I have this MVC 5 project and I am trying to pass parameter with dot to Kendo button, like this:
(Html.Kendo().Button()
.Name("Add")
.HtmlAttributes(new { type = "button" })
.Content("<span class='k-icon k-i-plus-outline'></span> Add Line Parameter")
The javascript code to bottom page execute this:
$("#Add").click(function () {
$('#wrapperViews').load('/controller/CreateParameter', id = #Model.dummy );
});
The code doesn't work for the param is "XX.DD" and return error
"Uncaught ReferenceError: XX is not defined
at HTMLButtonElement.eval (eval at (jquery.min.js:2), :12:78)
at HTMLButtonElement.dispatch (jquery.min.js:3)
at HTMLButtonElement.r.handle (jquery.min.js:3)"
It works if I pass just XX or even if I set parameter manually like this:
$("#Add").click(function () {
$('#wrapperViews').load('/controller/CreateParameter', id = "XX.DD" );
});
Any help would be appreciated.
Related
I'm trying to write a simple unit test and can't seem to figure it out. I want to test a bootstrap modal to ensure it displays the correct contents when I pass certain object properties to it. Here's what my modal code looks like:
import React, { Component, PropTypes } from 'react';
import { Button, Modal } from 'react-bootstrap';
class ModalBox extends Component {
render() {
const { modalBox } = this.props;
let content;
if (modalBox.contentBody) {
content = modalBox.contentBody;
} else {
content = (
<span>
<Modal.Header closeButton onHide={this.close.bind(this)}>
<Modal.Title>{modalBox.title}</Modal.Title>
</Modal.Header>
<Modal.Body>
{modalBox.message}
</Modal.Body>
{modalBox.isConfirm &&
<Modal.Footer>
<Button onClick={modalBox.onCancel} className="modal-button cancel">{modalBox.cancelText || 'Cancel'}</Button>
<Button onClick={modalBox.onConfirm} className="modal-button confirm">{modalBox.confirmText || 'Confirm'}</Button>
</Modal.Footer>
}
</span>
);
}
return (
<Modal show={typeof modalBox != 'undefined'} onHide={this.close.bind(this)} dialogClassName={modalBox.dialogClassName || ''} backdrop={modalBox.backdrop || true}>
{content}
</Modal>
);
}
}
So for a test, I want to make sure that if I pass the prop modalBox containing the contentBody field that it just returns the contentBody for the modal body. Here's an example of what I'm trying to test:
it("renders only contentBody when provided", () => {
let modalBoxObj = {
contentBody: <div className="test-content-body">This is a test.</div>
};
let element = React.createElement(ModalBox, {modalBox: modalBoxObj});
let component = TestUtils.renderIntoDocument(element);
let modalWrapper = TestUtils.scryRenderedDOMComponentsWithClass(component, 'modal');
// modalWrapper returns an empty array, so this returns "Expected 0 to be 1"
expect(modalWrapper.length).toBe(1);
let testBody = TestUtils.scryRenderedDOMComponentsWithClass(component, 'test-content-body');
// testBody returns an empty array, so this returns "Expected 0 to be 1"
expect(testBody.length).toBe(1);
// this returns "TypeError: 'undefined' is not an object (evaluating 'testBody[0].innerHTML')"
expect(testBody[0].innerHTML).toEqual("This is a test.");
}
I've also tried doing shallow rendering with TestUtils.createRenderer and trying that approach, but had no luck with it. Based on the examples I've seen online and previous testing experience with react <0.14, I feel this test should work. I just don't know what I'm missing or misunderstanding. In the past, I did something like below and just looked at the componentNode object to find elements and such, but componentNode is returning null.
let component = TestUtils.renderIntoDocument(element);
let componentNode = findDOMNode(component);
Thanks for your help!
The solution ended up being to add a ref to the ModalBox component. Once added, we were able to target the node like this:
let component = TestUtils.renderIntoDocument(<ModalBox modalBox={modalBoxObj} />);
let componentNode = findDOMNode(component.refs.modalBox._modal);
My question is somewhat similar to followin unanswered question. (Not sure though)
Sitecore 8 SPEAK: Getting an Error When calling a Method in JS File
I am using Sitecore8
On my page there is a button and on its click event I want to call add() of custom datasource component.
Layout:
JS Code for the Page:
define(["sitecore"], function (Sitecore) {
var JsonListPage = Sitecore.Definitions.App.extend({
initialized: function () {
alert('Inside Json PageList Init');
},
loadData: function () {
alert('Button clicked');
app.add();
}
});
return JsonListPage;
});
JS Code for the custom datasource component:
define(["sitecore"], function (Sitecore) {
var model = Sitecore.Definitions.Models.ControlModel.extend({
initialize: function (options) {
this._super();
this.set("json", null);
alert('Inside Jsondatasource Init');
},
add: function (data) {
var json = this.get("json");
if (json === null)
json = new Array();
// this is done because array.push changes the array to an object which then do no work on the SPEAK listcontrol.
var newArray = new Array(json.length + 1);
for (var i = json.length - 1; i >= 0; i--)
newArray[i + 1] = json[i];
newArray[0] = data;
this.set("json", newArray);
}
});
var view = Sitecore.Definitions.Views.ControlView.extend({
initialize: function (options) {
this._super();
this.model.set("json", null);
}
});
Sitecore.Factories.createComponent("JsonDatasource", model, view, ".x-sitecore-jsondatasource");
});
.cshtml for Custom component:
#using Sitecore.Mvc
#using Sitecore.Mvc.Presentation
#using Sitecore.Web.UI.Controls.Common.UserControls
#model RenderingModel
#{
var userControl = Html.Sitecore().Controls().GetUserControl(Model.Rendering);
userControl.Requires.Script("client", "JsonDatasource.js");
userControl.Class = "x-sitecore-jsondatasource";
userControl.Attributes["type"] = "text/x-sitecore-jsondatasource";
userControl.DataBind = "Json: json";
var htmlAttributes = userControl.HtmlAttributes;
}
<div #htmlAttributes>
am here again
</div>
When the page loads:
It shows alert from Custom components Init
Then shows alert from host page's Init
On button click it shows the alert and after that gives error on "app".
There is some bit which I am missing.. any help would be appreciated.. Please let me know if you need anymore inputs.
Thanks in advance!
app is only available in debug mode so id avoid using that, use "this" instead.
From your code example it appears that you are calling app.Add(), There is no Add function on your pageCode, this is what your code is doing. Instead you need to access your components's Add Method.
Instead to access events within your component you want to call the function like this:
this.ComponentID.Add();
I have an example of a custom SPEAK component here you can refer to for how to create the component. https://github.com/sobek1985/MikeRobbinsSPEAKRichTextEditor
From the code is seems your creating a JSON datasource, there is an example by Anders here http://laubplusco.net/creating-simple-sitecore-speak-json-datasource/
I'm working on an app where text conditionally appears in a ::before pseudo element's content property and is rendered on the page. After a code change caused this important text to accidentally disappear, I wanted to be able to write tests that would capture that error if it happened again, but there are challenges grabbing the content from pseudo-selectors. I was looking for something like:
#scss
.content-div {
&.condition-true {
&:before {
content: "conditional text";
}
}
}
#coffeescript
if #someCondition
$('content-div').addClass('condition-true')
else
$('content-div').removeClass('condition-true')
#spec
context "when true" do
it "should have the conditional text" do
# do thing that makes it true
expect( page ).to have_content("conditional text")
end
end
The solution wasn't so easy, and I thought I'd share here and let others comment, or provide other solutions.
I'm using Capybara 2.3.0 and Poltergeist 1.5.1.
The key was passing a block of code to page.evaluate_script, as well as Javascript's getComputedStyle() function.
content_array = page.evaluate_script <<-SCRIPT.strip.gsub(/\s+/,' ')
(function () {
var elementArray = $('.desired-css-selector');
var contentArray = [];
for (var i = 0, tot=elementArray.length; i < tot; i++) {
var content = window.getComputedStyle( elementArray[i], ':before' ).getPropertyValue('content');
contentArray.push(content);
}
return contentArray;
})()
SCRIPT
content_array.each { |c| c.gsub!(/\A'|'\Z/, '') }
expect( content_array ).to include("conditional text")
UPDATE - SIMPLE EXAMPLE:
I've recently had to do a much simpler version of this:
color = page.evaluate_script <<-SCRIPT
(function () {
var element = document.getElementById('hoverme');
var color = window.getComputedStyle( element, ':hover' ).getPropertyValue('color');
return color;
})()
SCRIPT
I'm having a difficult time returning data from a module using RequireJS and Knockout to populate my markup for my single page app. Knockout can't seem to find my data binding observables.
I'm trying to keep each view in a separate js file, but I'm failing to identify where I've gone wrong. Here's what I have so far:
/app/app.js
define(function(require) {
require('simrou');
var $ = require('jQuery'),
ko = require('knockout'),
videoView = require('videoView');
var init = function() {
var viewModel = function() {
var self = this;
self.currentPage = ko.observable();
self.videoView = new videoView();
}
var view = new viewModel();
ko.applyBindings( view );
_router = new Simrou({
'/video/:id': [ view.videoView.getVideo ]
});
_router.start();
};
return {
init: init
};
});
/app/videoView.js
define(function(require) {
"use strict";
var $ = require('jQuery'),
ko = require('knockout');
return function() {
var self = this;
self.currentPage = ko.observable( 'showVideo' );
self.currentVideo = ko.observable();
self.videoData = ko.observableArray([]);
self.videoList = ko.observableArray([]);
var getVideo = function( event, params ) {
// ajax pseudo code
$.ajax({});
self.videoData( dataFromAjaxCall );
}
return {
getVideo: getVideo
};
};
});
index.html
When I browse to /#/video/14 I receive the following error:
Uncaught ReferenceError: Unable to parse bindings.
Bindings value: attr: { 'data-video-id': videoData().id }
Message: videoData is not defined
Here's the markup:
<section id="showVideo" data-bind="fadeVisible: currentPage()=='showVideo', with: $root">
<div class="video" data-bind="attr: { 'data-video-id': videoData().id }></div>
</section>
Like I said, I'm trying to keep each view separated, but I would love some enlightenment on what I'm doing wrong, or if this is even possible? Is there a better more efficient way?
videoData is a property of $root.videoView, not of the root model (the one you passed to applyBindings). It's also an observableArray, so videoData() is just a plain array and even if you get the context right, you won't be able to access its id property, since, being an array, it doesn't have.named properties.
The problem
I am trying to test some directives (code for both below). One of them is an "email" (called "epost" in the code(norwegian)) directive. The solution to this should work for all of them, so I am keeping it to this one for now.
Technologies: Angularjs, Jasmine, Requirejs, (grunt & karma running in Chrome)
The directive validates email addresses in two ways; on upshift and on blur. I can test the upshift without problems as you can see in the test below, but I can't figure out how to simulate a blur so the bind('blur') in the directive runs.
What I have done
I have tried to catch the compiled element like this:
elem = angular.element(html);
element = $compile(elem)($scope);
And then in the test i tried several permutations to trigger the blur with a console log just inside the bind function in the directive. None of the below works. It does not trigger.
elem.trigger('blur');
element.trigger('blur');
elem.triggerHandler('blur');
element.triggerHandler('blur');
element.blur();
elem.blur();
I based the injection and setup on this: To test a custom validation angularjs directive
The email directive in angularjs wrapped in requirejs
define(function() {
var Directive = function() {
return {
require: 'ngModel',
link: function(scope, elem, attrs, ctrl) {
var pattern = /^[A-Za-z0-9._%+-]+#[A-Za-z0-9.-]+\.[A-Za-z]{2,4}$/;
elem.bind('blur', function() {
scope.$apply(function () {
if (!elem.val() || pattern.test(elem.val())) {
ctrl.$setValidity('epost', true);
} else {
ctrl.$setValidity('epost', false);
}
});
});
ctrl.$parsers.unshift(function(viewValue) {
if (pattern.test(viewValue)) {
ctrl.$setValidity('epost', true);
return viewValue;
} else {
return undefined;
}
});
}
};
};
return Directive;
});
The test (using jasmine and requirejs)
define([
'Angular',
'AngularMocks',
], function () {
describe('Directives', function () {
var $scope;
var form;
beforeEach(module('common'));
beforeEach(function () {
var html = '<form name="form">';
html += '<input type="text" id="epost" name="epost" epost="" ng-model="model.epost"/>';
html += '</form>';
inject(function ($compile, $rootScope) {
$scope = $rootScope.$new();
$scope.model = {
epost: null
};
// Compile the element, run digest cycle
var elem = angular.element(html);
$compile(elem)($scope);
$scope.$digest();
form = $scope.form;
});
});
describe('(epost) Given an input field hooked up with the email directive', function () {
var validEmail = 'a#b.no';
var invalidEmail = 'asdf#asdf';
it('should bind data to model and be valid when email is valid on upshift', function () {
form.epost.$setViewValue(validEmail);
expect($scope.model.epost).toBe(validEmail);
expect(form.epost.$valid).toBe(true);
});
});
});
});
I have been able to figure out where I went wrong after some breakpoint debugging.
The "element" item I get out using the approach described in the top of the question is not actually the directive it self. It's an object which wraps the form and the directive.
Like this
{ 0: // The form
{ 0: // The directive (input element)
{
}
}
}
To actually simulate a blur on the directive it self, I did something like this
var directiveElement = $(element[0][0]);
directiveElement.blur();
After getting the element I wanted, and wrapping it in a jQuery object (may be optional), it worked like a charm. I then used the approach like in the test in the question with $setViewValue and checked the model value like this.
form.epost.$setViewValue('a#b.no');
directiveElement.blur();
expect($scope.model.epost).toBe('a#b.no');
expect($scope.form.epost.$valid).toBeTruthy();
Hope this could be of help to others trying to figure the directive testing out.
I too ran into a similar problem and it mystified me. My solution was to use JQuery to get the input and then use angular.element(input).triggerHandler('blur') to make it work. This is odd to me because I do not have to do this with the click event.
spyOn(controller, 'setRevenueIsInvalid');
var sugarRow = $(element).find('tr#ve_id_5')[0];
var amount = $(sugarRow).find('input.amount')[0];
angular.element(amount).triggerHandler('blur');
expect(controller.setRevenueIsInvalid).toHaveBeenCalled();