I have transferred these xls into G SHeets but the IFs don't work in Cells U9 onwards. I know the tick boxes don't work because of no WIngdings in Google however if we enter R for a student in cells E9, F9, G9, etc, eventually U9 should say Pass. More R's along the row means U9 should say Merit etc
https://drive.google.com/file/d/117n553pXdiaC7MEOZ3xGphmrXJn50L_s/view?usp=sharing
font was set to white, formula is fine
=IF(COUNTIF($E9:$T9, "R")=16, "Distinction",
IF(COUNTIF($E9:$P9, "R")=12, "Merit",
IF(COUNTIF($E9:$K9, "R")=7, "Pass",
IF(SUM(COUNTIF($E9:$K9, "R"), COUNTIF($E9:$K9, "8"))=7, "Pass Referral",
IF(SUM(COUNTIF($E9:$K9, "R"), COUNTIF($E9:$K9, "T"), COUNTIF($E9:$K9, "8"))=7, "Unsafe", "z")))))
see spreadsheet
Related
Okay so i have a this formula:
=ArrayFormula({"Manager:";IF(D5:D="",,IFERROR(VLOOKUP("*"®EXEXTRACT(D5:D,"[a-zA-Z]+")&"*",'Client-Manager'!A:B,2,FALSE),"NO MATCH"))})
It works fine with what i have it doing now but i'm running into a problem now were i need to compare both last and first name and i can't figure out how to do it.
Here is an example sheet:
Sheet im working with
Im comparing in "work-order" sheet column D with and in "manager" sheet column A to then output back on "work-order" sheet column G.
Formula i'm working with resides in "Manager" cell in "work-order" sheet in column G
try:
=ARRAYFORMULA({"Manager:"; IF(D5:D="",,
IFERROR(VLOOKUP("*"®EXEXTRACT(REGEXREPLACE(D5:D, ",", ),
"[a-zA-Z ]+")&"*", 'Client-Manager'!A:B, 2, ),
IFERROR(VLOOKUP("*"®EXEXTRACT(D5:D,
"[a-zA-Z]+")&"*", 'Client-Manager'!A:B, 2, ), "NO MATCH")))})
I have a data in Excel and I have uploaded in power bi, created a visualisation using a chart which looks like -
blank, CP, Jj10 are basically my y axis and dashes are my bars of horizontal chart. I have tried to show how my chart looks like because I don't get any other option
(Blank)-------------998
CP-----------56
Jj10--------44
0BN--------------77
Hi-po---2
Naas-------21
There is a column named performance (sheet_name=Empl_data) and what I want is to replace the blanks with Non-GT in power bi with creating a new column.
What my output should look like -
(Non-GT)-------------998
CP-----------56
Jj10--------44
0BN--------------77
Hi-po---2
Naas-------21
I have tried this -
Non-GT = IF(ISBLANK('Empl_data'[performance]),"Non-GT",'Empl_data'[performance])
What i get is
Non-GT----------------964
(Blank)-------------34
CP-----------56
Jj10--------44
0BN--------------77
Hi-po---2
Naas-------21
I just want to replace blanks with Non-TSG completely but still it shows blank. Please help me out to solve the problem and please let me know if I have made clear what my prblm is.
My data -
Empl_id
Empl_name
performance
99807
Somman paul
0076
Richards.M
8870
Maheen Josef.T
11209
Dojar Farah
6651
Macklegn Sagoe
Hi-po
551
Cada Farez
Jj10
12
Qwezy Goha
Hi-po
6567
Beheriop Produse
CP
2227
John semmers
0BN
656
Majeeio .f
80100
Drejju Yan
Is it actually Blank where it is showing nothing? First confirm there are spaces or really null in the data, then apply conditions as bellow-
Non-GT =
IF(
'Empl_data'[performance] = BLANK() || 'Empl_data'[performance] = "",
"Non-GT",
'Empl_data'[performance]
)
Q: Where you are transforming data with that condition? Power Query Editor? Or creating Measure or Calculated column?
I have the following code. I've read many threads on how to solve query returning empty value but none of them worked in my case.
I've also shared a workaround Google spreadsheet.
What I'm going to do is that search first tab by query and if it matched, show a green tick, otherwise show a red cross.
The code below works for green tick but in case of red cross, it shows an error.
How the code below is expected to operate:
It makes a query on tab1 and if student number is in column C (with some defined conditions) OR is in column D (without any condition), it shows a green tick, otherwise, it must insert a red cross.
if(OR(QUERY(LiveAttendanceForm!$A:$C,
"select C
where A >= timestamp '"&TEXT(D$1, "yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss")&"'
and A <= timestamp '"&TEXT(D$2, "yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss")&"'
and C = "&$C5, 0)=$C5,Query(LiveAttendanceForm!$A:$D,"select D where D = "&$C5,0)=$C5),"✅","❌")
I also tried using iferror function before the query, but it shows all fields as true and makes all cells green tick. I'll be very grateful if someone can help me fix this annoying issue! The share Google sheet's link is below:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1KfkA48OyOnZAPQAbtdEIs9AYaAPRFRFOpvQRM5QyPss/edit?usp=sharing
you will need to wrap your queries into IFERROR:
=IF(OR(IFERROR(QUERY(LiveAttendanceForm!$A:$C,
"select C
where A >= timestamp '"&TEXT(D$1, "yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss")&"'
and A <= timestamp '"&TEXT(D$2, "yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss")&"'
and C = "&$C4, 0))=$C4,
IFERROR(QUERY(LiveAttendanceForm!$A:$D,
"select D
where D = "&$C4, 0))=$C4), "✅", "❌")
I have a data table - can be extracted to text or spreadsheet - The column has random text with areas in square metres that I want to copy to a new column in hectares. (So parse text and divide by 10,000).
e.g.
Deposited Plan 172499, 53,310 m2
Deposited Plan 166167, 853 m2
This plan has no area stated
Section 21 Block I Wellington District, 403,573 m2
Output column should have:
5.3310
0.0853
40.3573
Is there a way I can automate this in LibreOffice Calc, or with a regular expression editor like TextCrawler? Or perhaps using an AutoIt script?
Try with this
/([0-9]+,*[0-9]+\sm2)$/
I'm trying to use the Neo4j 2.1.5 regex matching in Cypher and running into problems.
I need to implement a full text search on specific fields that a user has access to. The access requirement is key and is what prevents me from just dumping everything into a Lucene instance and querying that way. The access system is dynamic and so I need to query for the set of nodes that a particular user has access to and then within those nodes perform the search. I would really like to match the set of nodes against a Lucene query, but I can't figure out how to do that so I'm just using basic regex matching for now. My problem is that Neo4j doesn't always return the expected results.
For example, I have about 200 nodes with one of them being the following:
( i:node {name: "Linear Glass Mosaic Tiles", description: "Introducing our new Rip Curl linear glass mosaic tiles. This Caribbean color combination of greens and blues brings a warm inviting feeling to a kitchen backsplash or bathroom. The colors work very well with white cabinetry or larger tiles. We also carry this product in a small subway mosaic to give you some options! SOLD OUT: Back in stock end of August. Call us to pre-order and save 10%!"})
This query produces one result:
MATCH (p)-->(:group)-->(i:node)
WHERE (i.name =~ "(?i).*mosaic.*")
RETURN i
> Returned 1 row in 569 ms
But this query produces zero results even though the description property matches the expression:
MATCH (p)-->(:group)-->(i:node)
WHERE (i.description=~ "(?i).*mosaic.*")
RETURN i
> Returned 0 rows in 601 ms
And this query also produces zero results even though it includes the name property which returned results previously:
MATCH (p)-->(:group)-->(i:node)
WITH i, (p.name + i.name + COALESCE(i.description, "")) AS searchText
WHERE (searchText =~ "(?i).*mosaic.*")
RETURN i
> Returned 0 rows in 487 ms
MATCH (p)-->(:group)-->(i:node)
WITH i, (p.name + i.name + COALESCE(i.description, "")) AS searchText
RETURN searchText
>
...
SotoLinear Glass Mosaic Tiles Introducing our new Rip Curl linear glass mosaic tiles. This Caribbean color combination of greens and blues brings a warm inviting feeling to a kitchen backsplash or bathroom. The colors work very well with white cabinetry or larger tiles. We also carry this product in a small subway mosaic to give you some options! SOLD OUT: Back in stock end of August. Call us to pre-order and save 10%!
...
Even more odd, if I search for a different term, it returns all of the expected results without a problem.
MATCH (p)-->(:group)-->(i:node)
WITH i, (p.name + i.name + COALESCE(i.description, "")) AS searchText
WHERE (searchText =~ "(?i).*plumbing.*")
RETURN i
> Returned 8 rows in 522 ms
I then tried to cache the search text on the nodes and I added an index to see if that would change anything, but it still didn't produce any results.
CREATE INDEX ON :node(searchText)
MATCH (p)-->(:group)-->(i:node)
WHERE (i.searchText =~ "(?i).*mosaic.*")
RETURN i
> Returned 0 rows in 3182 ms
I then tried to simplify the data to reproduce the problem, but in this simple case it works as expected:
MERGE (i:node {name: "Linear Glass Mosaic Tiles", description: "Introducing our new Rip Curl linear glass mosaic tiles. This Caribbean color combination of greens and blues brings a warm inviting feeling to a kitchen backsplash or bathroom. The colors work very well with white cabinetry or larger tiles. We also carry this product in a small subway mosaic to give you some options! SOLD OUT: Back in stock end of August. Call us to pre-order and save 10%!"})
WITH i, (
i.name + " " + COALESCE(i.description, "")
) AS searchText
WHERE searchText =~ "(?i).*mosaic.*"
RETURN i
> Returned 1 rows in 630 ms
I tried using the CYPHER 2.1.EXPERIMENTAL tag as well but that didn't change any of the results. Am I making incorrect assumptions on how the regex support works? Is there something else I should try or some other way to debug the problem?
Additional information
Here is a sample call that I make to the Cypher Transactional Rest API when creating my nodes. This is the actual plain text that is sent (other than some formatting for easier reading) when adding nodes to the database. Any string encoding is just standard URL encoding that is performed by Go when creating a new HTTP request.
{"statements":[
{
"parameters":
{
"p01":"lsF30nP7TsyFh",
"p02":
{
"description":"Introducing our new Rip Curl linear glass mosaic tiles. This Caribbean color combination of greens and blues brings a warm inviting feeling to a kitchen backsplash or bathroom. The colors work very well with white cabinetry or larger tiles. We also carry this product in a small subway mosaic to give you some options! SOLD OUT: Back in stock end of August. Call us to pre-order and save 10%!",
"id":"lsF3BxzFdn0kj",
"name":"Linear Glass Mosaic Tiles",
"object":"material"
}
},
"resultDataContents":["row"],
"statement":
"MATCH (p:project { id: { p01 } })
WITH p
CREATE UNIQUE (p)-[:MATERIAL]->(:materials:group {name: \"Materials\"})-[:MATERIAL]->(m:material { p02 })"
}
]}
If it is an encoding issue, why does a search on name work, description not work, and name + description not work? Is there any way to examine the database to see if/how the data was encoded. When I perform searches, the text returned appears correct.
just a few notes:
probably replace create unique with merge (which works a bit differently)
for your fulltext search I would go with the lucene legacy index for performance, if your group restriction is not limiting enough to keep the response below a few ms
I just tried your exact json statement, and it works perfectly.
inserted with
curl -H accept:application/json -H content-type:application/json -d #insert.json \
-XPOST http://localhost:7474/db/data/transaction/commit
json:
{"statements":[
{
"parameters":
{
"p01":"lsF30nP7TsyFh",
"p02":
{
"description":"Introducing our new Rip Curl linear glass mosaic tiles. This Caribbean color combination of greens and blues brings a warm inviting feeling to a kitchen backsplash or bathroom. The colors work very well with white cabinetry or larger tiles. We also carry this product in a small subway mosaic to give you some options! SOLD OUT: Back in stock end of August. Call us to pre-order and save 10%!",
"id":"lsF3BxzFdn0kj",
"name":"Linear Glass Mosaic Tiles",
"object":"material"
}
},
"resultDataContents":["row"],
"statement":
"MERGE (p:project { id: { p01 } })
WITH p
CREATE UNIQUE (p)-[:MATERIAL]->(:materials:group {name: \"Materials\"})-[:MATERIAL]->(m:material { p02 }) RETURN m"
}
]}
queried:
MATCH (p)-->(:group)-->(i:material)
WHERE (i.description=~ "(?i).*mosaic.*")
RETURN i
returns:
name: Linear Glass Mosaic Tiles
id: lsF3BxzFdn0kj
description: Introducing our new Rip Curl linear glass mosaic tiles. This Caribbean color combination of greens and blues brings a warm inviting feeling to a kitchen backsplash or bathroom. The colors work very well with white cabinetry or larger tiles. We also carry this product in a small subway mosaic to give you some options! SOLD OUT: Back in stock end of August. Call us to pre-order and save 10%!
object: material
What you can try to check your data is to look at the json or csv dumps that the browser offers (little download icons on the result and table-result)
Or you use neo4j-shell with my shell-import-tools to actually output csv or graphml and check those files.
Or use a bit of java (or groovy) code to check your data.
There is also the consistency-checker that comes with the neo4j-enterprise download. Here is a blog post on how to run it.
java -cp 'lib/*:system/lib/*' org.neo4j.consistency.ConsistencyCheckTool /tmp/foo
I added a groovy test script here: https://gist.github.com/jexp/5a183c3501869ee63d30
One more idea: regexp flags
Sometimes there is a multiline thing going on, there are two more flags:
multiline (?m) which also matches across multiple lines and
dotall (?s) which allows the dot also to match special chars like newlines
So could you try (?ism).*mosaic.*