How to simulate a CRM plugin sandbox isolation mode in unit tests? - unit-testing

Context
I would like to write some unit tests against classes what will be utilized by CRM 2016 CodeActivity and Plugin classes. The final assembly will be registered in sandbox isolation mode.
I want to be sure if a test case is green when running unit tests, it will not be more restricted in sandbox isolation security restrictions when registered and run in CRM.
Question
Is there any way to simulate the sandbox isolation when running unit tests?

That's a really good question. You can maybe simulate running the plugin assemblies and code activities in a sandbox based on this Sandbox example.
With that example you could run the codeactivity with a limited set of permissions.
Now, what are the exact limitations of CRM online? Found this article. There is a Sandbox Limitations sections with some of them. If you find another one please let me know. Cause I'd be keen on adding this feature to FakeXrmEasy
Cheers,

I found this today: https://github.com/carltoncolter/DynamicsPlugin/blob/master/DynamicsPlugin.Tests/PluginContainer.cs
Which I used to turn into this:
using System;
using System.Diagnostics;
using System.Globalization;
using System.Net;
using System.Net.NetworkInformation;
using System.Reflection;
using System.Security;
using System.Security.Permissions;
using System.Text.RegularExpressions;
namespace Core.DLaB.Xrm.Tests.Sandbox
{
public static class SandboxWrapper
{
public static T Instantiate<T>(object[] constructorArguments = null)
{
return new SandboxWrapper<T>().Instantiate(constructorArguments);
}
public static T InstantiatePlugin<T>(string unsecureConfig = null, string secureConfig = null)
{
object[] args = null;
if (secureConfig == null)
{
if (unsecureConfig != null)
{
args = new object[] {unsecureConfig};
}
}
else
{
args = new object[]{unsecureConfig, secureConfig};
}
return new SandboxWrapper<T>().Instantiate(args);
}
}
public class SandboxWrapper<T> : MarshalByRefObject, IDisposable
{
private const string DomainSuffix = "Sandbox";
/// <summary>
/// The Sandbox AppDomain to execute the plugin
/// </summary>
public AppDomain SandboxedAppDomain { get; private set; }
public T Instantiate(object[] constructorArguments = null)
{
/*
* Sandboxed plug-ins and custom workflow activities can access the network through the HTTP and HTTPS protocols. This capability provides
support for accessing popular web resources like social sites, news feeds, web services, and more. The following web access restrictions
apply to this sandbox capability.
* Only the HTTP and HTTPS protocols are allowed.
* Access to localhost (loopback) is not permitted.
* IP addresses cannot be used. You must use a named web address that requires DNS name resolution.
* Anonymous authentication is supported and recommended. There is no provision for prompting the
on user for credentials or saving those credentials.
*/
constructorArguments = constructorArguments ?? new object[] { };
var type = typeof(T);
var source = type.Assembly.Location;
var sourceAssembly = Assembly.UnsafeLoadFrom(source);
var setup = new AppDomainSetup
{
ApplicationBase = AppDomain.CurrentDomain.BaseDirectory,
ApplicationName = $"{sourceAssembly.GetName().Name}{DomainSuffix}",
DisallowBindingRedirects = true,
DisallowCodeDownload = true,
DisallowPublisherPolicy = true
};
var ps = new PermissionSet(PermissionState.None);
ps.AddPermission(new SecurityPermission(SecurityPermissionFlag.SerializationFormatter));
ps.AddPermission(new SecurityPermission(SecurityPermissionFlag.Execution));
ps.AddPermission(new FileIOPermission(PermissionState.None));
ps.AddPermission(new ReflectionPermission(ReflectionPermissionFlag.RestrictedMemberAccess));
//RegEx pattern taken from: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/gg334752.aspx
ps.AddPermission(new WebPermission(NetworkAccess.Connect,
new Regex(
#"^http[s]?://(?!((localhost[:/])|(\[.*\])|([0-9]+[:/])|(0x[0-9a-f]+[:/])|(((([0-9]+)|(0x[0-9A-F]+))\.){3}(([0-9]+)|(0x[0-9A-F]+))[:/]))).+")));
// We don't need to add these, but it is important to note that there is no access to the following
ps.AddPermission(new NetworkInformationPermission(NetworkInformationAccess.None));
ps.AddPermission(new EnvironmentPermission(PermissionState.None));
ps.AddPermission(new RegistryPermission(PermissionState.None));
ps.AddPermission(new EventLogPermission(PermissionState.None));
SandboxedAppDomain = AppDomain.CreateDomain(DomainSuffix, null, setup, ps, null);
return Create(constructorArguments);
}
private T Create(object[] constructorArguments)
{
var type = typeof(T);
return (T)Activator.CreateInstanceFrom(
SandboxedAppDomain,
type.Assembly.ManifestModule.FullyQualifiedName,
// ReSharper disable once AssignNullToNotNullAttribute
type.FullName, false, BindingFlags.CreateInstance,
null, constructorArguments,
CultureInfo.CurrentCulture, null
).Unwrap();
}
#region IDisposable Support
//Implementing IDisposable Pattern: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/standard/design-guidelines/dispose-pattern
private bool _disposed; // To detect redundant calls
protected virtual void Dispose(bool disposing)
{
if (_disposed) return;
if (disposing)
{
if (SandboxedAppDomain != null)
{
AppDomain.Unload(SandboxedAppDomain);
SandboxedAppDomain = null;
}
}
_disposed = true;
}
// This code added to correctly implement the disposable pattern.
void IDisposable.Dispose()
{
// Do not change this code. Put cleanup code in Dispose(bool disposing) above.
Dispose(true);
}
#endregion
}
}
Which can be used as such:
SandboxWrapper.InstantiatePlugin<YourPluginType>(unsecureString, secureString)
Not sure how much of it is valid or not, but it worked for handling my testing of xml and JSON serialization correctly.

Related

Salesforce Apex web service test class error

I'm working on Salesforce Apex web service to create record. Below is the apex web service class that I have written:
global class createCloudRecord {
global class projectInputs{
webService Integer ProjectID;
webService String ProjectName;
}
webService static Boolean createSFRecords(List<projectInputs> inputs) {
cv__Designation__c desg = new cv__Designation__c();
desg.cv__Active__c = true;
desg.cv__Default__c = false;
desg.cv__Description__c = 'Test Desc';
desg.OwnerId = '002B0000000K9soIAD';
desg.Name = inputs[0].ProjectName;
desg.cv__ExternalId__c = string.valueof(inputs[0].ProjectID);
insert desg;
return true;
}
}
It's working fine and creating records on SF cloud via SOAP API call. Now I have to written the test class for above web service with code coverage of min 75%.
Below is the code that I have written for my test class:
#isTest
private class createCloudRecordTest {
static testMethod void testCreateSFRecords() {
createCloudRecord.projectInputs project = new createCloudRecord.projectInputs();
project.ProjectID = 12345;
project.ProjectName = 'TestProject';
createCloudRecord.createSFRecords(project);
}
}
But this is showing an error for this line createCloudRecord.createSFRecords(project);:
Error: Compile Error: Method does not exist or incorrect signature.
Anyone has any idea how can I make this working.
Thanks!
I got the solution for my question. The problem was in my web service I've defined param as list but above in test class I'm passing param as single record.
So it should be something like below:
#isTest
private class createCloudRecordTest {
static testMethod void testCreateSFRecords() {
createCloudRecord.projectInputs project = new createCloudRecord.projectInputs();
project.ProjectID = 12345;
project.ProjectName = 'TestProject';
list<createCloudRecord.projectInputs> projects = new list<createCloudRecord.projectInputs>();
projects.add(project);
createCloudRecord.createSFRecords(projects);
}
}

How to create new record from web service in ADF?

I have created a class and published it as web service. I have created a web method like this:
public void addNewRow(MyObject cob) {
MyAppModule myAppModule = new MyAppModule();
try {
ViewObjectImpl vo = myAppModule.getMyVewObject1();
================> vo object is now null
Row r = vo.createRow();
r.setAttribute("Param1", cob.getParam1());
r.setAttribute("Param2", cob.getParam2());
vo.executeQuery();
getTransaction().commit();
} catch (Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
As I have written in code, myAppModule.getMyVewObject1() returns a null object. I do not understand why! As far as I know AppModule has to initialize the object by itself when I call "getMyVewObject1()" but maybe I am wrong, or maybe this is not the way it should be for web methods. Has anyone ever faced this issue? Any help would be very appreciated.
You can check nice tutorial: Building and Using Web Services with JDeveloper
It gives you general idea about how you should build your webservices with ADF.
Another approach is when you need to call existing Application Module from some bean that doesn't have needed environment (servlet, etc), then you can initialize it like this:
String appModuleName = "org.my.package.name.model.AppModule";
String appModuleConfig = "AppModuleLocal";
ApplicationModule am = Configuration.createRootApplicationModule(appModuleName, appModuleConfig);
Don't forget to release it:
Configuration.releaseRootApplicationModule(am, true);
And why you shouldn't really do it like this.
And even more...
Better aproach is to get access to binding layer and do call from there.
Here is a nice article.
Per Our PM : If you don't use it in the context of an ADF application then the following code should be used (sample code is from a project I am involved in). Note the release of the AM at the end of the request
#WebService(serviceName = "LightViewerSoapService")
public class LightViewerSoapService {
private final String amDef = " oracle.demo.lightbox.model.viewer.soap.services.LightBoxViewerService";
private final String config = "LightBoxViewerServiceLocal";
LightBoxViewerServiceImpl service;
public LightViewerSoapService() {
super();
}
#WebMethod
public List<Presentations> getAllUserPresentations(#WebParam(name = "userId") Long userId){
ArrayList<Presentations> al = new ArrayList<Presentations>();
service = (LightBoxViewerServiceImpl)getApplicationModule(amDef,config);
ViewObject vo = service.findViewObject("UserOwnedPresentations");
VariableValueManager vm = vo.ensureVariableManager();
vm.setVariableValue("userIdVariable", userId.toString());
vo.applyViewCriteria(vo.getViewCriteriaManager().getViewCriteria("byUserIdViewCriteria"));
Row rw = vo.first();
if(rw != null){
Presentations p = createPresentationFromRow(rw);
al.add(p);
while(vo.hasNext()){
rw = vo.next();
p = createPresentationFromRow(rw);
al.add(p);
}
}
releaseAm((ApplicationModule)service);
return al;
}
Have a look here too:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jDBd3JuroMQ

How do I invoke Multiple Startup Projects when running a unit tests in Debug Mode

This seems like a simple thing to do but I can't seem to find any info anywhere! I've got a solution that has a service that we run in 'Console Mode' when debugging. I want it to be started and 'attached' when I run my unit test from Visual Studio.
I'm using Resharper as the unit test runner.
Not a direct answer to your question, BUT
We faced a similar problem recently and eventually settled on a solution using AppDomain
As your solution is already running as a Console project it would be little work to make it boot in a new AppDomain. Furthermore, you could run Assertions on this project as well as part of unit testing. (if required)
Consider the following static class Sandbox which you can use to boot multiple app domains.
The Execute method requires a Type which is-a SandboxAction. (class definition also included below)
You would first extend this class and provide any bootup actions for running your console project.
public class ConsoleRunnerProjectSandbox : SandboxAction
{
protected override void OnRun()
{
Bootstrapper.Start(); //this code will be run on the newly create app domain
}
}
Now to get your app domain running you simply call
Sandbox.Execute<ConsoleRunnerProjectSandbox>("AppDomainName", configFile)
Note you can pass this call a config file so you can bootup your project in the same fashion as if you were running it via the console
Any more questions please ask.
public static class Sandbox
{
private static readonly List<Tuple<AppDomain, SandboxAction>> _sandboxes = new List<Tuple<AppDomain, SandboxAction>>();
public static T Execute<T>(string friendlyName, string configFile, params object[] args)
where T : SandboxAction
{
Trace.WriteLine(string.Format("Sandboxing {0}: {1}", typeof (T).Name, configFile));
AppDomain sandbox = CreateDomain(friendlyName, configFile);
var objectHandle = sandbox.CreateInstance(typeof(T).Assembly.FullName, typeof(T).FullName, true, BindingFlags.Default, null, args, null, null, null);
T sandBoxAction = objectHandle.Unwrap() as T;
sandBoxAction.Run();
Tuple<AppDomain, SandboxAction> box = new Tuple<AppDomain, SandboxAction>(sandbox, sandBoxAction);
_sandboxes.Add(box);
return sandBoxAction;
}
private static AppDomain CreateDomain(string name, string customConfigFile)
{
FileInfo info = customConfigFile != null ? new FileInfo(customConfigFile) : null;
if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(customConfigFile) && !info.Exists)
throw new ArgumentException("customConfigFile not found using " + customConfigFile + " at " + info.FullName);
var appsetup = new AppDomainSetup();
//appsetup.ApplicationBase = Path.GetDirectoryName(typeof(Sandbox).Assembly.Location);
appsetup.ApplicationBase = AppDomain.CurrentDomain.SetupInformation.ApplicationBase;
if (customConfigFile==null)
customConfigFile = AppDomain.CurrentDomain.SetupInformation.ConfigurationFile;
appsetup.ConfigurationFile = customConfigFile;
var sandbox = AppDomain.CreateDomain(
name,
AppDomain.CurrentDomain.Evidence,
appsetup);
return sandbox;
}
public static void DestroyAppDomainForSandbox(SandboxAction action)
{
foreach(var tuple in _sandboxes)
{
if(tuple.Second == action)
{
AppDomain.Unload(tuple.First);
Console.WriteLine("Unloaded sandbox ");
_sandboxes.Remove(tuple);
return;
}
}
}
}
[Serializable]
public abstract class SandboxAction : MarshalByRefObject
{
public override object InitializeLifetimeService()
{
return null;
}
public void Run()
{
string name = AppDomain.CurrentDomain.FriendlyName;
Log.Info("Executing {0} in AppDomain:{1} thread:{2}", name, AppDomain.CurrentDomain.Id, Thread.CurrentThread.ManagedThreadId);
try
{
OnRun();
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
Log.Error(ex, "Exception in app domain {0}", name);
throw;
}
}
protected abstract void OnRun();
public virtual void Stop()
{
}
}

Server architecture and SubSonic

Im trying to develop an server /client application. The server will be a bunch of webservices, the idea was to expose methods like:
Company GetNewCompany(); //Creates an new Company Object
Save(Company C);
CompanyCollection GetCompany(Query q);
Where Query object is part of Subsonic 2.1. But the problem is that SubSonic is not built for this, Have I missed something here? or is it just impossible to to use subsonic query language over SOAP?
This would have been great feature, becuase then it is really easy to make an application server using subsonic.
Br
Soren.
If you want to use subsonic v3 you can look at this issue that talks about IUpdatable:
http://code.google.com/p/subsonicthree/issues/detail?id=30
This will let you use ado data services somewhat painlessly. You use a DB constructor that take a URI argument. This probably won't be a part of v3 but you could make changes like this yourself.
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using Microsoft.VisualStudio.TestTools.UnitTesting;
using WcfClientTest.NorthwindService;
namespace WcfClientTest
{
/// <summary>
/// Summary description for WcfTest
/// To run these tests, load this project, and somehow get a server running at the URI.
/// This can be done by updating the service reference to start the development server.
/// </summary>
[TestClass]
public class WcfTest
{
private string baseURI = "http://127.0.0.1:49649/Northwind.svc";
private DB ctx;
/// <summary>
/// Sets up test.
/// </summary>
[TestInitialize]
public void SetUp()
{
ctx = new DB(new Uri(baseURI));
}
[TestCleanup]
public void Cleanup()
{
}
[TestMethod]
public void Select_Simple_With_Variable()
{
int categoryID = 5;
IQueryable<Product> result = from p in ctx.Products
where p.CategoryID == categoryID
select p;
List<Product> products = result.ToList();
Assert.AreEqual(7, products.Count());
}
[TestMethod]
public void TestAddNew()
{
// add customer
var c = new Customer
{
CustomerID = "XXXXX",
ContactTitle = "Prez",
Country = "USA",
ContactName = "Big Guy",
CompanyName = "Big Guy Company"
};
ctx.AddToCustomers(c);
ctx.SaveChanges();
IQueryable<Customer> qCustomer = from cust in ctx.Customers
where cust.CustomerID == "XXXXX"
select cust;
Customer c2 = qCustomer.FirstOrDefault();
Assert.AreEqual("XXXXX", c2.CustomerID);
if (c2 != null)
{
ctx.DeleteObject(c2);
}
ctx.SaveChanges();
IQueryable<Customer> qCustomer2 = from cust in ctx.Customers
where cust.ContactName == "Big Guy"
select cust;
// Returns null if the row isn't found.
Customer c3 = qCustomer2.SingleOrDefault();
Assert.AreEqual(null, c3);
}
}
}
And this is all there is to the service:
using System.Data.Services;
using Northwind;
namespace NorthwindService
{
[System.ServiceModel.ServiceBehavior(IncludeExceptionDetailInFaults=false)]
public class Northwind: DataService<DB>
{
// This method is called only once to initialize service-wide policies.
public static void InitializeService(IDataServiceConfiguration config)
{
config.SetEntitySetAccessRule("*", EntitySetRights.All);
config.UseVerboseErrors = true;
}
}
}
And for web.config:
<system.serviceModel>
<serviceHostingEnvironment aspNetCompatibilityEnabled="true"/>
</system.serviceModel>

Virtual Server IIS WMI Problem

I have been tasked with finding out what is causing an issue with this bit of code:
public static ArrayList GetEthernetMacAddresses()
{
ArrayList addresses = new ArrayList();
ManagementClass mc = new ManagementClass("Win32_NetworkAdapter");
// This causes GetInstances(options)
// to return all subclasses of Win32_NetworkAdapter
EnumerationOptions options = new EnumerationOptions();
options.EnumerateDeep = true;
foreach (ManagementObject mo in mc.GetInstances(options)) {
string macAddr = mo["MACAddress"] as string;
string adapterType = mo["AdapterType"] as string;
if (!StringUtil.IsBlank(macAddr) && !StringUtil.IsBlank(adapterType))
{
if (adapterType.StartsWith("Ethernet")) {
addresses.Add(macAddr);
}
}
}
return addresses;
}
On our (Win2003) virtual servers, this works when run as part of a console application but not from a web service running on IIS (on that same machine).
Alternatively, I can use this code in a web service on IIS (on the virtual server) and get the correct return values:
public static string GetMacAddresses()
{
ManagementClass mgmt = new ManagementClass(
"Win32_NetworkAdapterConfiguration"
);
ManagementObjectCollection objCol = mgmt.GetInstances();
foreach (ManagementObject obj in objCol)
{
if ((bool)obj["IPEnabled"])
{
if (sb.Length > 0)
{
sb.Append(";");
}
sb.Append(obj["MacAddress"].ToString());
}
obj.Dispose();
}
}
Why does the second one work and not the first one?
Why only when called through an IIS web service on a virtual machine?
Any help would be appreciated.
UPDATE: After much telephone time with all different levels of MS Support, the've come to the conclusion that this is "As Designed".
Since it is on a driver level for the virtual network adapter driver, the answer was that we should change our code "to work around the issue".
This means that you cannot reliable test code on virtual servers unless you with the same code that you use on physical servers, since we can't guarantee that the servers are exact replicas...
Okay, so I wrote this code to test the issue:
public void GetWin32_NetworkAdapter()
{
DataTable dt = new DataTable();
dt.Columns.Add("AdapterName", typeof(string));
dt.Columns.Add("ServiceName", typeof(string));
dt.Columns.Add("AdapterType", typeof(string));
dt.Columns.Add("IPEnabled", typeof(bool));
dt.Columns.Add("MacAddress", typeof(string));
//Try getting it by Win32_NetworkAdapterConfiguration
ManagementClass mgmt = new ManagementClass("Win32_NetworkAdapter");
EnumerationOptions options = new EnumerationOptions();
options.EnumerateDeep = true;
ManagementObjectCollection objCol = mgmt.GetInstances(options);
foreach (ManagementObject obj in objCol)
{
DataRow dr = dt.NewRow();
dr["AdapterName"] = obj["Caption"].ToString();
dr["ServiceName"] = obj["ServiceName"].ToString();
dr["AdapterType"] = obj["AdapterType"];
dr["IPEnabled"] = (bool)obj["IPEnabled"];
if (obj["MacAddress"] != null)
{
dr["MacAddress"] = obj["MacAddress"].ToString();
}
else
{
dr["MacAddress"] = "none";
}
dt.Rows.Add(dr);
}
gvConfig.DataSource = dt;
gvConfig.DataBind();
}
When it's run on a physical IIS box I get this:
Physical IIS server http://img14.imageshack.us/img14/8098/physicaloutput.gif
Same code on Virtual IIS server:
Virtual server http://img25.imageshack.us/img25/4391/virtualoutput.gif
See a difference? It's on the first line. The virtual server doesn't return the "AdapterType" string. Which is why the original code was failing.
This brings up an interesting thought. If Virtual Server is supposed to be an "virtual" representation of a real IIS server, why doesn't it return the same values?
Why are the two returning different results? It's possible that due to the different user accounts, you'll get different results running from the console and from a service.
Why does (1) fail and (2) work? Is it possible that a null result for adapterType return a null value? If so, would the code handle this condition?