The built ffmpeg.exe is not working as expected - c++

In my c++ application, I want to use ffmpeg lib statically.
I downloaded the ffmpeg-3.4.1 source and built the statically linked ffmpeg using MINGW, Yasm and VS2015 Command prompt as follows,
Downloaded the msys2-x86_64-20161025.exe
On opening the MINGW command prompt, install the required gcc tool using command "pacman -S make gcc diffutils"
Renamed C:\msys64\usr\bin\link.exe to C:\msys64\usr\bin\link_orig.exe
Downloaded the yasm 32 bit exe and set it's path to PATH environment variable. ("%PATH%;D:\ffmpeg")
Run VS2015, and open MINGW- C:\msys64\msys2_shell.cmd -use-full-path
On opening MingW, change pwd to ffmpeg. Run ./configure then make the make install.
The configuration is used : ./configure --prefix="build" --toolchain=msvc --arch=x86 --enable-yasm --enable-asm --disable-shared --enable-static
It is built successfully. I got the bin folder having ffmpeg.exe and ffprobe.exe. The size of ffmpeg.exe is 18 Mb. Also the 7 libs as .a file.
I guess I have to convert.a files to .lib and use in application?
I wanted to confirm if I have built everything correctly. So I tried to convert a .webm file to mp4 using the built ffmpeg.exe. I found that the size of output file is very large and quality is too bad. The input.webm file size was only 15 Mb and output.mp4 file size was about 188 Mb.
Then I downloaded the statically link ffmpeg application from https://ffmpeg.zeranoe.com/builds/. I see the size of ffmpeg.exe is about 35 Mb and It works fine. For same .webm file, it created .mp4 file only 44 Mb and quality is also ok. I figured out that it is built with lots of external libs.
Are external libs creating the difference or my built ffmpeg application is not right? Do I need all those libs in my application too in order to get similar output?
screenshot output.mp4 from built ffmpeg.exe(15 Mb)

Without external libraries linked in, FFmpeg can already do many (but not all) things you will want it to do, and it will also in many cases not be as good at them as it would be with the specialized libs.
So, in short, yes, you need those external libs for the majority of common cases (especially if it involves MP4 and other modern formats).
So that brings us to building FFmpeg:
Building FFmpeg is a nightmarish experience. And that is on linux, where it is the easiest.
On Windows, where you seem to need it, it reaches Lovecraftian levels of horror - which you already glanced at.
Thankfully, this wonderful helper script exists:
https://github.com/rdp/ffmpeg-windows-build-helpers
Set up a virtual machine running a recent Ubuntu (or other distro if you prefer) and follow the "Cross-compiling from a Linux environment" steps.
I do not recommend using the Windows pipeline with cygwin or msys, as that is just incredibly slow compared to doing it all natively on linux (or even in a VM).
The script is also extremely configurable, so you can make changes as you wish. In my case, for example, I removed the "--disable-shared" option from the build script as I needed a dynamic build.

Related

wxWidgets jpeg library build issue

I'm trying to build wxWidgets library into a custom path on a Fedora 27 operative system.
I achieved the wx-config file path recognition and works with the cmake execution. Also, I load libraries and include dirs based on modified wxWidgets finder cmake file that sets thewx-config custom path successfully.
But cmake does not load my wxWidgets configuration. I mean, wx_gtk2u_jpeg-3.1 builded lib could not be founded (suposed to be /usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_jpeg-3.1.so). I need jpeg dependency from wxWidgets for my project.
I'm sure that problem is not about cmake files. However, the problem is wxWidgets compilation because cmake can found the other builded dependencies into /usr/lib/
I actually installed the libjpeg-turbo-devel package that includes the libjpeg.h needed for wxWidgets building without success of libwx_gtk2u_jpeg-3.1.so creation.
The weirdest part is that $ wx-config --libs shows the wx_gtk2u_jpeg-3.1 lib to be linked and the hint paths that it should be founded.
wxWidgets commands for building:
$ ./configure --with-libjpeg=builtin --with-libpng=builtin --with-libtiff=builtin --with-zlib=builtin --with-expat=builtin --enable-webviewwebkit=no --prefix=/opt/cpp_dependencies/2018Q1/usr'
$ make -j 4
$ make install
You can check out my cmake files, the cmake output and wxWidgets building output in order to reproducing it: https://gist.github.com/jjalvarezl/b70accae269ef56c56010bedf157c27f
You can see line 1543 of wxWidgets building output file that jpeg library is buildin, and, 1564 of same file, the make install command that installs all libwx_<lib_name>.so libraries into final /usr/lib path. Anyway, no one contains the needed library.
Please show the exact error message, as it's not clear what the actual problem is. What I can say, is that the different built-in versions of 3rd party libraries, such as libjpeg, are always static libraries, even when wxWidgets themselves are shared. I.e. you're never going to have libwx_gtk2u_jpeg-3.1.so, only .a.
I'd also strongly recommend using system versions of the 3rd party libraries under Unix systems. This means that your wxWidgets applications will get security updates from your OS vendor and you don't risk running into any incompatibilities due to using 2 different versions of the same library in your application.

How to build Crypto++ library on Linux with MinGW?

im trying to port a c++ project from visual studio 2013 to netbeans on ubuntu. The target is a windows executable, so far im able to compile windows exe files from netbeans using mingw as compiler.
The project needs the Crypto++ library and i only have the .lib version for visual studio. To include the library in netbeans i first need to build the Crypto++ library in the .a format.
Its not clear to me how should i do that.
Ive found informations on how to build the library for linux with mingw but not for cross compilation with mingw. The provided GNUmakefile does not work.
Should i set up a vm with windows and mingw and compile the library that way? Or maybe use the qmake "hack" as suggested here http://www.qtcentre.org/threads/28809-Compiling-amp-using-Crypto-with-mingw-version-of-Qt ? The last good Crypto++ version suggested there is quite old. This is confusing, porting the whole project is easier than having the required library.
Im open to any suggestion.
tldr: how to build libcryptopp.a on linux for the cross compilation of a windows exe project
edit:
for example if i cross compile something there are windows libraries in the /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/lib/ folder like libuser32.a. i need to make the equivalend libcryptopp.a.. sorry if is a bit unclear.
if i simply build using the steps in answer (and in the wiki) i end up with a libcryptopp.a file but i suspect is linux-only, cause if i link that library in netbeans in the .exe file im cross compiling i end up with undefined references to cryptopp stuff everywere. the paths are correct, i suspect the library needs to be replaced with the equivalent libcryptopp.a compatible with crosscompiling.
edit2: im trying to follow the answer down here, now im stuck here. after this command to build cryptopp.
make CXX=/usr/bin/i686-w64-mingw32-gcc INCLUDES="-I /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/include" LIBS="-L /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/lib" CXXFLAGS="-std=c++0x"
and many variations of it i always end up with this error
trap.h:26:25: fatal error: Windows.h: No such file or directory
# include
which makes me think its using the right compiler to make a .a lib file for cross compiling the windows .exe with the lib.
however i dont understand whats going on now with the missing header..:(
Also if i try to link the lib file (used with visual studio) i get a lot of linking errors, undefined reference to cryptopp stuff.
ill offer a symbolic beer (a couple of $ of Bitcoins) if someone finds out how to do it.
Inspired by http://wiki.amule.org/wiki/Cross-compilation_for_windows_with_mingw:
sudo apt-get install mingw-w64
git clone https://github.com/weidai11/cryptopp
cd cryptopp
export TARGET=i686-w64-mingw32
CXX=$TARGET-g++ RANLIB=$TARGET-ranlib AR=$TARGET-ar LDLIBS=-lws2_32 make -f GNUmakefile
I've found informations on how to build the library for linux with mingw but not for cross compilation with mingw.
Its relatively easy...
Get Crypto++ ZIP into MinGW.
Unpack Crypto++ ZIP.
Change directories.
Build the library.
Verify All tests passed.
(1) and (2) can be tricky because Cygwin and MinGW are missing a lot of tools. So curl https://www.cryptopp.com/cryptopp563.zip -o cryptopp563.zip may not work.
For (2), I seem to recall ZIP is missing, so unzip -aoq cryptopp563.zip -d cryptopp-5.6.3 may not work.
At step (4), just perform make static dynamic test and be sure it finished with All tests passed.
I do a lot of testing with Cygwin and MinGW. I have a script that copies Crypto++ into the environments from my Desktop. I have not been able to figure out a way to automate it. A recent question on automating it was closed, so no one can supply an answer (see How to automate software testing for Cygwin and MinGW).

How to install protobuf on windows? (Win7x64/MinGW)

C++-Protobuf does not compile in VS2012. Now I want to use MinGW to compile it on windows. Can someone please give me some brief headwords on how to compile protobuf on Win7 x64. I already installed MinGW with the GUI installer. Google writes as MinGW setup notice that I should refer to the Unix installation notes. But I cant figure out how to use the auto tools on windows.
Edit
Okay this is what I've done until now:
$ mount C:/ WinDir
$ cd ./[...]/protobuf.2.4.1
$ ./configure
$ minGW32-make.exe
$ minGW32-make.exe check
minGW32-make.exe runs without errors, but no tests are running and I cant find libprotobuf.lib. There are some libprotobuf.dll but I need the lib, dont I?.
You should have an MSys console together with your MinGW instalation. This console provides an linux-like environment in which you should be able to use autotools normally.
If MSys is not installed, you can grab it from the MinGW site too.
cd to your directory with sources and try the usual:
$ ./configure
$ make
Some libraries cause problems on Windows but most compile well with MinGW and MSys. Come back and add more info to your question if you run into specific problems.
Edit:
minGW32-make.exe runs without errors, but no tests are running and I cant find libprotobuf.lib. There are some libprotobuf.dll but I need the lib, dont I?.
Usually for a dynamic library you'd get protobuf.dll (the dynamic library) and libprotobuf.a (the static wrapper library).
When linking, just pass -lprotobuf to the linker - it will look for both libprotobuf.a and protobuf.lib.
(.lib is another static library format, which is partially handled by MinGW but not native here.)
You will not work with a .lib file when using the MinGW toolchain. Instead, you are able to link against the dll directly. The MinGW Wiki explains this.
I could get dll and lib both. This is when you do not want static lib file and want to use dll and lib file.
You need to make following changes in Protobuf code:
Open the project in VS. Or any other editor. I use VS2015.
In libProtoBuf project settings, in C/C++ Preprocessor add following flags.
PROTOBUF_USE_DLLS; LIBPROTOBUF_EXPORTS;
Those flags will export information from profobuf using dllexport
in ur client code where you are using Protobuf, define: PROTOBUF_USE_DLLS. Which will make protobuf includes to use dllimport.
Once you do step 2, you will see both dll and lib in your output folder. Otherwise, you will always see just dll and not lib file.
Hope this helps. If not, please write a message here and I can help you getting this sorted out.

Why is my program trying to use libluajit-5.1.so.2 instead of libluajit.so?

I have a project I'm writing that uses LuaJIT. I'm trying to run my project on a computer I have not run it on in a while. It used to run just fine but now when I try to run it it complains.
I have LuaJIT in my source tree, and it builds just fine. I'm using CMake to generate my make files, and as far as I can tell CMake finds the file libluajit.so, but when I run my program, I get the following error:
../build/game/game: error while loading shared libraries: libluajit-5.1.so.2: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
I don't know why it's looking for that version of the library instead of libluajit.so. This is Ubuntu linux for what it's worth. I can add more details if necessary, I can add more details if necessary, I'm not sure what info would be helpful to figure out happening.
Edit:
To build and link the program I have these lines in the file CMakeLists.txt (this is abbreviated a bit to just show the relevant bits)
find_package(LuaJIT REQUIRED)
set(Extern_LIBS luajit)
add_executable(proj ${proj_Sources})
target_link_libraries(proj ${Extern_LIBS})
After I run cmake on my source directory, I run make. Then to run it I just run ./proj
When you built it, the ".so" was actually a symlink to the library. Verisioned filenames and SONAMEs are used so that multiple versions of a library can coexist, preventing problems commonly found on... other operating systems whereby older software is incompatible with the newer library, and newer software is incompatible with the older library.

Compiling a static QT application on Windows

I am new to QT and I am enjoying the experience except for the fact I cannot manage to statically link the QT library to the output binaries. When I run the output file outside of the QT directory, I get The program can't start beacuse QtCored4.dll is missing. Obviously QT is dynamically linking their libraries and requesting a .dll I do not have. Is there a way to statically compile QT's libraries into a static binary so none of QT's dlls are required? I ask this because I am already up to 11 .dlls for my project, and I would really like to cut down the amount of files that have to be distributed with my software. Size is not a problem for me. Thanks.
I have tried adding CONFIG += static to the .pro file, but to no avail.
First off, you can't statically link Qt unless you've bought a commercial license. To do so would put you in violation of the LGPL license under which the non-commercial version is distributed. I feel your pain, I've got many, many DLL's to go with my software.
Thankfully, you probably do have the DLL's if you used the installer: you don't need to build from source, that should have been done automatically. You'll find them in Qt\Version\bin, where Qt is the directory you installed Qt, and version is the version of Qt you installed. For example, mine is found in G:\Libraries\Qt\4.7.1\bin.
I did, however, have some issues with not having one of the DLL's built - one for working with OpenGL - and performed a rebuild to do so. I've also done so when I've switched versions of Visual Studio. I think it's handy to be able to do so, it's easy, Open a terminal in the Qt directory, and execute:
configure.exe -platform XXX'
Where XXX denotes the type of build you want to perform. Valid options include win32-msvc2005, win32-msvc2008, win32-msvc2010. So I use:
configure.exe -platform win32-msvc2010'
Other options are detailed here. These instructions apply if you've downloaded the source code, however you might have to add the current directory to the path variable like so:
set PATH=%cd%\bin;%PATH%
The whole procedure should take about an hour.
You need to download the source packet of QT and compile it. It takes some time but is not really complicated.
Download and unzip QT source
Start a compiler shell (Visual Studio or mingw)
Execute configure in the QT source directory - add a flag for static compile here
execute make (Visual Studio nmake)
Wait some hours depending on the speed of your machine