I have a null dataset such as
data a;
if 0;
run;
Now I wish to use proc report to print this dataset. Of course, there will be nothing in the report, but I want one sentence in the report said "It is a null dataset". Any ideas?
Thanks.
You can test to see if there are any observations in the dataset first. If there are observations, then use the dataset, otherwise use a dummy dataset that looks like this and print it:
data use_this_if_no_obs;
msg = 'It is a null dataset';
run;
There are plenty of ways to test datasets to see if they contain any observations or not. My personal favorite is the %nobs macro found here: https://stackoverflow.com/a/5665758/214994 (other than my answer, there are several alternate approaches to pick from, or do a google search).
Using this %nobs macro we can then determine the dataset to use in a single line of code:
%let ds = %sysfunc(ifc(%nobs(iDs=sashelp.class) eq 0, use_this_if_no_obs, sashelp.class));
proc print data=&ds;
run;
Here's some code showing the alternate outcome:
data for_testing_only;
if 0;
run;
%let ds = %sysfunc(ifc(%nobs(iDs=for_testing_only) eq 0, use_this_if_no_obs, sashelp.class));
proc print data=&ds;
run;
I've used proc print to simplify the example, but you can adapt it to use proc report as necessary.
For the no data report you don't need to know how many observations are in the data just that there are none. This example shows how I would approach the problem.
Create example data with zero obs.
data class;
stop;
set sashelp.class;
run;
Check for no obs and add one obs with missing on all vars. Note that no observation are every read from class in this step.
data class;
if eof then output;
stop;
modify class end=eof;
run;
make the report
proc report data=class missing;
column _all_;
define _all_ / display;
define name / order;
compute before name;
retain_name=name;
endcomp;
compute after;
if not missing(retain_name) then l=0;
else l=40;
msg = 'No data for this report';
line msg $varying. l;
endcomp;
run;
Related
I often work with a large number of variables that have zero or empty values only, but I could not find a SAS command to drop these unwanted variables. I know we can use SAS/IML, but I encountered such cases many times and would like to have a macro that may help me without having to type the variable names to avoid errors. Here is my code for removing variables with zero values only. It works to produce a cleaned output data set y from a raw data set x without using the names of the variables. I hope others could have a better solution or help me to make mine better.
%Macro dropZeroV(x, y) ;
proc means data = &x. ;
var _numeric_;
output out = sumTab ; run;
proc transpose data = sumTab(drop = _TYPE_) out= sumt; var _Numeric_; id _STAT_; run;
%let Vlst =;
proc sql noprint;
select _NAME_ into : dropLst separated by ' '
from sumT
where Max=0 and Min =0;
data &y.;
set &x.; drop &dropLst.;
run;
proc print data = &y.; run;
%Mend dropZeroV;
Use STACKODS and ODS SUMMARY to get the table in the format needed in one step rather than multiple steps. This limits it to the sum, since if the sum = 0, all values are 0. You may also want to look at rounding to avoid any issues with numeric precision.
PROC MEANS + PROC TRANSPOSE go to :
ods select none;
proc means data= &x. stackods sum;
var _numeric_;
ods output summary = sumT;
run;
Suppose there are ten datasets with same structure: date and price, particularly they have same time period but different price
date price
20140604 5
20140605 7
20140607 9
I want to combine them and create a panel dataset. Since there is no name in each datasets, I attempt to add a new variable name into each data and then combine them.
The following codes are used to add name variable into each dataset
%macro name(sourcelib=,from=,going=);
proc sql noprint; /*read datasets in a library*/
create table mytables as
select *
from dictionary.tables
where libname = &sourcelib
order by memname ;
select count(memname)
into:obs
from mytables;
%let obs=&obs.;
select memname
into : memname1-:memname&obs.
from mytables;
quit;
%do i=1 %to &obs.;
data
&going.&&memname&i;
set
&from.&&memname&i;
name=&&memname&i;
run;
%end;
%mend;
So, is this strategy correct? Whether are there a different way to creating a panel data?
There are really two ways to setup repeated measures data. You can use the TALL method that your code will create. That is generally the most flexible. The other would be a wide format with each PRICE being stored in a different variable. That is usually less flexible, but can be easier for some analyses.
You probably do not need to use macro code or even code generation to combine 10 datasets. You might find that it is easier to just type the 10 dataset names than to write complex code to pull the names from metadata. So a data step like this will let you list any number of datasets in the SET statement and use the membername as the value for the new PANEL variable that distinguishes the source dataset.
data want ;
length dsn $41 panel $32 ;
set in1.panel1 in1.panela in1.panelb indsname=dsn ;
panel = scan(dsn,-1,'.') ;
run;
And if your dataset names follow a pattern that can be used as a member list in the SET statement then the code is even easier to write. So you could have a list of names that have a numeric suffix.
set in1.panel1-in1.panel10 indsname=dsn ;
or perhaps names that all start with a particular prefix.
set in1.panel: indsname=dsn ;
If the different panels are for the same dates then perhaps the wide format is easier? You could then merge the datasets by DATE and rename the individual PRICE variables. That is generate a data step that looks like this:
data want ;
merge in1.panel1 (rename=(price=price1))
in1.panel2 (rename=(price=price2))
...
;
by date;
run;
Or perhaps it would be easier to add a BY statement to the data set that makes the TALL dataset and then transpose it into the WIDE format.
data tall;
length dsn $41 panel $32 ;
set in1.panel1 in1.panela in1.panelb indsname=dsn ;
by date ;
panel = scan(dsn,-1,'.') ;
run;
proc transpose data=tall out=want ;
by date;
id panel;
var price ;
run;
I can't comment on the SQL code but the strategy is correct. Add a name to each data set and then panel on the name with the PANELBY statement.
That is a valid way to achieve what you are looking for.
You are going to need 2 . in between the macros for library.data syntax. The first . is used to concatenate. The second shows up as a ..
I assume you will want to append all of these data sets together. You can add
data &going..want;
set
%do i=1 %to &obs;
&from..&&memname&i
%end;
;
run;
You can combine your loop that adds the names and that data step like this:
data &going..want;
set
%do i=1 %to &obs;
&from..&&memname&i (in=d&i)
%end;
;
%do i=1 %to &obs;
if d&i then
name = &&memname&i;
%end;
run;
It’s the first time that I’ve opened sas today and I’m looking at some code a colleague wrote.
So let’s say I have some data (import) where duplicates occur but I want only those which have a unique number named VTNR.
First she looks for unique numbers:
data M.import;
set M.import;
by VTNR;
if first.VTNR=1 then unique=1;
run;
Then she creates a table with the duplicated numbers:
data M.import_dup1;
set M.import;
where unique^=1;
run;
And finally a table with all duplicates.
But here she is really hardcoding the numbers, so for example:
data M.import_dup2;
set M.import;
where VTNR in (130001292951,130100975613,130107546425,130108026864,130131307133,130134696722,130136267001,130137413257,130137839451,130138291041);
run;
I’m sure there must be a better way.
Since I’m only familiar with R I would write something like:
import_dup2 <- subset(import, is.element(import$VTNR, import_dup1$VTNR))
I guess there must be something like the $ also for sas?
To me it looks like the most direct translation of the R code
import_dup2 <- subset(import, is.element(import$VTNR, import_dup1$VTNR))
Would be to use SQL code
proc sql;
create table import_dup2 as
select * from import
where VTNR in (select VTNR from import_dup1)
;
quit;
But if your intent is to find the observations in IMPORT that have more than one observation per VTNR value there is no need to first create some other table.
data import_dup2 ;
set import;
by VTNR ;
if not (first.VTNR and last.VTNR);
run;
I would use the options in PROC SORT.
Make sure to specify an OUT= dataset otherwise you'll overwrite your original data.
/*Generate fake data with dups*/
data class;
set sashelp.class sashelp.class(obs=5);
run;
/*Create unique and dup dataset*/
proc sort data=class nouniquekey uniqueout=uniquerecs out=dups;
by name;
run;
/*Display results - for demo*/
proc print data=uniquerecs;
title 'Unique Records';
run;
proc print data=dups;
title 'Duplicate Records';
run;
Above solution can give you duplicates but not unique values. There are many possible ways to do both in SAS. Very easy to understand would be a SQL solution.
proc sql;
create table no_duplicates as
select *
from import
group by VTNR
having count(*) = 1
;
create table all_duplicates as
select *
from import
group by VTNR
having count(*) > 1
;
quit;
I would use Reeza's or Tom's solution, but for completeness, the solution most similar to R (and your preexisting code) would be three steps. Again, I wouldn't use this here, it's excess work for something you can do more easily, but the concept is helpful in other situations.
First, get the dataset of duplicates - either her method, or proc sort.
proc sort nodupkey data=have out=nodups dupout=dups;
by byvar;
run;
Then pull those into a macro list:
proc sql;
select byvar
into :duplist separated by ','
from dups;
quit;
Then you have them in &duplist. and can use them like so:
data want;
set have;
if not (byvar in &duplist.);
run;
data want;
set import;
where VTNR in import_dup1;
run;
What i want to do: I need to create a new variables for each value labels of a variable and do some recoding. I have all the value labels output from a SPSS file (see sample).
Sample:
proc format; library = library ;
value SEXF
1 = 'Homme'
2 = 'Femme' ;
value FUMERT1F
0 = 'Non'
1 = 'Oui , occasionnellement'
2 = 'Oui , régulièrement'
3 = 'Non mais j''ai déjà fumé' ;
value ... (many more with different amount of levels)
The new variable name would be the actual one without F and with underscore+level (example: FUMERT1F level 0 would become FUMERT1_0).
After that i need to recode the variables on this pattern:
data ds; set ds;
FUMERT1_0=0;
if FUMERT1=0 then FUMERT1_0=1;
FUMERT1_1=0;
if FUMERT1=1 then FUMERT1_1=1;
FUMERT1_2=0;
if FUMERT1=2 then FUMERT1_2=1;
FUMERT1_3=0;
if FUMERT1=3 then FUMERT1_3=1;
run;
Any help will be appreciated :)
EDIT: Both answers from Joe and the one of data_null_ are working but stackoverflow won't let me pin more than one right answer.
Update to add an _ underscore to the end of each name. It looks like there is not option for PROC TRANSREG to put an underscore between the variable name and the value of the class variable so we can just do a temporary rename. Create rename name=newname pairs to rename class variable to end in underscore and to rename them back. CAT functions and SQL into macro variables.
data have;
call streaminit(1234);
do caseID = 1 to 1e4;
fumert1 = rand('table',.2,.2,.2) - 1;
sex = first(substrn('MF',rand('table',.5),1));
output;
end;
stop;
run;
%let class=sex fumert1;
proc transpose data=have(obs=0) out=vnames;
var &class;
run;
proc print;
run;
proc sql noprint;
select catx('=',_name_,cats(_name_,'_')), catx('=',cats(_name_,'_'),_name_), cats(_name_,'_')
into :rename1 separated by ' ', :rename2 separated by ' ', :class2 separated by ' '
from vnames;
quit;
%put NOTE: &=rename1;
%put NOTE: &=rename2;
%put NOTE: &=class2;
proc transreg data=have(rename=(&rename1));
model class(&class2 / zero=none);
id caseid;
output out=design(drop=_: inter: rename=(&rename2)) design;
run;
%put NOTE: _TRGIND(&_trgindn)=&_trgind;
First try:
Looking at the code you supplied and the output from Joe's I don't really understand the need for the formats. It looks to me like you just want to create dummies for a list of class variables. That can be done with TRANSREG.
data have;
call streaminit(1234);
do caseID = 1 to 1e4;
fumert1 = rand('table',.2,.2,.2) - 1;
sex = first(substrn('MF',rand('table',.5),1));
output;
end;
stop;
run;
proc transreg data=have;
model class(sex fumert1 / zero=none);
id caseid;
output out=design(drop=_: inter:) design;
run;
proc contents;
run;
proc print data=design(obs=40);
run;
One good alternative to your code is to use proc transpose. It won't get you 0's in the non-1 cells, but those are easy enough to get. It does have the disadvantage that it makes it harder to get your variables in a particular order.
Basically, transpose once to vertical, then transpose back using the old variable name concatenated to the variable value as the new variable name. Hat tip to Data null for showing this feature in a recent SAS-L post. If your version of SAS doesn't support concatenation in PROC TRANSPOSE, do it in the data step beforehand.
I show using PROC EXPAND to then set the missings to 0, but you can do this in a data step as well if you don't have ETS or if PROC EXPAND is too slow. There are other ways to do this - including setting up the dataset with 0s pre-proc-transpose - and if you have a complicated scenario where that would be needed, this might make a good separate question.
data have;
do caseID = 1 to 1e4;
fumert1 = rand('Binomial',.3,3);
sex = rand('Binomial',.5,1)+1;
output;
end;
run;
proc transpose data=have out=want_pre;
by caseID;
var fumert1 sex;
copy fumert1 sex;
run;
data want_pre_t;
set want_pre;
x=1; *dummy variable;
run;
proc transpose data=want_pre_t out=want delim=_;
by caseID;
var x;
id _name_ col1;
copy fumert1 sex;
run;
proc expand data=want out=want_e method=none;
convert _numeric_ /transformin=(setmiss 0);
run;
For this method, you need to use two concepts: the cntlout dataset from proc format, and code generation. This method will likely be faster than the other option I presented (as it passes through the data only once), but it does rely on the variable name <-> format relationship being straightforward. If it's not, a slightly more complex variation will be required; you should post to that effect, and this can be modified.
First, the cntlout option in proc format makes a dataset of the contents of the format catalog. This is not the only way to do this, but it's a very easy one. Specify the appropriate libname as you would when you create a format, but instead of making one, it will dump the dataset out, and you can use it for other purposes.
Second, we create a macro that performs your action one time (creating a variable with the name_value name and then assigning it to the appropriate value) and then use proc sql to make a bunch of calls to that macro, once for each row in your cntlout dataset. Note - you may need a where clause here, or some other modifications, if your format library includes formats for variables that aren't in your dataset - or if it doesn't have the nice neat relationship your example does. Then we just make those calls in a data step.
*Set up formats and dataset;
proc format;
value SEXF
1 = 'Homme'
2 = 'Femme' ;
value FUMERT1F
0 = 'Non'
1 = 'Oui , occasionnellement'
2 = 'Oui , régulièrement'
3 = 'Non mais j''ai déjà fumé' ;
quit;
data have;
do caseID = 1 to 1e4;
fumert1 = rand('Binomial',.3,3);
sex = rand('Binomial',.5,1)+1;
output;
end;
run;
*Dump formats into table;
proc format cntlout=formats;
quit;
*Macro that does the above assignment once;
%macro spread_var(var=, val=);
&var._&val.= (&var.=&val.); *result of boolean expression is 1 or 0 (T=1 F=0);
%mend spread_var;
*make the list. May want NOPRINT option here as it will make a lot of calls in your output window otherwise, but I like to see them as output.;
proc sql;
select cats('%spread_var(var=',substr(fmtname,1,length(Fmtname)-1),',val=',start,')')
into :spreadlist separated by ' '
from formats;
quit;
*Actually use the macro call list generated above;
data want;
set have;
&spreadlist.;
run;
I'm working with a rather large several dataset that are provided to me as a CSV files. When I attempt to import one of the files the data will come in fine but, the number of variables in the file is too large for SAS, so it stops reading the variable names and starts assigning them sequential numbers. In order to maintain the variable names off of the data set I read in the file with the data row starting on 1 so it did not read the first row as variable names -
proc import file="X:\xxx\xxx\xxx\Extract\Live\Live.xlsx" out=raw_names dbms=xlsx replace;
SHEET="live";
GETNAMES=no;
DATAROW=1;
run;
I then run a macro to start breaking down the dataset and rename the variables based on the first observations in each variable -
%macro raw_sas_datasets(lib,output,start,end);
data raw_names2;
raw_names;
if _n_ ne 1 then delete;
keep A -- E &start. -- &end.;
run;
proc transpose data=raw_names2 out=raw_names2;
var A -- &end.;
run;
data raw_names2;
set raw_names2;
col1=compress(col1);
run;
data raw_values;
set raw;
keep A -- E &start. -- &end.;
run;
%macro rename(old,new);
data raw_values;
set raw_values;
rename &old.=&new.;
run;
%mend rename;
data _null_;
set raw_names2;
call execute('%rename('||_name_||","||col1||")");
run;
%macro freq(var);
proc freq data=raw_values noprint;
tables &var. / out=&var.;
run;
%mend freq;
data raw_names3;
set raw_names2;
if _n_ < 6 then delete;
run;
data _null_;
set raw_names3;
call execute('%freq('||col1||")");
run;
proc sort data=raw_values;
by StudySubjectID;
run;
data &lib..&output.;
set raw_values;
run;
%mend raw_sas_datasets;
The problem I'm running into is that the variable names are now all set properly and the data is lined up correctly, but the labels are still the original SAS assigned sequential numbers. Is there any way to set all of the labels equal to the variable names?
If you just want to remove the variable labels (at which point they default to the variable name), that's easy. From the SAS Documentation:
proc datasets lib=&lib.;
modify &output.;
attrib _all_ label=' ';
run;
I suspect you have a simpler solution than the above, though.
The actual renaming step needs to be done differently. Right now it's rewriting the entire dataset over and over again - for a lot of variables that is a terrible idea. Get your rename statements all into one datastep, or into a PROC DATASETS, or something else. Look up 'list processing SAS' for details on how to do that; on this site or on google you will find lots of solutions.
You likely can get SAS to read in the whole first line. The number of variables isn't the problem; it is probably the length of the line. There's another question that I'll find if I can on this site from a few months ago that deals with this exact problem.
My preferred option is not to use PROC IMPORT for CSVs anyway; I would suggest writing a metadata table that stores the variable names and the length/types for the variables, then using that to write import code. A little more work at first, but only has to be done once per study and you guarantee PROC IMPORT isn't making silly decisions for you.
In the library sashelp is a table vcolumn. vcolumn contains all the names of your variables for each library by table. You could write a macro that puts all your variable names into macro variables and then from there set the label.
Here's some code that I put together (not very pretty) but it does what you're looking for:
data test.label_var;
x=1;
y=1;
label x = 'xx';
label y = 'yy';
run;
proc sql noprint;
select count(*) into: cnt
from sashelp.vcolumn
where memname = 'LABEL_VAR';quit;
%let cnt = &cnt;
proc sql noprint;
select name into: name1 - :name&cnt
from sashelp.vcolumn
where memname = 'LABEL_VAR';quit;
%macro test;
%do i = 1 %to &cnt;
proc datasets library=test nolist;
modify label_var;
label &&name&i=&&name&i;
quit;
%end;
%mend test;
%test;