I have created a class and published it as web service. I have created a web method like this:
public void addNewRow(MyObject cob) {
MyAppModule myAppModule = new MyAppModule();
try {
ViewObjectImpl vo = myAppModule.getMyVewObject1();
================> vo object is now null
Row r = vo.createRow();
r.setAttribute("Param1", cob.getParam1());
r.setAttribute("Param2", cob.getParam2());
vo.executeQuery();
getTransaction().commit();
} catch (Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
As I have written in code, myAppModule.getMyVewObject1() returns a null object. I do not understand why! As far as I know AppModule has to initialize the object by itself when I call "getMyVewObject1()" but maybe I am wrong, or maybe this is not the way it should be for web methods. Has anyone ever faced this issue? Any help would be very appreciated.
You can check nice tutorial: Building and Using Web Services with JDeveloper
It gives you general idea about how you should build your webservices with ADF.
Another approach is when you need to call existing Application Module from some bean that doesn't have needed environment (servlet, etc), then you can initialize it like this:
String appModuleName = "org.my.package.name.model.AppModule";
String appModuleConfig = "AppModuleLocal";
ApplicationModule am = Configuration.createRootApplicationModule(appModuleName, appModuleConfig);
Don't forget to release it:
Configuration.releaseRootApplicationModule(am, true);
And why you shouldn't really do it like this.
And even more...
Better aproach is to get access to binding layer and do call from there.
Here is a nice article.
Per Our PM : If you don't use it in the context of an ADF application then the following code should be used (sample code is from a project I am involved in). Note the release of the AM at the end of the request
#WebService(serviceName = "LightViewerSoapService")
public class LightViewerSoapService {
private final String amDef = " oracle.demo.lightbox.model.viewer.soap.services.LightBoxViewerService";
private final String config = "LightBoxViewerServiceLocal";
LightBoxViewerServiceImpl service;
public LightViewerSoapService() {
super();
}
#WebMethod
public List<Presentations> getAllUserPresentations(#WebParam(name = "userId") Long userId){
ArrayList<Presentations> al = new ArrayList<Presentations>();
service = (LightBoxViewerServiceImpl)getApplicationModule(amDef,config);
ViewObject vo = service.findViewObject("UserOwnedPresentations");
VariableValueManager vm = vo.ensureVariableManager();
vm.setVariableValue("userIdVariable", userId.toString());
vo.applyViewCriteria(vo.getViewCriteriaManager().getViewCriteria("byUserIdViewCriteria"));
Row rw = vo.first();
if(rw != null){
Presentations p = createPresentationFromRow(rw);
al.add(p);
while(vo.hasNext()){
rw = vo.next();
p = createPresentationFromRow(rw);
al.add(p);
}
}
releaseAm((ApplicationModule)service);
return al;
}
Have a look here too:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jDBd3JuroMQ
Related
I am creating a service on top of a Ktor client. My payload is XML, and as such a simplified version of my client looks like this :
class MavenClient(private val client : HttpClient) {
private suspend fun getRemotePom(url : String) =
try{ MavenClientSuccess(client.get<POMProject>(url)) }catch (e: Exception) { MavenClientFailure(e)
}
companion object {
fun getDefaultClient(): HttpClient {
return HttpClient(Apache) {
install(JsonFeature) {
serializer = JacksonSerializer(jackson = kotlinXmlMapper)
accept(ContentType.Text.Xml)
accept(ContentType.Application.Xml)
accept(ContentType.Text.Plain)
}
}
}
}
}
Note the use of a custom XMLMapper, attached to a custom data class.
I want to test this class, and follow the documentation.
I end up with the following code for my test client :
private val mockClient = HttpClient(MockEngine) {
engine {
addHandler { request ->
when (request.url.fullUrl) {
"https://lengrand.me/minimal/1.2/minimal-1.2.pom" -> {
respond(minimalResourceStreamPom.readBytes()
, headers = headersOf("Content-Type" to listOf(ContentType.Application.Xml.toString())))
}
"https://lengrand.me/unknown/1.2/unknown-1.2.pom" -> {
respond("", HttpStatusCode.NotFound)
}
else -> error("Unhandled ${request.url.fullUrl}")
}
}
}
// TODO : How do I avoid repeating this again ? That's my implementation?!
install(JsonFeature) {
serializer = JacksonSerializer(jackson = PomParser.kotlinXmlMapper)
accept(ContentType.Text.Xml)
accept(ContentType.Application.Xml)
accept(ContentType.Text.Plain)
}
}
private val Url.hostWithPortIfRequired: String get() = if (port == protocol.defaultPort) host else hostWithPort
private val Url.fullUrl: String get() = "${protocol.name}://$hostWithPortIfRequired$fullPath"
private val mavenClient = MavenClient(mockClient)
Now, I am not worried about the Mapper itself, because I test it directly.
However what bothers me is that I essentially have to duplicate the complete logic of my client to test behaviour?
This seems very brittle, because for example it will cause my tests to fail and have to be updated if I move to Json tomorrow. Same if I start using Response Validation for example.
This is even more true for another client where I am using a defaultRequest, which I have to completely copy over as well:
private val mockClient = HttpClient(MockEngine) {
install(JsonFeature) {
serializer = JacksonSerializer(mapper)
accept(ContentType.Application.Json)
}
defaultRequest {
method = HttpMethod.Get
host = "api.github.com"
header("Accept", "application/vnd.github.v3+json")
if (GithubLogin().hasToken()) header("Authorization", GithubLogin().authToken)
}
Am I doing things wrong? Am I testing too much ? I am curious as to how I can improve this.
Thanks a lot for your input!
P.S : Unrelated but the page about testing on Ktor mentions adding the dependency to the implementation. Sounds like I should use testImplementation instead to avoid shipping the lib with my application ?
The MockEngine is designed for stubbing real HTTP client implementation to test objects that use it. The duplication problem, you encounter, lies in the fact that transforming response body responsibility belongs to the client. So I suggest either use Jackson directly to transform a response body (in this case you don't need to use JsonFeature) or extract common configuration in a extension function and call it for both engines.
Context
I would like to write some unit tests against classes what will be utilized by CRM 2016 CodeActivity and Plugin classes. The final assembly will be registered in sandbox isolation mode.
I want to be sure if a test case is green when running unit tests, it will not be more restricted in sandbox isolation security restrictions when registered and run in CRM.
Question
Is there any way to simulate the sandbox isolation when running unit tests?
That's a really good question. You can maybe simulate running the plugin assemblies and code activities in a sandbox based on this Sandbox example.
With that example you could run the codeactivity with a limited set of permissions.
Now, what are the exact limitations of CRM online? Found this article. There is a Sandbox Limitations sections with some of them. If you find another one please let me know. Cause I'd be keen on adding this feature to FakeXrmEasy
Cheers,
I found this today: https://github.com/carltoncolter/DynamicsPlugin/blob/master/DynamicsPlugin.Tests/PluginContainer.cs
Which I used to turn into this:
using System;
using System.Diagnostics;
using System.Globalization;
using System.Net;
using System.Net.NetworkInformation;
using System.Reflection;
using System.Security;
using System.Security.Permissions;
using System.Text.RegularExpressions;
namespace Core.DLaB.Xrm.Tests.Sandbox
{
public static class SandboxWrapper
{
public static T Instantiate<T>(object[] constructorArguments = null)
{
return new SandboxWrapper<T>().Instantiate(constructorArguments);
}
public static T InstantiatePlugin<T>(string unsecureConfig = null, string secureConfig = null)
{
object[] args = null;
if (secureConfig == null)
{
if (unsecureConfig != null)
{
args = new object[] {unsecureConfig};
}
}
else
{
args = new object[]{unsecureConfig, secureConfig};
}
return new SandboxWrapper<T>().Instantiate(args);
}
}
public class SandboxWrapper<T> : MarshalByRefObject, IDisposable
{
private const string DomainSuffix = "Sandbox";
/// <summary>
/// The Sandbox AppDomain to execute the plugin
/// </summary>
public AppDomain SandboxedAppDomain { get; private set; }
public T Instantiate(object[] constructorArguments = null)
{
/*
* Sandboxed plug-ins and custom workflow activities can access the network through the HTTP and HTTPS protocols. This capability provides
support for accessing popular web resources like social sites, news feeds, web services, and more. The following web access restrictions
apply to this sandbox capability.
* Only the HTTP and HTTPS protocols are allowed.
* Access to localhost (loopback) is not permitted.
* IP addresses cannot be used. You must use a named web address that requires DNS name resolution.
* Anonymous authentication is supported and recommended. There is no provision for prompting the
on user for credentials or saving those credentials.
*/
constructorArguments = constructorArguments ?? new object[] { };
var type = typeof(T);
var source = type.Assembly.Location;
var sourceAssembly = Assembly.UnsafeLoadFrom(source);
var setup = new AppDomainSetup
{
ApplicationBase = AppDomain.CurrentDomain.BaseDirectory,
ApplicationName = $"{sourceAssembly.GetName().Name}{DomainSuffix}",
DisallowBindingRedirects = true,
DisallowCodeDownload = true,
DisallowPublisherPolicy = true
};
var ps = new PermissionSet(PermissionState.None);
ps.AddPermission(new SecurityPermission(SecurityPermissionFlag.SerializationFormatter));
ps.AddPermission(new SecurityPermission(SecurityPermissionFlag.Execution));
ps.AddPermission(new FileIOPermission(PermissionState.None));
ps.AddPermission(new ReflectionPermission(ReflectionPermissionFlag.RestrictedMemberAccess));
//RegEx pattern taken from: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/gg334752.aspx
ps.AddPermission(new WebPermission(NetworkAccess.Connect,
new Regex(
#"^http[s]?://(?!((localhost[:/])|(\[.*\])|([0-9]+[:/])|(0x[0-9a-f]+[:/])|(((([0-9]+)|(0x[0-9A-F]+))\.){3}(([0-9]+)|(0x[0-9A-F]+))[:/]))).+")));
// We don't need to add these, but it is important to note that there is no access to the following
ps.AddPermission(new NetworkInformationPermission(NetworkInformationAccess.None));
ps.AddPermission(new EnvironmentPermission(PermissionState.None));
ps.AddPermission(new RegistryPermission(PermissionState.None));
ps.AddPermission(new EventLogPermission(PermissionState.None));
SandboxedAppDomain = AppDomain.CreateDomain(DomainSuffix, null, setup, ps, null);
return Create(constructorArguments);
}
private T Create(object[] constructorArguments)
{
var type = typeof(T);
return (T)Activator.CreateInstanceFrom(
SandboxedAppDomain,
type.Assembly.ManifestModule.FullyQualifiedName,
// ReSharper disable once AssignNullToNotNullAttribute
type.FullName, false, BindingFlags.CreateInstance,
null, constructorArguments,
CultureInfo.CurrentCulture, null
).Unwrap();
}
#region IDisposable Support
//Implementing IDisposable Pattern: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/standard/design-guidelines/dispose-pattern
private bool _disposed; // To detect redundant calls
protected virtual void Dispose(bool disposing)
{
if (_disposed) return;
if (disposing)
{
if (SandboxedAppDomain != null)
{
AppDomain.Unload(SandboxedAppDomain);
SandboxedAppDomain = null;
}
}
_disposed = true;
}
// This code added to correctly implement the disposable pattern.
void IDisposable.Dispose()
{
// Do not change this code. Put cleanup code in Dispose(bool disposing) above.
Dispose(true);
}
#endregion
}
}
Which can be used as such:
SandboxWrapper.InstantiatePlugin<YourPluginType>(unsecureString, secureString)
Not sure how much of it is valid or not, but it worked for handling my testing of xml and JSON serialization correctly.
I'm working on Salesforce Apex web service to create record. Below is the apex web service class that I have written:
global class createCloudRecord {
global class projectInputs{
webService Integer ProjectID;
webService String ProjectName;
}
webService static Boolean createSFRecords(List<projectInputs> inputs) {
cv__Designation__c desg = new cv__Designation__c();
desg.cv__Active__c = true;
desg.cv__Default__c = false;
desg.cv__Description__c = 'Test Desc';
desg.OwnerId = '002B0000000K9soIAD';
desg.Name = inputs[0].ProjectName;
desg.cv__ExternalId__c = string.valueof(inputs[0].ProjectID);
insert desg;
return true;
}
}
It's working fine and creating records on SF cloud via SOAP API call. Now I have to written the test class for above web service with code coverage of min 75%.
Below is the code that I have written for my test class:
#isTest
private class createCloudRecordTest {
static testMethod void testCreateSFRecords() {
createCloudRecord.projectInputs project = new createCloudRecord.projectInputs();
project.ProjectID = 12345;
project.ProjectName = 'TestProject';
createCloudRecord.createSFRecords(project);
}
}
But this is showing an error for this line createCloudRecord.createSFRecords(project);:
Error: Compile Error: Method does not exist or incorrect signature.
Anyone has any idea how can I make this working.
Thanks!
I got the solution for my question. The problem was in my web service I've defined param as list but above in test class I'm passing param as single record.
So it should be something like below:
#isTest
private class createCloudRecordTest {
static testMethod void testCreateSFRecords() {
createCloudRecord.projectInputs project = new createCloudRecord.projectInputs();
project.ProjectID = 12345;
project.ProjectName = 'TestProject';
list<createCloudRecord.projectInputs> projects = new list<createCloudRecord.projectInputs>();
projects.add(project);
createCloudRecord.createSFRecords(projects);
}
}
I want to use "GATE" through web. Then I decide to create a SOAP web service in java with help of GATE Embedded.
But for the same document and saved Pipeline, I have a different run-time duration, when GATE Embedded runs as a java web service.
The same code has a constant run-time when it runs as a Java Application project.
In the web service, the run-time will be increasing after each execution until I get a Timeout error.
Does any one have this kind of experience?
This is my Code:
#WebService(serviceName = "GateWS")
public class GateWS {
#WebMethod(operationName = "gateengineapi")
public String gateengineapi(#WebParam(name = "PipelineNumber") String PipelineNumber, #WebParam(name = "Documents") String Docs) throws Exception {
try {
System.setProperty("gate.home", "C:\\GATE\\");
System.setProperty("shell.path", "C:\\cygwin2\\bin\\sh.exe");
Gate.init();
File GateHome = Gate.getGateHome();
File FrenchGapp = new File(GateHome, PipelineNumber);
CorpusController FrenchController;
FrenchController = (CorpusController) PersistenceManager.loadObjectFromFile(FrenchGapp);
Corpus corpus = Factory.newCorpus("BatchProcessApp Corpus");
FrenchController.setCorpus(corpus);
File docFile = new File(GateHome, Docs);
Document doc = Factory.newDocument(docFile.toURL(), "utf-8");
corpus.add(doc);
FrenchController.execute();
String docXMLString = null;
docXMLString = doc.toXml();
String outputFileName = doc.getName() + ".out.xml";
File outputFile = new File(docFile.getParentFile(), outputFileName);
FileOutputStream fos = new FileOutputStream(outputFile);
BufferedOutputStream bos = new BufferedOutputStream(fos);
OutputStreamWriter out;
out = new OutputStreamWriter(bos, "utf-8");
out.write(docXMLString);
out.close();
gate.Factory.deleteResource(doc);
return outputFileName;
} catch (Exception ex) {
return "ERROR: -> " + ex.getMessage();
}
}
}
I really appreciate any help you can provide.
The problem is that you're loading a new instance of the pipeline for every request, but then not freeing it again at the end of the request. GATE maintains a list internally of every PR/LR/controller that is loaded, so anything you load with Factory.createResource or PersistenceManager.loadObjectFrom... must be freed using Factory.deleteResource once it is no longer needed, typically using a try-finally:
FrenchController = (CorpusController) PersistenceManager.loadObjectFromFile(FrenchGapp);
try {
// ...
} finally {
Factory.deleteResource(FrenchController);
}
But...
Rather than loading a new instance of the pipeline every time, I would strongly recommend you explore a more efficient approach to load a smaller number of instances of the pipeline but keep them in memory to serve multiple requests. There is a fully worked-through example of this technique in the training materials on the GATE wiki, in particular module number 8 (track 2 Thursday).
I deveploped a simple WCF service called CLSAPIService that it's Contract contains a method named UpdateLastOpenCloseCall:
[OperationContract(Name = "UpdateLastOpenCloseCall", Action = "http://uniform.com/UpdateLastOpenCloseCall")]
CallResult UpdateLastOpenCloseCall(int iSwitchID, int iAgentID, string strExtension, BusinessDataField[] bdFields);
One of its parameters is a simple DataContract:
[DataContract]
public struct BusinessDataField
{
[DataMember]
public string Name;
[DataMember]
public object Value;
}
Then I created a simple testing project in Managed C++ in Visual .Net 2005, and created web reference for the service:
CLSAPIProxy::CLSAPIService^ service = gcnew CLSAPIProxy::CLSAPIService();
CLSAPIProxy::BusinessDataField ^f1 = gcnew CLSAPIProxy::BusinessDataField();
f1->Name = L"test_string";
f1->Value = L"string";
CLSAPIProxy::BusinessDataField ^f2 = gcnew CLSAPIProxy::BusinessDataField();
f2->Name = L"test_int";
f2->Value = 123;
System::Collections::Generic::List<CLSAPIProxy::BusinessDataField^> ^list = gcnew;
System::Collections::Generic::List<CLSAPIProxy::BusinessDataField^>();
list->Add(f1);
list->Add(f2);
service->UpdateLastOpenCloseCall(1,true,22817,true,L"24319",list->ToArray());
When the BusinessDataField structure arrives to the WCF method, it appears that only the Value property is updated, and the Name property is null, even though I assiged it a value.
What could be the problem?
please add Order to your data member.
[DataMember(Name = "FirstName", IsRequired = true, Order = 2)]
and consult the following article:
Change The Order Of data members