There's something which I cant understand about AWS DynamoDb throughput.
Lets consider strongly consistent reads.
Now, I understand that in this case, 1 unit of capacity would mean I can read up to 4KB of per second.
It's the "per second" bit that slightly confuses me. If you know exactly how quickly you want to read data then you can set the units appropriately. But what if you're not too fussy about the read time?
Say I do have only 1 read unit assigned to my table and I try to read an item which is more than 4KB. Now surely that just means that my read is going to take more than 1 second? That would be fine but the documentation talks about Requests failing. How can AWS determine that I used too many units when I didn't request that the data be read within a particular time?
Maybe I am missing something obvious. Can you someone help clear this up?
DynamoDB can consume up to 300 seconds of unused throughput in burst capacity.
The maximum item size in DynamoDB is 400KB and 1 RCU gives you a read of up to 4KB.
Lets say you want to read an item that is 400KB in size and you have 1 RCU on your table. You could retrieve that item once every 100 seconds.
Because of burst capacity there will always be a time you can read that item, because in fact you can use up to 300 RCUs in one go, not just 1.
Imagine starting the table with that 400KB item. You need to wait 100 seconds without spending any RCUs so that you've earned enough burst capacity to get the item. After 101 seconds you make the request, spend 100 RCUs and get the item. After another 5 seconds you make the request again, but get denied with a Throttling Exception.
So no, DynamoDB will not increase request latency to meet your RCU provision. It either returns your results as fast as possible, or throws an exception.
EDIT: By the way, I should mention that all AWS DynamoDB SDKs handle Throttling Exceptions for you. If you try and read an item, but get denied because you don't have enough throughput available, the SDK backs off and try again. So unless your table really is under provisioned, you shouldn't have to worry about handling Throttling Exceptions.
Related
I have created a DynamoDB table with 1 RCU (manual provisioned capacity).
I have inserted some items to read in that table.
I can launch a scan on my table (which consumes 82 RCUs according to the response).
I understand this is possible because of the burst capacity.
What I don't understand though, is why am I able to keep consuming huge numbers of RCUs for long periods of time.
As you can see on this screenshot, despite the RCU being 1, I have been
consuming around 150 or 200 RCU per minute for more than 1 hour (we can barely see the 1 RCU red line at the bottom).
Why is that? (some of the requests are of course throttled but why so little ?)
How much data do you have in that table?
When you try scan operation from console, it will read items from the table that will consume RCUs.
There are options to configure baseline read/write capacity units and enable autoscaling if you expect variable reads/write requests. If the load starts to increase, dynamo db service will gradually scale to fulfil those requests instead of throttling.
https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/database/amazon-dynamodb-auto-scaling-performance-and-cost-optimization-at-any-scale/
I use Lambda to read from a JSON Api and write in DynamoDB via http request. The JSON Api is very big (has 200k objects) and my function is extremely slow with writing to DynamoDB. I used the regular write function and after 10 min I could only populate 5k rows in my DynamoDB table. I was thinking about using BatchWriteItem but since it can only do 25 puts in one batch, it would still take too much time to write all 200k rows. Is there any better solution?
This will be because you're being throttled.
For Lambda
There are a maximum number of concurrent invocations of Lambdas that can be running at a time, the default limit is 1000 concurrent requests.
If you have more than 1000 concurrent requests at the same time you will need to reach out to AWS Support to increase this, you will also need to provide a business use case for why it needs to support this.
For DynamoDB
Whether you use batch or single PutItem your DynamoDB table is configured with a number of WCU (Write Credit Units) and RCU (Read Credit Units).
A single write credit unit covers 1 write of an item 1Kb or less (every extra kb is another unit). If you exceed this you will start to be throttled for write requests, if you're using the SDK it may use exponential backoff as well to keep attempting to write.
As a solution for this you should do one of the following:
If this is a one time process you can adjust the WCU as a fixed number, then wait 5 minutes for it to increase and then scale down.
If this is a natural flow on your app then enable DynamoDB autoscaling to naturally increase and decrease throughout the day
In addition look at your data modelling as this can lead to throttling too.
In extreme cases, throttling can occur if a single partition receives more than 3,000 RCUs or 1,000 WCUs
I am trying to understand how dynamo DB provisioned throughput (RCU/WCU) works.
I tried 2 scenarios where i made a change in WCU ( 1,000 & 10,000), but the WCU consumed figures which i am getting is same i.e. 809.63.
In a nutshell, i have 123 records distributed in 5 files, each record is of 400 KB ( according to dynamo db limit rule). When executing these cases there was no throttling, and strange thing is script execution time is same i.e. 6 sec, even though i have changed WCU count to 1k & 10k respectively.
My question is why does it behave like this. I would like to know your comments on this.
My assumption is if i decrease/increase WCU count, i should see changes in script execution time, which is not in my case.
Dynamo DB Scenario tests:
WCU/RCU do not increase the speed of a DynamoDB SDK response time, they only set an upper limit for capacity usage.
Read and Write Capacity Units are, as the name suggests, capacity units. They indicate the upper limit of how much capacity your table can handle in terms of read/write. What this means is, in your case since you are using 809.63 WCU, if your WCU is set to above 810 then you won't get any throttled requests. However, if you lower your WCU to 800, you will start seeing your requests being throttled.
If you have consistent TPS and know how many capacity units you will be using, then set just the amount that you will require. In your case, 1k WCU seems sufficient and will not make any difference compared to 10k in terms of performance, unless you use more than 1k WCU, in which case you can provision more capacity or implement auto-scaling to handle it.
See here for more information: Documentation
Edit: As discussed in below comments, if you use more capacity than is provisioned, DynamoDB will temporarily allow a burst of capacity to support it for up to 5 minutes, which could lead to varying results in terms of throttling
Before answering, many Thanks to Deiv & Stu for finding this evidence.
DynamoDB can consume up to 300 seconds of unused throughput in burst capacity.
The maximum item size in DynamoDB is 400KB and 1 RCU gives you a read of up to 4KB.
Lets say you want to read an item that is 400KB in size and you have 1 RCU on your table. You could retrieve that item once every 100 seconds.
Because of burst capacity there will always be a time you can read that item, because in fact you can use up to 300 RCUs in one go, not just 1.
Imagine starting the table with that 400KB item. You need to wait 100 seconds without spending any RCUs so that you've earned enough burst capacity to get the item. After 101 seconds you make the request, spend 100 RCUs and get the item. After another 5 seconds you make the request again, but get denied with a Throttling Exception.
So no, DynamoDB will not increase request latency to meet your RCU provision. It either returns your results as fast as possible, or throws an exception.
I am trying to call dynamodb write operation to write around 60k records.
I have tried to put 1000 write capacity unites for Provisioned Write capacity. But my write operation is still taking lot of time. Also when I check the metrics I can still see the consumed Write capacity units as around 10 per seconds.
My record size is definitely less than 1KB.
Is there a way we can speed up the write operation for dynamodb?
So here is what I figured out.
I changed my call to use batchWrite and my consumed Write capacity units has increased significantly upto 286 write capacity units.
Also the complete write operation finished within couple of minutes.
As mentioned in all above answers using putItem to load large number of data has the latency issues and it affects your consumed capacities. It is always better to batchWrite.
DynamoDB performance, like most databases is highly dependent on how it is used.
From your question, it is likely that you are using only a single DynamoDB partition. Each partition can support up to 1000 write capacity units and up to 10GB of data.
However, you also mention that your metrics show only 10 write units consumed per second. This is very low. Check all the metrics visible for the table in the AWS console. This is a tab per table under the DynamoDB pages. Check for throttling and any errors. Check the consumed capacity is below the provisioned capacity on the charts.
It is possible that there is some other bottleneck in your process.
It looks like you can send more requests per second. You can perform more request, but if you send requests in a loop like this:
for item in items:
table.putItem(item)
You need to mind the roundtrip latency for each request.
You can use two tricks:
First, upload data from multiple threads/machines.
Second, you can use BatchWriteItem method that allow you to write up to 25 items in one request:
The BatchWriteItem operation puts or deletes multiple items in one or
more tables. A single call to BatchWriteItem can write up to 16 MB of
data, which can comprise as many as 25 put or delete requests.
Individual items to be written can be as large as 400 KB.
I am new to DynamoDB and I'm having trouble getting my head around the Provisioned Throughput.
From what I've read it seems you can use this to set the limit of reads and writes at one time. Have I got that wrong?
Basically what I want to do is store emails that are sent through my software. I currently store them in a MySQL database but the amount of data is very large which is why I am looking at DynamoDB. This data I do not need to access very often but when it's needed, I need to be able to access it.
Last month 142,925 emails were sent and each "row" (or email) in the MySQL table I store them in is around 2.5KB.
Sometimes 1 email is sent, other times there might be 3,000 at one time. There's no way of knowing when or how many will be sent at any given time.
Do you have any suggestions on what my Throughputs should be?
And if I did go over, am I correct in understanding that Amazon throttles it and adds them over time? Or does it just throw and error and that's the end of it?
Thanks so much for your help.
I'm using DynamoDB with the Java SDK. When you have an access burst, amazon first tries to keep up, even allowing a bit above the provisioned throughput, after that it start throttling and also throws exceptions. In our code we use this error to break the requests into smaller batches and sometimes force a sleep to cool it down a bit.
When dealing with your situation it really depends on the type of crunching you need to do "from time to time". How much time do you need to get all the data from the table? do you really need to get all of it? And ~100k a month doesn't sound too much for MySQL in my mind.. it all depends on the querying power you need.
Also note that in DynamoDB writes are more expensive than reads so maybe that alone signals that it is not the best fit for your write-intensive problem.
DynamoDb is very expensive, I would suggest not to store emails in dynamo db as each read and write cost good amount, Basically 1 read unit means 4KB data read per sec and 1 write unit means 1KB data write per sec, As you mentioned your each email is 2.5KB, hence while searching data(if you dont have proper key for searching the email) table will be completely scanned that will cost a very good amount as you will need several write units for reading.