I have this in config.toml:
baseURL = "https://my-username.github.io/blog/"
and there is a static file at static/img/foo.png.
Now, in content/posts/bar.md, I have the following content:
---
title: "Bar"
---
The picture isn't showing after I started the hugo server, so I inspected elements, and found out that Hugo generated the following URL for it:
http://localhost:1313/blog/posts/bar/img/hireme.png
This is not what I expect; it should be
http://localhost:1313/blog/img/hireme.png
When I use , the picture is displayed correctly, but this is quite strange: /blog/ is part of baseURL, why do I need to type it again?
I think you should use <base> tag to make baseURL for static files.
Add the <base> tag into <head>:
<base href="{{ .Site.BaseURL }}">
And then you can insert image in post like this:
References:
https://www.w3schools.com/tags/tag_base.asp
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Element/base
In a simple setup where your site lives in the domain's root, a absolute reference to the image would be a standard practice. However, in your case where the site is nested, a more crafty solution is necessary.
I suggest using a shortcode to solve your dilemma. Just simply create a shortcode that takes in a resource file path and spits out the desired absolute path every time. The advantage to this approach is flexibility for future resource relocation to a cdn for example.
Your markdown code will be something like this:
![foo]({{< resource url="img/foo.png" >}})
Your shortcode template will be something like this:
{{ .Site.BaseURL }}{{ .Get "url" }}
Create a file named 'resource.html' in 'layouts/shortcodes/' folder, and drop in the shortcode template code above.
So when you decide you want to switch to a cdn you could easily do this:
://cdn.example.com/{{ .Get "url" }}
Related
I use this template to list links:
<a class="col-sm-offset-1 col-sm" href="{{ oLink.link }}" target="_blank">{{ oLink.text }}</a>
oLink.link could be something like: 'http://www.google.com' or '\\shared_files\GMO-M0960\GMO-M0960_01.pdf'
oLink.text is just a simple text to be used.
Links reference to another webpage work correctly, but links reference to files inside a shared directory don't (new window never opens)
It works only if I right click on the link and then copy its url in a new window.
Do I need to configure something? This seems to be so simple.
I have in a twig template an image url, like "public://path/to/image.png". I want to get "sites/default/files/path/to/image.png" to use it in the template.
I thought it should work with something like this:
{{ url ('public://path/to/image.png') }}
or
{{ file_uri_scheme ('public://path/to/image.png') }}
But all I get are errors. I know that the second one is a PHP function, but is there any chance to do it with TWIG?
You can use the twig function file_url to get a relative path:
{{ file_url('public://path/to/image.png') }}
Checkout the documentation under https://www.drupal.org/node/2486991
It accepts a uri and creates a relative path to the file. At least in Drupal 8.1.
Retrieving a URL to a page from a "path" is deprecated in D8. https://www.drupal.org/node/2073811
EDIT:
nah im wrong and just missunderstood the spelling ;/
the correct answer is: they are working on a twig extension.
i was searching for a way to get my image uri / urls and achieved it with
{{ node.field_image[delta].entity.url }}
I'm working on a project in Symfony2 and I have several small pieces of html that need to be included in one of my main views. According to the official Twig documentation I should be able to simply use {% include 'filename.html' %} but in Symfony unless the filename ends in ".html.twig" it throws and error saying it cannot find the file. I'd like to avoid using Twig templates for these files since they have no dynamic content and lots of double braces (they're javascript templates) and requiring the template designer to have to wrap every one of these files in {% raw %} tags seems like a really Kludgey way to do it.
I also came upon the same problem trying to find a solution to include files (mustache templates) as raw in Twig templates so Twig doesn't try to parse them.
At first I had my mustache template files named simply sometemplate.html and wrapped in {% raw %} tags. This worked for a while, but then I started using PhpStorm IDE with the Handlebars plugin (for mustache syntax). For PhpStorm to recognize the files as mustache syntax, they need to have a unique file extension (.mustache by default), so I renamed my sometemplate.html to sometemplate.mustache but I really disliked the idea that my mustache templates needed to be wrapped with Twig tags. So I ended up doing what #rdjs said in his option 3. This is the best solution imo.
Here's the working Twig extension function I made:
function twig_include_raw(Twig_Environment $env, $template) {
return $env->getLoader()->getSource($template);
}
$twig->addFunction('include_raw', new Twig_Function_Function('twig_include_raw', array('needs_environment' => true)));
With this in place you can easily include files as "raw" without Twig parsing them by doing:
{{ include_raw('sometemplate.mustache')|raw }}
I even made a Twig macro for simplifying including mustache templates to HTML head sections:
{% macro mustache_script(id, file) -%}
<script id="{{ id }}" type="text/x-mustache-template">
{{ include_raw(file)|raw }}
</script>
{%- endmacro %}
And after importing the file with the above macro to your Twig template ({% import "macros.twig" %} for example), you can easily import mustache template files in your Twig templates by simply doing {{ mustache_script('sometemplate_tpl', 'sometemplate.mustache') }} inside a HTML <head> section.
I hope this helps someone who's looking for a solution to the same problem.
A quick recap on twig file extensions (taken from the documentation):
Every template name also has two extensions that specify the format and engine for that template.
AcmeBlogBundle:Blog:index.html.twig - HTML format, Twig engine
AcmeBlogBundle:Blog:index.html.php - HTML format, PHP engine
AcmeBlogBundle:Blog:index.css.twig - CSS format, Twig engine
By default, any Symfony2 template can be written in either Twig or PHP, and the last part of the extension (e.g. .twig or .php) specifies which of these two engines should be used. The first part of the extension, (e.g. .html, .css, etc) is the final format that the template will generate.
Therefore it makes sense to me that including a file as .html would be at the least ambiguous even if it didn't throw an error.
So you have 3 choices:
If the files are purely javascript then include them as script tags in your page.
If they are mixed HTML and JS then escape the JS with {% raw %} and include the files as foo.html.twig templates. If there are lots of scripts being included like this then most likely your designers could do with a little refactoring and move the bulk of their scripts to external files (see option 1)
If you really insist you could always write a Twig extension to include raw HTML files. (EDIT: See #Haprog's answer below for more details on this option).
{{ include_html('foo/bar.html') }}
UPDATE 2015 twig has since added the source function:
{{ source('AcmeSomeBundle:Default:somefile.html.twig') }}
Kudos to #Nigel Angel in the comments below for option 4.
I came accross this post, as I had a similar question. After an hour or so searching and trying, I found out, that as from Twig Version 1.15 the "source Function" was added.
Maybe that helps someone in the future.
Follow up on Kari, if you're in an extension.. you can apply it this way.
public function getFunctions() {
return [
'include_raw' => new \Twig_Function_Method($this, 'twig_include_raw', array('needs_environment'=> true, 'is_safe'=> array('all')))
];
}
And that'd be a $this->twig_include_raw type method. You'd include within your template as:
{{ include_raw("my/file/here.html.twig") }}
No need for " | raw".
I'm running the developer's Django server while writing a simple view and it seems whenever I request a page, the console shows that there are 2 GETs for the same URL. What would cause this happen? I'm not using any redirects, so I don't see how a 2nd request would be made?
EDIT: It appears to be caused by the template. Changing to a blank html file for a template resolved the issue. The question is why? I have multiple {% if %} {% endif %} sections, with no elses. Could that be an issue?
It also could be Firefox following a WC3 directive under which it's supposed to dual load if certain tags come empty or broken, for example, a without a src="" etc. That being said, I saved off the rendered HTML on receipt and moved it into a static file, where I added the same headers as the real checkout and a small DB log of all accesses.
I just stumble upon this problem and fixed it removing my img wit src=""
Please confirm, if Django is redirecting after appending slash to your url. Its the property APPEND_SLASH in your settings.py controls that.
The second request is probably caused by a mis-configured asset link - a script, style or img tag which is empty or omits the initial / and is therefore re-requesting the page.
It could be your shortcut/favicon
Do you have link rel="shortcut icon" in your page template? Comment it out to see if it removes the second request
In my case : I have the same javascript code in 2 files : one in the base template and the same one in another template. As I use ajax to not reload all the page I got the call 2x, then 4x, and 8x, ...
The solution is the use the javascript code only in mybase.html
Hereafter my js code :
<script type="text/javascript">
// Code jQuery Ici
$(document).ready(function(){
// GET
$(".ajax_onglet_get").click(function(e){
var lien = $(this).attr('href');
$('#zone_travail').fadeOut('fast', function(){
$('#zone_travail').load(lien, function() {
$('#zone_travail').fadeIn('fast');
});
});
e.preventDefault()
});
});
I trying to implement the url template tag into my project.
I have a button that allows the user to save the data he is seeing.
So the url of this button is this:
(2)url(r'^nameviews/download/$', 'my.path.is.this.to.download' name="load"),
template:
Download
the url of the page that shows the information, and where the button is located is:
(1)(r'^nameviews/$', path.to.page),
but when I tried to click on the button (it should appear the url 2)it doesn't open the file with the data but instead gives me the same url that the main page (1)
the html validator gives me a error on the
<a href="">
It seems it doesn't recognize the url tag.
Anyone has any idea?
Resolved! I didn't really understood what's happen because I didn't change much but should have been some silly mistake.
Sorry!
Thanks any way :)
EDIT
Be careful with the order of the urls. At urls.py try this order:
url(r'^nameviews/download/$', name_of_view, name="load"),
url(r'^nameviews/$', name_of_view, name="first page"),
name_of_view is equal if the view is the same