I have a task that seems well-suited to Mturk. I've never before used the service, however, and despite reading through some of the documentation I'm having a difficult time judging how hard it would be to set up a task. I'm a strong beginner or weak intermediate in R. I've messed around with a project that involved a little understanding of XML. Otherwise, I have no programming or web development skills (I'm a statistician/epidemiologist). I'm hoping someone can give me an idea of what would be involved in creating my task so I can decide of it is worth the effort to learn how to create a HIT.
Essentially, I have recurring projects that require many graphs to be digitized (i.e. go from images to x,y coordinates). The automatic digitization software that I've tried isn't great for this task because some of the graphs are from old journal articles and they have gray-scale lines that cross each other multiple times. Figuring out which line is which requires a little human judgement. Workflow for the HIT would be to have each Mturker:
Download a properly named empty Excel workbook.
Download a JPEG of the graphs.
Download a free plot digitization program.
Open the graph in the plot digitization software, calibrate the axes, trace the outline of each curve, paste the coordinates into the corresponding Excel workbook that I have given them, extract some numbers off the graph into a second sheet of the same workbook.
Send me the Excel files.
I'd have these done in duplicate to make sure that there is acceptable agreement between the two Mturkers who did each graph.
Is this a reasonable task to accomplish via Mechanical Turk? If so, can a somewhat intelligent person who isn't a programmer/web developer pull it off? I've poked around the internet a bit but I still can't tell if I just haven't found the right resource to teach me how to do this or if I'd need 5 years of experience as a web developer to pull it off. Thanks.
No this really isn't a task for Mechanical Turk at all. Not only because you are requiring them to download a bunch of stuff which they won't do, but it's way too complex for them to have confidence they are doing it right and will get paid. Pay is binary so could go through all that for nothing.
You are also probably violating terms of service if they have to divulge personal info for the programs.
If you have a continuous need for this then MAYBE you can prequalify people by creating qualification on the service and then using just those workers.
Related
I have a mini project for my new course in Tensorflow for this semester with random topics. Since I have some background on Convolution Neuron Network, I intend to use it for my project. My computer can only run CPU version of TensorFlow.
However, as a new bee, I realize that there are a lot of topics such that MNIST, CIFAR-10, etc, thus I don't know which suitable topic I should pick out from them. I only have two weeks left. It would be great if the topic is not too complicated but too not easy for study because it matchs my intermediate level.
In your experience, could you give me some advice about the specific topic I should do for my project?
Moreover, it would be better if in this topic I can provide my own data to test my training, because my professor said that it is a plus point to get A grade in my project.
Thanks in advance,
I think that to answer this question you need to properly evaluate the marking criteria for your project. However, I can give you a brief overview of what you've just mentioned.
MNIST: MNIST is a Optical Character Recognition task for individual numbers 0-9 in images size 28px square. This is considered the "Hello World" of CNNs. It's pretty basic and might be too simplistic for your requirements. Hard to gauge without more information. Nonetheless, this will run pretty quickly with CPU Tensorflow and the online tutorial is pretty good.
CIFAR-10: CIFAR is a much bigger dataset of objects and vehicles. The image sizes are 32px square so individual image processing isn't too bad. But the dataset is very large and your CPU might struggle with it. It takes a long time to train. You could try training on a reduced dataset but I don't know how that would go. Again, depends on your course requirements.
Flowers-Poets: There is the Tensorflow for Poets re-training example which might not be suitable for your course, you could use the flowers dataset to build your own model.
Build-your-own-model: You could use tf.Layers to build your own network and experiment with it. tf.Layers is pretty easy to use. Alternatively you could look at the new Estimators API that will automate a lot of the training processes for you. There are a number of tutorials (of varying quality) on the Tensorflow website.
I hope that helps give you a run-down of what's out there. Other datasets to look at are PASCAL VOC and imageNet (however they are huge!). Models to look at experimenting with may include VGG-16 and AlexNet.
I have given a project to develop Algorithmic trading system using c++ and quickFix library, I search on google about quickFix library but didn't find any useful information.
Can anybody give me some information , from where should I start?
You provide very little detail in your question, so I can only guess at a helpful approach. I have done what you are starting, in Python, and can give you some orientation. All the links Karl mentioned are crucial, (you should pay special attention to the quickfix documentation on the config file) to which I would add FIXIMATE.
To do something like this in QF you need to answer a number of questions.
Logon. Figure out how to logon. Try to get a data dictionary from your counterparty. You don't want to be forced to modify your DD too much.
Interface. How will you tell QF to logon, logoff, exit terrible positions, and so forth? I use a command line tool (cmd2) that gives me this ability. Other people code GUI windows.
Message Cracking. Some versions of QF come with a cracker but if you don't have it in C++ you will have to write your own so you can parse the incoming messages.
Data Management. How will you save incoming market data, both in RAM and to disk for analysis later? How will you represent and monitor your positions, your working orders, your audit trail? Familiarize yourself with the ScreenLogFactory and FileLogFactory in QF.
Auxiliary Functions. You will need a lot of functions you will write yourself to help at all stages. Save them all in one place and organize them into categories for easy access.
Monitoring. How will you know if something goes wrong (or right) when you are not in front of your computer monitoring the algo? I launch a completely separate process which consumes messages via a queue and sends me texts and emails.
Risk. You don't want your machine sending 1000 orders to market in the blink of an eye. You need to code some checks that will veto bad orders as a final stage before they go out. Also some code that will tell you if you are in a position when you are supposed to be flat. This part is very important.
Strategy. You will need the ability to quickly ingest data, analyze it, and generate signals. For flexibility you should not design your strategy into your system, but you should design a strategy object which can support any strategy you come up with. Then you deploy those objects within your system.
Order handling. Your algo needs to know when and how to enter orders, cancel them, move stops, etc. It will need to deal with partial fills, and be able to support multiple order types.
This is just the beginning, off the top of my head. It is a long road to do all by yourself with no help. Very interesting though, and rewarding.
You can find the QuickFIX downloads on the quickfixengine.org website here: http://www.quickfixengine.org/. From there, you can download either the source code or download pre-built packages for Visual Studio 2010, 2012 and 2013.
Documentation for QuickFIX can be found in their documentation area here: http://www.quickfixengine.org/quickfix/doc/html/. The documentation includes compilation/installation instructions and a "Getting Started" section which discusses setting up a project and writing your first QuickFIX application.
If you wish to know more about the FIX protocol, you are advised to look at the FIX website here: http://www.fixtradingcommunity.org. There are specifications on that website that will give you information on the types of messages supported by FIX and how they should be used.
I'm on a project that among other video related tasks should eventually be capable of extracting the audio of a video and apply some kind of speech recognition to it and get a transcribed text of what's said on the video. Ideally it should output some kind of subtitle format so that the text is linked to a certain point on the video.
I was thinking of using the Microsoft Speech API (aka SAPI). But from what I could see it is rather difficult to use. The very few examples that I found for speech recognition (most are for Text-To-Speech which mush easier) didn't perform very well (they don't recognize a thing). For example this one: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms717071%28v=vs.85%29.aspx
Some examples use something called grammar files that are supposed to define the words that the recognizer is waiting for but since I haven't trained the Windows Speech Recognition thoroughly I think that might be adulterating the results.
So my question is... what's the best tool for something like this? Could you provide both paid and free options? Well the best "free" (as it comes with Windows) option I believe it's SAPI, all the rest should be paid but if they are really good it might be worth it. Also if you have any good tutorials for using SAPI (or other API) on a context similar to this it would be great.
On the whole this is a big ask!
The issue with any speech recognition system is that it functions best after training. It needs context (what words to expect) and some kind of audio benchmark (what does each voice sound like). This might be possible in some cases, such as a TV series if you wanted to churn through hours of speech -separated for each character- to train it. There's a lot of work there though. For something like a film there's probably no hope of training a recogniser unless you can get hold of the actors.
Most film and TV production companies just hire media companies to transcribe the subtitles based on either direct transcription using a human operator, or converting the script. The fact that they still need humans in the loop for these huge operations suggests that automated systems just aren't up to it yet.
In video you have a plethora of things that make you life difficult, pretty much spanning huge swathes of current speech technology research:
-> Multiple speakers -> "Speaker Identification" (can you tell characters apart? Also, subtitles normally have different coloured text for different speakers)
-> Multiple simultaneous speakers -> The "cocktail party problem" - can you separate the two voice components and transcribe both?
-> Background noise -> Can you pick the speech out from any soundtrack/foley/exploding helicopters.
The speech algorithm will need to be extremely robust as different characters can have different gender/accents/emotion. From what I understand of the current state of recognition you might be able to get a single speaker after some training, but asking a single program to nail all of them might be tough!
--
There is no "subtitle" format that I'm aware of. I would suggest saving an image of the text using a font like Tiresias Screenfont that's specifically designed for legibility in these circumstances, and use a lookup table to cross-reference images against video timecode (remembering NTSC/PAL/Cinema use different timing formats).
--
There's a bunch of proprietary speech recognition systems out there. If you want the best you'll probably want to license a solution off one of the big boys like Nuance. If you want to keep things free the universities of RWTH and CMU have put some solutions together. I have no idea how good they are or how well they might be suited to the problem.
--
The only solution I can think of similar to what you're aiming at is the subtitling you can get on news channels here in the UK "Live Closed Captioning". Since it's live, I assume they use some kind of speech recognition system trained to the reader (although it might not be trained, I'm not sure). It's got better over the past few years, but on the whole it's still pretty poor. The biggest thing it seems to struggle with is speed. Dialogue is normally really fast, so live subtitling has the extra issue of getting everything done in time. Live closed captions quite frequently get left behind and have to miss a lot of content out to catch up.
Whether you have to deal with this depends on whether you'll be subtitling "live" video or if you can pre-process it. To deal with all the additional complications above I assume you'll need to pre-process it.
--
As much as I hate citing the big W there's a goldmine of useful links here!
Good luck :)
This falls into the category of dictation, which is a very large vocabulary task. Products like Dragon Naturally Speaking are amazingly good and that has a SAPI interface for developers. But it's not so simple of a problem.
Normally a dictation product is meant to be single speaker and the best products adapt automatically to that speaker, thereby improving the underlying acoustic model. They also have sophisticated language modeling which serves to constrain the problem at any given moment by limiting what is known as the perplexity of the vocabulary. That's a fancy way of saying the system is figuring out what you're talking about and therefore what types of words and phrases are likely or not likely to come next.
It would be interesting though to apply a really good dictation system to your recordings and see how well it does. My suggestion for a paid system would be to get Dragon Naturally Speaking from Nuance and get the developer API. I believe that provides a SAPI interface, which has the benefit of allowing you to swap in the Microsoft speech or any other ASR engine that supports SAPI. IBM would be another vendor to look at but I don't think you will do much better than Dragon.
But it won't work well! After all the work of integrating the ASR engine, what you will probably find is that you get a pretty high error rate (maybe half). That would be due to a few major challenges in this task:
1) multiple speakers, which will degrade the acoustic model and adaptation.
2) background music and sound effects.
3) mixed speech - people talking over each other.
4) lack of a good language model for the task.
For 1) if you had a way of separating each actor on a separate track that would be ideal. But there's no reliable way of separating speakers automatically in a way that would be good enough for a speech recognizer. If each speaker were at a distinctly different pitch, you could try pitch detection (some free software out there for that) and separate based on that, but this is a sophisticated and error prone task.) The best thing would be hand editing the speakers apart, but you might as well just manually transcribe the speech at that point! If you could get the actors on separate tracks, you would need to run the ASR using different user profiles.
For music (2) you'd either have to hope for the best or try to filter it out. Speech is more bandlimited than music so you could try a bandpass filter that attenuates everything except the voice band. You would want to experiment with the cutoffs but I would guess 100Hz to 2-3KHz would keep the speech intelligible.
For (3), there's no solution. The ASR engine should return confidence scores so at best I would say if you can tag low scores, you could then go back and manually transcribe those bits of speech.
(4) is a sophisticated task for a speech scientist. Your best bet would be to search for an existing language model made for the topic of the movie. Talk to Nuance or IBM, actually. Maybe they could point you in the right direction.
Hope this helps.
I have started learning Data Mining and wish to create a small project in C++/Java that allows me to utilize a database, say from twitter and then publish a particular set of results (for eg. all the news items on a feed). I want to know how to go about it? Where should I start?
This is a really broad question, so it's hard to answer. Here are some things to consider:
Where are you going to get the data? You mention twitter, but you'll still need to collect the data in some way. There are probably libraries out there for listening to twitter streams, or you could probably buy the data if someone is selling it.
Where are you going to store the data? Depending on how much you'll have and what you plan to do with it, a traditional relational database may or may not be the best fit. You may be better off with something that supports running mapreduce jobs out-of-the box.
Based on the answers to those questions, the choice of programming languages and libraries will be easier to make.
If you're really set on Java, then I think a Hadoop cluster is probably what you want to start out with. It supports writing mapreduce jobs in Java, and works as an effective platform for other systems such as HBase, a column-oriented datastore.
If your data are going to be fairly regular (that is, not much variation in structure from one record to the next), maybe Hive would be a better fit. With Hive, you can write SQL-like queries, given only data files as input. I've never used Mahout, but I understand that its machine learning capabilities are suited for data mining tasks.
These are just some ideas that come to mind. There are lots of options out there and choosing between them has as much to do with the particular problem you're trying to solve and your own personal tastes as anything else.
If you just want to start learning about Data Mining there are two books that I particularly really enjoy:
Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. Christopher M. Bishop. Springer.
And this one, which is for free:
http://infolab.stanford.edu/~ullman/mmds.html
Good references for you are
AI course taught by people who actually know the subject,Weka website, Machine Learning datasets, Even more datasets, Framework for supporting the mining of larger datasets.
The first link is a good introduction on AI taught by Peter Norvig and Sebastian Thrun, Google's Research Director, and Stanley's creator (the autonomous car), respectively.
The second link you get you to Weka website. Download the software - which is pretty intuitive - and get the book. Make sure you understand all the concepts: what's data mining, what's machine learning, what are the most common tasks, and what are the rationales behind them. Play a lot with the examples - the software package bundles some datasets - until you understand what generated the results.
Next, go to real datasets and play with them. When tackling massive datasets, you may face several performance issues with Weka - which is more of a learning tool as far as my experience can tell. Thus I recommend you to take a look at the fifth link, which will get you to Apache Mahout website.
It's far from being a simple topic, however, it's quite interesting.
I can tell you how I did it.
1) I got the data using twitter4j.
2) I analyzed the data using JUNG.
You have to define a class representing edges and a class representing vertices.
These classes will contain the attributes of the edges and vertices.
3) Then, there is a simple function to add an edge g.addedge(V1,V2,edgeFromV1ToV2) or to add a vertex g.addVertex(V).
The class that defines edges or vertices is easy to create. As an example :
`public class MyEdge {
int Id;
}`
The same is done for vertices.
Today I would do it with R, but if you don't want to learn a new programming language, just import jung which is a java library.
Data mining is broad fields with many different techniques; classification, clustering, association and pattern mining, outlier detection, etc.
You should first decide what you want to do and then decide wich algorithm you need.
If you are new to data mining, I would recommend to read some books like Introduction to Data Mining by Tan, Steinbach and Kumar.
I would like to suggest you to use python or R for data mining process. Doing work with java or c , it bit difficult in the sense you need to do a lot coding
I have recently become interested in the field(s) of data mining and machine learning. The idea of going through huge datasets and trying to correlate hidden patterns and trends is fascinating. So far I have done the following
Used Weka to load simple data sets and generate decision trees
Continously read books, wiki's, blogs and SO on the same
Started playing around SQL Server DM and Python API's
Have an idea on options of freely available data sets on the web(freedb, UN etc)
What is hindering me is the minute I try to go beyond classification/associsciation and into priori/apriori algorithms I am stuck because understanding mathematical equations and logic is not(to put it modestly) one of my strong points.
So my question would be are there anybody in the Data mining field(in the role of product owner or builder) who are not naturally mathematicians? If so, how would you approach in undestanding the field since free tools like Weka and Rapid-miner both expects some mathematical/statistical background?
P.S: Excuse me if I made some mistake in the query like mixing Data mining and analytics when they are separate as I am still getting my feet wet. I hope my core question is clear.
Well, being able to do some analysis of what the data mining models are showing is absolutely vital. However, these days all of the math and statistics are taken care of by the data mining models. You don't need to understand the math behind them (although it helps).
For example, you can look through the SQL Server Analysis Services Data Mining Algorithms and see that even the technical reference is how to use these implementations, not how to recreate them.
If you can understand the business cases and you can understand what the data mining is telling you, there's really no need to delve into the math behind it.
As for some of the free tools, I've never used them, so I can't speak to them. However, I'm a big fan of SSAS and those data mining models, which don't require an extensive mathematical background.
As Eric says, and as far as you only intend to use the existing algorithms and APIs and make sense from them, I don't see problems with the required math/statistics skill set (anyway, you'll need some previous basic knowledge/level).
Now, if you intend to do research or if you want to improve or modify existing algorithms, or why not, create your own algorithms, then math and statistics is a MUST. I just started doing some research in this area, and I'm still trying to fill my skills gap =)