I have literally tried everything but still in vain. This here is InvoiceJournalExpParticipantProvider class that is supposed to provide me partici[ant names inside the workflow (all of this is custom code). Now what i want is to pass the LedgerJounalTrans table instead of the VendInvoiceInfoTable or VendInvoiceInfoLine table. I cannot seem to find a way to do this. I tried using the following code
else if (_context.parmTableId() == tableNum(LedgerJournalTrans))
{
ledgerJournalTrans = LedgerJournalTrans::findRecId(_context.parmRecId(),false);
}
But it constantly gives me an error either telling me that the operand types are of not the same types or the number of arguments passed are invalid although when i go and check the findRecId() method of ledgerJournalTrans table there are only two params being passed.
public WorkflowUserList resolve(WorkflowContext _Context, WorkflowParticipantToken _participantTokenName)
{
WorkflowUserList userList = WorkflowUserList::construct();
VendInvoiceInfoTable vendInvoiceInfoTable;
VendInvoiceInfoLine vendInvoiceInfoLine;
VendInvoiceInfoLine_Project vendInvoiceInfoLine_Project;
WorkflowParticipantExpenToken workflowParticipantExpenToken;
WorkflowParticipantExpenTokenLine workflowParticipantExpenTokenLine;
RefRecId dimensionAttributeSetRecId;
MarkupTrans markupTrans;
CompanyInfo legalEntity;
ProjTable projTable;
HcmWorker worker;
DirPersonUser personUser;
HcmPositionDetail hcmPositionDetail;
HcmPosition hcmPosition;
HcmPositionWorkerAssignment hcmPositionWorkerAssignment;
LedgerJournalTrans ledgerJournalTrans;
// check participant token name is given otherwise throw error
if(!_participantTokenName)
{
throw error('Participant name');
}
userList.add('Admin');
if (!_participantTokenName)
{
throw error("#SYS105453");
}
workflowParticipantExpenToken = WorkflowParticipantExpenToken::findName(
this.documentType(),
_participantTokenName);
if (!workflowParticipantExpenToken)
{
throw error(strFmt("#SYS313865", _participantTokenName));
}
if (_context.parmTableId() == tableNum(VendInvoiceInfoTable))
{
vendInvoiceInfoTable = VendInvoiceInfoTable::findRecId(_context.parmRecId());
}
else if (_context.parmTableId() == tableNum(VendInvoiceInfoLine))
{
vendInvoiceInfoTable = VendInvoiceInfoLine::findRecId(_context.parmRecId()).vendInvoiceInfoTable();
}
Please look at this case:
if (product.ProductId == 0)
{
product.CreateDate = DateTime.UtcNow;
product.EditDate = DateTime.UtcNow;
context.Products.Add(product);
if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(product.ProductValueProduct)) { SaveProductValueProduct(product); }
}
context.SaveChanges();
When I debug code the ProductId is negative, but afer save the ProductId is corect in database (I know this is normal), but when I want to use it here: SaveProductValueProduct(product) after add to context.Products.Add(product); ProductId behaves strangely. (I'm creating List inside SaveProductValueProduct)
List<ProductValueProductHelper> pvpListToSave = new List<ProductValueProductHelper>();
foreach (var item in dProductValueToSave)
{
ProductValueProductHelper pvp = new ProductValueProductHelper();
pvp.ProductId = (item.Value.HasValue ? item.Value : product.ProductId).GetValueOrDefault();
pvp.ValueId = Convert.ToInt32(item.Key.Remove(item.Key.IndexOf(",")));
pvp.ParentProductId = (item.Value.HasValue ? product.ProductId : item.Value);
pvpListToSave.Add(pvp);
}
I want to use ProductId for relationship. Depends on logic I have to save ProductId at ProductId column OR ProductId at ParentProductId column.
The ProductId 45 save corent at ProductId column (3rd row - this is a relationship), BUT not at ParentProductId (2nd row - this is just null able int column for app logic), although while debug I pass the same negative value from product.ProductId there.
QUESTION:
how can I pass correct ProductId to column that it isn't a relationship column
I just use SaveProductValueProduct(product) after SaveChanges (used SaveChanges twice)
if (product.ProductId == 0)
{
product.CreateDate = DateTime.UtcNow;
product.EditDate = DateTime.UtcNow;
context.Products.Add(product);
}
context.SaveChanges();
if (product.ProductId != 0)
{
if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(product.ProductValueProduct)) { SaveProductValueProduct(product); }
context.SaveChanges();
}
I set this as an answer because it fixes the matter, but I am very curious if there is any other way to solve this problem. I dont like to use context.SaveChanges(); one after another.
My TestNG test implementation throws an error despite the expected value matches with the actual value.
Here is the TestNG code:
#Test(dataProvider = "valid")
public void setUserValidTest(int userId, String firstName, String lastName){
User newUser = new User();
newUser.setLastName(lastName);
newUser.setUserId(userId);
newUser.setFirstName(firstName);
userDAO.setUser(newUser);
Assert.assertEquals(userDAO.getUser().get(0), newUser);
}
The error is:
java.lang.AssertionError: expected [UserId=10, FirstName=Sam, LastName=Baxt] but found [UserId=10, FirstName=Sam, LastName=Baxt]
What have I done wrong here?
The reason is simple. Testng uses the equals method of the object to check if they're equal. So the best way to achieve the result you're looking for is to override the equals method of the user method like this.
public class User {
private String lastName;
private String firstName;
private String userId;
// -- other methods here
#Override
public boolean equals(Object obj) {
if (obj == null) {
return false;
}
if (!User.class.isAssignableFrom(obj.getClass())) {
return false;
}
final User other = (User) obj;
//If both lastnames are not equal return false
if ((this.lastName == null) ? (other.lastName != null) : !this.lastName.equals(other.lastName)) {
return false;
}
//If both lastnames are not equal return false
if ((this.firstName == null) ? (other.firstName != null) : !this.firstName.equals(other.firstName)) {
return false;
}
//If both lastnames are not equal return false
if ((this.userId == null) ? (other.userId != null) : !this.userId.equals(other.userId)) {
return false;
}
return true;
}
}
and it'll work like magic
It seems you are either comparing the wrong (first) object or equals is not correctly implemented as it returns false.
The shown values are just string representations. It doesn't actually mean that both objects have to be equal.
You should check if userDAO.getUser().get(0) actually returns the user you are setting before.
Posting the implementation of User and the userDAO type might help for further clarification.
NOTE: Note directly related to this question but it's answer to my issue that got me to this question. I am sure more ppl might end-up on this post looking for this solution.
This is not precisely the a solution if Equals method needs overriding but something that I very commonly find myself blocked due to:
If you have used Capture and are asserting equality over captured value, please be sure to get the captured value form captured instance.
eg:
Capture<Request> capturedRequest = new Capture<>();
this.testableObj.makeRequest(EasyMock.capture(capturedRequest))
Assert.assertEquals(capturedRequest.getValue(), expectedRequest);
V/S
Assert.assertEquals(capturedRequest, expectedRequest);
while the compiler wont complain in either case, the Assertion Obviously fails in 2nd case
Is there a way to retrieve the set-at-creations properties of an EmberJS object if you don't know all your keys in advance?
Via the inspector I see all the object properties which appear to be stored in the meta-object's values hash, but I can't seem to find any methods to get it back. For example object.getProperties() needs a key list, but I'm trying to create a generic object container that doesn't know what it will contain in advance, but is able to return information about itself.
I haven't used this in production code, so your mileage may vary, but reviewing the Ember source suggests two functions that might be useful to you, or at least worth reviewing the implementation:
Ember.keys: "Returns all of the keys defined on an object or hash. This is useful when inspecting objects for debugging. On browsers that support it, this uses the native Object.keys implementation." Object.keys documentation on MDN
Ember.inspect: "Convenience method to inspect an object. This method will attempt to convert the object into a useful string description." Source on Github
I believe the simple answer is: you don't find a list of props. At least I haven't been able to.
However I noticed that ember props appear to be prefixed __ember, which made me solve it like this:
for (f in App.model) {
if (App.model.hasOwnProperty(f) && f.indexOf('__ember') < 0) {
console.log(f);
}
};
And it seems to work. But I don't know whether it's 100% certain to not get any bad props.
EDIT: Adam's gist is provided from comments. https://gist.github.com/1817543
var getOwnProperties = function(model){
var props = {};
for(var prop in model){
if( model.hasOwnProperty(prop)
&& prop.indexOf('__ember') < 0
&& prop.indexOf('_super') < 0
&& Ember.typeOf(model.get(prop)) !== 'function'
){
props[prop] = model[prop];
}
}
return props;
}
Neither of these answers are reliable, unfortunately, because any keys paired with a null or undefined value will not be visible.
e.g.
MyClass = Ember.Object.extend({
name: null,
age: null,
weight: null,
height: null
});
test = MyClass.create({name: 'wmarbut'});
console.log( Ember.keys(test) );
Is only going to give you
["_super", "name"]
The solution that I came up with is:
/**
* Method to get keys out of an object into an array
* #param object obj_proto The dumb javascript object to extract keys from
* #return array an array of keys
*/
function key_array(obj_proto) {
keys = [];
for (var key in obj_proto) {
keys.push(key);
}
return keys;
}
/*
* Put the structure of the object that you want into a dumb JavaScript object
* instead of directly into an Ember.Object
*/
MyClassPrototype = {
name: null,
age: null,
weight: null,
height: null
}
/*
* Extend the Ember.Object using your dumb javascript object
*/
MyClass = Ember.Object.extend(MyClassPrototype);
/*
* Set a hidden field for the keys the object possesses
*/
MyClass.reopen({__keys: key_array(MyClassPrototype)});
Using this method, you can now access the __keys field and know which keys to iterate over. This does not, however, solve the problem of objects where the structure isn't known before hand.
I use this:
Ember.keys(Ember.meta(App.YOUR_MODEL.proto()).descs)
None of those answers worked with me. I already had a solution for Ember Data, I was just after one for Ember.Object. I found the following to work just fine. (Remove Ember.getProperties if you only want the keys, not a hash with key/value.
getPojoProperties = function (pojo) {
return Ember.getProperties(pojo, Object.keys(pojo));
},
getProxiedProperties = function (proxyObject) {
// Three levels, first the content, then the prototype, then the properties of the instance itself
var contentProperties = getPojoProperties(proxyObject.get('content')),
prototypeProperties = Ember.getProperties(proxyObject, Object.keys(proxyObject.constructor.prototype)),
objectProperties = getPojoProperties(proxyObject);
return Ember.merge(Ember.merge(contentProperties, prototypeProperties), objectProperties);
},
getEmberObjectProperties = function (emberObject) {
var prototypeProperties = Ember.getProperties(emberObject, Object.keys(emberObject.constructor.prototype)),
objectProperties = getPojoProperties(emberObject);
return Ember.merge(prototypeProperties, objectProperties);
},
getEmberDataProperties = function (emberDataObject) {
var attributes = Ember.get(emberDataObject.constructor, 'attributes'),
keys = Ember.get(attributes, 'keys.list');
return Ember.getProperties(emberDataObject, keys);
},
getProperties = function (object) {
if (object instanceof DS.Model) {
return getEmberDataProperties(object);
} else if (object instanceof Ember.ObjectProxy) {
return getProxiedProperties(object);
} else if (object instanceof Ember.Object) {
return getEmberObjectProperties(object);
} else {
return getPojoProperties(object);
}
};
In my case Ember.keys(someObject) worked, without doing someObject.toJSON().
I'm trying to do something similar, i.e. render a generic table of rows of model data to show columns for each attribute of a given model type, but let the model describe its own fields.
If you're using Ember Data, then this may help:
http://emberjs.com/api/data/classes/DS.Model.html#method_eachAttribute
You can iterate the attributes of the model type and get meta data associated with each attribute.
This worked for me (from an ArrayController):
fields: function() {
var doc = this.get('arrangedContent');
var fields = [];
var content = doc.content;
content.forEach(function(attr, value) {
var data = Ember.keys(attr._data);
data.forEach(function(v) {
if( typeof v === 'string' && $.inArray(v, fields) == -1) {
fields.push(v);
}
});
});
return fields;
}.property('arrangedContent')
In my application I have two views, Main View and Contacts view, and I have a saved Contacts ID.
When I load my second view, that should access default Contacts Database using my saved ID list and get these contacts information Title, etc. It leaves because the contact has been deleted.
So, How can I check if the contact that I has its ID is exists before I try to access its fields and cause a leave ?
CContactDatabase* contactsDb = CContactDatabase::OpenL();
CleanupStack::PushL(contactsDb);
for (TInt i = 0; i < CsIDs.Count(); i++)// looping through contacts.
{
TRAPD(err, contactsDb->ReadContactL(CsIDs[i])) //---->CsIDs is an array that holds IDs
if(KErrNotFound == err)
{
CsIDs.Remove(i);
}
}
CleanupStack::PopAndDestroy(1,contactsDb);
Thanks Abhijith for your help, and I figured out the reason behind this issue, I shouldn't call
ReadContactL directly under TRAPD under For loop, So I created a function that checks the ID validity
and I called it under TRAPD, and now my Contacts List View loads well, and invalid IDs removed from
My saved IDs list.
Solution is to follow Symbian C++ rules when dealing with "Leave":
void LoadContactsL()
{
CContactDatabase* contactsDb = CContactDatabase::OpenL();
CleanupStack::PushL(contactsDb);
for (TInt i = 0; i < CsIDs.Count(); i++)// looping through contacts.
{
TRAPD(err, ChickValidContactsIDL(i)) //-->Calling IDs checking function under TRAPD
if(KErrNotFound == err)
{
CsIDs.Remove(i);
}
}
CleanupStack::PopAndDestroy(1,contactsDb);
}
// A function that checks invalid IDs.
//Important Symbian rule: Return "void" for functions that "Leave" under TRAP harness.
void ChickValidContactsIDL(TInt index)
{
CPbkContactEngine* iPbkEngine = CPbkContactEngine::NewL(&iEikonEnv->FsSession());
CleanupStack::PushL(iPbkEngine);
iPbkEngine->OpenContactL(CsIDs[index]);
CleanupStack::PopAndDestroy(1,iPbkEngine);
}