right now, I am currently trying to output the contents of buf.mtext so I can make sure take the correct input before moving on with my program. Everything seems to work fine, except one thing; msgrcv() puts garbage characters into the buffer, and the reciever process outputs garbage characters.
Here is my sender process:
int main (void)
{
int i; // loop counter
int status_01; // result status
int msqid_01; // message queue ID (#1)
key_t msgkey_01; // message-queue key (#1)
unsigned int rand_num;
float temp_rand;
unsigned char eight_bit_num;
unsigned char counter = 0;
unsigned char even_counter = 0;
unsigned char odd_counter = 0;
srand(time(0));
struct message {
long mtype;
char mtext[BUFFER_SIZE];
} buf_01;
msgkey_01 = MSG_key_01; // defined at top of file
msqid_01 = msgget(msgkey_01, 0666 | IPC_CREAT)
if ((msqid_01 <= -1) { exit(1); }
/* wait for a key stroke at the keyboard ---- */
eight_bit_num = getchar();
buf_01.mtype = 1;
/* send one eight-bit number, one at a time ------------ */
for (i = 0; i < NUM_REPEATS; i++)
{
temp_rand = ((float)rand()/(float)RAND_MAX)*255.0;
rand_num = (int)temp_rand;
eight_bit_num = (unsigned char)rand_num;
if ((eight_bit_num % 2) == 0)
{
printf("Even number: %d\n", eight_bit_num);
even_counter = even_counter + eight_bit_num;
}
else
{
printf("Odd number: %d\n", eight_bit_num);
odd_counter = odd_counter + eight_bit_num;
}
/* update the counters ------------------------------ */
counter = counter + eight_bit_num;
if((eight_bit_num % 2) == 0) { even_counter = even_counter + eight_bit_num; }
else { odd_counter = odd_counter + eight_bit_num; }
buf_01.mtext[0] = eight_bit_num; // copy the 8-bit number
buf_01.mtext[1] = '\0'; // null-terminate it
status_01 = msgsnd(msqid_01, (struct msgbuf *)&buf_01, sizeof(buf_01.mtext), 0);
status_01 = msgctl(msqid_01, IPC_RMID, NULL);
}
Here is my receiver process:
int main() {
struct message {
long mtype;
char mtext[BUFFER_SIZE];
} buf;
int msqid;
key_t msgkey;
msgkey = MSG_key_01;
msqid = msgget(msgkey, 0666); // connect to message queue
if (msqid < 0) {
printf("Failed\n");
exit(1);
}
else {
printf("Connected\n");
}
if (msgrcv(msqid, &buf, BUFFER_SIZE, 0, 0) < 0) { // read message into buf
perror("msgrcv");
exit(1);
}
printf("Data received is: %s \n", buf.mtext);
printf("Done receiving messages.\n");
return 0;
}
The output is usually something like as follows:
Data received is: ▒
Done receiving messages.
I have made sure to clear my message queues each time after running the sender and receiver processes, as well, since I have come to find out this can cause issues. Thanks in advance for your help.
Turns out neither of the suggested solutions were the issue, as I suspected; the sender process actually works just fine. The problem was that I was trying to print buf.mtext instead of buf.mtext[0] which isn't an actual integer value. I fixed the issue by just doing this:
int temp_num = buf.mtext[0];
printf("Data recieved is %d \n", temp_num);
Related
Hi i am trying to record from a board and i have successfully record 4 seconds. Problem is when i try to record for more time, i got an error telling me that there not enough memory. my target is to record a 5 minutes file. Until now i have create a buffer named snIn[256] where are the samples. i send it to a big buffer of [16K * 4sec] and when it is full, i create the wav file.
#include "SAI_InOut.hpp"
#include "F746_GUI.hpp"
#include "Delay.hpp"
#include "WaveformDisplay.hpp"
#include "SDFileSystem.h"
#include "wavfile.h"
using namespace Mikami;
#define RES_STR_SIZE 0x20
#define WAVFILE_SAMPLES_PER_SECOND 16000
#define REC_TIME 4
//Create an SDFileSystem object
SDFileSystem sd("sd");
bool flag = 1;
int count = 0;
char *res_buf;
int rp = 0;
const int NUM_SAMPLES = WAVFILE_SAMPLES_PER_SECOND * REC_TIME;
Array<int16_t> my_buffer(NUM_SAMPLES);
int j = 0;
static const char *target_filename = "/sd/rectest.wav";
const int SEG_SIZE = 256;
int sent_array = 0;
int rec(const char *filename, Array<int16_t> my_buffer)
{
j = 0;
flag = 0;
sent_array = 0;
WavFileResult result;
wavfile_info_t info;
wavfile_data_t data;
WAVFILE_INFO_AUDIO_FORMAT(&info) = 1;
WAVFILE_INFO_NUM_CHANNELS(&info) = 1;
WAVFILE_INFO_SAMPLE_RATE(&info) = WAVFILE_SAMPLES_PER_SECOND;
WAVFILE_INFO_BITS_PER_SAMPLE(&info) = 16;
WAVFILE_INFO_BYTE_RATE(&info) = WAVFILE_INFO_NUM_CHANNELS(&info) * WAVFILE_INFO_SAMPLE_RATE(&info) * (WAVFILE_INFO_BITS_PER_SAMPLE(&info) / 8);
WAVFILE_INFO_BLOCK_ALIGN(&info) = 2;
WAVFILE *wf = wavfile_open(filename, WavFileModeWrite, &result);
if (result != WavFileResultOK) {
wavfile_result_string(result, res_buf, RES_STR_SIZE);
printf("%s", res_buf);
return result;
} else printf ("Open file success \r\n");
rp = 0;
WAVFILE_DATA_NUM_CHANNELS(&data) = 1;
result = wavfile_write_info(wf, &info);
if (result != WavFileResultOK) {
wavfile_result_string(result, res_buf, RES_STR_SIZE);
printf("%s", res_buf);
return result; } else printf ("Write info success \r\n");
while ( rp < NUM_SAMPLES ) {
WAVFILE_DATA_CHANNEL_DATA(&data, 0) = my_buffer[rp];
result = wavfile_write_data(wf, &data);
rp += 1;
}
if (result != WavFileResultOK) {
wavfile_result_string(result, res_buf, RES_STR_SIZE);
printf("%s", res_buf);
return result; } else printf ("Write Data file success \r\n");
result = wavfile_close(wf);
if (result != WavFileResultOK) {
wavfile_result_string(result, res_buf , RES_STR_SIZE);
printf("%s", res_buf);
return result; } else printf ("Close file success \r\n");
//UnMount the filesystem
sd.unmount();
printf("Success rec !\r\n");
return 0;
}
int main()
{
//Mount the filesystem
sd.mount();
const float MAX_DELAY = 0.5f; // 最大遅延,単位:秒
const int FS = I2S_AUDIOFREQ_16K; // 標本化周波数: 16 kHz
const uint32_t MAX_ARRAY_SIZE = (uint32_t)(MAX_DELAY*FS);
SaiIO mySai(SaiIO::BOTH, 256, FS, INPUT_DEVICE_DIGITAL_MICROPHONE_2);
Label myLabel(185, 10, "Delay System", Label::CENTER, Font16);
// ButtonGroup: "ON", "OFF"
const uint16_t BG_LEFT = 370;
const uint16_t BG_WIDTH = 100;
const uint16_t BG_HEIGHT = 45;
ButtonGroup onOff(BG_LEFT, 40, BG_WIDTH/2, BG_HEIGHT,
2, (string[]){"ON", "OFF"}, 0, 0, 2, 1);
const uint16_t SB_LEFT = BG_LEFT - 320;
const uint16_t SB_WIDTH = 270;
const uint16_t SB_Y0 = 240;
char str[20];
sprintf(str, " %3.1f [s]", MAX_DELAY);
SeekBar barDelay(SB_LEFT, SB_Y0, SB_WIDTH,
0, MAX_ARRAY_SIZE, 0, "0", "", str);
NumericLabel<float> labelDelay(SB_LEFT+SB_WIDTH/2, SB_Y0-40, "DELEY: %4.2f", 0, Label::CENTER);
DelaySystem delaySystem(MAX_ARRAY_SIZE);
WaveformDisplay displayIn(*GuiBase::GetLcdPtr(), SB_LEFT+7, 70, 256, 9,LCD_COLOR_WHITE, LCD_COLOR_CYAN,GuiBase::ENUM_BACK);
Label inLabel(SB_LEFT-30, 65, "IN");
WaveformDisplay displayOut(*GuiBase::GetLcdPtr(), SB_LEFT+7, 130, 256, 9,LCD_COLOR_WHITE, LCD_COLOR_CYAN,GuiBase::ENUM_BACK);
Label outLabel(SB_LEFT-30, 125, "OUT");
int runStop = 1;
Array<int16_t> snIn(mySai.GetLength());
Array<int16_t> snOut(mySai.GetLength());
mySai.RecordIn();
mySai.PlayOut();
mySai.PauseOut();
while (true)
{
// On/OFF
int num;
if (onOff.GetTouchedNumber(num))
if (runStop != num)
{
if (num == 0) mySai.ResumeOut();
else mySai.PauseOut();
runStop = num;
}
if (mySai.IsCompleted())
{
for (int n=0; n<mySai.GetLength() ; n++)
{
int16_t xL, xR;
mySai.Input(xL,xR);
int16_t xn = xL + xR;
snIn[n] = xn;
my_buffer[j] = xn;
j++;
if (j == NUM_SAMPLES && flag == 1) {
rec (target_filename , my_buffer); }
int16_t yn = delaySystem.Execute(xn);
mySai.Output(yn, yn);
snOut[n] = yn;
}
mySai.Reset();
displayIn.Execute(snIn);
}
}
}
I thought about a possible solution, to fill directly the "data field" of the wavefile with the snIn[256] buffer (instead of using my_buffer) again and again and at the end close the wavfile. Please let me know what you think about that and other solutions
things to note: 1) while a write operation is being performed, more data is still coming in.
At the very least I would double buffer that data, so can be writing one buffer while the other one fills.
Usually this means using an interrupt to collect the samples (into which ever buffer is currently being filed.)
the foreground program waits for the current buffer to be 'full', then initiates write operation.,
then waits again for a buffer to be 'full'
The interrupt function tracks which buffer is being filled and the current index into that buffer. When a buffer is full, set a 'global' status to let the foreground program know which buffer is ready to be written.
The foreground program writes the buffer, then resets the status for that buffer.
I am sending data (10 files, approx 10-20 kb each) using sockets in C++ on Linux.
My pseudo code in the server:
for(i=0;i<10;i++){
ret = send(sockfd, filedata, filedatasize, 0);
}
ret returns the correct file size for all data files, no errors, but the client only receives 4-5 files.
But, if I use this instead:
for(i=0;i<10;i++){
ret = send(sockfd, filedata, filedatasize, 0);
sleep(1);
}
The client receives all files, and not errors!
What is the problem?
I tried tweaking SO_RCVBUF and SO_SNDBUF, but no changes.
EDIT: (the complete code has 200000 lines to paste!)
Here is the server code:
int Socket::sendMsg(char * data, unsigned int uiSize)
{
unsigned short * us;
int i, iRet;
us = (unsigned short *)(m_pSendBuffer);
*us = (unsigned short)(uiSize + 2);
memcpy((char *)m_pSendBuffer + 2, data, uiSize);
iRet = isend(m_pSendBuffer, uiSize + 2);
if (iRet<0) {
return SOCKET_ERROR;
}
return iRet;
}
int Socket::isend(char * data, int size)
{
int outlen, ret;
outlen= 0;
while (outlen< size) {
ret= send(sockfd, (data+ outlen), size - outlen, 0);
if (ret< 0) {
return -1;
}
else outlen+= ret;
}
return outlen;
}
Here is the client code:
void XSocket::onRead()
{
int iRet;
unsigned short * usp;
unsigned int uiReadSize;
while (1) {
iRet = recv(m_Sock, (char *)m_pRecvBuffer, 2, 0);
uiReadSize = 0;
usp = (unsigned short *)(m_pRecvBuffer);
uiReadSize = (int)(*usp - 2);
iRet = recv(m_Sock, (char *)(m_pRecvBuffer + 2), uiReadSize, 0);
if (iRet < 0) {
//return error
}
else if (iRet == 0) {
//disconnect
}
//PROCCESS MSG
}
}
On the client side:
you are not doing any error handling on the first recv() call, and your second recv() call is not breaking the loop if the server disconnects gracefully.
you are not looping the reading of each buffer of data, like you loop the sending of them on the server side. There is no 1-to-1 relationship between the number of bytes sent and the number of bytes received. If you are expecting X number of bytes to arrive, keep reading until you actually receive that many bytes.
Given these bugs, there is no guarantee that your client is actually receiving all of the data correctly.
Try something more like this:
void XSocket::onRead()
{
int iRet;
unsigned short * usp;
unsigned int uiReadSize;
while (1) {
iRet = irecv((char *)m_pRecvBuffer, 2);
if (iRet<= 0) {
break;
}
usp = (unsigned short *)(m_pRecvBuffer);
uiReadSize = (int)(*usp - 2);
iRet = irecv((char *)(m_pRecvBuffer + 2), uiReadSize);
if (iRet<= 0) {
break;
}
//PROCCESS MSG
}
}
int XSocket::irecv(char * data, int size)
{
int inlen, ret;
inlen= 0;
while (inlen< size) {
ret= recv(m_Sock, (data+ inlen), size - inlen, 0);
if (ret< 0) {
return -1;
}
else if (ret== 0) {
return 0;
}
else {
inlen+= ret;
}
}
return inlen;
}
im solved this problem!!, im changed epoll from edge trigger to level trigger, and solved!
I assume that for messages that are of only 1 byte (a char), I will use read() and write() directly.
For those messages having size > 1 bytes, I use two subfunctions to read and write them over sockets.
For example, I have the server construct a string called strcities (list of city) and print it out --> nothing strange. Then send the number of bytes of this string to the client, and then the actual string.
The client will first read the number of bytes, then the actual city list.
For some reason my code sometimes work and sometimes doesn't. If it works, it also prints out some extra characters that I have no idea where they come from. If it doesn't, it hangs and forever waits in the client, while the server goes back to the top of the loop and wait for next command from the client. Could you please take a look at my codes below and let me know where I did wrong?
Attempt_read
string attempt_read(int rbytes) { // rbytes = number of bytes of message to be read
int count1, bytes_read;
char buffer[rbytes+1];
bool notdone = true;
count1 = read(sd, buffer, rbytes);
while (notdone) {
if (count1 == -1){
perror("Error on write call");
exit(1);
}
else if (count1 < rbytes) {
rbytes = rbytes - count1; // update remaining bytes to be read
count1 = read(sd, buffer, rbytes);
}
else {notdone = false;}
} // end while
string returnme;
returnme = string(buffer);
return returnme;
}
Attempt_write
void attempt_write(string input1, int wbytes) { // wbytes = number of bytes of message
int count1;
bool notdone = true;
count1 = write(sd, input1.c_str(), wbytes);
while (notdone) {
if (count1 == -1){
perror("Error on write call");
exit(1);
}
else if (count1 < wbytes) {
wbytes = wbytes - count1;
count1 = write(sd, input1.c_str(), wbytes);
}
else {notdone = false;}
} // end while
return;
}
1) string class has a method size() that will return the length of the string, so you do not actually need a second attempt_write parameter.
2) You can transfer length of message before message or you can transfer a terminating 0 after, if you only will sent an ASCII strings. Because your connection could terminate at any time, it is better to send exact length before sending the string, so your client could know, what to expect.
3) What compilator do you use, that would allow char buffer[rbytes+1]; ? A standard c++ would require char buffer = new char[rbytes+1]; and corresponding delete to avoid a memory leaks.
4) In your code, the second read function call use same buffer with no adjustment to length, so you, practically, overwrite the already received data and the function will only work, if all data will be received in first function call. Same goes for write function
I would suggest something like this:
void data_read(unsigned char * buffer, int size) {
int readed, total = 0;
do {
readed = read(sd, buffer + total, size - total);
if (-1 == writted) {
perror("Error on read call");
exit(1);
}
total += readed;
} while (total < size);
}
string attempt_read() {
int size = 0;
data_read((unsigned char *) &size, sizeof(int));
string output(size, (char) 0x0);
data_read((unsigned char *) output.c_str(), size);
return output;
}
void data_write(unsigned char * buffer, int size) {
int writted, total = 0;
do {
writted = write(sd, buffer + total, size - total);
if (-1 == writted) {
perror("Error on write call");
exit(1);
}
total += writted;
} while (total < size);
}
void attempt_write(string input) {
int size = input.size();
data_write((unsigned char *) &size, sizeof(int));
data_write((unsigned char *) input.c_str(), size);
}
I am trying to send large amounts of data over a socket, sometimes when I call send (on Windows) it won't send all the data I requested, as expected. So, I wrote a little function that should have solved my problems- but it's causing problems where the data isn't being sent correctly and causing the images to be corrupted. I'm making a simple chat room where you can send images (screenshots) to each other.
Why is my function not working?
How can I make it work?
void _internal_SendFile_alignment_512(SOCKET sock, BYTE *data, DWORD datasize)
{
Sock::Packet packet;
packet.DataSize = datasize;
packet.PacketType = PACKET_FILETRANSFER_INITIATE;
DWORD until = datasize / 512;
send(sock, (const char*)&packet, sizeof(packet), 0);
unsigned int pos = 0;
while( pos != datasize )
{
pos += send(sock, (char *)(data + pos), datasize - pos, 0);
}
}
My receive side is:
public override void OnReceiveData(TcpLib.ConnectionState state)
{
if (state.fileTransfer == true && state.waitingFor > 0)
{
byte[] buffer = new byte[state.AvailableData];
int readBytes = state.Read(buffer, 0, state.AvailableData);
state.waitingFor -= readBytes;
state.bw.Write(buffer);
state.bw.Flush();
if (state.waitingFor == 0)
{
state.bw.Close();
state.hFile.Close();
state.fileTransfer = false;
IPEndPoint ip = state.RemoteEndPoint as IPEndPoint;
Program.MainForm.log("Ended file transfer with " + ip);
}
}
else if( state.AvailableData > 7)
{
byte[] buffer = new byte[8];
int readBytes = state.Read(buffer, 0, 8);
if (readBytes == 8)
{
Packet packet = ByteArrayToStructure<Packet>(buffer);
if (packet.PacketType == PACKET_FILETRANSFER_INITIATE)
{
IPEndPoint ip = state.RemoteEndPoint as IPEndPoint;
String filename = getUniqueFileName("" + ip.Address);
if (filename == null)
{
Program.MainForm.log("Error getting filename for " + ip);
state.EndConnection();
return;
}
byte[] data = new byte[state.AvailableData];
readBytes = state.Read(data, 0, state.AvailableData);
state.waitingFor = packet.DataSize - readBytes;
state.hFile = new FileStream(filename, FileMode.Append);
state.bw = new BinaryWriter(state.hFile);
state.bw.Write(data);
state.bw.Flush();
state.fileTransfer = true;
Program.MainForm.log("Initiated file transfer with " + ip);
}
}
}
}
It receives all the data, when I debug my code and see that send() does not return the total data size (i.e. it has to be called more than once) and the image gets yellow lines or purple lines in it — I suspect there's something wrong with sending the data.
I mis-understood the question and solution intent. Thanks #Remy Lebeau for the comment to clarify that. Based on that, you can write a sendall() function as given in section 7.3 of http://beej.us/guide/bgnet/output/print/bgnet_USLetter.pdf
int sendall(int s, char *buf, int *len)
{
int total = 0; // how many bytes we've sent
int bytesleft = *len; // how many we have left to send
int n = 0;
while(total < *len) {
n = send(s, buf+total, bytesleft, 0);
if (n == -1) {
/* print/log error details */
break;
}
total += n;
bytesleft -= n;
}
*len = total; // return number actually sent here
return n==-1?-1:0; // return -1 on failure, 0 on success
}
You need to check the returnvalue of send(). In particular, you can't simply assume that it is the number of bytes sent, there is also the case that there was an error. Try this instead:
while(datasize != 0)
{
n = send(...);
if(n == SOCKET_ERROR)
throw exception("send() failed with errorcode #" + to_string(WSAGetLastEror()));
// adjust pointer and remaining number of bytes
datasize -= n;
data += n;
}
BTW:
Make that BYTE const* data, you're not going to modify what it points to.
The rest of your code seems too complicated, in particular you don't solve things by aligning to magic numbers like 512.
I've got the following two programs, one acting as a reader and the other as a writer. The writer seems to only send about 3/4 of the data correctly to be read by the reader. Is there any way to guarantee that all the data is being sent? I think I've got it set up so that it reads and writes reliably, but it still seems to miss 1/4 of the data.
Heres the source of the writer
#define pipe "/tmp/testPipe"
using namespace std;
queue<string> sproutFeed;
ssize_t r_write(int fd, char *buf, size_t size) {
char *bufp;
size_t bytestowrite;
ssize_t byteswritten;
size_t totalbytes;
for (bufp = buf, bytestowrite = size, totalbytes = 0;
bytestowrite > 0;
bufp += byteswritten, bytestowrite -= byteswritten) {
byteswritten = write(fd, bufp, bytestowrite);
if(errno == EPIPE)
{
signal(SIGPIPE,SIG_IGN);
}
if ((byteswritten) == -1 && (errno != EINTR))
return -1;
if (byteswritten == -1)
byteswritten = 0;
totalbytes += byteswritten;
}
return totalbytes;
}
void* sendData(void *thread_arg)
{
int fd, ret_val, count, numread;
string word;
char bufpipe[5];
ret_val = mkfifo(pipe, 0777); //make the sprout pipe
if (( ret_val == -1) && (errno != EEXIST))
{
perror("Error creating named pipe");
exit(1);
}
while(1)
{
if(!sproutFeed.empty())
{
string s;
s.clear();
s = sproutFeed.front();
int sizeOfData = s.length();
snprintf(bufpipe, 5, "%04d\0", sizeOfData);
char stringToSend[strlen(bufpipe) + sizeOfData +1];
bzero(stringToSend, sizeof(stringToSend));
strncpy(stringToSend,bufpipe, strlen(bufpipe));
strncat(stringToSend,s.c_str(),strlen(s.c_str()));
strncat(stringToSend, "\0", strlen("\0"));
int fullSize = strlen(stringToSend);
signal(SIGPIPE,SIG_IGN);
fd = open(pipe,O_WRONLY);
int numWrite = r_write(fd, stringToSend, strlen(stringToSend) );
cout << errno << endl;
if(errno == EPIPE)
{
signal(SIGPIPE,SIG_IGN);
}
if(numWrite != fullSize )
{
signal(SIGPIPE,SIG_IGN);
bzero(bufpipe, strlen(bufpipe));
bzero(stringToSend, strlen(stringToSend));
close(fd);
}
else
{
signal(SIGPIPE,SIG_IGN);
sproutFeed.pop();
close(fd);
bzero(bufpipe, strlen(bufpipe));
bzero(stringToSend, strlen(stringToSend));
}
}
else
{
if(usleep(.0002) == -1)
{
perror("sleeping error\n");
}
}
}
}
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
signal(SIGPIPE,SIG_IGN);
int x;
for(x = 0; x < 100; x++)
{
sproutFeed.push("All ships in the sea sink except for that blue one over there, that one never sinks. Most likley because it\'s blue and thats the mightiest colour of ship. Interesting huh?");
}
int rc, i , status;
pthread_t threads[1];
printf("Starting Threads...\n");
pthread_create(&threads[0], NULL, sendData, NULL);
rc = pthread_join(threads[0], (void **) &status);
}
Heres the source of the reader
#define pipe "/tmp/testPipe"
char dataString[50000];
using namespace std;
char *getSproutItem();
void* readItem(void *thread_arg)
{
while(1)
{
x++;
char *s = getSproutItem();
if(s != NULL)
{
cout << "READ IN: " << s << endl;
}
}
}
ssize_t r_read(int fd, char *buf, size_t size) {
ssize_t retval;
while (retval = read(fd, buf, size), retval == -1 && errno == EINTR) ;
return retval;
}
char * getSproutItem()
{
cout << "Getting item" << endl;
char stringSize[4];
bzero(stringSize, sizeof(stringSize));
int fd = open(pipe,O_RDONLY);
cout << "Reading" << endl;
int numread = r_read(fd,stringSize, sizeof(stringSize));
if(errno == EPIPE)
{
signal(SIGPIPE,SIG_IGN);
}
cout << "Read Complete" << endl;
if(numread > 1)
{
stringSize[numread] = '\0';
int length = atoi(stringSize);
char recievedString[length];
bzero(recievedString, sizeof(recievedString));
int numread1 = r_read(fd, recievedString, sizeof(recievedString));
if(errno == EPIPE)
{
signal(SIGPIPE,SIG_IGN);
}
if(numread1 > 1)
{
recievedString[numread1] = '\0';
cout << "DATA RECIEVED: " << recievedString << endl;
bzero(dataString, sizeof(dataString));
strncpy(dataString, recievedString, strlen(recievedString));
strncat(dataString, "\0", strlen("\0"));
close(fd);
return dataString;
}
else
{
return NULL;
}
}
else
{
return NULL;
}
close(fd);
}
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
int rc, i , status;
pthread_t threads[1];
printf("Starting Threads...\n");
pthread_create(&threads[0], NULL, readItem, NULL);
rc = pthread_join(threads[0], (void **) &status);
}
You are definitely using signals the wrong way. Threads are completely unnecessary here - at least in the code provided. String calculations are just weird. Get this book and do not touch the keyboard until you finished reading :)
The general method used to send data through named pipes is to tack on a header with the length of the payload. Then you read(fd, header_len); read(rd, data_len); Note the latter read() will need to be done in a loop until data_len is read or eof. Note also if you've multiple writers to a named pipe then the writes are atomic (as long as a reasonable size) I.E. multiple writers will not case partial messages in the kernel buffers.
It's difficult to say what is going on here. Maybe you are getting an error returned from one of your system calls? Are you sure that you are successfully sending all of the data?
You also appear to have some invalid code here:
int length = atoi(stringSize);
char recievedString[length];
This is a syntax error, since you cannot create an array on the stack using a non-constanct expression for the size. Maybe you are using different code in your real version?
Do you need to read the data in a loop? Sometimes a function will return a portion of the available data and require you to call it repeatedly until all of the data is gone.
Some system calls in Unix can also return EAGAIN if the system call is interrupted - you are not handling this case by the looks of things.
You are possibly getting bitten by POSIX thread signal handling semantics in your reader main thread.
The POSIX standard allows for a POSIX thread to receive the signal, not necessarily the thread you expect. Block signals where not wanted.
signal(SIG_PIPE,SIG_IGN) is your friend. Add one to reader main.
POSIX thread handling semantics, putting the POS into POSIX. ( but it does make it easier to implement POSIX threads.)
Examine the pipe in /tmp with ls ? is it not empty ?