Now, I am trying to develop a testing tool, which can make unit testing. I mean I want to use JUnit in my testing tool to test other projects. But I don't know how to insert JUnit into my testing tool. Is it possible to do that and how? And is there any other open-source testing tool can be inserted into my testing tool?
To use Junit API make sure you got the jar in the classpath
To use Junit tests you need the testing class to extend SystemTestCase4
and your function to have #Test annotation above it
if you want code to run before your test so use function with #Before
and if you want after use function with #After
public class BaseTest extends SystemTestCase4 {
#Before
public void beforeEachTest() throws Exception {
}
#Test
#TestProperties(name = "test test ")
public void testTest() throws Exception {
//run your tested code
}
#After
public void afterEachTest() throws Exception {
}
as for how to test your projects it depend what tests you want to do?
For unit testing just add your own tests inside the projects
Integration, Functional or other tests need you to understand how to "Attack" it, meaning if it's UI tests for web so use tools for that (Selenium for example) if it's for checking network so use JMeter
Related
I want to put Unit Test to this class with NUnit, how do I do it?
using Microsoft.Azure.Functions.Extensions.DependencyInjection;
using Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection;
using Universal.DataTransferNCFDGII.Function.Services;
[assembly: FunctionsStartup(typeof(Universal.DataTransferNCFDGII.Function.Startup))]
namespace Universal.DataTransferNCFDGII.Function
{
public class Startup : FunctionsStartup
{
public override void Configure(IFunctionsHostBuilder builder)
{
builder.Services.AddSingleton<IInsertData, InsertData>();
}
}
}
Generally you do not test classes and methods Startup and Configure as there is no real logic of yours in need of testing. You would just be testing that the dependency injection setup works and that is not your code. It is a good practice while writing tests to remember to only test your code, not third party or .NET libraries. It would be better to cover this with an integration test, rather than unit test.
If you are concerned with no test for this class and method impacting your code coverage, you can just put the ExcludeFromCodeCoverage attribute on your method or class, like this:
[ExcludeFromCodeCoverage]
public override void Configure(IFunctionsHostBuilder builder)
We have to use an app.config key in our unit test cases, but the value of that key is supposed to be different in the test cases. So depending on that values how to run specific cases? If one unit test case runs then other test cases should not run how to manage this programmatically in c#?
Thank you
One approach you can follow is to wrap the use of your configurations in an interface.
public interface IConfigurationWrapper
{
string GetConfigA();
string GetConfigB();
}
public class ConfigurationWrapper : IConfigurationWrapper
{
public ConfigurationWrapper ()
{
return ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["countoffiles"]
}
}
And then on your tests mock it with NSubsititute or any other mocking library:
var configurations = Substitute.For<IConfigurationWrapper>();
configurations.GetConfigA().Returns("Config A for testing!")
Them you can use this mock(s) to run parameterized tests with xUnit.
This project of mine, has an implementation of this wrapper pattern for testing.
Can someone suggest a way to run tests in a specific order in Visual Studio 2013 Express?
Is there a way to create a playlist for the tests, which also defines the order in which to run them?
By the way: These are functional tests, using Selenium, written as unit tests in C#/Visual Studio. Not actual unit tests. Sometimes a regression test suite is so big it takes a while to run through all the tests. In these cases, I've often seen the need to run the test in a prioritized order. Or, there can be cases where it's difficult to run some tests without some other tests having been run before. In this regard, it's a bit more complicated than straight unit tests (which is the reason why it's normally done by test professionals, while unit tests are done by developers).
I've organised the tests in classes with related test methods. Ex.: All login tests are in a class called LoginTests, etc.
Class LoginTests:
- AdminCanLogin (...)
- UserCanLogin (...)
- IncorrectLoginFails (...)
- ...
CreatePostTests
- CanCreateEmptyPost (...)
- CanCreateBasicPost (...)
...
These classes are unit test classes, in their own project. They in turn calls classes and methods in a class library that uses Selenium.
MS suggests creating an "Ordered Unit Test" project. However, this is not available in the Express edition.
To address your playlist request directly see MS article: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh270865.aspx Resharper also has a nice test play list tool as well.
Here is an article on how to setup Ordered Tests but you cannot use this feature with Express as it requires Visual Studio Ultimate, Visual Studio Premium, Visual Studio Test Professional. http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms182631.aspx
If you need them ordered then they are more then likely integration tests. I am assuming you would like them ordered so you can either prepare data for the test or tear data back down after the test.
There are several ways to accommodate this requirement if it is the case. Using MSTest there are 4 attributes for this you can see more details of when they are executed here http://blogs.msdn.com/b/nnaderi/archive/2007/02/17/explaining-execution-order.aspx.
My other suggestion would be to have a helper class to preform the tasks(not tests) you are looking to have done in order, to be clear this class would not be a test class just a normal class with common functionality that would be called from within your tests.
If you need a test to create a product so another test can use that product and test that it can be added to a shopping cart then I would create a "SetupProduct" method that would do this for you as I am sure you would be testing various things that would require a product. This would prevent you from having test dependencies.
With that said, integration tests are good to verify end to end processes but where possible and applicable it might be easier to mock some or all dependencies such as your repositories. I use the Moq framework and find it really easy to work with.
This code is from the blog post linked above, I am placing it here in case the link ever dies.
Here is an example of a test class using the setup / tear down attributes to help with your tests.
[TestClass]
public class VSTSClass1
{
private TestContext testContextInstance;
public TestContext TestContext
{
get
{
return testContextInstance;
}
set
{
testContextInstance = value;
}
}
[ClassInitialize]
public static void ClassSetup(TestContext a)
{
Console.WriteLine("Class Setup");
}
[TestInitialize]
public void TestInit()
{
Console.WriteLine("Test Init");
}
[TestMethod]
public void Test1()
{
Console.WriteLine("Test1");
}
[TestMethod]
public void Test2()
{
Console.WriteLine("Test2");
}
[TestMethod]
public void Test3()
{
Console.WriteLine("Test3");
}
[TestCleanup]
public void TestCleanUp()
{
Console.WriteLine("TestCleanUp");
}
[ClassCleanup]
public static void ClassCleanUp()
{
Console.WriteLine("ClassCleanUp");
}
}
Here is the order that the methods were fired.
Class Setup
Test Init
Test1
TestCleanUp
Test Init
Test2
TestCleanUp
Test Init
Test3
TestCleanUp
ClassCleanUp
If you give more information on what you are trying to accomplish I would be happy to assist you in when to use which attribute or when to use the help class, note the helper class is NOT a test class just a standard class that has methods you can utilize to do common tasks that may be needed for multiple tests.
I am currently building a web application using GWT, GWTP.
And I have some questions about testings:
Is there a Lint-like tool for GWTP or GWT?
How to test presenters? (GWTP with Mockito)
How to test views?
Thanks.
Presenters can be easily unit-tested using Jukito. Here's a quick example of a Presenter being tested using Jukito.
#RunWith(JukitoRunner.class)
public class ShowCommentsPresenterTest {
#Inject
private ShowCommentsPresenter showCommentsPresenter;
#Inject
private PlaceManager placeManager;
#Test
public void onReset_PlaceRequestHasNoShowId_ShouldHideView() {
//given
when(placeManager.getCurrentPlaceRequest()).thenReturn(new PlaceRequest());
//when
showCommentsPresenter.onReset();
//then
verify(showCommentsPresenter.getView()).hide();
}
#Test
public void onReset_PlaceRequestHasAShowId_ShouldDisplayView() {
//given
String someShowId = "12345";
when(placeManager.getCurrentPlaceRequest()).thenReturn(new PlaceRequest()
.with(ParameterTokens.getShowId(), someShowId));
//when
showCommentsPresenter.onReset();
//then
verify(showCommentsPresenter.getView()).display();
}
}
In GWTP's philosophy, Views should not be unit-tested directly. Using a dumb View that is a slave to the Presenter, most of the logic can be tested through unit tests on the Presenters. Tools like Selenium are a better fit for testing UI interactivity.
Google put out a great article about using different testing methodologies with GWT. Definitely check it out. Personally, I use JUnit when I'm testing back-end stuff like business logic, and Selenium for testing the UI and application as a whole from the browser's perspective.
Can anyone tell me how get mbunit to run more than one test at a time without it setting up and tearing down after every test?
Currently I'm using selenium for UI testing and need to run the tests consecutively do a login page.
Thanks in advance,
cb
Are you looking for FixtureSetUp/FixtureTearDown attribute [used to be called TestFixtureSetUp], which is called at class level, meaning, it will be set up once for all the tests in one test class.
Setup/TearDown attribute is called on Method level.
MbUnit also support test assembly setup and teardown. Here is a link for this.
[assembly: AssemblyCleanUp(typeof(AssemblyCleaner))]
...
public class AssemblyCleaner
{
[SetUp]
public static void SetUp()
{
Console.WriteLine("Setting up {0}", typeof(AssemblyCleanUp).Assembly.FullName);
}
[TearDown]
public static void TearDown()
{
Console.WriteLine("Cleaning up {0}", typeof(AssemblyCleanUp).Assembly.FullName);
}
}