I'm trying to implement amCharts into a project, and it looks like when I pass it the EmberData model as it's dataProvider, it can't understand the promises.
I've tried to fix this by creating a computed property in my controller that looks like:
Route:
--route.js
import Ember from 'ember';
const {Route, RSVP} = Ember;
export default Route.extend({
queryParams: {
start: {refreshModel: true},
stop: {refreshModel: true}
},
model(params) {
let filter = {
filter: {
start: params.start,
stop: params.stop
}
};
return RSVP.hash({
users: this.store.query('userActivity', filter, {async: false}),
});
},
setupController(controller, model) {
controller.set('model', model);
controller.set('users', model.users);
},
});
Controller (there are other parts I've stripped out, but they aren't relevant, suffice to say they just change the query params which triggers a model refresh from route):
--controller.js
import Ember from 'ember';
const {Controller, computed, get, set} = Ember;
export default Controller.extend({
queryParams: [ 'start', 'stop' ],
dataProvider: computed('users', function () {
let users = get(this, 'users')
.map(function (user) {
return {
calls_out: user.calls_out,
calls_in: user.calls_in,
}
});
console.log(users);
return users;
}),
});
However, when I log this I get the following:
0: Object +
calls_in: ComputedProperty
calls_out: ComputedProperty
__proto__: Object
1: Object
2: Object
which means the object that amCharts needs to work with is still not the raw data. Is there a way to extract the data out into numbers rather than a Promise or a ComputedProperty?
Thanks!
Edit - adding userActivity model as requested:
import DS from 'ember-data';
import Ember from 'ember';
export default DS.Model.extend({
// Attributes
title: DS.attr('string'),
first_name: DS.attr('string'),
last_name: DS.attr('string'),
calls_in: DS.attr('number'),
calls_out: DS.attr('number'),
// Computed Attributes
full_name: Ember.computed('first_name', 'last_name', function () {
return `${this.get('first_name')} ${this.get('last_name')}`;
}),
// Relationships
user: DS.belongsTo('user')
});
Every attribute on a DS.Model is defined with DS.attr() and will be a Computed Property. This is required so that ember-data ca track changes and rollback or update attributes.
For your use case best is to use getProperties:
const {computed,get,getProperties} = Ember;
...
dataProvider: computed('users.#each.calls_out', 'users.#each.calls_in', function () {
return get(this, 'users').map(u => getProperties(u, 'calls_out', 'calls_in'));
})
Then get(this, 'dataProvider') will give you a raw Javascript Array with raw Javascript Objects with raw strings (or numbers, depending on your DS.attr).
What is in the "user" class? Are they Ember object? You may provide more code.
If "calls_in" and "calls_out" are computed properties of this user class, you should call them like this:
let users = get(this, 'users')
.map(function (user) {
return {
calls_out: user.get('calls_out'),
calls_in: user.get('calls_in'),
}
});
Related
So what I am doing is extremely basic: rendering model data to the template.
Upon setting the model hook, the {{model}} object doesn't show data in the corresponding template.
Here's my code:
contact (route):
user: Ember.inject.service('current-user'),
model: function()
{
// var that = this;
// console.log('whats being returned bitch: ', this.store.findRecord('contact', this.get('user').contactID));
//return this.store.findRecord('contact', this.get('user').contactID);
var records = this.store.findRecord('contact', this.get('user').contactID);
var promise = Ember.RSVP.defer();
// console.log('promise', promise.resolve());
// records.addObserver('isLoaded', function() {
// // console.log('records.getv', records);
promise.resolve(records);
//});
return promise;
},
setupController: function(controller)
{
// Get the parameters for the current route every time as they might change from one record to another
var params = this.paramsFor('dashboard.contact');
console.log('params', params);
// Set the data in the current instance of the object, this is required. Unless this is done the route will display the same data every time
this.module = Ember.String.capitalize(params.module);
this.id = params.id;
this.data = this.store.find(this.module,this.id);
// Set the data in the controller so that any data bound in the view can get re-rendered
controller.set('id',this.id);
controller.set('model',this.data);
controller.set('module',this.module);
}
});
First i was trying just this but it was not displaying data, then i tried deferring the promise and resolving it (like this) and finally i tried setting up the controller (setupController function) but that didn't work either since params is empty for some reason :/
contact(template):
<h1> Contact! </h1>
{{#each model as |contact|}}
<h3>{{contact.name}}</h3>
<h3>{{contact.password_c}}</h3>
{{/each}}
contact(model):
import DS from 'ember-data';
export default DS.Model.extend({
name: DS.attr('string'),
password_c: DS.attr('string'),
birthdate: DS.attr('string'),
assistant: DS.attr('string'),
account_name: DS.attr('string'),
email1: DS.attr('string'),
facebook: DS.attr('string'),
phone_home:DS.attr('string')
// address: Ember.computed('primary_address_street', 'primary_address_state',
// 'primary_address_city', 'primary_address_country', function() {
// return '${this.get('primary_address_street')} ${this.get('primary_address_state')} ${this.get('primary_address_city')} ${this.get('primary_address_country')}';
// })
});
Please help!
Let's assume this is your router
// app/router.js
import Ember from 'ember';
var Router = Ember.Router.extend({
});
Router.map(function() {
this.route('contacts', {path: '/contacts/:contact_id'});
});
export default Router;
and your model
// app/models/contact.js
import DS from 'ember-data';
export default DS.Model.extend({
name: DS.attr('string'),
password_c: DS.attr('string'),
});
then this is would be your contacts.js route it will have a very important role and We'll be using Ember Data's findRecord to retrieve an individual record from the data store.
// app/routes/contacts.js
import Ember from 'ember';
export default Ember.Route.extend({
model(param){
return this.store.findRecord('contact',param.contact_id);
}
});
note: this param is very important.The param is passed from the URL into the model. This posts model has an id that can be accessed via contact_id. It uses that id to look up the record so it can be returned. By default the template with the same name, contacts, will have access to this model.
Here we use Ember Data's findAll. This simply returns back all the records in the post data store.
// app/routes/application.js
import Ember from 'ember';
export default Ember.Route.extend({
model() {
return this.store.findAll('contact');
}
});
now
// app/templates/application.hbs
{{#each model as |contact|}}
<h3>{{contact.name}}</h3>
<h3>{{contact.password_c}}</h3>
{{/each}}
As I don't have access to see your service and all your code I tried to simplify the way you can return all contact and get that and also how you can pass Param easily.
for more information : https://guides.emberjs.com/v2.7.0/tutorial/ember-data/
You can follow this codes and customize as you would like, I hope it will resolve your problem.
UPDATE:
If you have already your user data and it's ok, then remove {{#each}}
and let's have {{contact.name}}, that should work, you just need #each
while you have all contact like this.store.findAll('contact'); or if
you are in you must have this {{model.name}}, then model would be
contact !
My ember app is not sending my foreign key to the back-end.
I have a table called issues which is has a related table called categories
My model is:
import DS from 'ember-data';
export default DS.Model.extend({
name: DS.attr('string'),
category_id: DS.belongsTo('category'),
description: DS.attr('string')
});
My route is:
import Ember from 'ember';
export default Ember.Route.extend({
model: function(){
return this.store.findAll('issue');
},
actions: {
create: function(){
var issue = this.store.createRecord('issue');
issue.name = this.get('controller').get('newName');
issue.description = this.get('controller').get('newDescription');
issue.category_id = parseInt(this.get('controller').get('newCategory'));
//debugger;
console.log(issue);
issue.save();
},
...
other actions
...
}
}
});
the console.log from above looks like the category_id is getting set correctly:
category_id: 3
description: "foobar"
name: "test"
However my JSON payload that gets sent to the backend looks like:
{"issue":{"name":"test","description":"foobar","category_id":null}}
I tried stepping through by adding a custom serialiser in app/serializers/application.js
export default DS.RESTSerializer.extend({
...
serialize: function(snapshot,options){
console.debug('options='+options);
debugger;
var json = this._super(snapshot, options);;
return json;
}
...
});
But I got lost in all the super calling super indirection.
The snapshot.record has category_id: 3, but the json coming back from the this._super() call has category_id: null
options has includeID:true
Any clues will be much appreciated ...
Ember : 2.0.2
Ember Data : 2.0.0
Your model definition is wrong, when dealing with relationships you define them just as you would define any other attribute, there is no need to use _id.
export default DS.Model.extend({
name: DS.attr('string'),
category: DS.belongsTo('category'),
description: DS.attr('string')
});
As for the creation you should always use setters/getters when dealing with ember objects:
create: function() {
var issue = this.store.createRecord('issue', {
name: this.get('controller').get('newName'),
description: this.get('controller').get('newDescription'),
category: this.get('controller').get('newCategory') // assuming new category is a DS.Model instance of category
});
issue.save();
}
If you wish to stick to the syntax you have you would use issue.set('name', this.get('controller').get('newName')), from the looks of your code it seems you are going about this in the wrong way.
You should have a this.route('new') nested under your issues route, that way you wouldn't have to use the controller to store information.
You would simply set the model of the new route to:
model: function() {
return this.store.createRecord('issue');
}
Your template would make use of the input helpers like so:
{{input value=model.name}} and your action would just get the currentModel and call .save().
I am using Ember 1.13.2 and Ember Data 1.13.4. The API conforms to JSON API format (http://jsonapi.org/format).
A user has many items. Doing {{model.items}} in the template will return ALL items of the user.
What if I also need to display ONLY blue items from the user. How should I go about this?
// Route
import Ember from 'ember';
export default Ember.Route.extend({
model(params) {
// Executes: http://localhost:3099/api/v1/users/5
return this.store.findRecord('user', params.user_id);
}
})
// Template
firstName: {{model.firstName}} - works
<br>items: {{model.items}} - works
<br>blue items: {{model.items}} - what do we do about this?
// app/models/user.js
import DS from 'ember-data';
export default DS.Model.extend({
items: DS.hasMany('item', { async: true }),
firstName: DS.attr('string')
});
// app/models/item.js
import DS from 'ember-data';
export default DS.Model.extend({
user: DS.belongsTo('user', { async: true }),
name: DS.attr('string')
});
I misunderstood the original question. It seems as if you want to fetch only the items where the color is blue (and avoid fetching the rest). For this, you'll need to query the server, which requires server-side code. But, once you have the server-side code done, you can do something like this:
blueItems: Ember.computed('items.#each.color', {
get() {
const query = {
user: this.get('id'),
color: 'blue'
};
return this.get('store').find('item', query);
}
})
But again, you'll need your server to support querying for that data. (The JSON API states how you need to return the data, but you'll need to implement the query yourself.)
Old answer that filters the items after fetching for display (just for reference):
I would use a computed property:
blueItems: Ember.computed('items.#each.color', {
get() {
return this.get('items').filter((item) => {
return item.get('color') === 'blue';
});
}
})
Or the shorthand ;)
blueItems: Ember.computed.filterBy('items', 'color', 'blue')
Not every operation has an Ember shorthand which is why I gave the full example first.
Using computed properties with promises is sometimes tricky, but this computed property should update whenever your items array updates.
I'm trying to retrieve all the layouts for a given account.
/app/models/account.js
import DS from 'ember-data';
export default DS.Model.extend({
companyName: DS.attr('string'),
layouts: DS.hasMany('layout')
});
/app/models/layout.js
import DS from 'ember-data';
export default DS.Model.extend({
name: DS.attr('string'),
account: DS.belongsTo('account', { async: true })
});
/app/routes/layouts.js
import Ember from 'ember';
export default Ember.Route.extend({
model: function() {
return Ember.RSVP.hash({
layouts: this.store.filter('layout', { account_id: 1 }, function(layout) {
console.log(layout.get('account').content.id);
return layout.get('account').content.id === 1;
})
});
}
});
The console.log line is outputting the ID that I'm expecting (1). In Ember inspector I can see 5 layout models and under 'Belongs To' I can see: account : <DS.PromiseObject:ember960>. Clicking that brings up content : <batmics#model:account::ember600:1> and clicking that brings up the properties, including the correct ID.
But in my templates layouts is empty... and I've no idea why.
Incidentally, layouts: this.store.find('layout', { account_id: 1 }) works, but I need it to use the filter so that it's an active array.
Ember Data works with all its IDs as strings.
Changing your check to === '1' should get this going for you.
import Ember from 'ember';
export default Ember.Route.extend({
model: function() {
return Ember.RSVP.hash({
layouts: this.store.filter('layout', { account_id: 1 }, function(layout) {
console.log(layout.get('account').content.id);
return layout.get('account').content.id === '1';
})
});
}
});
In my EmberJS application I am displaying a list of Appointments. In an action in the AppointmentController I need to get the appointments owner, but the owner always returns "undefined".
My files:
models/appointment.js
import DS from 'ember-data';
export default DS.Model.extend({
appointmentStatus: DS.attr('number'),
owner: DS.hasMany('person'),
date: DS.attr('Date')
});
models/person.js
import DS from 'ember-data';
export default DS.Model.extend({
name: DS.attr('string')
});
templates/appointmentlist.js
{{#each appointment in controller}}
<div>
{{appointment.date}} <button type="button" {{action 'doIt'}}>Do something!</button>
</div>
{{/each }}
controllers/appointmentlist.js
export default Ember.ArrayController.extend({
itemController: 'appointment'
});
controllers/appointment.js
export default Ember.ObjectController.extend({
actions:{
doIt: function(){
var appointment = this.get('model');
var owner = appointment.get('owner'); //returns undefined
//Do something with owner
}
}
});
Now, I know I can change the owner-property to owner: DS.hasMany('person', {async: true}), and then handle the promise returned from appointment.get('owner');, but that is not what I want.
I have discovered that if I do this {{appointment.owner}} or this {{appointment.owner.name}} in the appointmentlist template, the owner record is fetched from the server. So I guess Ember does not load relationships unless they are used in the template.
I think that the solution to my problem is to use the appointmentlists route to fetch the record in the belongsTo relationship. But I can't figure out how.
Maybe something like this?
routes/appointmentlist.js
export default Ember.Route.extend({
model: function() {
return this.store.find('appointment');
},
afterModel: function(appointments){
//what to do
}
});
EDIT
I did this:
routes/appointmentlist.js
export default Ember.Route.extend({
model: function() {
return this.store.find('appointment');
},
afterModel: function(appointments){
$.each(appointments.content, function(i, appointment){
var owner= appointment.get('owner')
});
}
});
and it works, but I do not like the solution...
You are still asynchronously loading those records, so if you are fast enough you could still get undefined. It'd be better to return a promise from the afterModel hook, or just modify the model hook to do it all.
model: function() {
return this.store.find('appointment').then(function(appointments){
return Ember.RSVP.all(appointments.getEach('owner')).then(function(){
return appointments;
});
});
}
or
model: function() {
return this.store.find('appointment');
},
afterModel: function(model, transition){
return Ember.RSVP.all(model.getEach('owner'));
}
Another way to go is:
export default Ember.Controller.extend({
modelChanged: function(){
this.set('loadingRelations',true);
Ember.RSVP.all(this.get('model').getEach('owner')).then(()=>{
this.set('loadingRelations',false);
});
}.observes('model')
});
This way the transition finishes faster and the relations are loaded afterwards. The loading-state can be observed through loadingRelations.
When there are a lot of relations to load I think this gives a better UX.
You want to load all the assocations in the route, because you want to use Fastboot for search engines and better first time site opened experience.
Holding your assocation loading after primary models are loaded, might not be the best decision.
I am using a syntax to load all assocations in the route:
let store = this.store;
let pagePromise = store.findRecord('page', params.page_id);
let pageItemsPromise = pagePromise.then(function(page) {
return page.get('pageItems');
});
return this.hashPromises({
page: pagePromise,
pageItems: pageItemsPromise
});
And for this.hashPromises I got a mixin:
import Ember from 'ember';
export default Ember.Mixin.create({
hashPromises: function(hash) {
let keys = Object.keys(hash);
return Ember.RSVP.hashSettled(hash).then(function(vals) {
let returnedHash = {};
keys.forEach(function(key) {
returnedHash[key] = vals[key].value;
});
return returnedHash;
});
}
});