Differences between AWS Fargate and multi-container Elastic Beanstalk? - amazon-web-services

I understand that ECS has EC2 and Fargate launch types that differ in the control they offer over the underlying environment configuration.
Before Fargate, ECS was used to provide detailed control over the container environment, while Elastic Beanstalk was used to abstract those details and just run the containers.
In the FAQ section of AWS ECS it says:
For Beanstalk, You simply specify which container images are to be deployed, the CPU and memory requirements, the port mappings, and the container links. You can work with Amazon ECS directly if you want more fine-grained control for custom application architectures.
Now with Fargate, it seems that the offered functionality is quite similar. So what are the differences between Fargate and docker on Elastic Beanstalk?

Multi Container Elastic Beanstalk, actually uses ECS to provision your cluster, which make it operate as a Platform-As-A-Service (PaaS) model, as then you can run your images on the cluster it sets up.
Fargate runs on a fully managed server so you dont worry about the cluster or server as you would in Elastic beanstalk. You just manage the Docker container making it more of a Software-As-A-Service (SaaS) model.

Related

Can I run multiple applications or containers for Docker images on a single AWS Beanstalk instance/cluster?

Running each application or micro-service on its own Beanstalk cluster, with multiple VMs in each, seem very inefficient. Is there a way that multiple micro-services can be run on a single cluster, with Beanstalk being aware of them being separate entities.
Sounds like running a multicontainer Docker environment is a solution for you. Each of the microservices would run in a separate Docker container (which can then be multiplied). In this case, Elastic Beanstalk manages an ECS - Elastic Container Service - cluster for you (creation, task definitions and execution). If you want to have more control over everything, you can use the ECS service directly.

Why do you want to use AWS ECS vs. ElasticBeanstalk for Docker?

I'm planning to use Docker, and associate 1 EC2 instance with 1 Microservice.
Why do I want to deploy Docker in AWS ECS vs. ElasticBeanstalk?
It is said that AWS ECS has a native support to Docker. Is that it?
It would be great if you could be elaborate the pros and cons of running docker on AWS ECS vs. ElasticBeanstalk.
Elastic Beanstalk (multi-container) is an abstraction layer on top of ECS (Elastic Container Service) with some bootstrapped features and some limitations:
Automatically interacts with ECS and ELB
Cluster health and metrics are readily available and displayed without any extra effort
Load balancer must terminate HTTPS and all backend connections are HTTP
Easily adjustable autoscaling and instance sizing
Container logs are all collected in one place, but still segmented by instance – so in a cluster environment finding which instance served a request that logged some important data is a challenge.
Can only set hard memory limits in container definitions
All cluster instances must run the same set of containers
As of ECS IT is Amazon’s answer to container orchestration. It’s a bit rough around the edges and definitely a leap from Elastic Beanstalk, but it does have the advantage of significantly more flexibility including the ability to even define a custom scheduler.
All of the limitations imposed by Elastic Beanstalk are lifted.
Refer these for more info :
Elastic Beanstalk vs. ECS vs. Kubernetes
Amazon EC2 Container Serivce
Amazon Elasticbeanstalk

What is the difference between Amazon ECS and Amazon EC2?

I'm just getting started on AWS EC2. I understand that EC2 is like a remote computer where I can do pretty much everything I want. Then I found out about ECS. I know it uses Docker, but I'm confused about the relationship between these two.
Is ECS just a Docker install in EC2?
If I already have an EC2 and I start an ECS, does it mean I have two instances?
Your question
Is ECS just a docker install in EC2? If I already have a EC2, then I
start a ECS, does it mean I have two instance?
No. AWS ECS is just a logical grouping (cluster) of EC2 instances, and all the EC2 instances part of an ECS act as Docker host i.e. ECS can send command to launch a container on them (EC2).
If you already have an EC2, and then launch ECS, you'll still have a single instance. If you add/register (by installing the AWS ECS Container Agent) the EC2 to ECS it'll become the part of the cluster, but still a single instance of EC2.
An Amazon ECS without any EC2 registered (added to the cluster) is good for nothing.
TL; DR
An overview
EC2 - is simply a remote (virtual) machine.
ECS stands for Elastic Container Service - as per basic definition of computer cluster, ECS is basically a logical grouping of
EC2 machines/instances. Technically speaking ECS is a mere
configuration for an efficient use and management of your EC2
instance(s) resources i.e. storage, memory, CPU, etc.
To simplify it further, if you have launched an Amazon ECS with no EC2 instances added to it, it's good for nothing i.e. you can't do anything about it. ECS makes sense only once one (or more) EC2 instances are added to it.
The next confusing thing here is the container term - which is not fully virtualized machine instances, and Docker is one technology we can use to create container instances. Docker is a utility you can install on our machine, which makes it a Docker host, and on this host you can create containers (same as virtual machines - but much more light-weight). To sum up, ECS is just about clustering of EC2 instances, and uses Docker to instantiate containers/instances/virtual machines on these (EC2) hosts.
All you need to do is launch an ECS, and register/add as much EC2 instances to it as you need. You can add/register EC2 instances, all you need is Amazon ECS Container Agent running on your EC2 instance/machine, which can be done manually or directly using the special AMI (Amazon Machine Image) i.e. Amazon ECS-optimized AMI, which already has the Amazon ECS Container Agent. During the launch of a new EC2 instance the Agent automatically registers it to the default ECS cluster.
The container agent running on each of the instances (EC2 instances) within an Amazon ECS cluster sends information about the instance's current running tasks and resource utilization to Amazon ECS, and starts and stops tasks whenever it receives a request from Amazon ECS. For more information, see Amazon ECS Container Agent. Once set, each of the created container instances (of whatever EC2 machine/node) will be an instance in Amazon ECS's swarm.
For more information – read step 10 from this documentation: Launching an Amazon ECS Container Instance:
Choose an AMI for your container instance. You can choose the Amazon
ECS-optimized AMI, or another operating system, such as CoreOS or
Ubuntu. If you do not choose the Amazon ECS-optimized AMI, you need to
follow the procedures in Installing the Amazon ECS Container Agent.
By default, your container instance launches into your default
cluster. If you want to launch into your own cluster instead of the
default, choose the Advanced Details list and paste the following
script into the User data field, replacing your_cluster_name with the
name of your cluster.
#!/bin/bash
echo ECS_CLUSTER=your_cluster_name >> /etc/ecs/ecs.config
Or, if you have an ecs.config file in Amazon S3 and have enabled
Amazon S3 read-only access to your container instance role, choose the
Advanced Details list and paste the following script into the User
data field, replacing your_bucket_name with the name of your bucket to
install the AWS CLI and write your configuration file at launch time.
Note For more information about this configuration, see Storing
Container Instance Configuration in Amazon S3.
#!/bin/bash
yum install -y aws-cli
aws s3 cp s3://your_bucket_name/ecs.config /etc/ecs/ecs.config
Just to clarify it further – you can create containers on your single EC2 instance without ECS. Install any of the containerization technology i.e. Docker and run the create container command, setting your EC2 as a Docker host, and have as much Docker containers as you want (or as much as your EC2's resources allow).
In simple words,ECS is a manager while EC2 instances are just like employees.
All the employees (EC2) under this manager(ECS) can perform "Docker" tasks and the manager also understands "docker" pretty well. So,whenever you need "docker" resources, you show up to the Manager. Manager already has status from every employee(EC2) decides which one should perform the task.
Now, coming back to your question, a manager without an "employee" does not make sense but is definitely possible.
EC2 allows you to launch individual instances which you can use for pretty much whatever you like.
ECS is a container service, which means it will launch instances that will be ready to launch container applications.
The main distinction between the two services is that with EC2 you have to manage each instance separately in whatever method you choose (manually, using a CM tool or any other way) - deploy your applications and maintain the connection between the servers yourself.
ECS allows you to launch a cluster of machines that will serve as the deployment ground of your container apps, allowing you to treat all instances in the cluster as one big instance available for your container workload.
And to answer your question - You can start an ECS cluster with no instances in it, but then it won't be able to run anything on it. Once you register an EC2 instance inside an ECS cluster, containers are ready to run in it. So the bottom line is - you can use both ECS and EC2 with only one instance, but that is not the actual use case these services were built for.
Put simply, Elastic Container Service (ECS) is a Docker container orchestration service.
You can ask it to run one or more Docker images, either as an auto-scaling capable "Service" or as an ad-hoc "Task".
The services and tasks run on a "Cluster". Originally, a Cluster was a group of one or more pre-configured EC2 servers running ECS Cluster Agent. The Cluster Agent would schedule the containers on the EC2 server. These EC2 servers show up in your EC2 Instances list and are charged at regular EC2 per-minute costs - You can even SSH onto them like any normal EC2 server.
If you wanted more capacity to run more Services or Tasks, or if you wanted resilience against EC2 failure, then you would more EC2 servers.
Around November 2017, AWS added ECS Fargate. Now a Cluster can run "serverless" without provisioning EC2 nodes. You simply define the amount of CPU and memory your Task or Service requires to operate, meaning that you just pay for the CPU and memory time rather than the EC2.
ECS stands for 'Elastic Container Service'. It is a container orchestration service.
Lets say you have a Docker container running and you decide to update the Docker image. It's relatively easy task to stop, pull and run if you have one container running but its tedious to do the same steps if you have 10 to 100 of containers running.
With AWS ECS you can have this control. You specify if update is required provide the latest image id and ECS will handle the stop, pull and run etc. commands for you. It also provides with much more additional features, refer - https://aws.amazon.com/ecs/features/
EC2 stand for 'Elastic Compute Cloud'. In simple terms its a virtual machine.
ECS uses EC2 to run your containers.
'These running docker containers (tasks) are run on EC2 instances'.
ECS is a container orchestrator just like Kubernetes or Docker swarm, EC2 is an Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud platform for Creating Virtual Machines. ECS allows you to run containers on either serverless environments (Fargate) where you don't have to run any VM or in a non managed environments where you host the containers on EC2 instances.
Okay, as you know EC2 is a virtual machine on AWS and ECS is a container orchestration system on AWS.
To use ECS, you need to run your container into some virtual machines which EC2 is one of an option to provide that.
You will need to install ecs-agent on EC2 to make a connection with ECS. And ECS also can monitor the resource usages on your EC2. So basically you choose the more high-level EC2 type, then more resource(CPU/MEM) your container can use.
EC2 is a compute service that enables applications to run on AWS, whereas ECS is an AWS service used primarily to orchestrate Docker containers.

Enterprise Apps with Docker and Elastic Beanstalk

I'm new to Docker and EB but not AWS. I've worked in environments where dedicated tenancy is a requirement, whether due to HIPPA or some other data protection requirements.
So far as I can tell, in order to deploy a Docker image, you must use Beanstalk, which means you aren't able to have a dedicated tenancy. I found this forum question that says if you create a VPC, you can have a dedicated Beanstalk. Is this correct? If so, will it work with Docker? If so any guides would be helpful.
Have you looked at Amazon's ECS service? It is a Docker container service that doesn't use Elastic Beanstalk.
You can also install Docker on any EC2 instance.
If you use a VPC then you can set the default tenancy to dedicated, which will result in dedicated tenancy instances being created by Beanstalk. You should be using a VPC already if you are concerned with HIPAA compliance, or if you want access to pretty much any of the new features released by Amazon in the last year.
Also, EBS stands for Elastic Block Storage, Elastic Beanstalk is usually abbreviated EB.
If you'd like to venture a bit more, you can also use other tools like
Kubernetes
Apache Mesos
RancherOS
For a more comprehensive list of Docker/Container related projects you can see this post:
How to scale Docker containers in production
You can run them all in EC2 with VPC, also using dedicated tenancy if you'd like to.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk Vs EC2 Container Service (ECS) - Docker

Have been running Docker with Elastic Beanstalk to deploy a relatively simple app, and it has been working great. Now with ECS on the horizon, I am interested to know what the differences are between the two services, and why one might use one over the other?
Amazon's documentation says the following:
Q: How is Amazon ECS different from AWS Elastic Beanstalk?
AWS Elastic Beanstalk is an application management platform that helps customers easily deploy and scale web applications and services. It keeps the provisioning of building blocks (e.g., EC2, RDS, Elastic Load Balancing, Auto Scaling, CloudWatch), deployment of applications, and health monitoring abstracted from the user so they can just focus on writing code. You simply specify which container images are to be deployed, the CPU and memory requirements, the port mappings, and the container links. Elastic Beanstalk will automatically handle all the details such as provisioning an Amazon ECS cluster, balancing load, auto-scaling, monitoring, and placing your containers across your cluster.
Elastic Beanstalk is ideal if you want to leverage the benefits of containers but just want the simplicity of deploying applications from development to production by uploading a container image. You can work with Amazon ECS directly if you want more fine-grained control for custom application architectures.