When I run docker-compose up in my Docker project it fails with the following message:
Error starting userland proxy: listen tcp 0.0.0.0:3000: bind: address already in use
netstat -pna | grep 3000
shows this:
tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:3000 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN -
I've already tried docker-compose down, but it doesn't help.
In your case it was some other process that was using the port and as indicated in the comments, sudo netstat -pna | grep 3000 helped you in solving the problem.
While in other cases (I myself encountered it many times) it mostly is the same container running at some other instance. In that case docker ps was very helpful as often I left the same containers running in other directories and then tried running again at other places, where same container names were used.
How docker ps helped me:
docker rm -f $(docker ps -aq) is a short command which I use to remove all containers.
Edit: Added how docker ps helped me.
This helped me:
docker-compose down # Stop container on current dir if there is a docker-compose.yml
docker rm -fv $(docker ps -aq) # Remove all containers
sudo lsof -i -P -n | grep <port number> # List who's using the port
and then:
kill -9 <process id> (macOS) or sudo kill <process id> (Linux).
Source: comment by user Rub21.
I had the same problem. I fixed this by stopping the Apache2 service on my host.
You can kill the process listening on that port easily with one command below :
kill -9 $(lsof -t -i tcp:<port#>)
ex :
kill -9 $(lsof -t -i tcp:<port#>)
or for ubuntu:
sudo kill -9 `sudo lsof -t -i:8000`
Man page for lsof : https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man8/lsof.8.html
-9 is for hard kill without checking any deps.
(Not related, but might be useful if its PORT 5000 mystery) - the culprit process is due to Mac OS monterery.
The port 5000 is commonly used to serve local development servers. When updating to the latest macOS operating system, I was unable the docker to bind to port 5000, because it was already in use. (You may find a message along the lines of Port 5000 already in use.)
By running lsof -i :5000, I found out the process using the port was named ControlCenter, which is a native macOS application. If this is happening to you, even if you use brute force (and kill) the application, it will restart itself. In my laptop, lsof -i :5000 returns that Control Center is being used by process id 433. I could do killall -p 433, but macOS keeps restarting the process.
The process running on this port turns out to be an AirPlay server. You can deactivate it in
System Preferences › Sharing, and unchecking AirPlay Receiver to release port 5000.
I had same problem,
docker-compose down --rmi all (in the same directory where you run docker-compose up)
helps
UPD: CAUTION - this will also delete the local docker images you've pulled (from comment)
For Linux/Unix:
Simple search for linux utility using following command
netstat -nlp | grep 8888
It'll show processing running at this port, then kill that process using PID (look for a PID in row) of that process.
kill PID
In some cases it is critical to perform a more in-depth debugging to the problem before stopping a container or killing a process.
Consider following the checklist below:
1) Check you current docker compose environment
Run docker-compose ps. If port is in use by another container, stop it with docker-compose stop <service-name-in-compose-file> or remove it by replacing stop with rm.
2) Check the containers running outside your current workspace
Run docker ps to see list of all containers running under your host.
If you find the port is in use by another container, you can stop it with docker stop <container-id>.
(*) Because you're not under the scope of the origin compose environment - it is a good practice first to use docker inspect to gather more information about the container that you're about to stop.
3) Check if port is used by other processes running on the host
For example if the port is 6379 run:
$ sudo netstat -ltnp | grep ':6379'
tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:6379 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 915/redis-server 12
tcp6 0 0 ::1:6379 :::* LISTEN 915/redis-server 12
(*) You can also use the lsof command which is mainly used to retrieve information about files that are opened by various processes (I suggest running netstat before that).
So, In case of the output above the PID is 915. Now you can run:
$ ps j 915
PPID PID PGID SID TTY TPGID STAT UID TIME COMMAND
1 915 915 915 ? -1 Ssl 123 0:11 /usr/bin/redis-server 127.0.0.1:6379
And see the ID of the parent process (PPID) and the execution command.
You can also run: $ pstree -s <PID> to a visual display of the process and its related processes.
In our case we can see that the process probably is a daemon (PPID is 1) - In that case consider running: A) $ cat /proc/<PID>/status in order to get a more in-depth information about the process like the number of threads spawned by the process, its capabilities, etc'.
B) $ systemctl status <PID> in order to see the systemd unit that caused the creation of a specific process. If the service is not critical - you can stop and disable the service.
4) Restart Docker service
Run: sudo service docker restart.
5) You reached this point and..
Only if its not placing your system at risk - consider restarting the server.
In my case it was
Error starting userland proxy: listen tcp 0.0.0.0:9000: bind: address already in use
And all that I need is turn off debug listening in php storm
Most probably this is because you are already running a web server on your host OS, so it conflicts with the web server that Docker is attempting to start.
So try this one-liner before trying anything else:
sudo service apache2 stop; sudo service nginx stop; sudo nginx -s stop;
I had apache running on my ubuntu machine. I used this command to kill it!
sudo /etc/init.d/apache2 stop
I was getting the below error when i was trying to launch a new container -
listen tcp 0.0.0.0:8080: bind: address already in use.
To check which process is running on port 8080, run below command:
netstat -tulnp | grep 8080
i got the output below
[root#ip-112-x6x-2x-xxx.xxxxx.compute.internal (aws_main) ~]# netstat -tulnp | grep 8080 tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:8080 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN **12749**/java [root#ip-112-x6x-2x-xxx.xxxxx.compute.internal (aws_main) ~]#
run
kill -9 12749
Then try to relaunch the container it should work
If redis server is started as a service, it will restart itself when you using kill -9 <process_id> or sudo kill -9 `sudo lsof -t -i:<port_number>` . In that case you will need to stop the redis service using following command.
sudo service redis-server stop
I upgraded my docker this afternoon and ran into the same problem. I tried restarting docker but no luck.
Finally, I had to restart my computer and it worked. Definitely a bug.
Check docker-compose.yml, it might be the case that the port is specified twice.
version: '3'
services:
registry:
image: mysql:5.7
ports:
- "3306:3306" <--- remove either this line or next
- "127.0.0.1:3306:3306"
Changing network_mode: "bridge" to "host" did it for me.
This with
version: '2.2'
services:
bind:
image: sameersbn/bind:latest
dns: 127.0.0.1
ports:
- 172.17.42.1:53:53/udp
- 172.17.42.1:10000:10000
volumes:
- "/srv/docker/bind:/data"
environment:
- 'ROOT_PASSWORD=secret'
network_mode: "host"
I ran into the same issue several times. Restarting docker seems to do the trick
A variation of #DmitrySandalov's answer: I had tomcat/java running on 8080, which needed to keep going. Looked at the docker-compose.yml file and altered the entry for 8080 to another of my choosing.
nginx:
build: nginx
ports:
#- '8080:80' <-- original entry
- '8880:80'
- '8443:443'
Worked perfectly. (The only wrinkle is the change will be wiped if I ever update the project, since it's coming from an external repo.)
At first, make sure which service you are running in your specific port. In your case, you are already using port number 3000.
netstat -aof | findstr :3000
now stop that process which is running on specific port
lsof -i tcp:3000
I resolve the issue by restarting Docker.
It makes more sense to change the port of the docker update instead of shutting down other services that use port 80.
Just a side note if you have the same issue and is with Windows:
In my case the process in my way is just grafana-server.exe. Because I first downloaded the binary version and double click the executable, and it now starts as a service by user SYSTEM which I cannot taskkill (no permission)
I have to go to "Service manager" of Windows and search for service "Grafana", and stop it. After that port 3000 is no longer occupied.
Hope that helps.
The one that was using the port 8888 was Jupiter and I had to change the configuration file of Jupiter notebook to run on another port.
to list who is using that specific port.
sudo lsof -i -P -n | grep 9
You can specify the port you want Jupyter to run uncommenting/editing the following line in ~/.jupyter/jupyter_notebook_config.py:
c.NotebookApp.port = 9999
In case you don't have a jupyter_notebook_config.py try running jupyter notebook --generate-config. See this for further details on Jupyter configuration.
Before it was running on :docker run -d --name oracle -p 1521:1521 -p 5500:5500 qa/oracle
I just changed the port to docker run -d --name oracle -p 1522:1522 -p 5500:5500 qa/oracle
it worked fine for me !
On my machine a PID was not being shown from this command netstat -tulpn for the in-use port (8080), so i could not kill it, killing the containers and restarting the computer did not work. So service docker restart command restarted docker for me (ubuntu) and the port was no longer in use and i am a happy chap and off to lunch.
maybe it is too rude, but works for me. restart docker service itself
sudo service docker restart
hope it works for you also!
I have run the container with another port, like... 8082 :-)
I came across this problem. My simple solution is to remove the mongodb from the system
Commands to remove mongodb in Ubuntu:
sudo apt-get purge mongodb mongodb-clients mongodb-server mongodb-dev
sudo apt-get purge mongodb-10gen
sudo apt-get autoremove
Let me add one more case, because I had the same error and none of the solutions listed so far works:
serv1:
...
networks:
privnet:
ipv4_address: 10.10.100.2
...
serv2:
...
# no IP assignment, no dependencies
networks:
privnet:
ipam:
driver: default
config:
- subnet: 10.10.100.0/24
depending on the init order, serv2 may get assigned the IP 10.10.100.2 before serv1 is started, so I just assign IPs manually for all containers to avoid the error. Maybe there are other more elegant ways.
I have the same problem and by stopping docker container it was resolved.
sudo docker container stop <container-name>
i solved with this sudo service redis-server stop
I currently have an AWS server set up with docker to run the Keycloak docker container. For SSL/TLS, there is an AWS loadbalancer configured to point https/443 traffic to the container and have it receive it over 8080, terminating the encryption connection on said load balancer.
When creating the container with the following command, I am able to browse to and log into the keycloak service by browsing to the server's IP address.
docker run --name keycloak -v keybase-storage -p 8080:8080 -e KEYCLOAK_USER=admin -e KEYCLOAK_PASSWORD=TempAdminPassword jboss/keycloak However if I try to log into the server by browsing to the URL, I am redirected to the url http://default-host:8080/auth/admin/ and the browser showing a connection error page.
When trying to find a solution to this, I found how to pass java options to the container when it is first run, and using the resources from this page I used the following command to start the container(URL replaced for privacy concerns)
docker run --name keycloak -v keybase-storage -p 8080:8080 -e KEYCLOAK_USER=admin -e KEYCLOAK_PASSWORD=TempAdminPassword -e JAVA_OPTS_APPEND="-Dkeycloak.frontendUrl=https://sso.IntendedURL.com" jboss/keycloak However this yields the same results when trying to browse to the page.
The main clue I have to go off of right now is this line near the end of the previously shown docker run command, which reads as follows:
19:23:00,039 INFO [org.wildfly.extension.undertow] (ServerService Thread Pool -- 67) WFLYUT0021: Registered web context: '/auth' for server 'default-server'
What I believe I need to do now is to either change the config of the docker container after it has been created(have been unable to edit files using docker exec, so this is less likely) or to pass a java option into the run command when the container is first started.
Please let me know if you have any questions or if I can provide any other information.
Thank you.
Environment information:
Operating system
Amazon Linux 2
Docker version
19.03.13-ce, build 4484c46
Keycloak version
12.0.1(WildFly Core 13.0.3.Final)
Setup is a docker container running ubuntu 16.04, clang/lldb 6.0. I want to be able to remote debug an application, for now via another terminal instead of an IDE.
My docker file
FROM ubuntu:16.04
RUN apt update
RUN apt install -y curl git nano cmake build-essential xz-utils
RUN apt install -y clang-6.0 lldb-6.0
EXPOSE 2000
CMD [ "/bin/bash" ]
I spin my container as follows
docker run --privileged --cap-add=SYS_PTRACE --security-opt seccomp=unconfined -it -v ~/Developer:/Developer -p 2000:2000 --name cpp-dev ubuntu-clang-dev
Debugging from within the container works
I can successfully compile and debug my program with clang++ and lldb when inside the container.
How I start my lldb-server
lldb-server-6.0 platform --server --listen *:2000
Now, from a separate terminal I do:
> lldb
> platform select remote-linux
> platform connect connect://localhost:2000
> target create test
> b main (which returns breakpoint main at main.cpp:5)
> process launch
Errors:
(lldb) process launch
error: connect remote failed (Failed to connect port)
error: process launch failed: Failed to connect port
What am I doing wrong?
I found it myself.
LLDB-server listens on port 2000 for incoming connections. Upon receiving such a request it spawns a separate 'lldb g : '. This secret port is not open to the outside world from my vm.
The easiest trick that works for me is to just have the container run on the same network as the host. Hence, once I start my container with:
docker run --privileged --cap-add=SYS_PTRACE --security-opt seccomp=unconfined -it -v ~/Developer:/Developer **--network host** --name cpp-dev ubuntu-clang-dev
it all works fine and I can run the lldb from the host as advertised.
You can specify the ports used by LLDB-server as such:
lldb-server platform --listen "*:31166" --server --min-gdbserver-port 31200 --max-gdbserver-port 31300
And of course you need to expose those ports in your Dockerfile:
EXPOSE 31166
EXPOSE 31200-31300
And also when you run the container:
docker run --privileged --name vapor-server -p 8080:8080 -p 31166:31166 -p 31200-31300:31200-31300 vapor-image
Please note you need to run the docker as privileged (--privileged option), otherwise attaching the debugger will fail with an Operation not Permitted error.
when running the following command:
cmd /c C:\sonar-runner-2.4\bin\sonar-runner.bat
(sonar runner is installed on the build machine)
i get the following errors:
ERROR: Sonar server 'http://localhost:9000' can not be reached
ERROR: Error during Sonar runner execution
ERROR: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused: connect
ERROR: Caused by: Connection refused: connect
what can cause these errors?
Hi dinesh,
this is my sonar-runner.properties file:
sonar.projectKey=NDM
sonar.projectName=NDM
sonar.projectVersion=1.0
sonar.visualstudio.solution=NDM.sln
#sonar.sourceEncoding=UTF-8
sonar.web.host:sonarqube
sonar.web.port=9000
# Enable the Visual Studio bootstrapper
sonar.visualstudio.enable=true
# Unit Test Results
sonar.cs.vstest.reportsPaths=TestResults/*.trx
# Required only when using SonarQube < 4.2
sonar.language=cs
sonar.sources=.
As you can see i set the sonar.web.host:sonarqube
sonar.web.port=9000 but when i run sonar-runner.bat i still get the
ERROR: Sonar server 'http://localhost:9000' can not be reached - why is it still looking for localhost:9000
and not sonarqube:9000 as i set?
i saw that in the log of sonar-runner.bat there the following line:
INFO: Work directory: D:\sTFS\26091\Sources\NDM\Source..sonar
while my solution is in D:\sTFS\26091\Sources\NDM\Source\
could this be the problem?
thanks,
Guy
If you use SonarScanner CLI with Docker, you may have this error because the SonarScanner container can not access to the Sonar UI container.
Note that you will have the same error with a simple curl from another container:
docker run --rm byrnedo/alpine-curl 127.0.0.1:9000
% Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current
Dload Upload Total Spent Left Speed
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:-- 0
curl: (7) Failed to connect to 127.0.0.1 port 8080: Connection refused
The solution is to connect the SonarScanner container to the same docker network of your sonar instance, for instance with --network=host:
docker run --network=host -e SONAR_HOST_URL='http://127.0.0.1:9000' --user="$(id -u):$(id -g)" -v "$PWD:/usr/src" sonarsource/sonar-scanner-cli
(other parameters of this command comes from the SonarScanner CLI documentation)
I got the same issue, and I changed to IP and it working well
Go to System References --> Network --> Advanced --> Open TCP/IP tabs --> copy the IPv4 Address.
change that IP instead localhost
Hope this can help
You should configure the sonar-runner to use your existing SonarQube server. To do so, you need to update its conf/sonar-runner.properties file and specify the SonarQube server URL, username, password, and JDBC URL as well. See https://docs.sonarqube.org/display/SCAN/Analyzing+with+SonarQube+Scanner for details.
If you don't yet have an up and running SonarQube server, then you can launch one locally (with the default configuration) - it will bind to http://localhost:9000 and work with the default sonar-runner configuration. See https://docs.sonarqube.org/latest/setup/get-started-2-minutes/ for details on how to get started with the SonarQube server.
For others who ran into this issue in a project that is not using a sonar-runners.property file, you may find (as I did) that you need to tweak your pom.xml file, adding a sonar.host.url property.
For example, I needed to add the following line under the 'properties' element:
<sonar.host.url>https://sonar.my-internal-company-domain.net</sonar.host.url>
Where the url points to our internal sonar deployment.
For me the issue was that the maven sonar plugin was using proxy servers defined in the maven settings.xml. I was trying to access the sonarque on another (not localhost alias) and so it was trying to use the proxy server to access it. Just added my alias to nonProxyHosts in settings.xml and it is working now. I did not face this issue in maven sonar plugin 3.2, only after i upgraded it.
<proxy>
<id>proxy_id</id>
<active>true</active>
<protocol>http</protocol>
<host>your-proxy-host/host>
<port>your-proxy-host</port>
<nonProxyHosts>localhost|127.0.*|other-non-proxy-hosts</nonProxyHosts>
</proxy>enter code here
The issue occurred with me in a different way a little a while ago,
I had a docker container running normally in the main network of my host machine accessible via the browser on the normal localhost:9000. But whenever the scanner wants to connect to the server it couldn't despite being on the same network of the host.
I made sure they are, because on the docker run command I mentioned --network=bridge
So the trick was that I pointed to the actual local ip of mine instead of just writing localhost
you can know the ip of your machine by typing ipconfig on windows or ifconfig on linux
so on the scan docker run command I have pointed to the server like that -Dsonar.host.url=http://192.168.1.2:9000 where 192.168.1.2 is my local host address
That was my final docker commands to run the Server:
docker run -d --name sonarqube \
--network=bridge \
-p 9000:9000 \
-e SONAR_JDBC_USERNAME=<db username> \
-e SONAR_JDBC_PASSWORD=<db password>\
-v sonarqube_data:/opt/sonarqube/data \
-v sonarqube_extensions:/opt/sonarqube/extensions \
-v sonarqube_logs:/opt/sonarqube/logs \
sonarqube:community
and that's for the Scanner:
docker run \
--network=bridge \
-v "<local path of the project to scan>:/usr/src" sonarsource/sonar-scanner-cli \
-Dsonar.projectKey=<project key> \
-Dsonar.sources=. \
-Dsonar.host.url=http://<local-ip>:9000 \
-Dsonar.login=<token>
In the config file there is a colon instead of an equal sign after the sonar.web.host.
Is:
sonar.web.host:sonarqube
Should be
sonar.web.host=sonarqube
In sonar.properties file in conf folder I had hardcoaded ip of my machine where sobarqube was installed in property sonar.web.host=10.9 235.22 I commented this and it started working for me.
Please check if postgres(or any other database service) is running properly.
When you allow the 9000 port to firewall on your desired operating System the following error "ERROR: Sonar server 'http://localhost:9000' can not be reached" will remove successfully.In ubuntu it is just like as by typing the following command in terminal "sudo ufw allow 9000/tcp" this error will removed from the Jenkins server by clicking on build now in jenkins.
I'm new to docker and haproxy.. I tried to follow the example from the official docker hub repo.
So, I have Dockerfile
FROM haproxy:1.5
COPY haproxy.cfg /usr/local/etc/haproxy/haproxy.cfg
and simple haproxy config (which I expect to redirect local calls to my EB instance)
global
# daemon
maxconn 256
defaults
mode http
timeout connect 5000ms
timeout client 50000ms
timeout server 50000ms
frontend http-in
bind *:80
default_backend servers
backend servers
server server1 {my-app}.elasticbeanstalk.com:80 maxconn 32
Build and run
$ docker build .
$ docker run --rm d4598bcc293f
Container starts and stucks, Ctrl+C doen't stop it. "docker kill" helps only.
My EB resource is up and running
$ curl {my-app}.elasticbeanstalk.com/status
{
"status": "OK"
}
But local calls fail
$ boot2docker ip
192.168.59.104
$ curl 192.168.59.104/status
curl: (7) Failed to connect to 192.168.59.104 port 80: Connection refused
What am I missing or doing wrong?
Thank you!
UPDATE: I've found the problem with calls redirections. Wrong port
number in haproxy.cfg.
But this problem still annoys me... Container starts and stucks,
Ctrl+C doen't stop it. "docker kill" helps only.
If you want to be able to exit with control-c, do docker run -i <image>. The -i means to pass input to the containerized program, and if HAProxy gets a control-c then it will terminate which will stop the container.
HAProxy doesn't produce any output unless you run it in debug mode, so there's not really much point to running attached, though. You might have a better time with docker run -d <image>, which will detach from the container and let it run in the background. To stop it, use docker kill.