I am working on a pipeline that takes data and do some partitioning on it, I am trying to load some data into bq table on gcp, but I got Too many partitions produced by query, allowed 4000, query produces at least 10000 partitions, I understand that it's a limitation by bq, and have found multiple purposed solutions to create a cluster on the data or partition by week instead of day, The problem is that I have no visibility on the data itself, I can not do this. if any other ideas are there please help.
Also, for sake of investigation and analysis, how to know how many big query jobs is submitted? is there a way to get the number of bq jobs submitted by specific dataflow?
Thannks
You can view the jobs created by a particular Dataflow job by navigating to the Google Cloud Console and clicking through to the Dataflow Job UI. Here is the relevant documentation with screenshots.
Related
Based on my research, the easiest and the most straight forward way to get metadata out of Glue's Data Catalog, is using Athena and querying the information_schema database. The article below has come up frequently in my research and is written by Amazon's team:
Querying AWS Glue Data Catalog
However, under the section titled Considerations and limitations the following is written:
Querying information_schema is most performant if you have a small to moderate amount of AWS Glue metadata. If you have a large amount of metadata, errors can occur.
Unfortunately, in this article, there do not seem to be any indications or suggestion regarding what constitutes as "large amount of metadata" and exactly what errors could occur when the metadata is large and one needs to query the metadata.
My question is, how to deal with the issue related to the ever growing size of data catalog's metadata so that one would never encounter errors when using Athena to query the metadata?
Is there a best practice for this? Or perhaps a better solution for getting the same metadata that querying the catalog using Athena provides without multiple or great many API calls (using boto3, Hive DDL etc)?
I talked to AWS Support and did some research on this. Here's what I gathered:
The information_schema is built at query execution time, there doesn't seem to be any caching.
If you access information_schema.tables, it will make separate calls for each schema you have to the Hive Metastore (Glue Data Catalog).
If you access information_schema.columns, it will make separate calls for each schema and each table in that schema you have to the Hive Metastore.
These queries are affected by the general service quotas. In this case, DML queries like your select must finish within 30 minutes.
If your Glue Data Catalog has many thousands of schemas, tables, and columns all of this may result in slow performance. As a rough guesstimate support told me that you should be fine as long as you have less than ~ 10000 tables, which should be the case for most people.
I have a set up with a few crawlers crawling a few buckets and generating tables within Glue that are then able to be queried from the Athena query engine.
I have noticed recently that a lot of tables have been popping up, none located in the buckets I am crawling and all look like some system generated tables
temp_table_*
There appear to be over 10 created every day, and when I look at the details of them they are generated from the system query results s3://aws-athena-query-results-*
Is there a reason these are created? Do I have to manually clean them up? Is there a way to stop them being generated, or ignore them ?
They are cluttering the ability to see the tables that matter in Athena.
Thanks in advance for any assistance.
I have lake dataset which take data from a OLTP system, with the nature of transactions we have lot of updates the next day, so to keep track of the latest record we are using active_flag = '1'.
We also created a update script which retires old records and updates active_flag = '0'.
Now the main question: how can i execute a update statement by changing table name automatically(programmatically).
I know we have a option of using cloudfunctions but it'll expire in 9 mins and I have atleast 350 tables to update.
Has anyone faced this situation earlier??
You can easily do this with Cloud Workflows.
There you setup the template calls to Bigquery as a substeps, and then you pass a list of tables, and loop through the items and invoke the BigQuery step for each item/table.
I wrote an article with samples that you can adapt: Automate the execution of BigQuery queries with Cloud Workflows
I want to retrieve data from BigQuery that arrived every hour and do some processing and pull the new calculate variables in a new BigQuery table. The things is that I've never worked with gcp before and I have to for my job now.
I already have my code in python to process the data but it's work only with a "static" dataset
As your source and sink of that are both in BigQuery, I would recommend you to do your transformations inside BigQuery.
If you need a scheduled job that runs in a pre determined time, you can use Scheduled Queries.
With Scheduled Queries you are able to save some query, execute it periodically and save the results to another table.
To create a scheduled query follow the steps:
In BigQuery Console, write your query
After writing the correct query, click in Schedule query and then in Create new scheduled query as you can see in the image below
Pay attention in this two fields:
Schedule options: there are some pre-configured schedules such as daily, monthly, etc.. If you need to execute it every two hours, for example, you can set the Repeat option as Custom and set your Custom schedule as 'every 2 hours'. In the Start date and run time field, select the time and data when your query should start being executed.
Destination for query results: here you can set the dataset and table where your query's results will be saved. Please keep in mind that this option is not available if you use scripting. In other words, you should use only SQL and not scripting in your transformations.
Click on Schedule
After that your query will start being executed according to your schedule and destination table configurations.
According with Google recommendation, when your data are in BigQuery and when you want to transform them to store them in BigQuery, it's always quicker and cheaper to do this in BigQuery if you can express your processing in SQL.
That's why, I don't recommend you dataflow for your use case. If you don't want, or you can't use directly the SQL, you can create User Defined Function (UDF) in BigQuery in Javascript.
EDIT
If you have no information when the data are updated into BigQuery, Dataflow won't help you on this. Dataflow can process realtime data only if these data are present into PubSub. If not, it's not magic!!
Because you haven't the information of when a load is performed, you have to run your process on a schedule. For this, Scheduled Queries is the right solution is you use BigQuery for your processing.
I have around 300 GBs of data on S3. Lets say the data look like:
## S3://Bucket/Country/Month/Day/1.csv
S3://Countries/Germany/06/01/1.csv
S3://Countries/Germany/06/01/2.csv
S3://Countries/Germany/06/01/3.csv
S3://Countries/Germany/06/02/1.csv
S3://Countries/Germany/06/02/2.csv
We are doing some complex aggregation on the data, and because some countries data is big and some countries data is small, the AWS EMR doesn't makes sense to use, as once the small countries are finished, the resources are being wasted, and the big countries keep running for long time. Therefore, we decided to use AWS Batch (Docker container) with Athena. One job works on one day of data per country.
Now there are roughly 1000 jobs which starts together and when they query Athena to read the data, containers failed because they reached Athena query limits.
Therefore, I would like to know what are the other possible ways to tackle this problem? Should I use Redshift cluster, load all the data there and all the containers query to Redshift cluster as they don't have query limitations. But it is expensive, and takes a lot of time to wramp up.
The other option would be to read data on EMR and use Hive or Presto on top of it to query the data, but again it will reach the query limitation.
It would be great if someone can give better options to tackle this problem.
As I understand, you simply send query to AWS Athena service and after all aggregation steps finish you simply retrieve resulting csv file from S3 bucket where Athena saves results, so you end up with 1000 files (one for each job). But the problem is number of concurrent Athena queries and not the total execution time.
Have you considered using Apache Airflow for orchestrating and scheduling your queries. I see airflow as an alternative to a combination of Lambda and Step Functions, but it is totally free. It is easy to setup on both local and remote machines, has reach CLI and GUI for task monitoring, abstracts away all scheduling and retrying logic. Airflow even has hooks to interact with AWS services. Hell, it even has a dedicated operator for sending queries to Athena, so sending queries is as easy as:
from airflow.models import DAG
from airflow.contrib.operators.aws_athena_operator import AWSAthenaOperator
from datetime import datetime
with DAG(dag_id='simple_athena_query',
schedule_interval=None,
start_date=datetime(2019, 5, 21)) as dag:
run_query = AWSAthenaOperator(
task_id='run_query',
query='SELECT * FROM UNNEST(SEQUENCE(0, 100))',
output_location='s3://my-bucket/my-path/',
database='my_database'
)
I use it for similar type of daily/weekly tasks (processing data with CTAS statements) which exceed limitation on a number of concurrent queries.
There are plenty blog posts and documentation that can help you get started. For example:
Medium post: Automate executing AWS Athena queries and moving the results around S3 with Airflow.
Complete guide to installation of Airflow, link 1 and link 2
You can even setup integration with Slack for sending notification when you queries terminate either in success or fail state.
However, the main drawback I am facing is that only 4-5 queries are getting actually executed at the same time, whereas all others just idling.
One solution would be to not launch all jobs at the same time, but pace them to stay within the concurrency limits. I don't know if this is easy or hard with the tools you're using, but it's never going to work out well if you throw all the queries at Athena at the same time. Edit: it looks like you should be able to throttle jobs in Batch, see AWS batch - how to limit number of concurrent jobs (by default Athena allows 25 concurrent queries, so try 20 concurrent jobs to have a safety margin – but also add retry logic to the code that launches the job).
Another option would be to not do it as separate queries, but try to bake everything together into fewer, or even a single query – either by grouping on country and date, or by generating all queries and gluing them together with UNION ALL. If this is possible or not is hard to say without knowing more about the data and the query, though. You'll likely have to post-process the result anyway, and if you just sort by something meaningful it wouldn't be very hard to split the result into the necessary pieces after the query has run.
Using Redshift is probably not the solution, since it sounds like you're doing this only once per day, and you wouldn't use the cluster very much. It would Athena is a much better choice, you just have to handle the limits better.
With my limited understanding of your use case I think using Lambda and Step Functions would be a better way to go than Batch. With Step Functions you'd have one function that starts N number of queries (where N is equal to your concurrency limit, 25 if you haven't asked for it to be raised), and then a poll loop (check the examples for how to do this) that checks queries that have completed, and starts new queries to keep the number of running queries at the max. When all queries are run a final function can trigger whatever workflow you need to run after everything is done (or you can run that after each query).
The benefit of Lambda and Step Functions is that you don't pay for idle resources. With Batch, you will pay for resources that do nothing but wait for Athena to complete. Since Athena, in contrast to Redshift for example, has an asynchronous API you can run a Lambda function for 100ms to start queries, then 100ms every few seconds (or minutes) to check if any have completed, and then another 100ms or so to finish up. It's almost guaranteed to be less than the Lambda free tier.
As I know Redshift Spectrum and Athena cost same. You should not compare Redshift to Athena, they have different purpose. But first of all I would think about addressing you data skew issue. Since you mentioned AWS EMR I assume you use Spark. To deal with large and small partitions you need to repartition you dataset by months, or some other equally distributed value.Or you can use month and country for grouping. You got the idea.
You can use redshift spectrum for this purpose. Yes, it is a bit costly but it is scalable and very good for performing complex aggregations.