The input consists of a set of tasks given in increasing order of start time, and each task has a certain duration associated.
The first line is number of tasks, for example
3
2 5
4 23
7 4
This means that there are 3 tasks. The first one starts at time 2, and ends at 7 (2+5). Second starts at 4, ends at 27. Third starts at 7, ends at 11.
We assume each task starts as soon as it is ready, and does not need to wait for a processor or anything else to free up.
This means we can keep track of number of active tasks:
Time #tasks
0 - 2 0
2 - 4 1
4 - 11 2
11 - 27 1
I need to find 2 numbers:
Max number of active tasks at any given time (2 in this case) and
Average number of active tasks over the entire duration computed here as :
[ 0*(2-0) + 1*(4-2) + 2*(11-4) + 1*(27-11) ] / 27
For this,
I have first found the time when all tasks have come to an end using the below code:
#include "stdio.h"
#include "stdlib.h"
typedef struct
{
long int start;
int dur;
} task;
int main()
{
long int num_tasks, endtime;
long int maxtime = 0;
scanf("%ld",&num_tasks);
task *t = new task[num_tasks];
for (int i=0;i<num_tasks;i++)
{
scanf("%ld %d",&t[i].start,&t[i].dur);
endtime = t[i].start + t[i].dur;
if (endtime > maxtime)
maxtime = endtime;
}
printf("%ld\n",maxtime);
}
Can this be done using Priority Queues implemented as heaps ?
Your question is rather broad, so I am going to just give you a teaser answer that will, hopefully, get you started, attempting to answer your first part of the question, with a not necessarily optimized solution.
In your toy input, you have:
2 5
4 23
7 4
thus you can compute and store in the array of structs that you have, the end time of a task, rather than its duration, for later usage. That gives as an array like this:
2 7
4 27
7 11
Your array is already sorted (because the input is given in that order) by start time, and that's useful. Use std::sort to sort the array, if needed.
Observe how you could check for the end time of the first task versus the start time of the other tasks. With the right comparison, you can determine the number of active tasks along with the first task. Checking whether the end time of the first task is greater than the start time of the second task, if true, denotes that these two tasks are active together at some point.
Then you would do the same for the comparison of the first with the third task. After that you would know how many tasks were active in relation with the first task.
Afterwards, you are going to follow the same procedure for the second task, and so on.
Putting all that together in code, we get:
#include "stdio.h"
#include "stdlib.h"
#include <algorithm>
typedef struct {
int start;
int dur;
int end;
} task;
int compare (const task& a, const task& b) {
return ( a.start < b.start );
}
int main() {
int num_tasks;
scanf("%d",&num_tasks);
task *t = new task[num_tasks];
for (int i=0;i<num_tasks;i++) {
scanf("%d %d",&t[i].start,&t[i].dur);
t[i].end = t[i].start + t[i].dur;
}
std::sort(t, t + num_tasks, compare);
for (int i=0;i<num_tasks;i++) {
printf("%d %d\n", t[i].start, t[i].end);
}
int max_noOf_tasks = 0;
for(int i = 0; i < num_tasks - 1; i++) {
int noOf_tasks = 1;
for(int j = i + 1; j < num_tasks; j++) {
if(t[i].end > t[j].start)
noOf_tasks++;
}
if(max_noOf_tasks < noOf_tasks)
max_noOf_tasks = noOf_tasks;
}
printf("Max. number of active tasks: %d\n", max_noOf_tasks);
delete [] t;
}
Output:
2 7
4 27
7 11
Max. number of active tasks: 2
Now, good luck with the second part of your question.
PS: Since this is C++, you could have used an std::vector to store your structs, rather than a plain array. That way you would avoid dynamic memory allocation too, since the vector takes care that for you automatically.
Related
This question was asked on 4th april in google codejam : https://codingcompetitions.withgoogle.com/codejam/round/000000000019fd27/000000000020bdf9.
The description of question is :
Cameron and Jamie's kid is almost 3 years old! However, even though the child is more independent now, scheduling kid activities and domestic necessities is still a challenge for the couple.
Cameron and Jamie have a list of N activities to take care of during the day. Each activity happens during a specified interval during the day. They need to assign each activity to one of them, so that neither of them is responsible for two activities that overlap. An activity that ends at time t is not considered to overlap with another activity that starts at time t.
For example, suppose that Jamie and Cameron need to cover 3 activities: one running from 18:00 to 20:00, another from 19:00 to 21:00 and another from 22:00 to 23:00. One possibility would be for Jamie to cover the activity running from 19:00 to 21:00, with Cameron covering the other two. Another valid schedule would be for Cameron to cover the activity from 18:00 to 20:00 and Jamie to cover the other two. Notice that the first two activities overlap in the time between 19:00 and 20:00, so it is impossible to assign both of those activities to the same partner.
Given the starting and ending times of each activity, find any schedule that does not require the same person to cover overlapping activities, or say that it is impossible.
Input
The first line of the input gives the number of test cases, T. T test cases follow. Each test case starts with a line containing a single integer N, the number of activities to assign. Then, N more lines follow. The i-th of these lines (counting starting from 1) contains two integers Si and Ei. The i-th activity starts exactly Si minutes after midnight and ends exactly Ei minutes after midnight.
Output
For each test case, output one line containing Case #x: y, where x is the test case number (starting from 1) and y is IMPOSSIBLE if there is no valid schedule according to the above rules, or a string of exactly N characters otherwise. The i-th character in y must be C if the i-th activity is assigned to Cameron in your proposed schedule, and J if it is assigned to Jamie.
If there are multiple solutions, you may output any one of them.
Input :
4
3
360 480
420 540
600 660
3
0 1440
1 3
2 4
5
99 150
1 100
100 301
2 5
150 250
2
0 720
720 1440
Output :
Case #1: CJC
Case #2: IMPOSSIBLE
Case #3: JCCJJ
Case #4: CC
My approach :
sort the task values on basis of starting or ending time and check whether it can be assigned to C or J. If all the task can be assigned then all good otherwise impossible.
I tried sorting on basis of both start time and end time but for both the cases got WA.
if someone can point out what i'm missing in implementation that qoulfd be very helpful.
My code:
#include<bits/stdc++.h>
using namespace std;
typedef struct task
{
int start_time;
int finish_time;
task()
{
this->start_time=0;
this->finish_time=0;
}
task(int start_time, int finish_time)
{
this->start_time=start_time;
this->finish_time=finish_time;
}
bool operator<(const task t)
{
return this->start_time<t.start_time;
}
}task;
int main()
{
int t;
cin>>t;
int a=1;
while(t--)
{
int n,st,ft;
cin>>n;
char res[1005];
int index = 0;
vector<task> task_list;
for(int i=0;i<n;i++)
{
cin>>st>>ft;
task t1(st,ft);
task_list.push_back(t1);
}
sort(task_list.begin(),task_list.end());
task j_task, c_task;
for(int i=0;i<n;i++)
{
if(task_list[i].start_time>=j_task.finish_time)
{
j_task = task_list[i];
res[index++] = 'J';
}
else if(task_list[i].start_time>=c_task.finish_time)
{
c_task = task_list[i];
res[index++] = 'C';
}
else
{
index = 0;
break;
}
}
if(index!=0)
{
res[index] = '\0';
cout<<"Case #"<<a++<<": "<<res<<endl;
}
else
{
cout<<"Case #"<<a++<<": "<<"IMPOSSIBLE"<<endl;
}
}
return 0;
}
You are asked to assign 'C' or 'J' to the original order of the tasks given in the input. So before sorting, you should save the index of the tasks and once sorted, assign 'C' or 'J' to those saved indices.
Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 3 years ago.
Improve this question
I am new to multithreading so any suggestions will be very useful! I am implementing a multithreading program according to the following requirements:
The user inputs a list of integers as a vector. Each vector element N represents a cell.
The vector elements are passed to a threading function, from which the total cells at a certain time are calculated
The lifetime of the cells ( 0.1 + N % 8 seconds) is calculated. At half their lifetime, they breed a number (( N – N % 8 ) / 8 ) of child cells.
The child cells live the same amount as their parents, but die without breeding when their lifetime is over.
A cell monitor is started before the first genesis cell thread is created. The monitor will print out the number of existing live cells every second, so as to monitor how many cells are live.
A main function awaits input from user. vector inputs are given, it will start the
monitor thread and then start the genesis cells threads.
The code in the question has given me some uncertainties on how the reproduction is supposed to be performed, but I have made the following assumptions:
((N - N % 8) / 8) refers to how many child cells are produced by each parent, N, when it reaches half its lifetime, this is not what the code in question implies
The child cells live the same amount of time as their parents, starting from when they are created - so they outlive their parents instead of dying at the same time, this is again not what the code in question does
The scheme I would employ to accomplish the outlined simulation would be to have one thread which controls a time variable, either the main thread or a thread created specifically for the purpose. This thread will increment the time as needed, but will wait for all threads to check if their cell has died or needs to reproduce and perform necessary operations between increments. The example below demonstrates this approach.
I find this is a little bit easier and perhaps clearer when using std::atomic variables to store the number of living cells, the simulation time, the number of threads needing to be checked, etc. When using an atomic variable, the necessary memory fencing is performed for any increment or decrement without needing a std::mutex or other explicit synchronization. Additionally, it may be better to implement a class for the cells, that way they can store their own lifetime, if they are alive still, whether they are a child or a parent, whether they have children, etc.
Example
#include <iostream>
#include <thread>
#include <atomic>
#include <vector>
#include <mutex>
class Cell {
public:
Cell(int x, bool child = false) {
lifetime = (0.1 + x % 8);
n = x;
is_child = child;
alive = true;
has_children = false;
}
int lifetime;
int n;
bool is_child;
bool has_children;
bool alive;
};
std::mutex mtx; // This will be used to synchronize threads.push_back()
// when creating children cells
std::vector<Cell> cells;
std::vector<std::thread> threads;
std::atomic<int> t; // The simulation time
std::atomic<int> living; // The number of living cells
std::atomic<int> check; // This will be used to ensure every thread goes through the
// necessary checks every time step
void thread_function(Cell cell) {
int prev = t;
while (living > 0) {
while (prev == t) {if (living == 0) return;}
prev = (int)t;
if (!cell.has_children && !cell.is_child && t > cell.lifetime / 2.0) {
cell.has_children = true;
// Create children and send them to new threads
for (int ii = 0; ii < ((cell.n - cell.n % 8) / 8); ii ++) {
living ++;
Cell c(ii, true); // Create a new cell which will die
c.lifetime = cell.lifetime + t; // {lifetime} seconds from now
mtx.lock();
threads.push_back(std::thread(thread_function, c));
mtx.unlock();
}
}
if (cell.alive && t >= cell.lifetime) {
cell.alive = false;
living --;
}
check --;
}
}
int main(int argn, char** argv) {
living = argn - 1;
if (argn > 1) {
for (int ii = 1; ii < argn; ii ++) {
cells.push_back(Cell(atoi(argv[ii])));
threads.push_back(std::thread(thread_function, cells[ii-1]));
}
}
t = 0;
while (living > 0) {
std::cout << "Total Cells: "+std::to_string(living)+" [ "+std::to_string(t)+
" s ]\n" << std::flush;
check = threads.size();
t ++;
while (check > 0) {
if (living == 0) break;
}
}
std::cout << "Total Cells: "+std::to_string(living)+" [ "+std::to_string(t)+
" s ]\n" << std::flush;
for (int ii = 0; ii < threads.size(); ii ++) {
threads[ii].join();
}
}
./cells 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Total Cells: 7 [ 0 s ]
Total Cells: 6 [ 1 s ]
Total Cells: 5 [ 2 s ]
Total Cells: 4 [ 3 s ]
Total Cells: 3 [ 4 s ]
Total Cells: 2 [ 5 s ]
Total Cells: 1 [ 6 s ]
Total Cells: 0 [ 7 s ]
./cells 21 12 6 7 1 17 25
Total Cells: 7 [ 0 s ]
Total Cells: 9 [ 1 s ]
Total Cells: 4 [ 2 s ]
Total Cells: 7 [ 3 s ]
Total Cells: 6 [ 4 s ]
Total Cells: 5 [ 5 s ]
Total Cells: 4 [ 6 s ]
Total Cells: 2 [ 7 s ]
Total Cells: 0 [ 8 s ]
You can achieve the same result using mutexes by surrounding every increment and decrement of check, t, and living.
Note Using global variables as I have is not good practice, I have done so only to simplify the demonstration of the multithreading, in practice it would be best to wrap them in a namespace, refactor the entire simulation into a class, or something of the like.
For this problem I need to to do multiple queries so I used a for loop for it
#include<bits/stdc++.h>
using namespace std;
int main(){
vector<int>ans; //vector to store the ans
string s,e; //real dna and virus dna
cin>>s;
int q,start,match=0; // no. of queries, starting value of the query, var to store matching occurence
unsigned int step=0; //var to keep count of virus dna iteration
cin>>q;
for(int i=0;i<q;i++){//loop to iterate q times
cin>>start;
int l,r,x,c;
if(start==2){ // for 2nd type query
cin>>l>>r>>e;
for(int i=l-1;i<=r-1;i++){
if(s[i]==e[step]){
match+=1;
}
step+=1;
if(step== e.length()){
step=0; //starting again from start of virus
}
}
}
ans.push_back(match);
match=0; //reintializing value for next query
if(start==1){ //for 1st type query
cin>>x>>c;
s[x-1]=c; //replacing char at x-1 with c
}
}
for(int j=0;j<ans.size();j++){ //loop for ans output
cout<<ans[j]<<endl;
}
return 0;
}
but it terminates before it should for ex: for this input,
ATGCATGC
4
2 1 8 ATGC
2 2 6 TTT
1 4 T
2 2 6 TA
It would stop at 5th line and print 8 ,2 ,0, 0 whereas it should be 8, 2, 4. If I do individual queries without loop things work fine but any kind of loop doesn't work. Pls help. Also any suggestion for solving this kind of problems more efficiently will be very helpful to me.
The bigger problem in your code is that the variable c is defined as int
int l,r,x,c;
when receive chars and not integers (T, in your example) so should be defined as char
int l,r,x;
char c;
If c is int, when you send 4 T to
cin>>x>>c;
x receive 4, c doesn't receive T (T isn't a valid int) so start the next iteration of the external cycle, is called
cin>>start;
when T remain in the buffer; start is integer so there is the same problem and the program end.
And, as pointed by soon, ans.push_back() should be inside the first if. Now a value (zero) is added also with rows starting with 1.
I am new c++ learner.I logged in Codeforces site and it is 11A question:
A sequence a0, a1, ..., at - 1 is called increasing if ai - 1 < ai for each i: 0 < i < t.
You are given a sequence b0, b1, ..., bn - 1 and a positive integer d. In each move you may choose one element of the given sequence and add d to it. What is the least number of moves required to make the given sequence increasing?
Input
The first line of the input contains two integer numbers n and d (2 ≤ n ≤ 2000, 1 ≤ d ≤ 106). The second line contains space separated sequence b0, b1, ..., bn - 1 (1 ≤ bi ≤ 106).
Output the minimal number of moves needed to make the sequence increasing.
I write this code for this question:
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
int main()
{
long long int n,d,ci,i,s;
s=0;
cin>>n>>d;
int a[n];
for(ci=0;ci<n;ci++)
{
cin>>a[ci];
}
for(i=0;i<(n-1);i++)
{
while(a[i]>=a[i+1])
{
a[i+1]+=d;
s+=1;
}
}
cout<<s;
return 0;
}
It work good.But In a test codeforces server enter 2000 number.Time limit is 1 second.But it calculate up to 1 second.
How to make this code shorter to calculate faster?
One improvement that can be made is to use
std::ios_base::sync_with_stdio(false);
By default, cin/cout waste time synchronizing themselves with the C library’s stdio buffers, so that you can freely intermix calls to scanf/printf with operations on cin/cout. By turning this off using the above call the input and output operations in the above program should take less time since it no longer initialises the sync for input and output.
This is know to have helped in previous code challenges that require code to be completed in a certain time scale and which the c++ input/output was causing some bottleneck in the speed.
You can get rid of the while loop. Your program should run faster without
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
int main()
{
long int n,d,ci,i,s;
s=0;
cin>>n>>d;
int a[n];
for(ci=0;ci<n;ci++)
{
cin>>a[ci];
}
for(i=0;i<(n-1);i++)
{
if(a[i]>=a[i+1])
{
int x = ((a[i] - a[i+1])/d) + 1;
s+=x;
a[i+1]+=x*d;
}
}
cout<<s;
return 0;
}
This is not a complete answer, but a hint.
Suppose our seqence is {1000000, 1} and d is 2.
To make an increasing sequence, we need to make the second element 1,000,001 or greater.
We could do it your way, by repeatedly adding 2 until we get past 1,000,000
1 + 2 + 2 + 2 + 2 + 2 + 2 + 2 + 2 + 2 + 2 + 2 + 2 + ...
which would take a while, or we could say
Our goal is 1,000,001
We have 1
The difference is 1,000,000
So we need to to do 1,000,000 / 2 = 500,000 additions
So the answer is 500,000.
Which is quite a bit faster, because we only did 1 addition (1,000,000 + 1), one subtraction (1,000,001 - 1) and one division (1,000,000 / 2) instead of doing half a million additions.
Just as #molbdnilo said, Use math to get rid of the loop, and it's simple.
Here is my code, accepted on Codeforces.
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
int main()
{
int n = 0 , b = 0;
int a[2001];
cin >> n >> b;
for(int i = 0 ; i < n ; i++){
cin >> a[i];
}
int sum = 0;
for(int i = 0 ; i < n - 1 ; i++){
if(a[i] >= a[i + 1]){
int minus = a[i] - a[i+1];
int diff = minus / b + 1;
a[i+1] += diff * b;
sum += diff;
}
}
cout << sum << endl;
return 0;
}
I suggest you profile your code to see where the bottlenecks are.
One of the popular areas of time wasting is with input. The fewer input requests, the faster your program will be.
So, you could speed up your program by reading from cin using read() into a buffer and then parse the buffer using istringstream.
Other techniques include loop unrolling and optimizing for data cache. Reducing the number of branches or if statements will also speed up your programs. Processor prefer crunching data and moving data around to jumping to different areas in the code.
There are n groups of friends staying in the queue in front of bus station. The i-th group consists of ai men. Also, there is a single bus that works on the route. The size of the bus is x, that is it can transport x men simultaneously.
When the bus comes (it always comes empty) to the bus station, several groups from the head of the queue goes into the bus. Of course, groups of friends don't want to split, so they go to the bus only if the bus can hold the whole group. In the other hand, none wants to lose his position, that is the order of groups never changes.
The question is: how to choose the size x of the bus in such a way that the bus can transport all the groups and everytime when the bus moves off the bus station there is no empty space in the bus (the total number of men inside equals to x)?
Input Format:
The first line contains the only integer n (1≤n≤10^5). The second line contains n space-separated integers a1,a2,…,an (1≤ai≤10^4).
Output Format:
Print all the possible sizes of the bus in the increasing order.
Sample:
8
1 2 1 1 1 2 1 3
Output:
3 4 6 12
I made this code:
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
#include <algorithm>
using namespace std;
int main(void)
{
int max=0,sum=0,i,n;
cin>>n;
int values[100000];
for ( i = 0; i < n; i++ )
{
cin>>values[i];
sum = sum + values[i];
if ( values[i] > max )
max = values[i];
}
int p = 0,j;
int count = 0;
vector<int> final;
for ( i = 0; i < n; i++ )
{
p = p + values[i];
j = 0;
if ( p >= max && sum%p == 0)
{
flag = 0;
while ( j < n )
{
garb = p;
while (garb!= 0)
{
garb = garb - values[j++];
if ( garb < 0 )
flag = 1;
}
}
if ( flag == 0 )
{
final.push_back(p);
count++;
}
}
}
sort(final.begin(),final.end());
for ( j = 0; j < count; j++ )
{
cout<<final[j]<<"\t";
}
return 0;
}
Edit: I did this in which basically, I am checking if the found divisor satisfies the condition, and if at any point of time, I get a negative integer on taking difference with the values, I mark it by using a flag. However, it seems to give me a seg fault now. Why?
I firstly, calculated the maximum value out of the all possible values, and then, I checked if its a divisor of the sum of the values. However, this approach doesn't work for the input as:
10
2 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 2
My output is
2 7 14
whereas the output should be
7 14
only.
Any other approach that I can go with?
Thanks!
I can think of the following simple solution (since your present concern is correctness and not time complexity):
Calculate the sum of all ai's (as you are already doing).
Calculate the maximum of all ai's (as you are already doing).
Find all the factors of sum that are > max(ai).
For each factor, iterate through the ai's and check whether the bus condition is satisfied.