How can I find all strings a project that are not being localised?
My goal is to add support for localisation by generating the XLIFF file, via Editor->Export For Localisation. In order to do that, I first added comment for Localiser where needed in the Storyboard.
Next, I need to find in the code all Strings that do not use NSLocalizedString("...", comment:"...").
Is there a way to find all these strings?
I didn't succeed writing a regex to find them, due to my lack of competence in regex.
My goal is to have a regex like this:
[withIdentifier: |NSLocalizedString(]".*"
in order to find all strings surrounded by quotes, and that are not precedeed by some keywords.
I tried with no success using negative look ahead with
A regular expression to exclude a word/string
It's not meant for automated replacement, but just to have a quick view if I haven't forgotten some strings.
Thank you very much!
OBJC
There is a possible way that you can find ALL The Strings which are not used by NSLocalizedString
Goto Product -> Analyze
From Left Panel you can see
Where you can find each and every string which are not Localized
On tap on that
XCode will tell you issue
SWIFT3
I am not Sure about solution NOT TESTED
https://medium.com/#pinmadhon/finding-non-nslocalized-strings-in-xcode-8-in-swift-3-or-objc-589ee279a166
Related
This probably isn't a VS Code-specific question but it's my tool of choice.
I have a log file with a lot of lines containing the following:
Company.Environment.Security.RightsBased.Policies.RightsUserAuthorizationPolicy
Those are debug-level log records that clutter the file I'm trying to process. I'm looking to remove the lines with that content.
I've looked into Regex but, unlike removing a blank line where you have the whole content in the search criteria (making find/replace easy), here I need to match from line break to line break on some criteria between the two, I think...
What are your thoughts on how criteria like that would work?
If the criteria is a particular string and you don't want to have to remember regexes, there is a few handy keyboard shortcuts that can help you out. I'm going to assume you're on a Mac.
Cmd-F to open find.
Paste your string.
Opt-Enter to select all of the instances of the string on the page.
Cmd-L to broaden the selection to the entire line of each instance on the page.
Delete/Backspace to remove those lines.
I think you should be able to just search for ^.*CONTENT.*$\n, where the content is the text you showed us. That is, search on the following pattern:
^.*Company\.Environment\.Security\.RightsBased\.Policies\.RightsUserAuthorizationPolicy.*$\n
And then just replace with empty string.
I have already up-voted answer of #james. But.. still I found one more easy and many feature available extension in VS Code. Here it is
It have much easy options to apply filters.
To match specific case mentioned in question. I am attaching screenshot which display how to use for it. I am posting this for others who come here in search for same issue. (Like I came)
I'm working on a twitter sentiment analysis tool in C++. So far I get the tweets from Twitter and I process them a bit ( lowercase, remove RT, remove # and URLs).
The next step is to remove emoticons and all those special characters. How does one do that? before you jump me, I already looked at other similar questions but none of them deals with C++. Mostly R,Python and PHP.
I was thinking to use regex however I can't get it to work. I tried it with removal of hashtags and URLs and I gave up. I ended up using normal string:find and find_first_of.
Is there any library or method available to get rid of those emoticons and special stuff ?
Thanks
I would recommend using regular expressions for this. Now you have two options, you can either extract only the characters you are interested in (if you are working with English tweets this would probably be A-Z,a-z, numbers and maybe some symbols, depending on your needs), or you can select invalid characters (emoticons) and replace them with an empty string.
I only have experience with Qt's RegularExpression engine, but the c++ standard library has regex support (although I'm not sure how good it is with Unicode), but the ICU provides a regex library too.
*I'd provide more links but I don't have enough reputation yet :/
I'm working with load files and trying to write a regex that will check for any rows in the file that do not have the correct number of delimiters. Let's pretend the delimiter is % (I'm not sure this text field supports the delimiters that are in the load file). The regex I wrote that finds all rows that are correct is:
^%([^%]*%){20}$
Sometimes it's more beneficial to find any rows that do not have the correct number of delimiters, so to accomplish that, I wrote this:
(^%([^%]*%){0,19}$)|(^%([^%]*%){21,}$)
I'm concerned about the efficiency of this (and any regex I write in general), so I'm wondering if there's a better way to write it, or if the way I wrote it is fine. I thought maybe there would be some way to use alternation with the repetition tokens, such as:
{0,19}|{21,}
but that doesn't seem to work.
If it's helpful to know, I'm just searching through the files in Sublime Text, which I believe uses PCRE. I'm also open to suggestions for making the first regex better in general, although I've found it to work pretty well even in exceptionally large load files.
If your regex engine supports negative lookaheads, you can slightly modify your original regex.
^(?!%([^%]*%){20}$)
The regex above is useful for test only. If you want to capture, then you need to add .* part.
^(?!%([^%]*%){20}$).*$
This is for all you regex hounds.
I need to filter my search in eclipse when I do a file search.
I am looking for aTracker but this brings back hundreds of results so I want to be able to thin the results out.
First off I would like to remove aTracker.sendException and possibly others.
This is a common problem for me so I'm finally posting for a solution so I don't need to go fetch my waders every time a search like this comes along.
To match all aTracker except aTracker.sendException, you can use a negative lookahead if eclipse supports it:
aTracker(?!\.sendException)
You should check the 'Regular expression' box I think.
I need to enhance the search functionality on a page listing user accounts. Rather than have multiple search boxes for each possible field, or a drop down menu where the user can only search against one field, I'd like a single search box and to use a gmail like syntax. That's the best way I can describe it, and what I mean by a gmail like search syntax is being able to type the following into the input box:
username:bbaggins type:admin "made up plc"
When the form is submitted, the search string should be split into it's separate parts, which will allow me to construct a SQL query. So for example, type:admin would form part of the WHERE clause so that it would find any record where the field type is equal to admin and the same for username. The text in quotes may be a free text search, but I'm not sure on that yet.
I'm thinking that a regular expression or two would be the best way to do this, but that's something I'm really not good at. Can anyone help to construct a regular expression which could be used for this purpose? I've searched around for some pointers but either I don't know what to search for or it's not out there as I couldn't find anything obvious. Maybe if I understood regular expressions better it would be easier :-)
Cheers,
Adam
No, you would not use regular expressions for this. Just split the string on spaces in whatever language you're using.
You don't necessarily have to use a regex. Regexes are powerful, but in many cases also slow. Regex also does not handle nested parameters very well. It would be easier for you to write a script that uses string manipulation to split the string and extract the keywords and the field names.
If you want to experiment with Regex, try the online REGex tester. Find a tutorial and play around, it's fun, and you should quickly be able to produce useful regexes that find any words before or after a : character, or any sentences between " quotation marks.
thanks for the answers...I did start doing it without regex and just wondered if a regex would be simpler. Sounds like it wouldn't though, so I'll go back to the way I was doing it and test it again.
Good old Mr Bilbo is my go to guy for any naming needs :-)
Cheers,
Adam