('should show select2 if optionOne is selected', async () => {
const { getByTestId, getAllByTestId } = render(<MyComponent/>);
expect(container.find('span').getElement().textContent).toBe("optionOne"); // this successfully finds select1 with optionOne selected, all good
await screen.findAllByTestId('select2')
expect(screen.getAllByTestId('select2')).toBeInTheDocument();
});
In the testing above, as select1 has optionOne selected, I expect to select2 to show up. However, I am getting an error Unable to find an element by: [data-testid="select2"]. It also returns the whole HTML body, where I see select1 element with optionOne selected, but no select2 at all as it seems to still be hidden.
What am I missing here? How can I unhide select2 within the unit test?
I'm trying to get Apollo gql to load more posts after clicking a button. So it would load the next 15 results, every time you click - load more.
This is my current code
import Layout from "./Layout";
import Post from "./Post";
import client from "./ApolloClient";
import { useQuery } from "#apollo/react-hooks"
import gql from "graphql-tag";
const POSTS_QUERY = gql`
query {
posts(first: 15) {
nodes {
title
slug
postId
featuredImage {
sourceUrl
}
}
}
}
`;
const Posts = props => {
let currPage = 0;
const { posts } = props;
const { loading, error, data, fetchMore } = useQuery(
POSTS_QUERY,
{
variables: {
offset: 0,
limit: 15
},
fetchPolicy: "cache-and-network"
});
function onLoadMore() {
fetchMore({
variables: {
offset: data.posts.length
},
updateQuery: (prev, { fetchMoreResult }) => {
if (!fetchMoreResult) return prev;
return Object.assign({}, prev, {
posts: [...prev.posts, ...fetchMoreResult.posts]
});
}
});
}
if (loading) return (
<div className="container mx-auto py-6">
<div className="flex flex-wrap">
Loading...
</div>
</div>
);
if (error) return (
<div className="container mx-auto py-6">
<div className="flex flex-wrap">
Oops, there was an error :( Please try again later.
</div>
</div>
);
return (
<div className="container mx-auto py-6">
<div className="flex flex-wrap">
{data.posts.nodes.length
? data.posts.nodes.map(post => <Post key={post.postId} post={post} />)
: ""}
</div>
<button onClick={() => { onLoadMore() }}>Load More</button>
</div>
);
};
export default Posts;
When you click load more it refreshes the query and console errors
Invalid attempt to spread non-iterable instance
I have been loading for solutions but a lot of the examples are previous or next pages like traditional pagination. Or a cursor based infinite loader which I don't want. I just want more posts added to the list onClick.
Any advise is appreciated, thank you.
Your current POSTS_QUERY it isn't accepting variables, so first you need change this:
const POSTS_QUERY = gql`
query postQuery($first: Int!, $offset: Int!) {
posts(first: $first, offset: $offset) {
nodes {
title
slug
postId
featuredImage {
sourceUrl
}
}
}
}
`;
Now, it will use the variables listed in your useQuery and fetchMore.
And to finish the error is because updateQuery isn't correct, change it to:
function onLoadMore() {
fetchMore({
variables: {
offset: data.posts.nodes.length
},
updateQuery: (prev, { fetchMoreResult }) => {
if (!fetchMoreResult) return prev;
return { posts: { nodes: [...prev.posts.nodes, ...fetchMoreResult.posts.nodes] } };
});
}
});
}
I would suggest useState hook to manage a variable that stores current offset in the dataset, place a useEffect to watch changes to that offset, the offset value in passed as query variable to load data. Remove fetchmore, useEffect hook will do the job.
When user clicks on load more button, you just need to update offset value, that will trigger the query and update data.
const [offset,setOffset] = React.useState(0)
const [results, setResults] = React.useState([])
const { loading, error, data } = useQuery(
POSTS_QUERY,
{
variables: {
offset: offset,
limit: 15
},
fetchPolicy: "cache-and-network"
}
);
React.useEffect(() => {
const newResults = [...results, ...data]
setResults(newResults)
}, [data])
function onLoadMore() {
setOffset(results.data.length)
}
I'm trying to take a user inputted code and compare it to code within my database. Right now I can bring the code and display it outside the map function but when I try to add it, it doesn't work. here is my database:
[
{
"dwelling_code": "ABC-XYZ",
"dwelling_name": "Neves Abode",
"has_superAdmin": true,
"room": []
}
This is the parent component:
class Dwel2 extends Component {
state = {
house: [],
selectedMovie: null,
data: "ABC-XYZ"
}
componentDidMount() {
fetch('Removed for question', {
method: 'GET',
headers: {
}
}).then(resp => resp.json())
.then(resp => this.setState({ house: resp }))
.catch(error => console.log(error))
}
houseClicked = h => {
console.log(h)
}
render() {
return <div>
<EnterCode dataFromParent={this.state.data}
house={this.state.house}
houseClicked={this.house} />
</div>
}
}
This is the child component:
function EnterCode(props) {
return (
<div>
<div>
*THIS BIT DISPLAYS THE CODE*{props.dataFromParent}
</div>
{props.house.map(house => {
var test = house.dwelling_name
var code = house.dwelling_code
if (code === {props.dataFromParent}) {
test = "Test"
}
return (
<React.Fragment>
<div>{test}</div>
</React.Fragment>
)
})}
</div>
)
}
I just want to compare the code in the database to the code defined in the parent component. Here is the error that's coming up this is in the child component.
Line 17:31: 'dataFromParent' is not defined no-undef
You made a tiny mistake in the if statement. You put the props.dataFromParent in brackets, which in the context of JSX would be required, but in the context of JS means creating an object, which is clearly wrong.
if (code === props.dataFromParent) {
test = "Test"
}
Hope this helps :)
Iterating over an array myarray=[1, 2, 3] works like this:
<template is="dom-repeat" items="[[myarray]]">
<span>[[item]]</span>
</template>
How can I iterate over an object myobject = {a:1, b:2, c:3}?
Here is a complete implementation:
<test-element obj='{"a": 1, "b": 2, "c": 3}'></test-element>
<dom-module id="test-element">
<template>
<template is="dom-repeat" items="{{_toArray(obj)}}">
name: <span>{{item.name}}</span>
<br> value: <span>{{item.value}}</span>
<br>
<hr>
</template>
</template>
<script>
Polymer({
properties: {
obj: Object
},
_toArray: function(obj) {
return Object.keys(obj).map(function(key) {
return {
name: key,
value: obj[key]
};
});
}
});
</script>
</dom-module>
I faced the same problem, but my use-case is a bit more demanding: I need two-way deep binding through the repeat. Plus I cannot afford rewriting the whole tree on each change.
Since I did not find a solution and the polymer team seems to take it slowly on this issue, I made something for the time being. It's written in ES2015, but translating that to vanilla ES5 should be straightforward. Runs in Chrome anyway as is. Or throw it at bable. This page details how. The gist for the purpose of this posting:
vulcanize element.html --inline-script --inline-css | \
crisper -h element.v.html -j element.js;
babel element.js -o element.js
So here we go:
<link rel="import" href="../../bower_components/polymer/polymer.html">
<dom-module id="my-objarray">
<script>
(function() {
'use strict';
class Objarray {
beforeRegister() {
this.is = 'my-objarray';
this.properties = {
array:{
notify:true,
type:Array,
value:function() {return new Array();}
},
object:{
notify:true,
type:Object
}
};
this.observers = ['_onArray(array.*)', '_onObject(object.*)'];
}
_onObject(change) {
if(this._setting) return;
if(change.path == "object") this._rewriteArray();
else this._writeElement(change);
}
_rewriteArray() {
this.splice("array", 0, this.array.length);
for(let i in this.object) {
this.push("array", {key:i, value:this.object[i]});
}
}
_writeElement(change) {
const path = change.path.match(/^object\.([^\.]+)(.*)$/);
const key = path[1];
const objectPath = "object." + key + (path[2] || "");
const id = this._getId(key);
const arrayPath = "array." + id + ".value" + (path[2] || "");
this.set(arrayPath, this.get(objectPath));
}
_getId(key) {
const collection = Polymer.Collection.get(this.array);
for(const element of this.array) {
if((element && element.key) === key) {
return collection.getKey(element);
}
}
}
_onArray(change) {
let path = change.path.match(/^array\.(#\d+)\.([^\.]+)(\.|$)/);
if(!path) return;
let id = path[1], field = path[2];
if(field == "key") throw new Error("my-objarray: Must not change key!");
if(field != "value") throw new Error("my-objarray: Only change inside value!");
this._setting = true;
this.set(this._getPath(change, id), change.value);
delete this._setting;
}
_getPath(change, id) {
let collection = Polymer.Collection.get(change.base);
let index = change.base.indexOf(collection.getItem(id));
let key = change.base[index].key;
return change.path.replace("array." + id + ".value", "object." + key);
}
}
Polymer(Objarray);
})();
</script>
</dom-module>
Usage:
<dom-module id="my-objarray-test">
<template strip-whitespace>
<my-objarray object="{{items}}" array="{{array}}"></my-objarray>
<template is="dom-repeat" items="{{array}}">
<div>
<label>{{item.key}}:</label>
<input type="number" value="{{item.value.data::input}}">
</div>
</template>
</template>
<script>
(function() {
'use strict';
class ObjarrayTest {
beforeRegister() {
this.is = 'my-repeat-test';
this.properties = {
items:{
notify:true,
type:Object,
value:function() {return new Object();}
}
};
this.observers = ['_onItems(items.*)'];
}
ready() {
console.log("my-repeat-test.ready");
this.items = {a:{data:1}, b:{data:2}};
}
_onItems(change) {console.log("test._onItems", change.path);}
}
Polymer(ObjarrayTest);
})();
</script>
</dom-module>
Hope that helps somebody. Presumable polymer now gets the feature like tomorrow :-)
I've been using Object.keys(obj).map(function(prop){return {id:prop, val:obj[prop]}})
Revisiting this to account for issues others have mentioned. This is compatible with all browsers and uses hasOwnProperty.
<template is="dom-repeat" items="[[_toArray(obj)]]">
key: [[item.key]] val: [[item.val]]
</template>
...
_toArray: function(obj, deep) {
var array = [];
for (var key in obj) {
if (deep || obj.hasOwnProperty(key)) {
array.push({
key: key,
val: obj[key]
});
}
}
return array;
}
You need to turn this object into a meaningful array to be able to iterate over it with the dom-repeat.
I have created a myObj property with the initial value. I have then created a property called myObjAsArray which is an empty array. In the ready callback function which is called when the local dom is ready, I am iterating over all of the properties of myObj and adding them to myObjAsArray (see here for how to iterate through an objects properties). You can then iterate over this array with dom-repeat.
<link rel="import" href="bower_components/polymer/polymer.html">
<dom-module id="test-element">
<style>
</style>
<template>
<template is="dom-repeat" items="{{myObjAsArray}}">
name: <span>{{item.name}}</span>
value: <span>{{item.value}}</span>
</template>
</template>
</dom-module>
<script>
Polymer({
is: "test-element",
properties: {
myObj: {
type: Object,
value: function () {
return {
a: 1,
b: 2,
c: 3
};
}
},
myObjAsArray: {
type: Array,
value: function () {
return [];
}
}
},
attached: function () {
var propArray = [];
for (var prop in this.myObj) {
if (this.myObj.hasOwnProperty(prop)) {
propArray.push({name: prop, value: this.myObj[prop]});
}
}
this.myObjAsArray = propArray;
}
});
</script>
Object.keys() doesn't seem to work in IE. So modified the implementation to use _.map instead.
<test-element obj='{"a": 1, "b": 2, "c": 3}'></test-element>
<dom-module id="test-element">
<template>
<template is="dom-repeat" items="{{getKeyValue(obj)}}">
key: <span>{{item.key}}</span>
<br> value: <span>{{item.value}}</span>
<br>
<hr>
</template>
</template>
<script>
Polymer({
properties: {
obj: Object
},
getKeyValue: function(obj) {
return _.map(obj, function(value, key) {
return {
key: key,
value: value
};
});
}
});
</script>
</dom-module>
https://jsfiddle.net/avidlearner/36jnb16d/
I'd like to transition one element as it changes to another element.
I've got 3 examples:
one that works, but uses a list of items that are kept around (jsfiddle)
one that doesnt work, and only keeps one item around, depending on the state (jsfiddle)
another one that doesn't work, that keeps both items around and hides/shows them (jsfiddle using hide/show)
What I want is more like the second one, which is a very slight variation of the first attempt that works.
Option 1:
/** #jsx React.DOM */
var ReactTransitionGroup = React.addons.TransitionGroup;
var TodoList = React.createClass({
getInitialState: function() {
return {items: ['hello', 'world', 'click', 'me']};
},
handleAdd: function() {
var newItems =
this.state.items.concat([prompt('Enter some text')]);
this.setState({items: newItems});
},
handleRemove: function(i) {
var newItems = this.state.items;
newItems.splice(i, 1)
this.setState({items: newItems});
},
render: function() {
var items = this.state.items.map(function(item, i) {
return (
<div key={item} onClick={this.handleRemove.bind(this, i)}>
{item}
</div>
);
}.bind(this));
return (
<div>
<div><button onClick={this.handleAdd} /></div>
<ReactTransitionGroup transitionName="example">
{items}
</ReactTransitionGroup>
</div>
);
}
});
var app = React.renderComponent(<TodoList />, document.body);
Option 2:
JSX that doesn't work, but is closer to what I'd like to do (really, hide one view, and show another)
/** #jsx React.DOM */
var ReactTransitionGroup = React.addons.TransitionGroup;
var Test = React.createClass({
getInitialState: function() {
return {showOne:true}
},
onClick: function() {
this.setState({showOne:! this.state.showOne});
},
render: function() {
var result;
if (this.state.showOne)
{
result = <div ref="a">One</div>
}
else
{
result = <div ref="a">Two</div>
}
return (
<div>
<div><button onClick={this.onClick}>switch state</button></div>
<ReactTransitionGroup transitionName="example">
{result}
</ReactTransitionGroup>
</div>
);
}
});
var app = React.renderComponent(<Test />, document.body);
Option 3:
Uses hide/show to keep the 2 views around, but still doesn't work.
/** #jsx React.DOM */
var ReactTransitionGroup = React.addons.TransitionGroup;
var Test = React.createClass({
getInitialState: function() {
return {showOne:true}
},
onClick: function() {
this.setState({showOne:! this.state.showOne});
},
render: function() {
var result;
var c1 = this.state.showOne ? "hide" : "show";
var c2 = this.state.showOne ? "show" : "hide";
return (
<div>
<div><button onClick={this.onClick}>switch state</button></div>
<ReactTransitionGroup transitionName="example">
<div className={c1}>One</div>
<div className={c2}>Two</div>
</ReactTransitionGroup>
</div>
);
}
});
var app = React.renderComponent(<Test />, document.body);
So long story short - How can I make a transition execute on switching from one main "component" to another? I don't get why option 1 works, but option 2 doesn't!
React is just changing the content of the DOM because that's all that changed. Give the elements unique keys to make them animate.
if (this.state.showOne)
{
result = <div key="one">One</div>
}
else
{
result = <div key="two">Two</div>
}
JSFiddle
I used Michelle Treys answer to solve a similar problem using React-Router (1.0.1). Its not clear from the api that the key is needed. I was following React-routers suggestion to render a routes children in a parent as follows:
render() {
return (
<div id='app-wrapper'>
<ReactTransitionGroup component='div' className='transition-wrapper'>
{this.props.children}
</ReactTransitionGroup>
</div>
);
}
However the componentWillEnter only triggered on page load. Following Michelle's solution, I cloned a the children as per the react-router updates and added a key as follows:
render() {
const { location } = this.props;
return (
<div id='app-wrapper'>
<ReactTransitionGroup component='div' className='transition-wrapper'>
{React.cloneElement(this.props.children, {
key: location.pathname,
})}
</ReactTransitionGroup>
</div>
);
}
Thanks for the fix. Cheers