I have written a C++ program using OpenGl in Visual Studio 2015 for Windows 7. I compiled my code using "release" instead of "debug". The program works fine on my computer, but when I move to another computer the program fails. I get the error message:
The program can't start because MSVCP140D.dll is missing from your computer. Try reinstalling the program to fix this problem.
I would like for my program to work on other computers so that I don't have to install the newest drivers or libraries in order for it to work. I have MSVCP140D.dll on my first computer, but I only have MSVCP120.dll on my other computer. How do I compile my code so that it does not require MSVCP140D.dll, but instead works with MSVCP120.dll?
First make sure your build settings are correct for release build : MSVCP140D.dll is the debug DLL of the Visual Studio 2015 runtime; the release version of this libray is MSVCP140.dll.
When you've fixed this, then you can install the Visual C++ Redistributable for Visual Studio 2015 on the target computer where you want to run your program : this will install the missing library. Notice that the VC++ redistributable does not install the debug libraries (MSVCP140D.dll) but the release ones (MSVCP140.dll).
Another option is to rebuild your program with static linking to the Visual C++ runtime. Open the Project Properties dialog and, in "Configuration Properties -> C/C++ -> Code Generation", field "Runtime Library", choose "Multi-threaded (/MT)". This way, there is no need to install the VC++ redistributable on the target computer.
You need to install Visual Studio 2013 in order to be able to link with MSVCP120.dll (you can continue using MSVC 2015, but select 2013 as the toolchain). Once MSVC 2013 is installed, you will be able to select it in project settings -> Platform Toolset.
Or link your application statically (change /MD to /MT in Code Generation settings). Then your app won't need any MSVC DLL to run (but it will become bigger).
Or install the VC 2015 Redistributable package on your other computer.
Related
So I tried to run my program in another computer, as you'd expect from the title, the computer was missing msvcp140.dll - I downloaded it from the internet (didn't have other options at the time) and it didn't work.
Aside from 32-64 bit versions of said .dll, are there different versions for each version of visual studio and/or for each Windows' version (7, 8, 10)?
I would rather not have make users install Visual Studio on their computer just for my program.
msvcp140.dll is a Dynamic Link Library (DLL) that is a part of Microsoft Visual C++ component. Your machine might not have the Microsoft redistributable for Visual C++.(I assuming you are using VC++ compiler). Since the other machine does not have MSVS installed, there is no guarantee it has the redist installed. Just install the appropriate redist package from your Visual Studio version to avoid error. msvcp140.dll is Microsoft Visual C++ version dependent.
If you don't want to redistribute MSVC DLLs with your application, you can make a static build of your application.
In Project Settings -> C/C++ -> Code Generation -> Runtime Library -> Select /MT or /MTd (debug)
A statically linked module will not require any MSVC DLLs (other than omp140, if you use OpenMP)
(The downside is that your EXE will become larger)
Hello I have downloaded and unzipped OpenCV-2.4.10.exe on my PC. Then created a new Win32 Console application project in VS 2015, set all the Paths in Project properties, set the environmental variables in Win8.1. When I'm trying to start the program in debugging mode I get the "The program can't start because MSVCP120D.dll is missing from your computer. Try reinstalling the program to fix this problem".
Then, I downloaded the Visual C++ redistributable for Visual Studio 2015 But the problem still remains. What should I do to use OpenCV in VS 2015?
OpenCV-2.4.10.exe comes with runtime binary dlls built to work with runtimes from vc10 (vs2010), vc11 (vs2012) and vc12 (vs2013).
These DLL files use MSVCP100.dll, MSVCP110.dll and MSVCP120.dll respectively, and if you have installed Visual Studio 2015 you should find them in your System32 (or SysWOW64) directory.
The MSVCP120D.dll error appears when your application tries to load the DEBUG version of the DLL binaries. You do not have MSVCP120D.dll unless you have Visual Studio 2013 installed on your system. To solve this problem, use the Release runtime instead of the Debug runtime.
All you need to do is exclude the DEBUG lib files from your project. This means including only the lib files without the suffix 'd'. (ie. include opencv_core2410.lib instead of opencv_core2410d.lib)
HTH
Extras:
You don't really need to load the Debug binaries, unless you need to debug openCV's source code. If you do, there's still a way. Download the openCV source code, use CMake to create a VS2015 project. You can then build your own dll binaries using the latest runtime from VS2015.
VS2015 uses vc14 while OpenCV2.4.10 doesn't come with pre-built binaries associated with vc14. This answer should help you to understand. Accordingly you should choose the right folder (vc14) for Linker>General>Additional Library Directories in project properties.
You can use cmake to build binaries using VS2015 or you can download a later version of OpenCV which has prebuilt binaries for vc14.
I am using Visual Studio 2013 I cant run my exe on another computers because of missing missing msvcr120d.dll and msvcp120d.dll.
I already downloaded vcredist from:
http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=40784
I tried MT (Multi-threaded) but same error. :(
Please help I tried everything.
You are linking against the Debug CRT library (indicated by the trailing d). Those aren't redistributable, and are only available on systems, where Visual Studio is installed.
The solution is to compile a release configuration. A release configuration links against the Release CRT library, that is part of the Visual C++ Redistributable Packages for Visual Studio 2013, and can be deployed alongside your application.
A release configuration can be built by selecting Release from the configuration dropdown list:
I have written a portable program in C# with certain dependencies (.NET Framework, Visual C++ redistributable, etc) that will run on Windows XP SP3 and up.
Because of that, the program needs a launcher that will run every time before the actual program does, checking that all the required dependencies are installed. If any of the dependencies are missing, an option to download and install that dependency, will be offered. If there are no missing dependencies, then the actual program is executed.
The launcher itself is relatively simple, consisting of some registry checkup and some WinAPI calls to verify the installed dependencies.
The file structure in the end will look something like this:
C#_compiled_portable_program.exe
C++_compiled_launcher.exe // executes on any system as low as a clean Windows XP SP3 install
The problem is that I have no idea how to compile a C++ code in Visual Studio 2013 that will run with absolute bare minimum dependencies (running on the runtime libraries that come with Windows XP SP3, at least).
Take for instance the absolute simplest C++ code:
#include "stdafx.h"
int _tmain(int argc, _TCHAR* argv[])
{
printf("Hello world!");
return 0;
}
If I compile this with Visual Studio 2013 with the default configurations, it will not execute on a machine that doesn't have VC++ 2013 installed, showing some nasty errors.
I looked around for similar questions and the closest I could find was
Visual Studio 2010 MSVCR dependency removal?, but the answers are either incomplete or outdated.
So, just like an installer, is it possible to compile a C++ project in Visual Studio 2013 that will run pretty much on any system?
This is not perfect, but will do for now.
This is what I did to make a C++ project, compiled in Visual Studio 2013, execute ona system that doesn't have VC++ 2013 installed.
I created a new C++ project in Visual Studio 2013, File>New>Project>Visual C++>Win32 Console Application
Then in Solution Explorer right click the project and select Properties.
Click the Configuration drop down menu and select All Configurations.
In Configuration Properties>General, set Platform Toolset to Visual Studio 2013 - Windows XP (v120_xp).
With Dependency Walker determine what modules are imported by the compiled exe (the release build, not the debug one). The imported modules should be:
c:\windows\system32\KERNEL32.DLL
c:\windows\system32\MSVCR120.DLL
KERNEL32.DLL is a system file so we don't have to worry about that, and MSVCR120.DLL is the Visual C++ 2013 Runtime Library and we need to distribute this file along with the release build. When the executable needs to load a module, it first looks at its current location for that file and then in PATH (System32, etc). If we copy MSVCR120.DLL at same location the release executable is, then the program will run even on systems without VC++ 2013 installed.
Since the project is a 32-bit application, download VC++ 2013 Redistributable x86, install it on a 32-bit version of Windows (I installed it on a fresh Windows XP virtual machine), and copy c:\windows\system32\MSVCR120.DLL.
Update:
Never mind. You don't have to distribute a copy of VC++ Runtime DLL file, you can just configure the project to link statically to the runtime library.
Here is explained how to do it. You'll still have to change the Platform Toolset though, if you plan on executing on Windows XP.
I am running Microsoft Visual Studio Express 2012 for Windows Desktop on a 64 bit machine with windows 8.
I create a completely new Win32 Console Application (in C++) and accept the default options. I then build and run the solution in both debug and release modes and it works all find and dandy. Next I configure the include and library directories for the dynamic SFML library. I link to the debug and release .lib files and put the debug and release .dll files in the proper directories. I then add some simple code which uses the library, build and run the application in debug mode and I get this error: "The program can't start because MSVCR100D.dll is missing from your computer. Try reinstalling the program to fix this problem." If I build and run the application in release mode it works with no errors. (And yes I have the redistributables installed 32 and 64 bit.) Now from what I understand and according to this thread that .dll file is for debugging only and is not included in the redistributable package (which would explain why it doesn't work in debug mode). The answer says that developers have it installed with visual studio by default. This is obviously not the case as evidence from the error and I've reinstalled visual studio and restarted my computer twice now.
In conclusion, how do I simply compile my solution in debug mode without getting this error?
I'm afraid someone will mark this as a duplicate so here we go:
LINK - "...you appear to be linking to the debug version of the runtime, it is not normal to distribute apps linked against the debug version of the runtime."
Doesn't pertain to me because I'm not distributing this app, just trying to run it in debug mode.
LINK - "I compiled my program using Microsoft visual c++ 2010 Express Edition and tried to run it on another machine that did not have the same compiler."
This person get's the error when he runs what hes compiled on a different computer, not when actually compiling the application.
LINK - "If you get this error for your release build..."
I dont.
LINK - "You can compile your project in "Release"..."
My project is not ready to be released therefore I should compile my project in debug mode.
MSVCR100D.dll is the dll for Visual Studio 10, so somewhere something is depending on it (the SFML dlls?). Whatever you compile (in debug mode) with Visual Studio 2012 will require MSVCR110D.dll, which you should have available on your machine as part of the installation.
I suggest you build SFML yourself on your own version of Visual Studio, it's pretty easy. In fact, the binaries available on the site as part of the SFML 2.0 RC are rather old and you'll do yourself a huge favor by building from the latest sources, as a lot of fixes and improvement were applied in the meantime.
(Also, definitely use 2.0 instead of 1.6. The site is rather misleading, but on the SFML forums virtually everyone will recommend you use the last version)
This message generally states that the dll is referred to directly or indirectly in your application and is missing.
The 'D' at the end show us this is the Debug version of the file, this is DLL file is provided with the Visual Studio 2010 installation. So the MSVCR100D.dll would be provided with the installation of Visual Studio 2010.
Of course, you could be missing other versions 2008 (MSVCR90D) 2010 (MSVCR100D) 2012 (MSVCR110D) or the 2013 (MSVCR120D), each dll is provided according to the Visual Studio version.
There are a few ways to solve this:
Check to be sure that you're compiling all the components of your
project in Release mode. If this does not solve the issue continue
to the next steps.
You could solve this locally by installing Visual Studio 2010 on your
machine. This is not what I would recommend, but it would surely
overcome the issue
You could also download the file from this third party website and
copy it to your projects bin:
http://www.dll-files.com/dllindex/dll-files.shtml?msvcr100d
This option is the LEAST recommended option.
Run dependency Walker and see what file depends on the MSVCR100D.dll
and the try and fix that file in order to break your dependency. You can download depends here: http://www.dependencywalker.com/
Check to be sure that you're project is linking the correct version of
the CRT and any other libraries you may be using (e.g., MFC, ATL,
etc.)
Note: Installing the redistributables alone will NOT solve this problem, since the redistributables only contain the release version of the file MSVCR100.dll (notice no 'D')
MSVCR100D is part of the 2010 Visual Studio package - indicating that some components of your system are compiled with the older version of Visual Studio, so you will need to install the Visual Studio 2010 version - you can probably still develop with the 2012 version, just as long as [parts of] the 2010 is on the machine.
Or you need to recompile some components that your application depends on to use the 2012 (msvcr110d) libraries - if you have all the source code, that would be my preferrred method.