I am trying to highlight (or find) any word that is preceded by another word, being define, and another specific word to be highlighted (as), when define is present, etc. Basically, I need to find words that are found because of other regex searches, but only targetting each word independently.
For example, having the following string:
define MyFile as File
In that case, define is searched using the regex statement \b-?define\b. I also need to find MyFile if it is preceded directly by define. Plus, as needs to be found as well only if it is preceded directly by a word, in this case MyFile, which is preceded by define, and this goes on and on.
How can this be done? I have messed around quite a bit to find how to highlight MyFile correctly, without any success. As for the specific recursive search of as and File, I am clueless.
Keep in mind that all the regex expressions must be separate, since I will use this as a Sublime Text custom syntax highlight match finder.
define\s([\w]+)\sas\s([\w]+)$
This regex code would capture all words after define separated by a space and all words after as separated by space as well
check this regex : https://regex101.com/r/aQ0yO0/2
For not having context of what the data looks like...this is a naive way of doing it but it's pretty intuitive. However, it doesn't use regex. The other examples are good ways to use regex.
seq = "word1 defined as blah blahh blahhh word2 defined as hello helloo"
words_of_interest = []
list_of_words = seq.split(" ")
for i,word in enumerate(list_of_words):
if word == "defined":
words_of_interest.append(list_of_words[i-1])
print words_of_interest
#['word1', 'word2']
The regular expression is always going to encompass the "define" as well. The trick is to use capture groups and refer to them afterwards. The specific way how to do this depends on the "flavor" of your regex.
As I'm not familiar with Sublime's regex, I'm just going to present an example in sed:
$ sed -e 's/define \([A-Za-z]*\)/include \1/g' <<< "define MyFile as File"
include MyFile as File
This example replaces all "define"s with "include"s - and adds whatever was captured by what's inside the group (the regex [A-Za-z]* in this case). Not too useful, but hopefully explanatory :)
The capture group is denoted by the escaped brackets, and (in sed) referenced by the escaped number (representing the index) of the group.
I believe it's capture groups as a concept that you're looking for, rather than any specific regex.
Related
I have such text (not RegEx, but simple text i my text file) phrase: \abc{xyz}{uvw}, and I'd like to change it to: xyz : uvw. xyz and uvw can be various, but \abc{}{} is constant.
Is there any way to replace this first phrase, to this second? I have it 380 times in my file, and changing it manually will take me an hour. I have also other similar phrases with other names than abc.
If I'd have a RegEx to replace it would be a big advantage for me. Could you help me with writing this RegExp?
PS. If you'd like to know, this phrases are LaTeX user defined commands.
Type of RegEx doesn't matter. I just need to correct the text (it's a lecture of my professor of Math). I need to correct it, but I gave no lots of time.
You should be able to use the following :
match \\abc{([^}]*)}{([^}]*)}
replace by \1 : \2
You can try it here.
[^}]* matches every character but }, it is used to match the content of the brackets without risk of overflowing.
Aside from that we escape the \ to match its literal character, group the content of two brackets in their own capturing group to which we refer in the replacement pattern.
I use Notepad++,
i need to search and replace entire word that contain a specific keyword.
Ex: someting HELP.blablabla.blabla someting
i would like to search entire text for words that contain the keyword "HELP" untill the first space OR the first comma.
In this case: HELP.blablabla.blabla
thanks a lot
Go to the search panel, check the regex checkbox on the bottom and try: (HELP)([^ ,]*)
Note: There are a space character after the ^
This regex means: Search for the entire word HELP (HELP) followed by anything that it isn't an space or an comma [^ ,] the ^ inside the brackets is a denial
Edit:
You can use just HELP[^ ,]* the parenthesis is just to create capturing groups if you need to use the specific groups to replace later. As pointed by #alphabravo
You say search and replace an entire word but if it were that simple then I wonder why a regular search and replace isn't sufficient. So I'm reading between the lines and assuming you want to match on full lines of text.
I think I've used npp enough to get the syntax right. I don't remember any eccentricities that would apply. Is the comma/space optional?
^[^, ]*HELP[^, ]*[, ]
I'm kinda thinking this one might be good enough:
^[^, ]*HELP
I have a bunch of artists that are named in this fashion:
Killers, The
Treatment, The
Virginmarys, The
I need them to look like
The Killers
The Treatment
The Virginmarys
I'm able to match the lines with , The ((^|\n)(.*, The) is what I've used) but the more advanced syntax is eluding me. I can use regex on the replacement syntax as well (it's for a TextPipe filter so it might as well be for Notepad++ or any other Regex text editor).
You should be able to use the following:
Find: (\S+),\s\S*
Replace: The $1
Or include the The..
Find: (\S+),\s+(\S+)
Replace: $2 $1
Depending on your editor, you may be better off using \1, \2, and so on for capture groups.
Since you need to specifically capture the title before the comma, do so:
(^|\n)(.*), The
And replace it putting the "the" in the right place:
\1The \2
Regular expressions define matches but not substitutions.
How and in which way you can perform substitutions is highly dependant on the application.
Most editors that provide regular expression support work on a line per line basis.
Some of them will allow substitutions such as
s/^(.*Banana)/INSERTED LINE\n\1/
which would then insert the specific pattern before each match. Note that others may not allow newlines in the substitution pattern at all. In VIM, you can input newlines into the command prompt using Ctrl+K Return Return. YMMV.
In Java, you would just first print the insertion text, then print the matching line.
I just stumbled on a case where I had to remove quotes surrounding a specific regex pattern in a file, and the immediate conclusion I came to was to use vim's search and replace util and just escape each special character in the original and replacement patterns.
This worked (after a little tinkering), but it left me wondering if there is a better way to do these sorts of things.
The original regex (quoted): '/^\//' to be replaced with /^\//
And the search/replace pattern I used:
s/'\/\^\\\/\/'/\/\^\\\/\//g
Thanks!
You can use almost any character as the regex delimiter. This will save you from having to escape forward slashes. You can also use groups to extract the regex and avoid re-typing it. For example, try this:
:s#'\(\\^\\//\)'#\1#
I do not know if this will work for your case, because the example you listed and the regex you gave do not match up. (The regex you listed will match '/^\//', not '\^\//'. Mine will match the latter. Adjust as necessary.)
Could you avoid using regex entirely by using a nice simple string search and replace?
Please check whether this works for you - define the line number before this substitute-expression or place the cursor onto it:
:s:'\(.*\)':\1:
I used vim 7.1 for this. Of course, you can visually mark an area before (onto which this expression shall be executed (use "v" or "V" and move the cursor accordingly)).
This is my first question, so I hope I didn't mess too much with the title and the formatting.
I have a bunch of file a client of mine sent me in this form:
Name.Of.Chapter.021x212.The.Actual.Title.Of.the.Chapter.DOC.NAME-Some.stuff.Here.ext
What I need is a regex to output just:
212 The Actual Title Of the Chapter
I'm not gonna use it with any script language in particular; it's a batch renaming of files through an app supporting regex (which already "preserves" the extension).
So far, all I was able to do was this:
/.*x(\d+)\.(.*?)\.[A-Z]{3}.*/ -->REPLACE: $1 $2
(Capture everything before a number preceded by an "x", group numbers after the "x", group everything following until a 3 digit Uppercase word is met, then capture everything that follows)
which gives me back:
212 The.Actual.Title.Of.the.Chapter
Having seen the result I thought that something like:
/.*x(\d+)\.([^.]*?)\.[A-Z]{3}.*/ -->REPLACE: $1 $2
(Changed second group to "Capture everything which is not a dot...") would have worked as expected.
Instead, the whole regex fails to match completely.
What am I missing?
TIA
cià
ale
.*x(\d+)\. matches Name.Of.Chapter.021x212.
\.[A-Z]{3}.* matches .DOC.NAME-Some.stuff.Here.ext
But ([^.]*?) does not match The.Actual.Title.Of.the.Chapter because this regex does not allow for any periods at all.
since you are on Mac, you could use the shell
$ s="Name.Of.Chapter.021x212.The.Actual.Title.Of.the.Chapter.DOC.NAME-Some.stuff.Here.ext"
$ echo ${s#*x}
212.The.Actual.Title.Of.the.Chapter.DOC.NAME-Some.stuff.Here.ext
$ t=${s#*x}
$ echo ${t%.[A-Z][A-Z][A-Z].*}
212.The.Actual.Title.Of.the.Chapter
Or if you prefer sed, eg
echo $filename | sed 's|.[^x]*x||;s/\.[A-Z][A-Z][A-Z].*//'
For processing multiple files
for file in *.ext
do
newfile=${file#*x}
newfile=${newfile%.[A-Z][A-Z][A-Z].*}
# or
# newfile=$(echo $file | sed 's|.[^x]*x||;s/\.[A-Z][A-Z][A-Z].*//')
mv "$file" "$newfile"
done
To your question "How can I remove the dots in the process of matching?" the answer is "You can't." The only way to do that is by processing the result of the match in a second step, as others have said. But I think there's a more basic question that needs to be addressed, which is "What does it mean for a regex to match a given input?"
A regex is usually said to match a string when it describes any substring of that string. If you want to be sure the regex describes the whole string, you need to add the start (^) and end ($) anchors:
/^.*x(\d+)\.(.*?)\.[A-Z]{3}.*$/
But in your case, you don't need to describe the whole string; if you get rid of the .* at either end, it will serve your just as well:
/x(\d+)\.(.*?)\.[A-Z]{3}/
I recommend you not get in the habit of "padding" regexes with .* at beginning and end. The leading .* in particular can change the behavior of the regex in unexpected ways. For example, it there were two places in the input string where x(\d+)\. could match, your "real" match would have started at the second one. Also, if it's not anchored with ^ or \A, a leading .* can make the whole regex much less efficient.
I said "usually" above because some tools do automatically "anchor" the match at the beginning (Python's match()) or at both ends (Java's matches()), but that's pretty rare. Most of the shells and command-line tools available on *nix systems define a regex match in the traditional way, but it's a good idea to say what tool(s) you're using, just in case.
Finally, a word or two about vocabulary. The parentheses in (\d+) cause the matched characters to be captured, not grouped. Many regex flavors also support non-capturing parentheses in the form (?:\d+), which are used for grouping only. Any text that is included in the overall match, whether it's captured or not, is said to have been consumed (not captured). The way you used the words "capture" and "group" in your question is guaranteed to cause maximum confusion in anyone who assumes you know what you're talking about. :D
If you haven't read it yet, check out this excellent tutorial.