Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
I'm getting quite familiar with Django and Tastypie but I have a question about best practices. When I'm hydrating data coming from a POST, should I prefer to hydrate all fields directly in the hydrate function or it's recommended to hydrate each field separetely in the corresponding hydrate_field subfunction? In my case I have only 4 fields and to me it seems faster to simply define the hydrate function with 5 lines of code performing the complete transformation of the provided bundle.
Thanks for your help
Hydrating all 4 fields in a single hydrate method is totally fine, just be careful not to hydrate data for read-only fields.
Related
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 3 years ago.
Improve this question
Is it possible to easily combine two xlsx spreadsheets? I basically just want to take sheet1 from spreadsheet1.xlsx and put it at the top of sheet1 on spreadsheet2.xlsx
I suspect you’ll need to read each spreadsheet into a query object and then perform a UNION on those two queries to join them (one on top of the other), and then write out that new object into a new spreadsheet.
https://helpx.adobe.com/coldfusion/cfml-reference/coldfusion-tags/tags-r-s/cfspreadsheet.html
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 6 years ago.
Improve this question
Both of these fields appear to serve essentially the same purpose. Are there any situations in which you would choose a SlugField instead of a URLField?
URLField is used to store URL, where as SlugField is used to store a alphanumeric/varchar value that relates to the title or some description of the model.
Example
URL: https://www.example.com/products/whss1540-wrogn-printed-slim-fit-sweatshirt
Slug: whss1540-wrogn-printed-slim-fit-sweatshirt
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
There are 3 different applications that has data which is not properly formatted. I am planning to write an application to properly format this data before entering into the DB. which is the best approach to make all the applications to call this formatting application? Should the formatting application be a web service called by all other application?
If they're indeed different applications (and not, say, three controllers and/or actions of a single webapp), yes, webservice would fit quite nice, I suppose.
Still there's the other way around: you can set up a simple application which will be called in the shell context. Or, if all these apps use the same platform, just create a 'library utility class' which will be called by this very platform.
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
Is it starting from WSDL or from coding?
I believe what you are asking is what is better: bottom up (coding first) vs top down (wsdl first).
There are many, many articles on the topic, so you can do a quick google search. This looks like a good article I found by searching.
It is depends on requirement and feasibilty.But mostly in case of service provider,first we write the code then generate the wsdl and publish it..When consumer wants to consumes the service then ,they generate the client code from wsdl and invoke the services....That how most application works......
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
I am migrating my django project to pylons and am up to form validations.
Is the builtin formencode module sufficient for form validation or is WTforms a "better" option? What would be the advatanges of using wtforms?
I chose sqlalchemy as the orm backend so something that plays nicely with that would be nice too.
WTForms is very similar to django forms. If you are migrating you should probably use it to speedup your migration.
I also recommend WTForms it's much easier to use than formencode and have builtin sqlalchemy extensions.