Properly exiting out of recursions? - c++

TrieNode and Trie Object:
struct TrieNode {
char nodeChar = NULL;
map<char, TrieNode> children;
TrieNode() {}
TrieNode(char c) { nodeChar = c; }
};
struct Trie {
TrieNode *root = new TrieNode();
typedef pair<char, TrieNode> letter;
typedef map<char, TrieNode>::iterator it;
Trie(vector<string> dictionary) {
for (int i = 0; i < dictionary.size(); i++) {
insert(dictionary[i]);
}
}
void insert(string toInsert) {
TrieNode * curr = root;
int increment = 0;
// while letters still exist within the trie traverse through the trie
while (curr->children.find(toInsert[increment]) != curr->children.end()) { //letter found
curr = &(curr->children.find(toInsert[increment])->second);
increment++;
}
//when it doesn't exist we know that this will be a new branch
for (int i = increment; i < toInsert.length(); i++) {
TrieNode temp(toInsert[i]);
curr->children.insert(letter(toInsert[i], temp));
curr = &(curr->children.find(toInsert[i])->second);
if (i == toInsert.length() - 1) {
temp.nodeChar = NULL;
curr->children.insert(letter(NULL, temp));
}
}
}
vector<string> findPre(string pre) {
vector<string> list;
TrieNode * curr = root;
/*First find if the pre actually exist*/
for (int i = 0; i < pre.length(); i++) {
if (curr->children.find(pre[i]) == curr->children.end()) { //DNE
return list;
}
else {
curr = &(curr->children.find(pre[i])->second);
}
}
/*Now curr is at the end of the prefix, now we will perform a DFS*/
pre = pre.substr(0, pre.length() - 1);
findPre(list, curr, pre);
}
void findPre(vector<string> &list, TrieNode *curr, string prefix) {
if (curr->nodeChar == NULL) {
list.push_back(prefix);
return;
}
else {
prefix += curr->nodeChar;
for (it i = curr->children.begin(); i != curr->children.end(); i++) {
findPre(list, &i->second, prefix);
}
}
}
};
The problem is this function:
void findPre(vector<string> &list, TrieNode *curr, string prefix) {
/*if children of TrieNode contains NULL char, it means this branch up to this point is a complete word*/
if (curr->nodeChar == NULL) {
list.push_back(prefix);
}
else {
prefix += curr->nodeChar;
for (it i = curr->children.begin(); i != curr->children.end(); i++) {
findPre(list, &i->second, prefix);
}
}
}
The purpose is to return all words with the same prefix from a trie using DFS. I manage to retrieve all the necessary strings but I can't exit out of the recursion.
The code completes the last iteration of the if statement and breaks. Visual Studio doesn't return any error code.

The typical end to a recursion is just as you said- return all words. A standard recursion looks something like this:
returnType function(params...){
//Do stuff
if(need to recurse){
return function(next params...);
}else{ //This should be your defined base-case
return base-case;
}
The issue arises in that your recursive function can never return- it can either execute the push_back, or it can call itself again. Neither of these seems to properly exit, so it'll either end quietly (with an inferred return of nothing), or it'll keep recursing.
In your situation, you likely need to store the results from recursion in an intermediate structure like a list or such, and then return that list after iteration (since it's a tree search and ought to check all the children, not return the first one only)
On that note, you seem to be missing part of the point of recursions- they exist to fill a purpose: break down a problem into pieces until those pieces are trivial to solve. Then return that case and build back to a full solution. Any tree-searching must come from this base structure, or you may miss something- like forgetting to return your results.

Check the integrity of your Trie structure. The function appears to be correct. The reason why it wouldn't terminate is if one or more of your leaf nodes doesn't have curr->nodeChar == NULL.
Another case is that any node (leaf or non-leaf) has a garbage child node. This will cause the recursion to break into reading garbage values and no reason to stop. Running in debug mode should break the execution with segmentation fault.
Write another function to test if all leaf-nodes have NULL termination.
EDIT:
After posting the code, the original poster has already pointed out that the problem was that he/she was not returning the list of strings.
Apart from that, there are a few more suggestions I would like to provide based on the code:
How does this while loop terminate if toInsert string is already in the Trie.
You will overrun the toInsert string and read a garbage character.
It will exit after that, but reading beyond your string is a bad way to program.
// while letters still exist within the trie traverse through the trie
while (curr->children.find(toInsert[increment]) != curr->children.end())
{ //letter found
curr = &(curr->children.find(toInsert[increment])->second);
increment++;
}
This can be written as follows:
while (increment < toInsert.length() &&
curr->children.find(toInsert[increment]) != curr->children.end())
Also,
Trie( vector<string> dictionary)
should be
Trie( const vector<string>& dictionary )
because dictionary can be a large object. If you don't pass by reference, it will create a second copy. This is not efficient.

I am a idiot. I forgot to return list on the first findPre() function.
vector<string> findPre(string pre) {
vector<string> list;
TrieNode * curr = root;
/*First find if the pre actually exist*/
for (int i = 0; i < pre.length(); i++) {
if (curr->children.find(pre[i]) == curr->children.end()) { //DNE
return list;
}
else {
curr = &(curr->children.find(pre[i])->second);
}
}
/*Now curr is at the end of the prefix, now we will perform a DFS*/
pre = pre.substr(0, pre.length() - 1);
findPre(list, curr, pre);
return list; //<----- this thing
}

Related

Trie only inserting first letter of a word, not the whole word

I am currently working a program where I am inserting words into a trie. Currently my insert function only adds in the first letter of the word and then stops. From everything I have looked up, my code looks correct, so I don't understand what the issue is.
I have tried moving the temp-> wordEnd = true to the outside of the for loop and within different locations in the function. For I believe this is the problem, due to everything else in my insert function looking correct.
Here is my insert function:
bool Trie::insert(string word)
{
TrieNode *temp = root;
temp->prefixAmount++;
for (int i = 0; i < word.length(); ++i)
{
int currentLetter = (int)word[i] - (int)'a';
if (temp->child[currentLetter] == NULL)
{
temp->child[currentLetter] = new TrieNode();
temp->child[currentLetter]->prefixAmount++;
temp = temp->child[currentLetter];
}
temp->wordEnd = true;
return true;
}
}
Also to help everyone follow my code a little bit better
Here is my TrieNode struct:
struct TrieNode
{
int prefixAmount;
struct TrieNode *child[ALPHA_SIZE];
bool wordEnd;
};
And here is my Trie constructor:
Trie::Trie()
{
root = new TrieNode();
root->wordEnd = false;
root->prefixAmount = 0;
}
The expected results are suppose to be that the whole word get inserted.
What actually happens is that only the first letter of the word gets added.
I've reformatted the code for you, and now you should hopefully see the main issue.
You are returning at the end of the block within the for loop. This will mean that it runs the first iteration of the for loop and just return without considering the rest of the letters.
An easy fix would be to put the return outside the for loop but there is another issue that you dont properly update the Trie if the current letter is already in it. Your NULL check is correct, but you should only new up the TrieNode on NULL but you also want to run all subsequent lines even if its not NULL. Fixed code will look like:
bool Trie::insert(string word)
{
TrieNode *temp = root;
temp->prefixAmount++;
for (int i = 0; i < word.length(); ++i)
{
int currentLetter = (int)word[i] - (int)'a';
if (temp->child[currentLetter] == NULL)
{
temp->child[currentLetter] = new TrieNode();
}
temp->child[currentLetter]->prefixAmount++;
temp = temp->child[currentLetter];
}
temp->wordEnd = true;
return true;
}
(Other minor issues in the code outside the scope of the question - prefer nullptr to NULL, why return a bool if its always true, if your string contains anything outside of a-z then you'll read outside the array bounds, prefer unique_ptr and make_unqiue to raw new/delete).

search function causes program to crash

I have been going through the debugger but can't seem to pinpoint exactly what is going wrong. I have come to my own conclusion i must be missing a nullptr check somewhere or something. If anyone can provide some help it would be greatly appreciated.
error message from debugger
error msg
which looks like makes the program crash on this line:
if (node->children_[index] == nullptr) {
search function
Node* search(const string& word, Node* node, int index) const {
Node* temp;
//same as recurssive lookup just difference is returns node weather terminal or not
if (index < word.length()) {
index = node->getIndex(word[index]);
if (node->children_[index] == nullptr) {
return nullptr;
}
else {
temp = search(word, node->children_[index], index++);
}
}
return temp; // this would give you ending node of partialWord
}
Node struct for reference
struct Node {
bool isTerminal_;
char ch_;
Node* children_[26];
Node(char c = '\0') {
isTerminal_ = false;
ch_ = c;
for (int i = 0; i < 26; i++) {
children_[i] = nullptr;
}
}
//given lower case alphabetic charachters ch, returns
//the associated index 'a' --> 0, 'b' --> 1...'z' --> 25
int getIndex(char ch) {
return ch - 'a';
}
};
Node* root_;
int suggest(const string& partialWord, string suggestions[]) const {
Node* temp;
temp = search(partialWord, root_, 0);
int count = 0;
suggest(partialWord, temp, suggestions, count);
return count;
}
Might be a very simple thing. Without digging I am not sure about the rank of the -> operator versus the == operator. I would take a second and try putting parenthesis around the "node->children_[index] == nullptr" part like this:
(node->children_[index]) == nullptr
just to make sure that the logic runs like you seem to intend.
Dr t
I believe the root cause is that you're using index for two distinct purposes: as an index into the word you're looking for, and as an index into the node's children.
When you get to the recursion, index has changed meaning, and it's all downhill from there.
You're also passing index++ to the recursion, but the value of index++ is the value it had before the increment.
You should pass index + 1.
[An issue in a different program would be that the order of evaluation of function parameters is unspecified, and you should never both modify a variable and use it in the same parameter list. (I would go so far as to say that you should never modify anything in a parameter list, but many disagree.)
But you shouldn't use the same variable here at all, so...]
I would personally restructure the code a little, something like this:
Node* search(const string& word, Node* node, int index) const {
// Return immediately on failure.
if (index >= word.length())
{
return nullptr;
}
int child_index = node->getIndex(word[index]);
// The two interesting cases: we either have this child or we don't.
if (node->children_[child_index] == nullptr) {
return nullptr;
}
else {
return search(word, node->children_[child_index], index + 1);
}
}
(Side note: returning a pointer to a non-const internal Node from a const function is questionable.)

Logic flaw in trie search

I'm currently working on a trie implementation for practice and have run into a mental roadbloack.
The issue is with my searching function. I am attempting to have my trie tree be able to retrieve a list of strings from a supplied prefix after they are loaded into the programs memory.
I also understand I could be using a queue/shouldnt use C functions in C++ ect.. This is just a 'rough draft' so to speak.
This is what I have so far:
bool SearchForStrings(vector<string> &output, string data)
{
Node *iter = GetLastNode("an");
Node *hold = iter;
stack<char> str;
while (hold->visited == false)
{
int index = GetNextChild(iter);
if (index > -1)
{
str.push(char('a' + index));
//current.push(iter);
iter = iter->next[index];
}
//We've hit a leaf so we want to unwind the stack and print the string
else if (index < 0 && IsLeaf(iter))
{
iter->visited = true;
string temp("");
stringstream ss;
while (str.size() > 0)
{
temp += str.top();
str.pop();
}
int i = 0;
for (std::string::reverse_iterator it = temp.rbegin(); it != temp.rend(); it++)
ss << *it;
//Store the string we have
output.push_back(data + ss.str());
//Move our iterator back to the root node
iter = hold;
}
//We know this isnt a leaf so we dont want to print out the stack
else
{
iter->visited = true;
iter = hold;
}
}
return (output.size() > 0);
}
int GetNextChild(Node *s)
{
for (int i = 0; i < 26; i++)
{
if (s->next[i] != nullptr && s->next[i]->visited == false)
return i;
}
return -1;
}
bool IsLeaf(Node *s)
{
for (int i = 0; i < 26; i++)
{
if (s->next[i] != nullptr)
return false;
}
return true;
}
struct Node{
int value;
Node *next[26];
bool visited;
};
The code is too long or i'd post it all, GetLastNode() retrieves the node at the end of the data passed in, so if the prefix was 'su' and the string was 'substring' the node would be pointing to the 'u' to use as an artificial root node
(might be completely wrong... just typed it here, no testing)
something like:
First of all, we need a way of indicating that a node represents an entry.
So let's have:
struct Node{
int value;
Node *next[26];
bool entry;
};
I've removed your visited flag because I don't have a use for it.
You should modify your insert/update/delete functions to support this flag. If the flag is true it means there's an actual entry up to that node.
Now we can modify the
bool isLeaf(Node *s) {
return s->entry;
}
Meaning that we consider a leaf when there's an entry... perhaps the name is wrong now, as the leaf might have childs ("y" node with "any" and "anywhere" is a leaf, but it has childs)
Now for the search:
First a public function that can be called.
bool searchForStrings(std::vector<string> &output, const std::string &key) {
// start the recursion
// theTrieRoot is the root node for the whole structure
return searchForString(theTrieRoot,output,key);
}
Then the internal function that will use for recursion.
bool searchForStrings(Node *node, std::vector<string> &output, const std::string &key) {
if(isLeaf(node->next[i])) {
// leaf node - add an empty string.
output.push_back(std::string());
}
if(key.empty()) {
// Key is empty, collect all child nodes.
for (int i = 0; i < 26; i++)
{
if (node->next[i] != nullptr) {
std::vector<std::string> partial;
searchForStrings(node->next[i],partial,key);
// so we got a list of the childs,
// add the key of this node to them.
for(auto s:partial) {
output.push_back(std::string('a'+i)+s)
}
}
} // end for
} // end if key.empty
else {
// key is not empty, try to get the node for the
// first character of the key.
int c=key[0]-'a';
if((c<0 || (c>26)) {
// first character was not a letter.
return false;
}
if(node->next[c]==nullptr) {
// no match (no node where we expect it)
return false;
}
// recurse into the node matching the key
std::vector<std::string> partial;
searchForStrings(node->next[c],partial,key.substr(1));
// add the key of this node to the result
for(auto s:partial) {
output.push_back(std::string(key[0])+s)
}
}
// provide a meaningful return value
if(output.empty()) {
return false;
} else {
return true;
}
}
And the execution for "an" search is.
Call searchForStrings(root,[],"an")
root is not leaf, key is not empty. Matched next node keyed by "a"
Call searchForStrings(node(a),[],"n")
node(a) is not leaf, key is not empty. Matched next node keyed by "n"
Call searchForStrings(node(n),[],"")
node(n) is not leaf, key is empty. Need to recurse on all not null childs:
Call searchForStrings(node(s),[],"")
node(s) is not leaf, key is empty, Need to recurse on all not null childs:
... eventually we will reach Node(r) which is a leaf node, so it will return an [""], going back it will get added ["r"] -> ["er"] -> ["wer"] -> ["swer"]
Call searchForStings(node(y),[],"")
node(y) is leaf (add "" to the output), key is empty,
recurse, we will get ["time"]
we will return ["","time"]
At this point we will add the "y" to get ["y","ytime"]
And here we will add the "n" to get ["nswer","ny","nytime"]
Adding the "a" to get ["answer","any","anytime"]
we're done

Do I need to set my destructor methods when I am using shared pointers?

I tried finding an answer but didn't see one for my particular problem. I am using shared pointers for a ternary search tree (to be used for a predictive text algorithm) and am running into some problems using shared pointers.
I've been away from C++ for 5 years, and let me tell you, Java does not help you learn pointers. I've had to relearn pointer material I learned in school 5-6 years ago over the past couple of days, and have successfully managed to destroy my code.
Here is most of the code I have:
// TernarySearchTree.cc
#include "stdafx.h"
#include "ternary_search_tree.h"
//Constructor
TernarySearchTree::TernarySearchTree() {
num_nodes_ = 0;
size_in_memory_ = 0;
root_node_ = nullptr;
}
TernarySearchTree::TernarySearchTree(const TernarySearchTree& other) {
num_nodes_ = other.num_nodes_;
size_in_memory_ = other.size_in_memory_;
TernarySearchTreeNode node;
node = *other.root_node_;
root_node_.reset(&node);
}
//Destructor
TernarySearchTree::~TernarySearchTree() {
}
//operators
TernarySearchTree& TernarySearchTree::operator=(const TernarySearchTree& other) {
//TODO: swap idiom - create a copy of the node then swap the new one with it
//do this first to provide exception safety
TernarySearchTreeNode node;
node = *other.root_node_;
root_node_.reset(&node);
num_nodes_ = other.num_nodes_;
size_in_memory_ = other.size_in_memory_;
return *this;
}
//Convert from string to c-style string
std::vector<char> TernarySearchTree::ConvertStringToCString(std::string str) {
std::vector<char> wordCharacters (str.begin(), str.end());
//remove newlines or tabs
if (wordCharacters.back() == '\n' || wordCharacters.back() == '\t') {
wordCharacters.pop_back();
}
wordCharacters.push_back('\0');
return wordCharacters;
}
//Insert a node
TernarySearchTreeNode TernarySearchTree::InsertNode(TernarySearchTreeNode &currentNode,
char character,
NodePosition position,
bool isRoot) {
TernarySearchTreeNode newNode;
newNode.set_character(character);
if (!isRoot) {
switch (position) {
case NODE_POS_LEFT:
currentNode.set_left_node(newNode);
break;
case NODE_POS_CENTRE:
currentNode.set_centre_node(newNode);
break;
case NODE_POS_RIGHT:
currentNode.set_right_node(newNode);
break;
default:
break;
}
}
return newNode;
}
//Insert a word
void TernarySearchTree::InsertWord(std::string word) {
std::vector<char> characters = ConvertStringToCString(word);
std::shared_ptr<TernarySearchTreeNode> currentNode = 0;
bool isFirstCharacter = true;
//Add each character to a node while traversing
//Base case where there is no root node
if (!root_node_) {
for(std::vector<char>::iterator it = characters.begin(); it != characters.end(); ++it) {
if (*it != '\0') {
//if it is the first character
//root_node_ is equal to the address of new node
if (isFirstCharacter) {
std::cout << "HIHI";
TernarySearchTreeNode node = InsertNode(*currentNode, *it, NODE_POS_CENTRE, true);
root_node_.reset(&node);
currentNode.reset(&node);
isFirstCharacter = false;
} else {
TernarySearchTreeNode node = InsertNode(*currentNode, *it, NODE_POS_CENTRE, false);
std::cout << std::endl << node.get_character();
currentNode.reset(&node);
}
}
}
//If not base case, then we need to compare each character
} else {
currentNode = root_node_;
for(std::vector<char>::iterator it = characters.begin(); it != characters.end(); ++it) {
if (*it != '\0') {
currentNode.reset(&SetNextNode(*currentNode, *it, *std::next(it, 1)));
} else {
currentNode->set_end_of_word(true);
}
}
}
}
//Recursive function for obtaining/adding the next node when inserting a word
TernarySearchTreeNode TernarySearchTree::SetNextNode(TernarySearchTreeNode &currentNode, const char currentChar, const char nextChar) {
//If characters match
if (currentChar == currentNode.get_character()) {
//if centre node exists
if (currentNode.get_centre_node()) {
return *(currentNode.get_centre_node());
//Otherwise, create a new node and recall method on that node
} else {
//If not the end of the word, make a new node with the next letter
if (nextChar != '\0') {
return InsertNode(currentNode, nextChar, NODE_POS_CENTRE, false);
} else {
return currentNode;
}
}
//If it is less, follow node on the left
} else if (currentChar < currentNode.get_character()) {
//if left node exists, recursive call
if (currentNode.get_left_node()) {
return SetNextNode(*(currentNode.get_left_node()), currentChar, nextChar);
//Otherwise, create a new node and recall method on that node
} else {
return SetNextNode(InsertNode(currentNode, currentChar, NODE_POS_LEFT, false), currentChar, nextChar);
}
//Otherwise it is bigger, so take right path
} else {
//if right node exists, recursive call
if (currentNode.get_right_node()) {
return SetNextNode(*(currentNode.get_right_node()), currentChar, nextChar);
//Otherwise, create a new node and recall method on that node
} else {
return SetNextNode(InsertNode(currentNode, currentChar, NODE_POS_RIGHT, false), currentChar, nextChar);
}
}
}
//Populate the TST from a word list/file
void TernarySearchTree::PopulateTreeFromTextFile(std::string fileName) {
std::ifstream file;
std::string line;
file.open(fileName);
if (file.is_open()) {
//Assume text file has one word per line
while (std::getline(file, line)) {
InsertWord(line);
}
}
}
//Search
bool TernarySearchTree::SearchForWord(std::string word) {
return false;
}
int _tmain(int argc, _TCHAR* argv[])
{
//Test
TernarySearchTree tst;
//Open file
tst.PopulateTreeFromTextFile("simple.txt");
//start at root and follow some paths
std::cout << tst.get_root_node();
/**std::vector<char> vec;
vec.push_back('a');
vec.push_back('c');
std::vector<char>::iterator it = vec.begin();
std::cout << *std::next(vec.begin(), 1);
std::cout << (*it < 'c');
it++;
std::cout << *std::next(it, 0);
std::cout << (*it < 'c');
**/
return 0;
}
and for the nodes:
/*TST node methods */
#include <iostream>
#include "ternary_search_tree_node.h"
/** ADD COPY CONSTRUCTOR*/
//Constructors
TernarySearchTreeNode::TernarySearchTreeNode() {
character_ = '\0';
end_of_word_ = false;
left_node_ = nullptr;
centre_node_ = nullptr;
right_node_ = nullptr;
}
TernarySearchTreeNode::TernarySearchTreeNode(const TernarySearchTreeNode& other) {
character_ = other.character_;
end_of_word_ = other.end_of_word_;
TernarySearchTreeNode leftNode;
leftNode = *other.left_node_;
left_node_.reset(&leftNode);
TernarySearchTreeNode centreNode;
centreNode = *other.centre_node_;
centre_node_.reset(&centreNode);
TernarySearchTreeNode rightNode;
rightNode = *other.right_node_;
right_node_.reset(&rightNode);
}
TernarySearchTreeNode::TernarySearchTreeNode(char character, bool end_of_word,
TernarySearchTreeNode left_node,
TernarySearchTreeNode centre_node,
TernarySearchTreeNode right_node) {
character_ = character;
end_of_word_ = end_of_word;
left_node_.reset(&left_node);
centre_node_.reset(&centre_node);
right_node_.reset(&right_node);
}
//Destructor
TernarySearchTreeNode::~TernarySearchTreeNode() {
left_node_.reset();
centre_node_.reset();
right_node_.reset();
}
//operators
TernarySearchTreeNode& TernarySearchTreeNode::operator=(const TernarySearchTreeNode& other) {
if (&other) {
TernarySearchTreeNode leftNode;
leftNode = *other.left_node_;
TernarySearchTreeNode centreNode;
centreNode = *other.centre_node_;
TernarySearchTreeNode rightNode;
rightNode = *other.right_node_;
left_node_.reset(&leftNode);
centre_node_.reset(&centreNode);
right_node_.reset(&rightNode);
character_ = other.character_;
end_of_word_ = other.end_of_word_;
}
return *this;
}
//printing
std::ostream& operator<<(std::ostream& os, const TernarySearchTreeNode& obj)
{
// write obj to stream
char c = obj.get_character();
bool b = obj.is_end_of_word();
os << c << "\t is end of word: " << b;
return os;
}
When I run in debug mode (Visual Studios), it is able to set the root node, but when it goes to input the second node, it crashes trying to delete "stuff" when currentNode calls .reset(&node) within the else statement of function InsertWord. Am I doing something wrong in the copy constructors or operator= methods, or the destructors? The cout line above it does print the correct letter, so it looks like the node is getting created properly.
The debug call stack shows:
TernarySearchTree.exe!std::_Ref_count_base::_Decref() Line 118 C++
TernarySearchTree.exe!std::_Ptr_base::_Decref()
Line 347 C++
TernarySearchTree.exe!std::shared_ptr::~shared_ptr()
Line 624 C++
TernarySearchTree.exe!std::shared_ptr::reset()
Line 649 C++
TernarySearchTree.exe!TernarySearchTreeNode::~TernarySearchTreeNode()
Line 50 C++ TernarySearchTree.exe!TernarySearchTreeNode::`scalar
deleting destructor'(unsigned int) C++
TernarySearchTree.exe!std::_Ref_count::_Destroy()
Line 161 C++ TernarySearchTree.exe!std::_Ref_count_base::_Decref()
Line 120 C++
TernarySearchTree.exe!std::_Ptr_base::_Decref()
Line 347 C++
TernarySearchTree.exe!std::shared_ptr::~shared_ptr()
Line 624 C++
TernarySearchTree.exe!std::shared_ptr::reset()
Line 649 C++
TernarySearchTree.exe!TernarySearchTreeNode::~TernarySearchTreeNode()
Line 50 C++
TernarySearchTree.exe!TernarySearchTree::InsertWord(std::basic_string,std::allocator
word) Line 105 C++ TernarySearchTree.exe!TernarySearchTree::PopulateTreeFromTextFile(std::basic_string,std::allocator
fileName) Line 182 C++ TernarySearchTree.exe!wmain(int argc, wchar_t * * argv) Line 200 C++
TernarySearchTree.exe!__tmainCRTStartup() Line 533 C
TernarySearchTree.exe!wmainCRTStartup() Line 377 C
kernel32.dll!7592338a() Unknown [Frames below may be incorrect
and/or missing, no symbols loaded for kernel32.dll]
ntdll.dll!77599f72() Unknown ntdll.dll!77599f45() Unknown
Thanks for any help you can provide! And let me know if there is anythign else you need me to provide (the text file I am reading in just has the word cornin it).
Your problem is that you're using Java style in C++. Unlike in Java where everything is essentially a pointer, in C++ you have to think about the difference between values, references, pointers, and object lifetime.
This function is bad:
TernarySearchTreeNode::TernarySearchTreeNode(char character, bool end_of_word,
TernarySearchTreeNode left_node,
TernarySearchTreeNode centre_node,
TernarySearchTreeNode right_node) {
character_ = character;
end_of_word_ = end_of_word;
left_node_.reset(&left_node);
centre_node_.reset(&centre_node);
right_node_.reset(&right_node);
}
You are taking TernarySearchTreeNode objects by value, then putting their address into a shared_ptr. The point of a shared_ptr to to take ownership of a dynamically allocated object (one created using new) and delete it when the reference count goes to zero. The objects above (left_node, etc) are stack objects that will go out of scope at the end of the function. When you put their address into a shared_ptr, it will then try to delete those objects later, but they no longer exist.
As far as recommending how to fix this, there is a whole lot going on here where the assumptions are just off. For instance, can a child node have more than one parent? Does it actually make sense to copy nodes?
I'll assume for the moment that copying nodes makes sense, so using shared_ptr is reasonable. In that case we might start here:
TernarySearchTreeNode TernarySearchTree::InsertNode(std::shared_ptr<TernarySearchTreeNode currentNode>,
char character,
NodePosition position,
bool isRoot) {
auto newNode = std::make_shared<TernarySearchTreeNode>();
newNode->set_character(character);
if (!isRoot) {
switch (position) {
case NODE_POS_LEFT:
currentNode->set_left_node(newNode);
Then all of your functions like set_left_node should also take std::shared_ptr<TernarySearchNode> as parameters. You should not be calling reset(), which exists to allow a shared_ptr to take ownership (refcount == 1) of a free pointer. shared_ptr works by incrementing the reference count on copy and dereferencing in the destructor. When you dereference the pointer and then take the address, you are working around the shared_ptr.

Finding cycle in Aho-Corasick automaton

I'am facing a problem which should be solved using Aho-Corasick automaton. I'am given a set of words (composed with '0' or '1') - patterns and I must decide if it is possible to create infinite text, which wouldn't contain any of given patterns. I think, the solution is to create Aho-Corasick automaton and search for a cycle without matching states, but I'm not able to propose a good way to do that. I thought of searching the states graph using DFS, but I'm not sure if it will work and I have an implementation problem - let's assume, that we are in a state, which has an '1' edge - but state pointed by that edge is marked as matching - so we cannot use that edge, we can try fail link (current state doesn't have '0' edge) - but we must also remember, that we could not go with '1' edge from state pointed by fail link of the current one.
Could anyone correct me and show me how to do that? I've written Aho-Corasick in C++ and I'am sure it works - I also understand the entire algorithm.
Here is the base code:
class AhoCorasick
{
static const int ALPHABET_SIZE = 2;
struct State
{
State* edge[ALPHABET_SIZE];
State* fail;
State* longestMatchingSuffix;
//Vector used to remember which pattern matches in this state.
vector< int > matching;
short color;
State()
{
for(int i = 0; i < ALPHABET_SIZE; ++i)
edge[i] = 0;
color = 0;
}
~State()
{
for(int i = 0; i < ALPHABET_SIZE; ++i)
{
delete edge[i];
}
}
};
private:
State root;
vector< int > lenOfPattern;
bool isFailComputed;
//Helper function used to traverse state graph.
State* move(State* curr, char letter)
{
while(curr != &root && curr->edge[letter] == 0)
{
curr = curr->fail;
}
if(curr->edge[letter] != 0)
curr = curr->edge[letter];
return curr;
}
//Function which computes fail links and longestMatchingSuffix.
void computeFailLink()
{
queue< State* > Q;
root.fail = root.longestMatchingSuffix = 0;
for(int i = 0; i < ALPHABET_SIZE; ++i)
{
if(root.edge[i] != 0)
{
Q.push(root.edge[i]);
root.edge[i]->fail = &root;
}
}
while(!Q.empty())
{
State* curr = Q.front();
Q.pop();
if(!curr->fail->matching.empty())
{
curr->longestMatchingSuffix = curr->fail;
}
else
{
curr->longestMatchingSuffix = curr->fail->longestMatchingSuffix;
}
for(int i = 0; i < ALPHABET_SIZE; ++i)
{
if(curr->edge[i] != 0)
{
Q.push(curr->edge[i]);
State* state = curr->fail;
state = move(state, i);
curr->edge[i]->fail = state;
}
}
}
isFailComputed = true;
}
public:
AhoCorasick()
{
isFailComputed = false;
}
//Add pattern to automaton.
//pattern - pointer to pattern, which will be added
//fun - function which will be used to transform character to 0-based index.
void addPattern(const char* const pattern, int (*fun) (const char *))
{
isFailComputed = false;
int len = strlen(pattern);
State* curr = &root;
const char* pat = pattern;
for(; *pat; ++pat)
{
char tmpPat = fun(pat);
if(curr->edge[tmpPat] == 0)
{
curr = curr->edge[tmpPat] = new State;
}
else
{
curr = curr->edge[tmpPat];
}
}
lenOfPattern.push_back(len);
curr->matching.push_back(lenOfPattern.size() - 1);
}
};
int alphabet01(const char * c)
{
return *c - '0';
}
I didn't look through your code, but I know very simple and efficient implementation.
First of all, lets add Dictionary Suffix Links to the tree (their description you can find in Wikipedia). Then you have to look through all your tree and somehow mark matching nodes and nodes that have Dict Suffix Links as bad nodes. The explanation of these actions is obvious: you don't need all the matching nodes, or nodes that have a matching suffix in them.
Now you have an Aho-Corasick tree without any matching nodes. If you just run DFS algo on the resulting tree, you will get what you want.