Related
I'm trying
void function(int y,int w)
{
printf("int function");
}
void function(float y,float w)
{
printf("float function");
}
int main()
{
function(1.2,2.2);
return 0;
}
I get an error error like..
error C2668: 'function' : ambiguous call to overloaded function
and when I try to call function(1.2,2) or function(1,2.2) it is printing as "int function"
Please clarify when will the function(float y,float w) be called?
Look at the error message from gcc:
a.cpp:16: error: call of overloaded ‘function(double, double)’ is ambiguous
a.cpp:3: note: candidates are: void function(int, int)
a.cpp:9: note: void function(float, float)
A call to either function would require truncation, which is why neither is preferred over the other. I suspect you really want void function(double y,double w). Remember that in C/C++, the default floating-point type for literals and parameter passing is double, NOT float.
UPDATE
If you really don't want to change the function signature from float to double, you can always use literals that are typed as float. If you add the suffix f to the floating point numbers, they will be typed float.
Your examples would then be function(1.2f, 2f) and function(1, 2.2f).
What is operator overloading?
Sbi's famous Operator overloading faq answers this in great detail.
Why are the two function versions in OP allowed to exist?
Notice they take different function parameter types(int and float) and hence qualify as valid function overloads.
What is overload resolution?
It is the process of selecting the most appropriate function/operator by the compiler implementation. If a best viable function exists and is unique, overload resolution succeeds and produces it as the result. Otherwise overload resolution fails and the invocation is treated as ill-formed and compiler provides a diagnostic. The compiler uses implicit conversion sequence to find the best match function.
C++03 Standard 13.3.3.1 Implicit Conversions:
An implicit conversion sequence is a sequence of conversions used to convert an argument in a function call to the type of the corresponding parameter of the function being called.
The implicit conversion sequences can be one of the following categories:
A standard conversion sequence(13.3.3.1.1)
A user-defined conversion sequence(13.3.3.1.2)
An ellipsis conversion sequence(13.3.3.1.3)
Note that each of these are ranked to determine the best viable function. The best viable function is the one all whose parameters have either better or equal-ranked implicit conversion sequences than all of the other viable functions.The standard details each of these in detail in respective sections. The standard conversion sequence is relevant to this case, it is summarized as:
With enough background on overloading resolution.
let us examine the code examples in OP:
function(1.2,2.2);
Important Rule: 1.2 and 2.2 are literals and they are treated as a double data type.
During implicit conversion sequences mapping:
Both the function parameter literals with double type need a conversion rank to either call the float or int version and none is a better match than other, they score exactly the same on conversion rank. The compiler is unable to detect the best viable match and it reports an ambiguity.
function(1.2,2);
During implicit conversion sequence mapping:
One of the function parameters 2 has an exact match with the int function version while another 1.2 has a conversion rank. For function which takes float as parameters the implicit conversion sequences for both parameters are of conversion rank.
So the function which takes int version scores better than the float version and is the best match and gets called.
How to resolve overloading ambiguity errors?
If you don't want the implicit conversion sequence mapping to throw you off, just provide functions and call them in such a way so that the parameters are a exact match. Since exact match scores over all others, You have a definite guarantee of your desired function getting called. In your case there are two ways to do this:
Solution 1:
Call the function so that parameters are exact match to the functions available.
function(1.2f,2.2f);
Since 1.2f and 2.2f are treated as float types they match exactly to the float function version.
Solution 2:
Provide a function overload which exactly matches the parameter type in called function.
function(double, double){}
Since 1.2 and 2.2 are treated as double the called function is exact match to this overload.
If you don't want to (as explained in the accepted answer):
use float literals, e.g. 1.2f
or change the existing float overload to double
You can add another overload that calls the float one:
void function(double y, double w)
{
function((float)y, (float)w);
}
Your code in main now will call the above function, which will call the float overload.
Function overloading in the above example has ambiguous calls because the return type are same and the 2nd argument in the call of function is double, which can be treated as int or float and hence the compiler confuses to which function to execute.
I hope this help
This code is self explaintary for all combination
You need to send two float to call a float function
#include<iostream>
#include<stdio.h>
using namespace std;
//when arguments are both int
void function(int y,int w) {
printf("int function\n");
}
//when arguments are both double
void function(double y, double w) {
printf("double function\n");
}
//when arguments are both float
void function(float y, float w) {
printf("float function\n");
}
//when arguments are int and float
void function(int y, float x) {
printf("int float function\n");
}
//when arguments are float and int
void function(float y,int w) {
printf("float int function\n");
}
//when arguments are int and double
void function(int y, double w) {
printf("int double function\n");
}
//when arguments are double and int
void function(double y, int x) {
printf("double int function\n");
}
//when arguments are double and float
void function(double y, float x) {
printf("double float function\n");
}
//when arguments are float and double
void function(float y, double x) {
printf("float double function\n");
}
int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
function(1.2,2.2);
function(1.2f,2.2f);
function(1,2);
function(1.2,2.2f);
function(1.2f,2.2);
function(1,2.2);
function(1,2.2f);
function(1.2,2);
function(1.2f,2);
return 0;
}
When sending a primitive type to a function as argument, if the primitive type you are sending is not exactly the same as it requests, you should always cast it to the requested primitive type.
int main()
{
function(1.3f, 2.4f);
function(1.3f, static_cast<float>(2.4));
function(static_cast<float>(1.3), static_cast<float>(2.4));
function(static_cast<float>(1), static_cast<float>(2));
return 0;
}
By default decimal is considered as double. If you want decimal to be floats you suffix it with f.
In your example when you call function(1.2,2.2) the compiler considers the values you have passed it as double and hence you are getting mismatch in function signature.
function(1.2,1.2) ====> function(double,double)
If you want to retain the function signature you need to use floating point suffix while passing floating point literal.
function(1.2f,1.2f) ====> function(float,float).
If you are more interested in knowing about floating point literals you can refer
Why floating point value such as 3.14 are considered as double by default in MSVC?
Like others have said, you give doubles to your overloaded function which is designed for floats. The overloading itself doesn't have any errors.
Here's the correct use of the overloaded function (notice the 'f'´s right after the numbers):
function(1.0f, 2.0f);
function(1.2,2.2);
Those numbers aren't floats, they are doubles. So this code says:
double p1 = 1.2;
double p2 = 2.2;
void (*fn)(double /*decltype(p1)*/, double /*decltype(p2)*/) = function;
The compiler is now looking a "function" which takes two doubles. There is no exact match. So next it looks for a function which takes an argument that can be cast from doubles. There are two matches.
function(int, int);
function(float, float);
You have several options.
Add an exact match overload.
void function(double, double)
{
printf("double function\n");
}
Use casting.
function(static_cast(1.2), static_cast(2.2));
Call "function" with floats instead of doubles:
function(1.2f, 2.2f);
Try This
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
void print(int i){
cout << i << endl;
}
void print(float i){
cout << i << endl;
}
int main(){
print(5);
print(5.5f);
return 0;
}
In function overloading when float can conflict with other data type in other same name functions then probably this is way to over come it. I tried it worked.
Just imagine how your arguments would be passed.
If it is passed as 1.2 and 2.2 to the (int,int) function then it would to truncated to 1 and 2.
If it is passed as 1.2 and 2.2 to the (float,float) it will be processed as is.
So here is where the ambiguity creeps in.
I have found two ways to solve this problem.
First is the use of literals:-
int main()
{
function(1.2F,2.2F);
return 0;
}
Secondly, and the way I like to do it, It always works (and can also be used for C++'s default conversion and promotion).
For int:-
int main()
{
int a=1.2, b=2.2;
function(a,b);
return 0;
}
For Float:-
int main()
{
float a=1.2, b=2.2;
function(a,b);
return 0;
}
So instead of using actual DIGITS. It is better to declare them as a type first, then overload!
See now, if you send it as (1.2,2) or (1,2.2) then compiler can simply send it to the int function and it would work.
However, to send it to the float function the compiler would have to promote 2 to float. Promotion only happens when no match is found.
Refer:-
Computer Science with C++
Sumita Arora
Chapter: Function Overloading
When using function with same name, parameter list must differ(either in type of parameter or number of parameters used). I was just practicing with this concept. I wrote the following code.
#include <iostream>
int myFunction(int n)
{
return 2*n;
}
float myFunction(float n)
{
return 3*n;
}
int main()
{
int x=myFunction(3);
std::cout << x;
return 0;
}
I thought I will get error because compiler will get confused which myFunction to use because I directly pass the value 3 without storing it in a particular type of variable . But I got output 6. So I tried the following code.
#include <iostream>
int myFunction(int n)
{
return 2*n;
}
float myFunction(float n)
{
return 3*n;
}
int main()
{
float x=myFunction(3.3);
std::cout << x;
return 0;
}
As previous one worked fine, I thought this will work fine too, as 3.3 is not integer so it's clear which one to call, but this time I got compiler error saying it's ambiguous.
So my doubt is why first code worked but not second one.
The process of selecting the overload during a call is called overload resolution. Given the types of the arguments, the compiler selects the best viable function from the list of candidates - the one that can be invoked with the least amount of promotions and implicit conversions.
In the first case the first one myFunction(int) requires 0 conversions for an int argument (3), and the second one requires one conversion (int -> float), so the first one is selected as the best candidate.
In the second case a double argument (3.3) requires a conversion to either int or float, so there is no clear winner and thus the call is ambiguous.
The fix could be to use a float argument (3.3f) or change myFunction(float) to myFunction(double).
Literals have types too. As integer literal 3 is of type int, then the 1st overload is selected.
As floating point literal 3.3 is of type double (but not float; with the suffix f like 3.3f the type is determined as float), the calling is ambiguous because it could convert to both int and float implicitly.
try this:
int x=myFunction(int(3));
float x=myFunction(float(3.3));
I have two overloaded function like below:
void print(int i) { ... }
void print(float f) { ... }
Its giving me this error for print(1.2);:
error: call of overloaded 'print(double)' is ambiguous
Can anyone explain me why?
1.2 is a double literal not a float.
So the compiler requires an explicit disambiguation.
1.2f would work as that is a float literal.
1.2 is a double literal, making the function you're trying to call ambiguous - a double can just as easily be truncated to a float or to an int. Using a float literal (1.2f) or explicitly casting it would solve the problem.
It is interpreting 1.2 as a double. Casting it to a float will solve the problem.
print( float(1.2) );
Consider following code:
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
int aaa(int a) {
cout << a * 0.3 << endl;
return a * 0.3;
}
int main()
{
cout << aaa(35000);
}
It prints out:
10500
10499
Why output differs?
I have a workaround to use "return a * 3 / 10;" but I don't like it.
Edit:
Found that doing "return float(a * 0.3);" gives expected value;
The result of 0.3*35000 is a floating point number, just slightly less than 10500. When printed it is rounded to 10500, but when coerced into an int the fractional digits are discarded, resulting in 10499.
int * double expression yields double, that's what the first thing prints.
Then you convert to int chopping the remaining part (even if it's almost there, sitting at 10500-DBL_EPSILON), and pass that back. The second prints that value.
float-int conversions should be made with care, better not at all.
a * 0.3 has type double. The call inside aaa calls
ostream& operator<< (double val);
whereas the one outside calls
ostream& operator<< (int val);
You'd get a warning (if you turn them on - I suggest you do) that the implicit cast from double to int isn't recommended.
I'm trying
void function(int y,int w)
{
printf("int function");
}
void function(float y,float w)
{
printf("float function");
}
int main()
{
function(1.2,2.2);
return 0;
}
I get an error error like..
error C2668: 'function' : ambiguous call to overloaded function
and when I try to call function(1.2,2) or function(1,2.2) it is printing as "int function"
Please clarify when will the function(float y,float w) be called?
Look at the error message from gcc:
a.cpp:16: error: call of overloaded ‘function(double, double)’ is ambiguous
a.cpp:3: note: candidates are: void function(int, int)
a.cpp:9: note: void function(float, float)
A call to either function would require truncation, which is why neither is preferred over the other. I suspect you really want void function(double y,double w). Remember that in C/C++, the default floating-point type for literals and parameter passing is double, NOT float.
UPDATE
If you really don't want to change the function signature from float to double, you can always use literals that are typed as float. If you add the suffix f to the floating point numbers, they will be typed float.
Your examples would then be function(1.2f, 2f) and function(1, 2.2f).
What is operator overloading?
Sbi's famous Operator overloading faq answers this in great detail.
Why are the two function versions in OP allowed to exist?
Notice they take different function parameter types(int and float) and hence qualify as valid function overloads.
What is overload resolution?
It is the process of selecting the most appropriate function/operator by the compiler implementation. If a best viable function exists and is unique, overload resolution succeeds and produces it as the result. Otherwise overload resolution fails and the invocation is treated as ill-formed and compiler provides a diagnostic. The compiler uses implicit conversion sequence to find the best match function.
C++03 Standard 13.3.3.1 Implicit Conversions:
An implicit conversion sequence is a sequence of conversions used to convert an argument in a function call to the type of the corresponding parameter of the function being called.
The implicit conversion sequences can be one of the following categories:
A standard conversion sequence(13.3.3.1.1)
A user-defined conversion sequence(13.3.3.1.2)
An ellipsis conversion sequence(13.3.3.1.3)
Note that each of these are ranked to determine the best viable function. The best viable function is the one all whose parameters have either better or equal-ranked implicit conversion sequences than all of the other viable functions.The standard details each of these in detail in respective sections. The standard conversion sequence is relevant to this case, it is summarized as:
With enough background on overloading resolution.
let us examine the code examples in OP:
function(1.2,2.2);
Important Rule: 1.2 and 2.2 are literals and they are treated as a double data type.
During implicit conversion sequences mapping:
Both the function parameter literals with double type need a conversion rank to either call the float or int version and none is a better match than other, they score exactly the same on conversion rank. The compiler is unable to detect the best viable match and it reports an ambiguity.
function(1.2,2);
During implicit conversion sequence mapping:
One of the function parameters 2 has an exact match with the int function version while another 1.2 has a conversion rank. For function which takes float as parameters the implicit conversion sequences for both parameters are of conversion rank.
So the function which takes int version scores better than the float version and is the best match and gets called.
How to resolve overloading ambiguity errors?
If you don't want the implicit conversion sequence mapping to throw you off, just provide functions and call them in such a way so that the parameters are a exact match. Since exact match scores over all others, You have a definite guarantee of your desired function getting called. In your case there are two ways to do this:
Solution 1:
Call the function so that parameters are exact match to the functions available.
function(1.2f,2.2f);
Since 1.2f and 2.2f are treated as float types they match exactly to the float function version.
Solution 2:
Provide a function overload which exactly matches the parameter type in called function.
function(double, double){}
Since 1.2 and 2.2 are treated as double the called function is exact match to this overload.
If you don't want to (as explained in the accepted answer):
use float literals, e.g. 1.2f
or change the existing float overload to double
You can add another overload that calls the float one:
void function(double y, double w)
{
function((float)y, (float)w);
}
Your code in main now will call the above function, which will call the float overload.
Function overloading in the above example has ambiguous calls because the return type are same and the 2nd argument in the call of function is double, which can be treated as int or float and hence the compiler confuses to which function to execute.
I hope this help
This code is self explaintary for all combination
You need to send two float to call a float function
#include<iostream>
#include<stdio.h>
using namespace std;
//when arguments are both int
void function(int y,int w) {
printf("int function\n");
}
//when arguments are both double
void function(double y, double w) {
printf("double function\n");
}
//when arguments are both float
void function(float y, float w) {
printf("float function\n");
}
//when arguments are int and float
void function(int y, float x) {
printf("int float function\n");
}
//when arguments are float and int
void function(float y,int w) {
printf("float int function\n");
}
//when arguments are int and double
void function(int y, double w) {
printf("int double function\n");
}
//when arguments are double and int
void function(double y, int x) {
printf("double int function\n");
}
//when arguments are double and float
void function(double y, float x) {
printf("double float function\n");
}
//when arguments are float and double
void function(float y, double x) {
printf("float double function\n");
}
int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
function(1.2,2.2);
function(1.2f,2.2f);
function(1,2);
function(1.2,2.2f);
function(1.2f,2.2);
function(1,2.2);
function(1,2.2f);
function(1.2,2);
function(1.2f,2);
return 0;
}
When sending a primitive type to a function as argument, if the primitive type you are sending is not exactly the same as it requests, you should always cast it to the requested primitive type.
int main()
{
function(1.3f, 2.4f);
function(1.3f, static_cast<float>(2.4));
function(static_cast<float>(1.3), static_cast<float>(2.4));
function(static_cast<float>(1), static_cast<float>(2));
return 0;
}
By default decimal is considered as double. If you want decimal to be floats you suffix it with f.
In your example when you call function(1.2,2.2) the compiler considers the values you have passed it as double and hence you are getting mismatch in function signature.
function(1.2,1.2) ====> function(double,double)
If you want to retain the function signature you need to use floating point suffix while passing floating point literal.
function(1.2f,1.2f) ====> function(float,float).
If you are more interested in knowing about floating point literals you can refer
Why floating point value such as 3.14 are considered as double by default in MSVC?
Like others have said, you give doubles to your overloaded function which is designed for floats. The overloading itself doesn't have any errors.
Here's the correct use of the overloaded function (notice the 'f'´s right after the numbers):
function(1.0f, 2.0f);
function(1.2,2.2);
Those numbers aren't floats, they are doubles. So this code says:
double p1 = 1.2;
double p2 = 2.2;
void (*fn)(double /*decltype(p1)*/, double /*decltype(p2)*/) = function;
The compiler is now looking a "function" which takes two doubles. There is no exact match. So next it looks for a function which takes an argument that can be cast from doubles. There are two matches.
function(int, int);
function(float, float);
You have several options.
Add an exact match overload.
void function(double, double)
{
printf("double function\n");
}
Use casting.
function(static_cast(1.2), static_cast(2.2));
Call "function" with floats instead of doubles:
function(1.2f, 2.2f);
Try This
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
void print(int i){
cout << i << endl;
}
void print(float i){
cout << i << endl;
}
int main(){
print(5);
print(5.5f);
return 0;
}
In function overloading when float can conflict with other data type in other same name functions then probably this is way to over come it. I tried it worked.
Just imagine how your arguments would be passed.
If it is passed as 1.2 and 2.2 to the (int,int) function then it would to truncated to 1 and 2.
If it is passed as 1.2 and 2.2 to the (float,float) it will be processed as is.
So here is where the ambiguity creeps in.
I have found two ways to solve this problem.
First is the use of literals:-
int main()
{
function(1.2F,2.2F);
return 0;
}
Secondly, and the way I like to do it, It always works (and can also be used for C++'s default conversion and promotion).
For int:-
int main()
{
int a=1.2, b=2.2;
function(a,b);
return 0;
}
For Float:-
int main()
{
float a=1.2, b=2.2;
function(a,b);
return 0;
}
So instead of using actual DIGITS. It is better to declare them as a type first, then overload!
See now, if you send it as (1.2,2) or (1,2.2) then compiler can simply send it to the int function and it would work.
However, to send it to the float function the compiler would have to promote 2 to float. Promotion only happens when no match is found.
Refer:-
Computer Science with C++
Sumita Arora
Chapter: Function Overloading