I have instantiated project variable like this:
MSBuildLocator.RegisterDefaults();
var workspace = MSBuildWorkspace.Create();
var project = workspace.OpenProjectAsync(csprojFilePath).Result;
A couple of days ago I was sure the project.Documents array was getting updated when they'd get edited, but now when I read the source of a specific document, after an edit, the source is out-of-date.
Am I remembering incorrectly or could something else be making this not work?
Edit: Based on this discussion it won't update on its own. Probably hadn't tested it that carefully.
Related
Until recently, everything worked, then the website has had the great idea to up the font and therefore part of my program doesn't work now. But let's get to the gist of the problem, I use a code to download the values of a table football scores that are constantly updated.
The code works fine, the only bug currently is in the way the value is captured by my regex.
Especially if the team has a table name like: "Manchester" then the values are downloaded properly, and if it is abbreviated from the site as: "Manchester Uni ...." then the bug appears.
I capture the team name using this code:
.Name = Remove_Tags(Regex.Match(Content, "<td class=""text team large-link"">(.+?)</td>").Groups(1).ToString)
Site link example: itDOTsoccerwayDOTcom
Image Example: http://www.mediafire.com/convkey/d022/ho877h9ahbo6bffzg.jpg
Complete class project: http://pastebin.com/kGxCXyWQ
to be precise, my code works on the table "Classifica" because the name "Manchester United" is full, while on other tables as "Tabelle larghe" values are not captured as the team's name is abbreviated from the site. I ask for help to you to fix this bug, my clients complain to me and I have to find an efficient solution as soon as possible. Sorry if I haven't insert the image here but I doesn't have the necessary reputation.
What I use:
- Joomla 2.5
- gantry framework
Need:
I must place in my homepage a slideshow module inside the mainbody as a featured article.
What I did:
Installed a slideshow module and placed temporary inside gantry's maintop-a position to see if it worked (it did), then moved in a non-previously-exsisting 'slideshow' position.
Created a new article, with this content: {loadposition slideshow} and set it to featured state.
Result:
the article was published correctly but the introtext char limit trimmed the actual module code to 100 chars making it useless.
What I already tried to fix the issue:
Modified my slideshow article from database adding the loadmodule code in the fulltext field (which was originally empty),
then modified components/com_content/view/featured/tmpl/default_item.php replacing echo $this->item->introtext; with an if to identify my slideshow article id then query the database to find the fulltext field and echo it. this thingy works but the loadmodule function isn't, so it's displayed as simple HTML. I deduce that introtext is treated differently than fulltext since what's inside the brackets is interpreted as code only when echoed as introtext, and I miss that layer.
Modified modules/mod_articles_category/helper.php to break the 100 introtext_limit, sadly finding that's not called for my featured articles (added dump($item, 'some name') which returns only the articles that are inside my news sidebar, even if all my featured articles including slideshow are categorized)
tried a million different combinations of the above (i.e.:{loadmodule slideshow}{module [myslideshow_article_id]} <- a module loader plugin i tried, ...) which are too long to put here.
Searched the whole project folder for files containing 'introtext' inside their code, finding alot, but nothing that actually trims it (except helper.php of course)
Searched the Joomla API
Googled for everything that came into my mind finding no working solutions.
Came Here :)
Thanks
If you want to show a module inside an artice, you can use an component to show them there.
In my experience, this works on normal and featured articles, so this might work for you:
http://www.nonumber.nl/extensions/modulesanywhere
I hope this was helpfull, since this is my first answer here.
Kind Regards,
McBurgerKong
I'm helping our Editors to clean up broken links and have been looking for answers to the following:
The Broken Link Report cannot be exported or sorted so it's not very useful (we have many broken links ~2000). Is there a SQL script that I can run to create the same report?
If an Editor fix a link, Rerun the report doesn't seem to take the item off the report. Does she have to Rebuild Link Database every time?
The Links button in the menu is helpful, but it is listing All Versions of referrers. Is there a SQL script to find only the lastest version?
When delete or archive an item and let Sitecore remove broke links, will all the affected items be published?
We are dealing with a large report (~2000 items) due to not maintaining it diligently. The goal is to reduce the number to 100~200 and keep it under control from now on. Any general advice on how to clean up broken links report is appreciated.
For your first (and partly third) questions:
In the Core database you can check what gets executed on the click of the Broken Link Report (the item that defines it is located in : /sitecore/content/Documents and settings/All users/Start menu/Right/Reporting Tools/Scan for Broken Links.
The application that gets started is /Applications/Tools/Broken Links.aspx, so if we look at *webroot*/sitecore/shell/Applications/Tools/Broken Links/Broken links.xml, we can see that the code used for it is Sitecore.Shell.Applications.Tools.BrokenLinks.BrokenLinksForm in the Sitecore.Client assembly.
Using Reflector you can see what it's executing. For your requirements, what I would say would be the easiest is to create your own version of the BrokenLinksForm, possibly simply adding an export functionality on it, or modify the code so it only takes the latest version. From looking at it very quickly I think the code to change (which is actually in the nested Scanner class) is:
...
foreach (ItemLink link in Globals.LinkDatabase.GetBrokenLinks(database))
{
list.Add(link);
}
...
You could possibly check whether the link item is the latest version, possibly by using something like
...
var version = link.GetSourceItem();
if (version.Versions.GetLatestVersion().Version == link.SourceItemVersion)
{
list.Add(link);
}
...
While you're at it you could of course also put in some sorting functionality :-)
It doesn't translate 1-on-1 with the Links button in the menu, but it should give you some pointers in the right direction.
As to your 2nd question: I believe that yes, the Link database does need to be rebuilt. I don't know if Sitecore has a schedule set up by default, but you could create your own agent in the <scheduling> node in the web.config to do this after X time.
Your last question: If you delete or archive an item and have Sitecore remove the broken links the affected items will, by default, not be published. If you have an auto-publish set up it'll show up of course.
ok so i'm working on a new version of cflive.net and one of the features is to link to code.
I am using jsfiddle.net as my inspiration for the new site.
Now with jsfiddle all the code runs in the client, so it is not a problem for other people to edit it.
But with CFML obviously the files need to be saved on the server first, which means the original file would get overwritten if anyone makes any changes, which is obviously going to be problematic as the original author may not want his files to get edited, so I am looking for some feedback/suggestions on what would be the best way to handle this.
My best idea so far is.
All files are stored in a unique folder using a JsessionID
e.g. anonymous files
/jsessionid/filename.cfm
or user files
/user/jsessionid/filename.cfm
the original author marks the files as editable or not. You must register and be logged in to have this control.
Files created anonymously (not logged in) can be edited as default.
If the file is editable then it can be edited, otherwise it gets duplicated for each new session.
Anonymous sessions get deleted if they have not been access for 90 days.
thoughts?
I am currently trying to understand a bit more about how Orchard handles Lists of Custom Content Types and I have run into a bit of an issue.
I created a Content Type named Story, which has the following parts:
Body
Common
Containable
Route
I created a list that holds these items, and all I am attempting to do is style them in such a way:
Story Title
Story Description (Basically a truncated version of the body?)
However, I cannot seem to figure out how to do the following:
Get the Title to actually appear (Currently all that appears is the body and a more link)
Remove the "more" link (and change this to be the actual Title)
I have looked into changing the Placement.info, and have looked all over in an attempt to find where the "more" link is added in each of the items. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
I finally managed to figure it out - Thanks to the Designer Tools Module, which made it very simple to go look into what was going on behind the scenes during Page Generation.
Basically - all that was necessary to accomplish this was to make some minor changes to the Parts.Common.Body.Summary.cshtml file. (found via ../Core/Common/Views/)
Which initially resembles the following:
#{
[~.ContentItem] contentItem = Model.ContentPart.ContentItem;
string bodyHtml = Model.Html.ToString();
var body = new HtmlString(Html.Excerpt(bodyHtml, 200).ToString()
.Replace(Environment.NewLine,"</p>"+Environment.NewLine+"<p>"));
}
<p>#body #Html.ItemDisplayLink(T("more").ToString(), contentItem)</p>
however by making a few changes (by using the Designer Tools) I change it into the following:
#{
[~.ContentItem] contentItem = Model.ContentPart.ContentItem;
string bodyHtml = Model.Html.ToString();
string title = Model.ContentPart.ContentItem.RoutePart.Title;
string summary = Html.Excerpt(bodyHtml, 100) + "...";
}
<div class='story'>
<p>
#Html.ItemDisplayLink(title, contentItem)
</p>
<summary>
#summary
</summary>
</div>
Although it could easily be shortened a bit - It does make the styling quite a big easier to handle. Anyways - I hope this helps :)
Alternately you can use the placement.info file in your theme assign different fields to your Summary and Detail views. It's much simplier.
http://orchardproject.net/docs/Understanding-placement-info.ashx
But, I used the same method you did till I discovered the .info file as well. It works and gives you a good understanding of how the system works, but the placement.info file seems easier.
Also, you probably don't want to be editing the view files in Core. I think your meant to override views in your theme directory.