I have a small myTest.exe file. I opened this in a text editor and copied the text.
std::string exeBinaryCode = "Copied text from exe";
Now I want that when I passed this string to the system(exeBinaryCode) then it will execute and give the same result that myTest.exe gives.
If anyone knows how to achieve this, please post the answer.
To begin with, executable files are binary files. You can't open them in text editors, or copy/paste them as text, or store them in a string variable.
(That last part isn't 100% true, since std::string basically just stores a string of bytes that don't necessarily have to be text, but you really shouldn't use it as such.)
There are a few different ways to achieve similar results, which you choose depends on what you're actually trying to accomplish.
Notice that none of these include directly running the binary data. Though there may be some obscure system call that allows you to do that you'll likely end up with loads of trouble (anti-virus, incompatibility across platforms, etc.).
Refer to the external executable by path
Simplest, just pass the path to the executable to system. If you intend to distribute your application you'd just package the external executable as well (so if you have your own code compiled into bin/myapp.exe in a zip-file you'd also have bin/whatineedtocall.exe in the same zip).
Unless you have very specific requirements this is what I'd recommend.
Use your build system to embed the data and write it to the file system
Some build systems and frameworks (for example CMake, see Embed resources (eg, shader code; images) into executable/library with CMake) have the ability to embed binary data such as executables into code. You can then, in your code, write this binary data to the file system when it is needed (preferably into some temporary location) and run it from there using system.
Embed as hexadecimal data and write to file system
Similar to the previous, but you can also insert the contents into your code manually. Note that you'd need to copy the executable binary not from a text editor, but in it's hexadecimal representation (see the previously linked question for examples, you'd want to end up with pretty much the same file).
Related
Is it possible to replace embedded resources [e.g. styles, images, text] in a Linux [ELF] binary?
I noticed that I can change text but if I type more text or if I remove text, then the segmentation faults start coming up. I have not gone through the ELF spec yet but I am wondering if it is possible.
I managed to extract the images from the binary using the mediaextract
project but I need to do just the opposite without breaking the binary structure.
This answer is specific for Qt's resource system (.qrc, rcc).
From the docs:
Currently, Qt always stores the data directly in the executable, even on Windows, macOS, and iOS, where the operating system provides native support for resources. This might change in a future Qt release.
So yes, the Qt resources are contained in the binary.
rcc'ing a .qrc file yields a .cpp file containing (mainly) simple char arrays which represent resource data, the resource names and some other metadata.
Compiling such a .cpp file creates byte fields in the binary.
You can alter such resources within a binary, but only in very limited ways.
For starters, if the binary contains any kind of self-check (like hashing the data section and comparing it to some pre-calculated hash), you will not be able to change the data in a reasonable way.
If your data doesn't have the same byte length as the original data, you can't simply replace it because it would alter the internal layout of the binary and invalidate relative addresses.
In case of replacing with shorter strings you might get away with zero-padding at the end.
Resources are compressed by default (in the ZIP format). It is possible to turn off compression.
If compression was turned on during compilation (which you don't control, as it seems), you'd need to create new data which compresses to the same length as the original.
I'm currently developing an application (Windows) that needs internal modifications upon download time.
Also, I'm delivering it using a Linux host, so, can't compile on demand as proposed.
How does Ninite deal with it?
In Ninite.com, each time you select different options, you get the same .exe, however, with minor modifications inside.
Option 1
Compile the program with predefined data (in Windows).
Use PHP to fseek the file and replace my custom strings.
Option 2
Append the original .EXE with a different resource file
Other?
Has someone developed something like this? What would be the best approach?
Thank you.
You can just append data to the back of your original executable. The Windows PE file format is robust enough that this does not invalidate the executable itself. (It will however invalidate any existing digital signatures.)
Finding the start of this data can be a challenge if its size isn't known up front. In that case, it may be necessary to append the variable-length data, and then append the data length (itself a fixed length field - 4 bytes should do). To read the extra data, read the last 4 bytes to get the data length. Get the file length, subtract 4 for the length field, then subtract the variable length to get the start of the data.
The most portable way could be to have a plugin (whose path in wired inside your main program) inside your application. That plugin would be modified (e.g. on Linux by generating C++ code gencod.cc, forking a g++ -Wall -shared -fPIC -O gencod.cc -o gencod.so compilation, then dlopen-ing the ./gencod.so) and your application could have something to generate the C++ source code of that plugin and to compile it.
I guess that the same might be doable on Windows (which I don't know). Probably the issue is to compile it (the compilation command would be different on Windows and on Linux). Beware that AFAIK on Windows a process cannot modify its own executable (but you should check).
Qt has a portable layer for plugins. See QPluginLoader & Qt Plugins HowTo
Alternatively, don't modify the application, but use some persistent file or data (at a well defined place, -whose location or filepath is wired in the executable- preferably in textual format like JSON, or maybe using sqlite, or a real database) keeping the changing information. Read also about application checkpointing.
If you need to implement your specific application checkpointing, you'll better design your application very early with this concern. Study garbage collection algorithms (a checkpointing procedure is similar to a precise copying GC) and read more about continuations. See also this answer to a very similar question.
I am writing a program that produces a formatted file for the user, but it's not only producing the formatted file, it does more.
I want to distribute a single binary to the end user and when the user runs the program, it will generate the xml file for the user with appropriate data.
In order to achieve this, I want to give the file contents to a char array variable that is compiled in code. When the user runs the program, I will write out the char file to generate an xml file for the user.
char* buffers = "a xml format file contents, \
this represent many block text \
from a file,...";
I have two questions.
Q1. Do you have any other ideas for how to compile my file contents into binary, i.e, distribute as one binary file.
Q2. Is this even a good idea as I described above?
What you describe is by far the norm for C/C++. For large amounts of text data, or for arbitrary binary data (or indeed any data you can store in a file - e.g. zip file) you can write the data to a file, link it into your program directly.
An example may be found on sites like this one
I'll recommend using another file to contain data other than putting data into the binary, unless you have your own reasons. I don't know other portable ways to put strings into binary file, but your solution seems OK.
However, note that using \ at the end of line to form strings of multiple lines, the indentation should be taken care of, because they are concatenated from the begging of the next lineļ¼
char* buffers = "a xml format file contents, \
this represent many block text \
from a file,...";
Or you can use another form:
char *buffers =
"a xml format file contents,"
"this represent many block text"
"from a file,...";
Probably, my answer provides much redundant information for topic-starter, but here are what I'm aware of:
Embedding in source code: plain C/C++ solution it is a bad idea because each time you will want to change your content, you will need:
recompile
relink
It can be acceptable only your content changes very rarely or never of if build time is not an issue (if you app is small).
Embedding in binary: Few little more flexible solutions of embedding content in executables exists, but none of them cross-platform (you've not stated your target platform):
Windows: resource files. With most IDEs it is very simple
Linux: objcopy.
MacOS: Application Bundles. Even more simple than on Windows.
You will not need recompile C++ file(s), only re-link.
Application virtualization: there are special utilities that wraps all your application resources into single executable, that runs it similar to as on virtual machine.
I'm only aware of such utilities for Windows (ThinApp, BoxedApp), but there are probably such things for other OSes too, or even cross-platform ones.
Consider distributing your application in some form of installer: when starting installer it creates all resources and unpack executable. It is similar to generating whole stuff by main executable. This can be large and complex package or even simple self-extracting archive.
Of course choice, depends on what kind of application you are creating, who are your target auditory, how you will ship package to end-users etc. If it is a game and you targeting children its not the same as Unix console utility for C++ coders =)
It depends. If you are doing some small unix style utility with no perspective on internatialization, then it's probably fine. You don't want to bloat a distributive with a file no one would ever touch anyways.
But in general it is a bad practice, because eventually someone might want to modify this data and he or she would have to rebuild the whole thing just to fix a typo or anything.
The decision is really up to you.
If you just want to keep your distributive in one piece, you might also find this thread interesting: Store data in executable
Why don't you distribute your application with an additional configuration file? e.g. package your application executable and config file together.
If you do want to make it into a single file, try embed your config file into the executable one as resources.
I see it more of an OS than C/C++ issue. You can add the text to the resource part of your binary/program. In Windows programs HTML, graphics and even movie files are often compiled into resources that make part of the final binary.
That is handy for possible future translation into another language, plus you can modify resource part of the binary without recompiling the code.
I have a text file (>50k lines) of ascii numbers, with string identifiers, that can be thought of as a collection of data vectors. Based on user input, the application only needs one of these data vectors at runtime.
As far as I can see, I have 3 options for getting the information from this text file:
Keep it as a text file, extract the required vector at run-time. I believe the downside is that you can't have a relative path in the code, so the user would have to point to the file's correct location (?). Or alternatively, get the configure script to inject the absolute path as a macro.
Convert it to a static unsigned char using xxd (as explained here) and then include the resulting file. Downside is that a 5MB file turns into a 25MB include file. Am I correct in thinking that this 25MB is loaded into memory for the duration of the runtime?
Convert it to an object and link using objcopy as explained here. This seems to keep the file size about the same -- are there other trade-offs?
Is there a standard/recommended method for doing this? I can use C or C++ if that makes a difference.
Thanks.
(Running on linux with gcc)
I would go with number 1 and pass the filepath into the program as an argument. There's nothing wrong with doing that and it is simple and straight-forward.
You should have a look at the answers here:
Directory of running program
The top voted answer gives you a glue how to handle your data file. But instead of the home folder I would suggest to save it under /usr/share as explained in the link.
I'd preffer to use zlib (and both ways are possible:side file or include with compressed data).
I'm making a simple game with SFML 1.6 in C++. Of course, I have a lot of picture, level, and data files. Problem is, I don't want these files visible. Right now they're just plain picture files in a res/ subdirectory, and I want to either conceal them or encrypt them. Is it possible to put the raw data from the files into a resource file or something? Any solution is okay to me, I just don't want the files exposed to the user.
EDIT
Cross platform solutions best, but if they don't exist, that's okay, I'm working on windows. But I don't really want to use a library if it's not needed.
Most environments come with a resource compiler that converts images/icons/etc into string data and includes them in the source.
Another common technique is to copy them into the end of the final .exe as the last part of the build process. Then at run time, open the .exe as a file and read the data from some determined offset, see Embedding a filesystem in an executable?
The ideal way for this is to make your own archive format, which would contain all of your files' data along with some extra info needed to split files distinctly within it.