I've been trying to cross compile jlibtorrent for the raspberry pi which uses boost build for compiling. I am using the officially provided cross compiler with the following config.jam:
import os ;
using gcc : arm : arm-linux-gnueabihf-g++ :
<cxxflags>-fPIC
<cxxflags>-std=c++14
<cxxflags>-fno-strict-aliasing
<cxxflags>-fvisibility=hidden
<linkflags>-m32
<linkflags>-static-libstdc++
<linkflags>-static-libgcc
<linkflags>"-z noexecstack"
# debug information
<cxxflags>-g
<cxxflags>-gdwarf-4
<cxxflags>-ggdb
;
I basically copied the existing configuration for linux-x86 and replaced the compiler, but I'm getting the following compilation error:
libtorrent/src/entry.cpp: In member function 'libtorrent::entry& libtorrent::entry::operator[](libtorrent::string_view)':
libtorrent/src/entry.cpp:86:33: error: no matching function for call to
'std::map<std::basic_string<char>, libtorrent::entry, libtorrent::aux::strview_less, std::allocator<std::pair<const std::basic_string<char>, libtorrent::entry> > >::find(libtorrent::string_view&)'
auto const i = dict().find(key);
My only guess is that the version of the cross compiler (4.9.3) is not compatible with libtorrent, because I saw in the linux-32-config.jam that it uses g++-5. Is there anything else I am missing?
You can find the modified repository in my github repositories. I am using swig/build-linux-armv7.sh for building.
that call (std::map::find()) was added in C++14 (see docs). I see you pass in -std=c++14 on the command line as well. Are you sure your GCC supports C++14? It seems a bit old for that.
The current stable branch of libtorrent only requires C++11 support, if that is the branch you're building, there may be something wrong with the compiler support detection here. If you are building from libtorrent master, it requires proper C++14 support. So in that case you may want to use the stable release.
Thanks to #Arvid I managed to compile it using the current stable branch for libtorrent (RC_1_2) and the following jam file, which you can find here.
import os ;
using gcc : arm : arm-linux-gnueabihf-g++ :
<cxxflags>-fPIC
<cxxflags>-std=c++11
<cxxflags>-fno-strict-aliasing
<cxxflags>-fvisibility=hidden
<linkflags>-static-libstdc++
<linkflags>-static-libgcc
<linkflags>"-z noexecstack"
# debug information
<cxxflags>-g
<cxxflags>-gdwarf-4
<cxxflags>-ggdb;
Related
I am trying to compile kernel for Cyanogenmod 13. I am getting error
ERROR: modpost: Found 2 section mismatch(es).
To see full details build your kernel with:
'make CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y'
To build the kernel despite the mismatches, build with:
'make CONFIG_NO_ERROR_ON_MISMATCH=y'
(NOTE: This is not recommended)
I read it here. That i need to compile my kernel using 4.7.
How can i choose the version of toolchain during cyanogenmod build ??
I believe you need to setup gcc version 4.7 and use CC variable to set it as a compiler. E.g. make target CC=/bin/gcc4.7
More information here and here.
Thanks to #nopasara and his valuable comment.
So i did little research further and discovered that the kernel is compatiable with arm-eabi tool chain not arm-linux-androideabi toolchain. So here is the command i used
export PATH=$PATH:~/android/system/prebuilts/gcc/linux-x86/arm/arm-linux-eabi-4.7/bin/ && export ARCH=arm && export SUBARCH=arm && export CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux-eabi- && make msm8226_defconfig O=~/android/system/out/target/product/E6790/obj/KERNEL_OBJ
and
make O=~/android/system/out/target/product/E6790/obj/KERNEL_OBJ zImage -j4
To do with this Cyanogenmod add following line to your BoardConfig.mk
TARGET_KERNEL_CROSS_COMPILE_PREFIX := arm-eabi-
and either use
export TARGET_LEGACY_GCC_VERSION=4.7
Or edit ~/android/system/build/core/combo/TARGET_linux-arm.mk and set version in
$(combo_2nd_arch_prefix)TARGET_LEGACY_GCC_VERSION := 4.7
I have written and built an R package that depends on Rcpp and requires the C++0x standard (for using the tgamma function in C++). I have tested the package on various desktop computers and operating systems, and it always seems to install and work fine. However, I would also like to use the package on an HPC server. When I try to install the package there in my local R library tree using R CMD INSTALL test (where test is the name of the package), I get the following error message from the compiler:
/usr/include/c++/4.4.7/c++0x_warning.h(31): catastrophic error: #error directive: This file requires compiler and library support for the upcoming ISO C++ standard, C++0x. This support is currently experimental, and must be enabled with the -std=c++0x or -std=gnu++0x compiler options.
#error This file requires compiler and library support for the upcoming \
^
compilation aborted for Metropolis_Sampler_Beta_Edgewise_Cpp_Statistics.cpp (code 4)
make: *** [Metropolis_Sampler_Beta_Edgewise_Cpp_Statistics.o] Error 4
ERROR: compilation failed for package ‘test’
It basically tells me that I should enable C++0x support when the compiler is called (as in this post). Yet, I thought adding the statement CXX_STD = CXX11 to the src/Makevars file in the R package would actually tell the compiler that this version needs to be used. And indeed that seems to be the case on various desktop computers I have tried. So my question is: how can I tell the compiler on the server that this C++ version should be used for compilation? Alternatively, how else can I install the package?
On the server, I load the module for R by entering module load math/R on the terminal before trying to install the package, and it reports back that the following modules were loaded:
Loading module dependency 'compiler/intel/13.1'.
Loading module dependency 'numlib/mkl/11.0.5'.
Edit 1: The server is a German university cluster called bwUniCluster. It is based on KITE 2.0/RHEL6.5/Lustre 2.5.2. As far as I can tell from the module message reported above, it seems to be the Intel C++ Compiler XE (ICPC) version 13.1.3. But actually I have no clue about compilers, so if you need to know anything more specific, please let me know.
Edit 2 It's also possible to execute module load compiler/gnu/4.9 on the terminal before I try to install the package. This results in the following error message (similar as the one above), which leads me to think that this is not a version problem:
/pfs/data1/software_uc1/bwhpc/common/compiler/gnu/4.9.2/bin/../include/c++/4.9.2/bits/c++0x_warning.h(32): catastrophic error: #error directive: This file requires compiler and library support for the ISO C++ 2011 standard. This support is currently experimental, and must be enabled with the -std=c++11 or -std=gnu++11 compiler options.
#error This file requires compiler and library support for the \
^
compilation aborted for Metropolis_Sampler_Beta_Edgewise_Cpp_Statistics.cpp (code 4)
make: *** [Metropolis_Sampler_Beta_Edgewise_Cpp_Statistics.o] Error 4
ERROR: compilation failed for package ‘test’
Edit 3: One of the comments suggests that both the R package and R itself need to be compiled using the same compiler version. Is this correct? R was built using g++ 4.4.7 on this machine. Does this mean that the only feasible solution is to convince the sys admin to recompile R with the other 4.9.2 compiler and provide it as a new module? I find this hard to believe, given the following sentence in the "Writing R Extensions" manual:
On these platforms, it is necessary to select a different compiler for C++11, via personal or site Makevars files.
The solution was indeed to recompile R on the server with a newer compiler, in this case Intel 14 (as discussed in Edit 3 in the original post). The sys admin was so kind to set up a new module for this R version.
Is there a way to compile with MingW with CodeBlocks in Windows so they can be used in Ubuntu or Centos distros?
I've tried compiling with GNU GCC option then got the output file with .o extensions under obj/Release/ folder.
When I run I get this error under my Vagrant Ubuntu machine:
-bash: ./main.o: cannot execute binary file
How can I compile it so it runs on my Linux machines?
The technical term for what you're trying to accomplish is cross-compilation. For that, you need to build a specific cross-compiler using GCC sources. If you still want to keep MinGW, there is a page explaining the steps needed to create a ARM cross-compiler : http://www.mingw.org/wiki/HostedCrossCompilerHOWTO. (you'll have to modify the target)
List of targets supported by GCC :
armv5te-android-gcc armv5te-linux-rvct armv5te-linux-gcc
armv5te-none-rvct
armv6-darwin-gcc armv6-linux-rvct armv6-linux-gcc
armv6-none-rvct
armv7-android-gcc armv7-darwin-gcc armv7-linux-rvct
armv7-linux-gcc armv7-none-rvct
mips32-linux-gcc
ppc32-darwin8-gcc ppc32-darwin9-gcc ppc32-linux-gcc
ppc64-darwin8-gcc ppc64-darwin9-gcc ppc64-linux-gcc
sparc-solaris-gcc
x86-android-gcc x86-darwin8-gcc x86-darwin8-icc
x86-darwin9-gcc x86-darwin9-icc x86-darwin10-gcc
x86-darwin11-gcc x86-darwin12-gcc x86-linux-gcc
x86-linux-icc x86-os2-gcc x86-solaris-gcc
x86-win32-gcc x86-win32-vs7 x86-win32-vs8
x86-win32-vs9
x86_64-darwin9-gcc x86_64-darwin10-gcc x86_64-darwin11-gcc
x86_64-darwin12-gcc x86_64-linux-gcc x86_64-linux-icc
x86_64-solaris-gcc x86_64-win64-gcc x86_64-win64-vs8
x86_64-win64-vs9
universal-darwin8-gcc universal-darwin9-gcc universal-darwin10-gcc
universal-darwin11-gcc universal-darwin12-gcc
generic-gnu
There is only one big caveat : since Windows is not POSIX compliant, I don't think you can use signals or pthreads.
Finally, brace yourself because it's a tedious task to build a cx-compiler (lots of obscure bugs). That's why profesionnal devs pays $$$ for "plug'n'play" solutions.
EDIT : this MXE project can be useful to you
I have just downloaded clang 3.3 (homebrew) from the LLVM web page to my mac (OS X 10.8.4), but get this compiler error when using std=c++11 stdlib=libc++:
In file included from /usr/include/c++/v1/string:434:
In file included from /usr/include/c++/v1/algorithm:594:
In file included from /usr/include/c++/v1/memory:590:
In file included from /usr/include/c++/v1/typeinfo:61:
/usr/include/c++/v1/exception:146:5: error: an attribute list cannot appear here
_LIBCPP_NORETURN friend void rethrow_exception(exception_ptr);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/usr/include/c++/v1/__config:190:28: note: expanded from macro '_LIBCPP_NORETURN'
# define _LIBCPP_NORETURN [[noreturn]]
^~~~~~~~~~~~
It seems that I also need another libc++ (even though it was said that it was 100% complete on MAC ...), but I cannot find any. Any help appreciated. Just for your info:
> clang++ -v
clang version 3.3 (tags/RELEASE_33/final)
Target: x86_64-apple-darwin12.4.0
Thread model: posix
And, yes, I googled it and found this: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.compilers.llvm.bugs/24138 claiming it's resolved in libc++ trunk ???
Okay, as suggested by Howard, I've downloaded tip-of-the-trunk libc++ into /opt/local/share/libcxx, but have trouble building it. The manual says to cd libcxx/lib, export TRIPLE=-apple-, and run ./buildit. I presume this implies bash (I'm usually a tcsh user, so I moved my .tcshrc, got a new shell and started bash). I did that and the compilations worked, but the library build failed. Apparently ./buildit doesn't see $TRIPLE=-apple-, as it picks the wrong LDSHARED_FLAG (not that on line 81, but that on line 103, which is to be used if $TRIPLE is not set), even though echo $TRIPLE yields -apple- as it should. When I add the statement echo TRIPLE = $TRIPLE at the top of buildit, it reports nothing. How come? What is wrong here?
The failure was that because the wrong LDSHARED_FLAG was picked the loading didn't work (ld complaint about the unknown option -soname which, I think, makes sense under linux). I don't know why buildit (a #! /bin/sh file) didn't pick up the TRIPLE environment variable (it did pick up several unwanted ones such as CXX and CC). I now simply added TRIPLE=-apple- at the top of that file and it did built the library. However, the loader spitted out several warnings all of which were of the form
ld: warning: direct access in ___cxa_bad_typeid to global weak symbol typeinfo for std::bad_typeid means the weak symbol cannot be overridden at runtime. This was likely caused by different translation units being compiled with different visibility settings.
But most importantly, it works (the compilation at least, I have yet to test the library). I have one final question. The advice was to use -I and -L to tell the compiler about the whereabouts of this version. Is it not possible to put it into the usual place /usr/include/c++/v1/? Note that Xcode has its version somewhere else anyway and I had put in a symbolic link (/usr/include/c++/v1/) to that one to get my homebrew clang 3.2 working (after the some Xcode update). What about the library? Can I also put it in a standard place?
Here is the home page of libc++:
http://libcxx.llvm.org
You can download the tip-of-trunk libc++ from there. You can tell clang to point to your download with -nostdinc++ -I<path-to-libc++>/include. You can also tell clang to link to your tip-of-trunk libc++ with -L<path-to-libc++>/lib and export DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH=<path-to-libcxx>/lib. The directions are all on the libc++ home page.
Xcode is the easiest way to get clang + libc++. But if you want the very latest, this is the place to go.
Congratulations!
Don't worry about the ld warning. It is a harmless ld bug that will be fixed in a future release. I see it on 10.8.4 too and it doesn't hurt anything.
The libc++ headers no longer live at /usr/include/c++/v1. Xcode has migrated them into itself. Having libc++ headers at /usr/include/c++/v1 from older installs has been a source of confusion and bugs. I regularly use -nostdinc++ -I to point to the libc++ headers I want (I often have several versions going at the same time), and that works well for me.
It is possible for you to replace your /usr/lib/libc++.1.dylib with that you have built. I do not recommend doing this. I have to sometimes to do a proper test, but I always do so very carefully because sometimes this causes me to have to reboot onto a backup disk and restore my /usr/lib to its original state. If you do go this route, it is a very good idea to have a backup of the original /usr/lib/libc++.1.dylib very handy.
I recommend instead -L on the command line, and export DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH=<path-to-libcxx>/lib in the shell. More than one person (including myself) has gotten their computer into a really nasty place by not following this advice.
If you run testit (under test/), all you need is DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH in that shell. The testit script is set up to point to the right places without an install.
Also I recommend figuring out why you had to modify buildit. No one else is seeing that behavior. printenv on your command line may help in this endeavor.
libc++ is updated often. We try to keep tip-of-trunk always in a shippable state.
How do I find out the version of GNU Radio that I have installed?
I would like the use their messaging libraries, but they are available on newer versions of gnuradio only and for some reason I'm getting a compilation error when I try to use the following code:
message_port_register_out(pmt::mp("out_message"));
I get the following error on compilation:
error: ‘message_port_register_out’ was not declared in this scope
It's supposed to be part of the gr_basic_block, which all blocks inherit from, but it's not compiling.
You can get the version number using python.
from gnuradio import gr
gr.version()
If you installed the complete package - not only the library - in a terminal window:
$ gnuradio-companion --version
GNU Radio Companion 3.7.2.1
or
$ gnuradio-config-info --version
3.7.2.1
According to the docs, message_port_register_out is a member of gr_basic_block. Based on the compilation error you have posted and the code snippet, I'd assume you need an instance to work with. It's hard to tell without more context however.