/(\w)(\w*)\1/
For this string:"mgntdygtxrvxjnwksqhxuxtrv" I match "txrvxjnwksqhxuxt" (using Ruby), but not the even longer valid substring "tdygtxrvxjnwksqhxuxt".
For a given string, here are two ways to find the longest substring that begins and ends with the same character.
Suppose
str = "mgntdygtxrvxjnwksqhxuxtrv"
Use a regular expression
r = /(.)(?=(.*\1))/
str.gsub(r).map { $1 + $2 }.max_by(&:length)
#=> "tdygtxrvxjnwksqhxuxt".
When, as here, the regular expression contains capture groups, it may be more convenient to use String#gsub without a second argument or block (in which case it returns an enumerator, which can be chained) than String#scan (" If the pattern contains groups, each individual result is itself an array containing one entry per group.") Here gsub performs no substitutions; it merely generates matches of the regular expression.
The regular expression can be made self-documenting by writing it in free-spacing mode.
r = /
(.) # match any char and save to capture group 1
(?= # begin a positive lookahead
(.*\1) # match >= 0 characters followed by the contents of capture group 1
) # end the postive lookahead
/x # free-spacing regex definition mode
The following intermediate calculation is performed:
str.gsub(r).map { $1 + $2 }
#=> ["gntdyg", "ntdygtxrvxjn", "tdygtxrvxjnwksqhxuxt", "txrvxjnwksqhxuxt",
# "xrvxjnwksqhxux", "rvxjnwksqhxuxtr", "vxjnwksqhxuxtrv", "xjnwksqhxux",
# "xux"]
Notice that this does not enumerate all substrings beginning and ending with the same character (because .* is greedy). It does not generate, for example, the substring "xrvx".
Do not use a regular expression
v = str.each_char.with_index.with_object({}) do |(c,i),h|
if h.key?(c)
h[c][:size] = i - h[c][:start] + 1
else
h[c] = { start: i, size: 1 }
end
end.max_by { |_,h| h[:size] }.last
str[v[:start], v[:size]]
#=> "tdygtxrvxjnwksqhxuxt"
Related
I was solving a problem. i solved the Longest Common starting substring of S2 in S1 part but the time complexity was very high.
In the below Code I have to find the Longest Common starting substring of str3 in s[i].
In the below code instead of find function i have also use KMP algorithm but i faced high time complexity again.
string str3=abstring1(c,1,2,3);
while(1)
{
size_t found = s[i].find(str3);
if(str3.length()==0)
break;
if (found != string::npos)
{
str1=str1+str3;
break;
}
else
{
str3.pop_back();
}
}
Example :
S1=balling S2=baller
ans=ball
S1=balling S2=uolling
ans=
We have to find common starting substring of S2 in S1
Can you help in c++
I find Similar Post but i was not able to do my self in c++.
Here is a solution that emits the faint aroma of a hack.
Suppose
s1 = 'snowballing'
s2 = 'baller'
Then form the string
s = s2 + '|' + s1
#=> 'baller|snowballing'
where the pipe ('|') can be any character that is not in either string. (If in doubt, one could use, say, "\x00".)
We may then match s against the regular expression
^(.*)(?=.*\|.*\1)
This will match the longest starting string in s2 that is present in s1, which in this example is 'ball'.
Demo
The regular expression can be broken down as follows.
^ # match beginning of string
( # begin capture group 1
.* # match zero or more characters, as many as possible
) # end capture group 1
(?= # begin a positive lookahead
.* # match zero or more characters, as many as possible
\| # match '|'
.* # match zero or more characters, as many as possible
\1 # match the contents of capture group 1
) # end positive lookahead
Language and package
python3.8, regex
Description
The inputs and wanted outputs are listed as following:
if (programWorkflowState.getTerminal(1, 2) == Boolean.TRUE) {
Want: programWorkflowState.getTerminal(1, 2) and Boolean.TRUE
boolean ignore = !_isInStatic.isEmpty() && (_isInStatic.peek() == 3) && isAnonymous;
Want: _isInStatic.peek() and 3
boolean b = (num1 * ( 2 + num2)) == value;
Want: (num1 * ( 2 + num2)) and value
My current regex
((?:\((?:[^\(\)]|(?R))*\)|[\w\.])+)\s*==\s*((?:\((?:[^\(\)]|(?R))*\)|[\w\.])+)
This pattern want to match \((?:[^\(\)]|(?R))*\) or [\w\.] on both side of "=="
Result on regex101.com
Problem: It failed to match the recursive part (num1 * ( 2 + num2)).
The explanation of the recursive pattern \((?:m|(?R))*\) is here
But if I only use the recursive pattern, it succeeded to match (num1 * ( 2 + num2)) as the image shows.
What's the right regex to achieve my purpose?
The \((?:m|(?R))*\) pattern contains a (?R) construct (equal to (?0) subroutine) that recurses the entire pattern.
You need to wrap the pattern you need to recurse with a group and use a subroutine instead of (?R) recursion construct, e.g. (?P<aux>\((?:m|(?&aux))*\)) to recurse a pattern inside a longer one.
You can use
((?:(?P<aux1>\((?:[^()]++|(?&aux1))*\))|[\w.])++)\s*[!=]=\s*((?:(?&aux1)|[\w.])+)
See this regex demo (it takes just 6875 steps to match the string provided, yours takes 13680)
Details
((?:(?P<aux1>\((?:[^()]++|(?&aux1))*\))|[\w.])++) - Group 1, matches one or more occurrences (possessively, due to ++, not allowing backtracking into the pattern so that the regex engine could not re-try matching a string in another way if the subsequent patterns fail to match)
(?P<aux1>\((?:[^()]++|(?&aux1))*\)) - an auxiliary group "aux1" that matches (, then zero or more occurrences of either 1+ chars other than ( and ) or the whole Group "aux1" pattern, and then a )
| - or
[\w.] - a letter, digit, underscore or .
\s*[!=]=\s* - != or == with zero or more whitespace on both ends
((?:(?&aux1)|[\w.])+) - Group 2: one or more occurences of Group "aux" pattern or a letter, digit, underscore or ..
I need a Regular Expression to check whether a value contains any other characters than digits between 0 and 9.
I also want to check the length of the value.
The RegEx I´ve made: ^([0-9]\d{6})$
My test value is: 123Z45 and 123456
The ABAP code:
FIND ALL OCCURENCES OF REGEX '^([0-9]\d{6})$' IN L_VALUE RESULTS DATA(LT_RESULTS).
I´m expecting a result in LT_RESULTS, when I´m testing the first test value '123Z45', because there is a non-digit character.
But LT_RESULTS is in nearly every test case empty.
Your expression ^([0-9]\d{6})$ translates to:
^ - start of input
( - begin capture group
[0-9] - a character between 0 and 9
\d{6} - six digits (digit = character between 0 and 9)
) - end capture group
$ - end of input
So it will only match 1234567 (7 digit strings), not 123456, or 123Z45.
If you just need to find a string that contains non digits you could use the following instead: ^\d*[^\d]+\d*$
* - previous element may occur zero, one or more times
[^\d] - ^ right after [ means "NOT", i.e. any character which is not a digit
+ - previous element may occur one or more times
Example:
const expression = /^\d*[^\d]+\d*$/;
const inputs = ['123Z45', '123456', 'abc', 'a21345', '1234f', '142345'];
console.log(inputs.filter(i => expression.test(i)));
You can also use this character class if you want to extract non-digit group:
DATA(l_guid) = '0074162D8EAA549794A4EF38D9553990680B89A1'.
DATA(regx) = '[[:alpha:]]+'.
DATA(substr) = match( val = l_guid
regex = regx
occ = 1 ).
It finds a first occured non-digit group of characters and shows it.
If you want to just check if they are exists or how much of them reside in your string, count built-in function is your friend:
DATA(how_many) = count( val = l_guid regex = regx ).
DATA(yes) = boolc( count( val = l_guid regex = regx ) > 0 ).
Match and count exist since ABAP 7.50.
If you don't need a Regular Expression for something more complex, ABAP has some nice comparison operators CO (Contains Only), CA, NA etc for you. Something like:
IF L_VALUE CO '0123456789' AND STRLEN( L_VALUE ) = 6.
Consider the string "AB 1 BA 2 AB 3 BA". How can I match the content between "AB" and "BA" in a non-greedy fashion (in awk)?
I have tried the following:
awk '
BEGIN {
str="AB 1 BA 2 AB 3 BA"
regex="AB([^B][^A]|B[^A]|[^B]A)*BA"
if (match(str,regex))
print substr(str,RSTART,RLENGTH)
}'
with no output. I believe the reason for no match is that there is an odd number of characters between "AB" and "BA". If I replace str with "AB 11 BA 22 AB 33 BA" the regex seems to work..
Merge your two negated character classes and remove the [^A] from the second alternation:
regex = "AB([^AB]|B|[^B]A)*BA"
This regex fails on the string ABABA, though - not sure if that is a problem.
Explanation:
AB # Match AB
( # Group 1 (could also be non-capturing)
[^AB] # Match any character except A or B
| # or
B # Match B
| # or
[^B]A # Match any character except B, then A
)* # Repeat as needed
BA # Match BA
Since the only way to match an A in the alternation is by matching a character except B before it, we can safely use the simple B as one of the alternatives.
The other answer didn't really answer: how to match non-greedily?
Looks like it can't be done in (G)AWK. The manual says this:
awk (and POSIX) regular expressions always match the leftmost, longest
sequence of input characters that can match.
https://www.gnu.org/software/gawk/manual/gawk.html#Leftmost-Longest
And the whole manual doesn't contain the words "greedy" nor "lazy". It mentions Extended Regular Expressions, but for greedy matching you'd need Perl-Compatible Regular Expressions. So… no, can't be done.
For general expressions, I'm using this as a non-greedy match:
function smatch(s, r) {
if (match(s, r)) {
m = RSTART
do {
n = RLENGTH
} while (match(substr(s, m, n - 1), r))
RSTART = m
RLENGTH = n
return RSTART
} else return 0
}
smatch behaves like match, returning:
the position in s where the regular expression r occurs, or 0 if it does not. The variables RSTART and RLENGTH are set to the position and length of the matched string.
Is it possible to do a find/replace using regular expressions on a string of dna such that it only considers every 3 characters (a codon of dna) at a time.
for example I would like the regular expression to see this:
dna="AAACCCTTTGGG"
as this:
AAA CCC TTT GGG
If I use the regular expressions right now and the expression was
Regex.Replace(dna,"ACC","AAA") it would find a match, but in this case of looking at 3 characters at a time there would be no match.
Is this possible?
Why use a regex? Try this instead, which is probably more efficient to boot:
public string DnaReplaceCodon(string input, string match, string replace) {
if (match.Length != 3 || replace.Length != 3)
throw new ArgumentOutOfRangeException();
var output = new StringBuilder(input.Length);
int i = 0;
while (i + 2 < input.Length) {
if (input[i] == match[0] && input[i+1] == match[1] && input[i+2] == match[2]) {
output.Append(replace);
} else {
output.Append(input[i]);
output.Append(input[i]+1);
output.Append(input[i]+2);
}
i += 3;
}
// pick up trailing letters.
while (i < input.Length) output.Append(input[i]);
return output.ToString();
}
Solution
It is possible to do this with regex. Assuming the input is valid (contains only A, T, G, C):
Regex.Replace(input, #"\G((?:.{3})*?)" + codon, "$1" + replacement);
DEMO
If the input is not guaranteed to be valid, you can just do a check with the regex ^[ATCG]*$ (allow non-multiple of 3) or ^([ATCG]{3})*$ (sequence must be multiple of 3). It doesn't make sense to operate on invalid input anyway.
Explanation
The construction above works for any codon. For the sake of explanation, let the codon be AAA. The regex will be \G((?:.{3})*?)AAA.
The whole regex actually matches the shortest substring that ends with the codon to be replaced.
\G # Must be at beginning of the string, or where last match left off
((?:.{3})*?) # Match any number of codon, lazily. The text is also captured.
AAA # The codon we want to replace
We make sure the matches only starts from positions whose index is multiple of 3 with:
\G which asserts that the match starts from where the previous match left off (or the beginning of the string)
And the fact that the pattern ((?:.{3})*?)AAA can only match a sequence whose length is multiple of 3.
Due to the lazy quantifier, we can be sure that in each match, the part before the codon to be replaced (matched by ((?:.{3})*?) part) does not contain the codon.
In the replacement, we put back the part before the codon (which is captured in capturing group 1 and can be referred to with $1), follows by the replacement codon.
NOTE
As explained in the comment, the following is not a good solution! I leave it in so that others will not fall for the same mistake
You can usually find out where a match starts and ends via m.start() and m.end(). If m.start() % 3 == 0 you found a relevant match.