We need to deploy labels to multiple CLoud Run services using below API method
https://cloud.google.com/run/docs/reference/rest/v1/namespaces.services/replaceService
We are looking for options where we can apply labels using API without any new image deployment from Container Registry . We understand that there will be deployment and revision change while applying labels but we want that during deployment it should not pull new image from container registry rather it should use the image from last revision . Any configuration parameter in Cloud Run to prevent new images being pulled while applying labels using API or gcloud run services update SERVICE --update-labels KEY=VALUE
The principle of Cloud Run (and Knative, because the behavior is the same) is that the revision is immutable. Thus, if you change something in it, a new revision is created. You can't fake it!
So, the solution is to not use the latest tag of your image, but the SHA of it.
# the latest
gcr.io/PROJECT_ID/myImage
gcr.io/PROJECT_ID/myImage:latest
# A specific version
gcr.io/PROJECT_ID/myImage:SHA123465465dfsqfsdf
Of course, you have to update your YAML for this.
Related
Is there any recommended method to create and deploy the Apigee API Proxy Bundle via a CI/CD pipeline (I'm using Azure DevOps)?
I want to avoid excessive API Proxy Bundles from being created and deployed when there are no changes to be made. I've already tested, and I see that identical bundles still create a new revision.
So far, my own solution is to write a PowerShell script to use apigeecli to download the current bundle and compare it against the apiproxy that I have locally in my repo. If it differs, I create and deploy a new API Proxy Bundle.
Has anyone seen anything better?
I have mainly automated with Gitlab but will share my ideas probably may help with your specific case.
So we use version control to manage our apigee repos. I have setup a gitlab pipeline that checks for the diff anytime we push to our repository and only if there are any changes do we redeploy the proxy to Apigee. Normally when the pipeline is triggered, we check if there are any changes to target servers, proxies and shared flows, and if changes are detected, we check the deployed revision and environments.
Through my deployment script, i am able to get a list of these changes and pass them to the pipeline as CHANGES variable. This means that only these modified proxies will be deployed.
On my pipeline I could do something like this git diff --name-only $CI_COMMIT_SHA..$CI_COMMIT_BEFORE_SHA > /changes.txt and pass the content of the changes file to the CHANGES to be deployed.
What are the ways how one can roll back the App Runner service to the previous revision?
We use a simple GitHub Actions workflow to build and upload a new docker image to the ECR registry.
How can I select an old image in ECR and upload this instead (rolling back revision)?
I'm also interested in this issue. It seems that when you create an app runner app with a specific image tag and that's it you cannot choose which version to deploy. You either have to amend the service change the Container image URI to the previous image
I have an ECS task which has 2 containers using 2 different images, both hosted in ECR. There are 2 GitHub repos for the two images (app and api), and a third repo for my IaC code (infra). I am managing my AWS infrastructure using Terraform Cloud. The ECS task definition is defined there using Cloudposse's ecs-alb-service-task, with the containers defined using ecs-container-definition. Presently I'm using latest as the image tag in the task definition defined in Terraform.
I am using CircleCI to build the Docker containers when I push changes to GitHub. I am tagging each image with latest and the variable ${CIRCLE_SHA1}. Both repos also update the task definition using the aws-ecs orb's deploy-service-update job, setting the tag used by each container image to the SHA1 (not latest). Example:
container-image-name-updates: "container=api,tag=${CIRCLE_SHA1}"
When I push code to the repo for e.g. api, a new version of the task definition is created, the service's version is updated, and the existing task is restarted using the new version. So far so good.
The problem is that when I update the infrastructure with Terraform, the service isn't behaving as I would expect. The ecs-alb-service-task has a boolean called ignore_changes_task_definition, which is true by default.
When I leave it as true, Terraform Cloud successfully creates a new version whenever I Apply changes to the task definition. (A recent example was to update environment variables.) BUT it doesn't update the version used by the service, so the service carries on using the old version. Even if I stop a task, it will respawn using the old version. I have to manually go in and use the Update flow, or push changes to one of the code repos. Then CircleCI will create yet aother version of the task definition and update the service.
If I instead set this to false, Terraform Cloud will undo the changes to the service performed by CircleCI. It will reset the task definition version to the last version it created itself!
So I have three questions:
How can I get Terraform to play nice with the task definitions created by CircleCI, while also updating the service itself if I ever change it via Terraform?
Is it a problem to be making changes to the task definition from THREE different places?
Is it a problem that the image tag is latest in Terraform (because I don't know what the SHA1 is)?
I'd really appreciate some guidance on how to properly set up this CI flow. I have found next to nothing online about how to use Terraform Cloud with CI products.
I have learned a bit more about this problem. It seems like the right solution is to use a CircleCI workflow to manage Terraform Cloud, instead of having the two services effectively competing with each other. By default Terraform Cloud will expect you to link a repo with it and it will auto-plan every time you push. But you can turn that off and use the terraform orb instead to run plan/apply via CircleCI.
You would still leave ignore_changes_task_definition set to true. Instead, you'd add another step to the workflow after the terraform/apply step has made the change. This would be aws-ecs/run-task, which should relaunch the service using the most recent task definition, which was (possibly) just created by the previous step. (See the task-definition parameter.)
I have decided that this isn't worth the effort for me, at least not at this time. The conflict between Terraform Cloud and CircleCI is annoying, but isn't that acute.
I aim to copy a gcr image from one project to another as soon as the image lands in the container registry of the first project. I am aware of the gcloud container images add-tag command, looking for a more automated option. Also the second project where the image has to be copied is protected by VPC-SC. Any leads will be appreciated...
I understand that you are looking for the best way to mirror the GCR images between two projects. Currently, you can follow the workaround in this document click to copy the container images for your use case. At the moment, the only way to move between two registries is by pulling from one and pushing to another, if you have the right permission. There is currently a tool on github that can automate this for you, gcrane click . However, for mirroring the container images between two projects, a feature request has already been submitted but there is no ETA.
According to the GCP documentation click , If the project is protected by VPC-SC, the container registry does not use googleapis.com domain. To achieve this, container registry need to configured via private DNS or BIND to map to the restricted VIP separately from other APIs.
When a change is made to a container registry that you own, a Pub/Sub message can be published. You can use this Pub/Sub message as a trigger to perform work. My immediate thought would be to create a Cloud Function that is triggered by the arrival of a message which then fires off a Cloud Build recipe. The Cloud Build would perform a docker pull of your original image and then a tag rename and then a docker push. It feels like this would be 100% automated and use components that are designed for CI/CD pipelines.
References:
Configuring Pub/Sub notifications
Cloud Build documentation
Terraform has a dedicated "docker" provider which works with images and containers and which can use a private registry and supply it with credentials, cf. the registry documentation. However, I didn't find any means to supply a Dockerfile directly without use of a separate registry. The problem of handling changes to docker files itself is already solved e.g. in this question, albeit without the use of terraform.
I could do a couple of workarounds: not using the dedicated docker provider, but use some other provider (although I don't know which one). Or I could start my own private registry (possibly in a docker container with terraform), run the docker commands locally which generate the images files (from terraform this could be done using the null_resource of the null provider) and then continue with those.
None of these workarounds make much sense to me. Is there a way to deploy docker containers described in a docker file directly using terraform?
Terraform is a provisioning tool rather than a build tool, so building artifacts like Docker images from source is not really within its scope.
Much as how the common and recommended way to deal with EC2 images (AMIs) is to have some other tool build them and Terraform simply to use them, the same principle applies to Docker images: the common and recommended path is to have some other system build your Docker images -- a CI system, for example -- and to publish the results somewhere that Terraform's Docker provider will be able to find them at provisioning time.
The primary reason for this separation is that it separates the concerns of building a new artifact and provisioning infrastructure using artifacts. This is useful in a number of ways, for example:
If you're changing something about your infrastructure that doesn't require a new image then you can just re-use the image you already built.
If there's a problem with your Dockerfile that produces a broken new image, you can easily roll back to the previous image (as long as it's still in the registry) without having to rebuild it.
It can be tempting to try to orchestrate an entire build/provision/deploy pipeline with Terraform alone, but Terraform is not designed for that and so it will often be frustrating to do so. Instead, I'd recommend treating Terraform as just one component in your pipeline, and use it in conjunction with other tools that are better suited to the problem of build automation.
If avoiding running a separate registry is your goal, I believe that can be accomplished by skipping using docker_image altogether and just using docker_container with an image argument referring to an image that is already available to the Docker daemon indicated in the provider configuration.
docker_image retrieves a remote image into the daemon's local image cache, but docker build writes its result directly into the local image cache of the daemon used for the build process, so as long as both Terraform and docker build are interacting with the same daemon, Terraform's Docker provider should be able to find and use the cached image without interacting with a registry at all.
For example, you could build an automation pipeline that runs docker build first, obtains the raw id (hash) of the image that was built, and then runs terraform apply -var="docker_image=$DOCKER_IMAGE" against a suitable Terraform configuration that can then immediately use that image.
Having such a tight coupling between the artifact build process and the provisioning process does defeat slightly the advantages of the separation, but the capability is there if you need it.